{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,21]],"date-time":"2026-09-21T21:08:59Z","timestamp":1790024939630,"version":"4.0.1"},"reference-count":34,"publisher":"JMIR Publications Inc.","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["JMIR Hum Factors"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"background\">\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Adherence to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) self-management plans can improve health outcomes, yet access to pulmonary rehabilitation remains limited. Digital self-management interventions, such as\n                      <jats:italic>myCOPD<\/jats:italic>\n                      , offer a potential means to extend support across care pathways. However, little is known about how these tools are delivered in routine practice or how delivery influences patient engagement across different clinical settings.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"objective\">\n                    <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      This study explored perceived barriers and facilitators to the delivery of and engagement with\n                      <jats:italic>myCOPD<\/jats:italic>\n                      by examining the perspectives of both patients and health care professionals (HCPs) across 2 National Health Service settings.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"methods\">\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      This qualitative study was conducted between November 2023 and April 2024 across 2 contrasting clinical pathways: community pulmonary rehabilitation and a hospital discharge service following acute exacerbation of COPD. Semistructured interviews were conducted with patients using\n                      <jats:italic>myCOPD<\/jats:italic>\n                      and HCPs involved in its delivery. Topic guides covered health background, digital technology use, and experiences of engaging with the intervention. A convenience sampling approach, with elements of purposive sampling, ensured representation across settings. Clinical data were obtained from health records with consent, and usage data were provided by my mhealth Ltd. Data were analyzed using abductive thematic analysis informed by the Medical Research Council\u2019s process evaluation framework.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"results\">\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Thirty interviews were completed (16 patients and 14 HCPs). Patients described how multimorbidity, perceived digital ability, and socioeconomic context shaped their engagement with\n                      <jats:italic>myCOPD<\/jats:italic>\n                      , operating as \u201clayers of vulnerability\u201d that influenced whether COPD self-management could be prioritized. HCPs highlighted organizational and workflow constraints that shaped how the intervention was introduced and supported. Delivery approaches differed markedly between settings: community teams adopted proactive, relationship-based support that enabled iterative discussion, tailored recommendations, and continuity, whereas hospital teams described passive, onboarding-focused delivery shaped by time pressures, staffing constraints, and discharge priorities. These contrasting delivery models influenced engagement patterns, with proactive support associated with more\n                      <jats:italic>multifaceted engagement<\/jats:italic>\n                      (characterized as routine and sustained) and passive onboarding associated with\n                      <jats:italic>single-aspect engagement<\/jats:italic>\n                      (characterized as short-term and transactional). Participants also identified perceived barriers (eg, usability concerns, limited integration with in-person care) and perceived benefits (eg, improved inhaler technique, increased confidence, lifestyle adjustments).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"conclusions\">\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Delivery context and local workflows play a central role in shaping how patients engage with digital self-management tools. Proactive, relational support appears to facilitate deeper and more sustained engagement, whereas passive onboarding may limit the intervention\u2019s potential. Implementation strategies should align digital tools with local capacities, staffing structures, and patient characteristics, attending to layered vulnerabilities such as multimorbidity and digital confidence. Further work is needed to understand how proactive delivery models can be resourced and integrated within routine COPD care.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.2196\/88108","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,24]],"date-time":"2026-08-24T18:05:07Z","timestamp":1787594707000},"page":"e88108-e88108","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Understanding Delivery and Engagement With a Digital Self-Management Intervention for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Across Two Clinical Settings: Qualitative Study"],"prefix":"10.2196","volume":"13","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0006-4726-0805","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Martin","family":"Ruddock","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6080-0120","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Alison","family":"Blythin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0520-3726","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Bethany","family":"Cliffe","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3853-883X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Lucy","family":"Yardley","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4805-5759","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"James","family":"Dodd","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6065-8088","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Rachel","family":"Williams","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5513-7571","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Katherine","family":"Bradbury","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1771-3851","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Tom","family":"Wilkinson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5098-1092","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ben","family":"Ainsworth","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1010","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,21]]},"reference":[{"issue":"2","key":"R1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1183\/13993003.01879-2017","article-title":"Low uptake of palliative care for COPD patients within primary care in the UK","volume":"51","author":"Bloom","journal-title":"Eur Respir J"},{"issue":"3","key":"R2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"202","DOI":"10.1136\/thorax-2022-219320","article-title":"Cause-specific mortality in COPD subpopulations: a cohort study of 339 647 people in England","volume":"79","author":"Whittaker","journal-title":"Thorax"},{"issue":"3","key":"R3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"00208","DOI":"10.1183\/23120541.00208-2020","article-title":"National clinical audit for hospitalised exacerbations of COPD","volume":"6","author":"Hurst","journal-title":"ERJ Open Res"},{"issue":"null","key":"R4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"427","DOI":"10.2147\/COPD.S346591","article-title":"Frequency and severity of exacerbations of COPD associated with future risk of exacerbations and mortality: a UK routine health care data study","volume":"17","author":"Whittaker","journal-title":"Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis"},{"issue":"1","key":"R5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12916-015-0361-0","article-title":"Implementing supported self-management for asthma: a systematic review and suggested hierarchy of evidence of implementation studies","volume":"13","author":"Pinnock","journal-title":"BMC Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"R6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12916-017-0823-7","article-title":"Systematic meta-review of supported self-management for asthma: a healthcare perspective","volume":"15","author":"Pinnock","journal-title":"BMC Med"},{"key":"R7","unstructured":"Breathing well: an assessment of respiratory care in England and Wales. Royal College of Physicians; 2024. URL: https:\/\/www.rcp.ac.uk\/media\/afbjck5p\/nrap_breathing-well-report-final-version-2.pdf [Accessed 01-09-2026]"},{"key":"R8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2147\/PPA.S385857","article-title":"Advancing digital solutions to overcome longstanding barriers in asthma and COPD management","volume":"17","author":"Bosnic-Anticevich","journal-title":"Patient Prefer Adherence"},{"issue":"1","key":"R9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"62","DOI":"10.1071\/AH18064","article-title":"Going digital: a narrative overview of the effects, quality and utility of mobile apps in chronic disease self-management","volume":"44","author":"Scott","journal-title":"Aust Health Rev"},{"issue":"1","key":"R10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/s41533-020-0167-1","article-title":"Are COPD self-management mobile applications effective? A systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"30","author":"Shaw","journal-title":"NPJ Prim Care Respir Med"},{"issue":"12","key":"R11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/42358","article-title":"Desperately seeking intersectionality in digital health disparity research: narrative review to inform a richer theorization of multiple disadvantage","volume":"24","author":"Husain","journal-title":"J Med Internet Res"},{"key":"R12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3389\/fdgth.2025.1713334","article-title":"Achieving clinically meaningful outcomes in digital health: a six-step, cyclical precision engagement framework (ENGAGE)","volume":"7","author":"Eiselt","journal-title":"Front Digit Health"},{"issue":"2","key":"R13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"229","DOI":"10.15326\/jcopdf.2023.0441","article-title":"Variations in COPD health care access and outcomes: a rapid review","volume":"11","author":"Shatto","journal-title":"Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis"},{"issue":"4","key":"R14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e291","DOI":"10.1016\/S2589-7500(23)00248-0","article-title":"Remote digital health technologies for improving the care of people with respiratory disorders","volume":"6","author":"Dunn","journal-title":"Lancet Digit Health"},{"issue":"3","key":"R15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1083-6101.2000.tb00341.x","article-title":"The evolution of the digital divide: how gaps in internet access may impact electronic commerce","volume":"5","author":"Hoffman","journal-title":"J Comput Mediat Commun"},{"key":"R16","unstructured":"Internet access \u2013 households and individuals, Great Britain: 2018. Office for National Statistics; 2019. URL: https:\/\/www.ons.gov.uk\/peoplepopulationandcommunity\/householdcharacteristics\/homeinternetandsocialmediausage\/bulletins\/internetaccesshouseholdsandindividuals\/2018 [Accessed 01-09-2026]"},{"issue":"8","key":"R17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e526","DOI":"10.1016\/S2589-7500(21)00118-7","article-title":"The need for feminist intersectionality in digital health","volume":"3","author":"Figueroa","journal-title":"Lancet Digit Health"},{"issue":"3","key":"R18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"567","DOI":"10.1093\/pubmed\/fdaa047","article-title":"The Health Inequalities Assessment Toolkit: supporting integration of equity into applied health research","volume":"43","author":"Porroche-Escudero","journal-title":"J Public Health (Oxf)"},{"issue":"2","key":"R19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"86","DOI":"10.1111\/dewb.12206","article-title":"Identifying and evaluating layers of vulnerability - a way forward","volume":"19","author":"Luna","journal-title":"Dev World Bioeth"},{"issue":"1","key":"R20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"121","DOI":"10.3138\/ijfab.2.1.121","article-title":"Elucidating the concept of vulnerability: layers not labels","volume":"2","author":"Luna","journal-title":"Int J Fem Approaches Bioeth"},{"key":"R21","unstructured":"Evidence generation plan for digital technologies to support self-management of asthma: early-use assessment. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2026. URL: https:\/\/www.nice.org.uk\/guidance\/htg778\/resources\/evidence-generation-plan-for-digital-technologies-to-support-selfmanagement-of-asthma-earlyuse-assessment-pdf-20311922088133 [Accessed 01-09-2026]"},{"issue":"7","key":"R22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2016-014580","article-title":"Online versus face-to-face pulmonary rehabilitation for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: randomised controlled trial","volume":"7","author":"Bourne","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"issue":"4","key":"R23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1183\/23120541.00460-2020","article-title":"Evidence generation for the clinical impact of myCOPD in patients with mild, moderate and newly diagnosed COPD: a randomised controlled trial","volume":"6","author":"Crooks","journal-title":"ERJ Open Res"},{"issue":"5","key":"R24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"689","DOI":"10.1007\/s40258-023-00811-x","article-title":"myCOPD app for managing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a NICE medical technology guidance for a digital health technology","volume":"21","author":"Davies","journal-title":"Appl Health Econ Health Policy"},{"issue":"145","key":"R25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/s41746-020-00347-7","article-title":"A randomised controlled feasibility trial of E-health application supported care vs usual care after exacerbation of COPD: the RESCUE trial","volume":"3","author":"North","journal-title":"NPJ Digit Med"},{"issue":"mar19 6","key":"R26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"h1258","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.h1258","article-title":"Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance","volume":"350","author":"Moore","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"3","key":"R27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"535","DOI":"10.1177\/0038038509103208","article-title":"Implementing, embedding, and integrating practices: an outline of normalization process theory","volume":"43","author":"May","journal-title":"Sociology"},{"issue":"1","key":"R28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s13012-020-00983-3","article-title":"A systematic review of empirical studies examining mechanisms of implementation in health","volume":"15","author":"Lewis","journal-title":"Implement Sci"},{"key":"R29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"O\u2019Connor L Wang B Ye Z et al. Evaluation of an integrated digital and mobile intervention for COPD exacerbation. medRxiv. Preprint posted online on Feb 14, 2025. [doi: 10.1101\/2025.02.13.25322246] [Medline: 39990547]","DOI":"10.1101\/2025.02.13.25322246"},{"issue":"8","key":"R30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1080","DOI":"10.1093\/jamia\/ocy052","article-title":"Good intentions are not enough: how informatics interventions can worsen inequality","volume":"25","author":"Veinot","journal-title":"J Am Med Inform Assoc"},{"issue":"1","key":"R31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12916-018-1050-6","article-title":"Analysing the role of complexity in explaining the fortunes of technology programmes: empirical application of the NASSS framework","volume":"16","author":"Greenhalgh","journal-title":"BMC Med"},{"issue":"11","key":"R32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/jmir.8775","article-title":"Beyond adoption: a new framework for theorizing and evaluating nonadoption, abandonment, and challenges to the scale-up, spread, and sustainability of health and care technologies","volume":"19","author":"Greenhalgh","journal-title":"J Med Internet Res"},{"issue":"3","key":"R33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/humanfactors.7196","article-title":"Perceptions of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and their physiotherapists regarding the use of an eHealth intervention","volume":"4","author":"Vorrink","journal-title":"JMIR Hum Factors"},{"issue":"1","key":"R34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/1741-7015-8-63","article-title":"Normalisation process theory: a framework for developing, evaluating and implementing complex interventions","volume":"8","author":"Murray","journal-title":"BMC Med"}],"container-title":["JMIR Human Factors"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,21]],"date-time":"2026-09-21T20:52:05Z","timestamp":1790023925000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/humanfactors.jmir.org\/2026\/1\/e88108"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,21]]},"references-count":34,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2196\/88108","relation":{},"ISSN":["2292-9495"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2292-9495","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,21]]},"article-number":"v13i2e88108"}}