{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,18]],"date-time":"2026-08-18T15:29:36Z","timestamp":1787066976317,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":40,"publisher":"JMIR Publications Inc.","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Med Internet Res"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"background\">\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Typically, e-cohorts are susceptible to low participation rates, undermining representativeness. Frequent reminders can be a cost-effective strategy to increase response rates. However, their effectiveness may vary depending on the delivery mode and message content.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"objective\">\n                    <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This study aimed to evaluate different reminder strategies (ie, emails and\/or text messages with standard and\/or institutional wording) and compare their effectiveness in increasing the response rate in a population-based e-cohort of healthy adults.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"methods\">\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>We conducted a 4-arm parallel randomized controlled trial nested within the Le French Gut e-cohort (registration number 2021-A01439-32). In November 2024, we included participants who were enrolled online (SKEZIA platform) but were not yet active participants (ie, eligibility, consent form, and\/or personal information questionnaire had not been completed). Computer-generated randomization was stratified by time since enrollment. We sent 3 reminders, 72 hours apart, following 4 experimental designs: group 1, standard emails only; group 2, text messages only; group 3, institutional emails only; and group 4, standard email, followed by a text message and an institutional email. The primary outcome was the 30-day completion rate of the personal information questionnaire. We also measured completion time (ie, time between reminder received and questionnaire fully completed), online login rate, login time, email opening, and click-through rate. Participants were unaware of the trial, and investigators were blinded to group allocation.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"results\">\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      At the end of the trial, of the 20,487 eligible participants, 19,525 received at least 1 reminder (n=5225 in group 1; n=3858 in group 2, because n=1365 of the initial 5223 had no phone number and could not receive text messages; n=5222 in group 3; n=5220 in group 4). The per-protocol completion rate was 8.4%, with a higher rate in group 4 (9.4% vs 7.4%, 8.4%, and 8.3% for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively;\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      &lt;.001). Completion time was faster in group 2 (mean 6.3, SD 4.3 d) compared to groups 3 and 4 (mean 7.0, SD 3.5 and mean 7.2, SD 3.8 d, respectively;\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      =.003). The online login rate was higher, and the login time was faster in group 4 (login rate: 15.6% vs 12.1%, 14.3%, and 15.3% for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively;\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      &lt;.001; and login time: mean 7.1, SD 4.3 d vs mean 6.7, SD 4.3 d, mean 6.2, SD 4.6 d, mean 6.8, SD 3.9 d for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively;\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      =.002). For emails, opening rates were similar (\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      =.87), but the click-through rate was higher for institutional emails (23.1% vs 19.6% for standard formatting;\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      &lt;.001).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"conclusions\">\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>For the first time in a specifically designed randomized controlled trial, we directly compare email-only, text message\u2013only, and a combined reminder strategy in a large e-cohort. While previous studies focused on specific populations, our work examines a general adult population, demonstrating that a mixed delivery mode strategy effectively increases response rate by 27% compared to a single-channel approach. Text messages yielded faster responses, and institutional emails, with formal wording and coordinator\u2019s signature, seemed more appealing than less formal wording. These results provide concrete guidance for researchers seeking to improve recruitment in real-world e-cohorts.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.2196\/88577","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,18]],"date-time":"2026-08-18T14:56:02Z","timestamp":1787064962000},"page":"e88577-e88577","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Mixed Delivery Mode Reminder Strategy to Tackle Low Participation in an e-Cohort: Randomized Controlled Trial Nested Within the Le French Gut e-Cohort"],"prefix":"10.2196","volume":"28","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0005-0586-5905","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jessica","family":"Soyer","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3590-8935","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Aline","family":"Thomas","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0008-2122-8449","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"S\u00e9bastien","family":"Fromentin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0007-0728-1705","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Anne-Sophie","family":"Alvarez","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0008-8410-5358","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Chlo\u00e9","family":"Connan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1926-8077","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Nicolas","family":"Pons","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"name":"Le French Gut Consortium","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0003-0524-6747","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Alexandre","family":"Cavezza","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6318-8547","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Patrick","family":"Veiga","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1952-6830","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Robert","family":"Benamouzig","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4104-702X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jean-Philippe","family":"Bertocchio","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1010","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,18]]},"reference":[{"key":"R1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2020.04.021","article-title":"COllaborative open platform E-cohorts for research acceleration in trials and epidemiology","volume":"124","author":"Tran","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"issue":"5","key":"R2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"285","DOI":"10.1007\/s10654-007-9119-0","article-title":"New times, new needs; E-epidemiology","volume":"22","author":"Ekman","journal-title":"Eur J Epidemiol"},{"key":"R3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijnurstu.2021.104058","article-title":"Strategies to improve response rates to web surveys: a literature review","volume":"123","author":"Sammut","journal-title":"Int J Nurs Stud"},{"issue":"2","key":"R4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/publichealth.5880","article-title":"Lessons learned from methodological validation research in E-epidemiology","volume":"2","author":"Kesse-Guyot","journal-title":"JMIR Public Health Surveill"},{"key":"R5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.18148\/srm\/2009.v3i1.592","article-title":"Differential response rates in postal and Web-based surveys in older respondents","volume":"3","author":"Bech","journal-title":"Surv Res Methods"},{"issue":"11","key":"R6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.MR000008.pub5","article-title":"Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires","volume":"11","author":"Edwards","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"R7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.chbr.2022.100206","article-title":"Response rates of online surveys in published research: a meta-analysis","volume":"7","author":"Wu","journal-title":"Comput Hum Behav Rep"},{"key":"R8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2458-11-249","article-title":"A systematic review of the effect of retention methods in population-based cohort studies","volume":"11","author":"Booker","journal-title":"BMC Public Health"},{"issue":"5","key":"R9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/23499","article-title":"Maximizing participant engagement, participation, and retention in cohort studies using digital methods: rapid review to inform the next generation of very large birth cohorts","volume":"23","author":"Nkyekyer","journal-title":"J Med Internet Res"},{"issue":"6","key":"R10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/20199","article-title":"Efficacy of short message service text messaging interventions for postoperative pain management: systematic review","volume":"9","author":"Buck","journal-title":"JMIR Mhealth Uhealth"},{"issue":"12","key":"R11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1446","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2015.01.016","article-title":"Electronic prompts significantly increase response rates to postal questionnaires: a randomized trial within a randomized trial and meta-analysis","volume":"68","author":"Clark","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"R12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/58991","article-title":"A texting- and internet-based self-reporting system for enhanced vaccine safety surveillance with insights from a large integrated health care system in the United States: prospective cohort study","volume":"12","author":"Malden","journal-title":"JMIR Mhealth Uhealth"},{"issue":"6","key":"R13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"625","DOI":"10.1080\/13645579.2019.1629755","article-title":"The role of questionnaire length and reminders frequency on response rates to a web-based epidemiologic study: a randomised trial","volume":"22","author":"Blumenberg","journal-title":"Int J Soc Res Methodol"},{"key":"R14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.erss.2021.102312","article-title":"Increasing response rates and improving research design: learnings from the Smart Energy Research Lab in the United Kingdom","volume":"83","author":"Webborn","journal-title":"Energy Res Soc Sci"},{"key":"R15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.12688\/f1000research.51964.1","article-title":"Pre-notification and personalisation of text-messages to retain participants in a smoking cessation pregnancy RCT: an embedded randomised factorial trial","volume":"10","author":"Coleman","journal-title":"F1000Res"},{"issue":"2","key":"R16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"237","DOI":"10.1093\/eurpub\/ckx151","article-title":"Participation rates by educational levels have diverged during 25 years in Finnish health examination surveys","volume":"28","author":"Reinikainen","journal-title":"Eur J Public Health"},{"issue":"1","key":"R17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"26","DOI":"10.1016\/j.edurev.2008.01.003","article-title":"Comparing response rates in e-mail and paper surveys: a meta-analysis","volume":"4","author":"Shih","journal-title":"Educ Res Rev"},{"key":"R18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/64894","article-title":"Associations among diet, health, lifestyle, and gut microbiota composition in the general French population: protocol for the Le French Gut\u2013Le microbiote Fran\u00e7ais study","volume":"14","author":"Connan","journal-title":"JMIR Res Protoc"},{"issue":"11","key":"R19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/25209","article-title":"Comparing Email, SMS, and concurrent mixed modes approaches to capture quality of recovery in the perioperative period: retrospective longitudinal cohort study","volume":"5","author":"Romeiser","journal-title":"JMIR Form Res"},{"issue":"Suppl 1","key":"R20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3070","DOI":"10.1111\/1475-6773.12827","article-title":"Testing the impact of mixed-mode designs (mail and web) and multiple contact attempts within mode (mail or web) on clinician survey response","volume":"53","author":"Beebe","journal-title":"Health Serv Res"},{"key":"R21","unstructured":"Le French Gut. URL: https:\/\/lefrenchgut.fr [Accessed 24-07-2026]"},{"key":"R22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj-2024-081123","article-title":"CONSORT 2025 statement: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials","volume":"389","author":"Hopewell","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"R23","unstructured":"Le French gut: characterization of gut microbiota profiles in France. ClinicalTrials. URL: https:\/\/clinicaltrials.gov\/study\/NCT05758961 [Accessed 24-07-2026]"},{"key":"R24","unstructured":"RCT and trial registration requirements. JMIR Publications. 2026. URL: https:\/\/support.jmir.org\/hc\/en-us\/articles\/115001389307-RCT-and-Trial-Registration-Requirements [Accessed 20-05-2026]"},{"issue":"1","key":"R25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"273","DOI":"10.1016\/j.respol.2012.05.003","article-title":"Increasing web survey response rates in innovation research: an experimental study of static and dynamic contact design features","volume":"42","author":"Sauermann","journal-title":"Res Policy"},{"issue":"4","key":"R26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"317","DOI":"10.1080\/13645579.2016.1185255","article-title":"Improving web survey efficiency: the impact of an extra reminder and reminder content on web survey response","volume":"20","author":"Van Mol","journal-title":"Int J Soc Res Methodol"},{"issue":"2","key":"R27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"507","DOI":"10.1016\/j.chb.2011.10.023","article-title":"Improving retention rate and response quality in Web-based surveys","volume":"28","author":"S\u00e1nchez-Fern\u00e1ndez","journal-title":"Comput Human Behav"},{"issue":"5","key":"R28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1037","DOI":"10.1007\/s11135-009-9256-5","article-title":"Improving the response rate and quality in Web-based surveys through the personalization and frequency of reminder mailings","volume":"44","author":"Mu\u00f1oz-Leiva","journal-title":"Qual Quant"},{"issue":"4","key":"R29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"951","DOI":"10.1093\/poq\/nfu046","article-title":"Improving response rates and questionnaire design for mobile web surveys","volume":"78","author":"De Bruijne","journal-title":"Public Opin Q"},{"issue":"1","key":"R30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"22","DOI":"10.1080\/15228835.2019.1583154","article-title":"The use of text message reminders to increase completion of web-based surveys: results of two randomized control trials","volume":"38","author":"Langenderfer-Magruder","journal-title":"J Technol Hum Serv"},{"key":"R31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.childyouth.2017.05.013","article-title":"Recruitment and retention of child welfare workers in longitudinal research: successful strategies from the Florida Study of Professionals for Safe Families","volume":"78","author":"Wilke","journal-title":"Child Youth Serv Rev"},{"issue":"3","key":"R32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"384","DOI":"10.1177\/0894439307299588","article-title":"Reducing nonresponse by SMS reminders in mail surveys","volume":"25","author":"Virtanen","journal-title":"Soc Sci Comput Rev"},{"issue":"5","key":"R33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.1007\/s10654-012-9687-5","article-title":"The effect of reminders in a web-based intervention study","volume":"27","author":"Svensson","journal-title":"Eur J Epidemiol"},{"issue":"5","key":"R34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1210","DOI":"10.1093\/ntr\/ntv266","article-title":"Response parameters for SMS text message assessments among pregnant and general smokers participating in SMS cessation trials","volume":"18","author":"Naughton","journal-title":"Nicotine Tob Res"},{"issue":"5","key":"R35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"607","DOI":"10.1177\/17407745251320888","article-title":"Evaluating the use of text-message reminders and personalised text-message reminders on the return of participant questionnaires in trials, a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"22","author":"Doherty","journal-title":"Clin Trials"},{"issue":"7","key":"R36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"712","DOI":"10.1177\/1403494814544403","article-title":"Increasing health examination survey participation rates by SMS reminders and flexible examination times","volume":"42","author":"Tolonen","journal-title":"Scand J Public Health"},{"key":"R37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/1479-5868-4-39","article-title":"Who participates in a computer-tailored physical activity program delivered through the Internet? A comparison of participants\u2019 and non-participants\u2019 characteristics","volume":"4","author":"Spittaels","journal-title":"Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act"},{"issue":"2","key":"R38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"132","DOI":"10.1016\/j.chb.2009.10.015","article-title":"Factors affecting response rates of the web survey: a systematic review","volume":"26","author":"Fan","journal-title":"Comput Human Behav"},{"issue":"33","key":"R39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/MD.0000000000029959","article-title":"Perceptions and attitudes toward participation in clinical research in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a systematic review","volume":"101","author":"Aabdien","journal-title":"Medicine (Baltimore)"},{"issue":"10","key":"R40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1647","DOI":"10.1007\/s00228-022-03366-3","article-title":"Perception of clinical research among patients and healthy volunteers of clinical trials","volume":"78","author":"Bergmann","journal-title":"Eur J Clin Pharmacol"}],"container-title":["Journal of Medical Internet Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,18]],"date-time":"2026-08-18T14:56:06Z","timestamp":1787064966000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.jmir.org\/2026\/1\/e88577"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,18]]},"references-count":40,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2196\/88577","relation":{},"ISSN":["1438-8871"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1438-8871","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,18]]},"article-number":"v28i5e88577"}}