{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,30]],"date-time":"2026-06-30T17:48:03Z","timestamp":1782841683249,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":40,"publisher":"JMIR Publications Inc.","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["JMIR Res Protoc"],"abstract":"Abstract<\/jats:title>\n \n Background<\/jats:title>\n Lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose computed tomography reduces mortality by up to 20%, yet uptake in the United States remains below 6% of eligible individuals. Factors contributing to low uptake include lack of awareness, eligibility confusion, stigma associated with smoking history, and nihilistic beliefs about outcomes. Stigma triggers shame-avoidance behaviors, nihilism undermines perceived screening benefit, and misinformation amplifies both by spreading inaccurate eligibility criteria and exaggerated harms. Social media increasingly shapes how individuals encounter health information, form risk perceptions, and make screening decisions. Because platform architectures differ in content modality, algorithmic curation, and user demographics, single-platform studies cannot reliably characterize the digital information environment or identify platform-specific intervention targets.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Objective<\/jats:title>\n This study aims to (1) systematically characterize the clinical accuracy, stigma prevalence, and decision-support quality of lung cancer and screening content across 7 major social media platforms; (2) quantify platform-specific patterns in stigma manifestation and nihilistic messaging; (3) test whether inaccurate or stigmatizing content is associated with disproportionate engagement relative to accurate, nonstigmatizing content; and (4) as an exploratory aim, identify digital opinion leaders who could serve as partners for evidence-based dissemination.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Methods<\/jats:title>\n \n This cross-sectional content analysis will examine publicly accessible posts from Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, X\/Twitter, Reddit, and Bluesky. Posts will be identified through predefined search terms across 2 content domains: LCS and lung cancer narratives (diagnosis, treatment, survivorship). The sampling strategy combines relevance-based sampling, targeting approximately 700\u20101000 unique posts after deduplication\u2014a sample size providing 80% power for cross-platform comparisons assuming medium effect sizes. A structured codebook operationalizing constructs from diffusion of innovations theory, attribution theory of stigma, and health misinformation frameworks will assess accuracy, stigma, decision support, and equity. All posts will be dual-coded by trained coders. Interrater reliability will be assessed using Gwet\u2019s AC1. Analyses will include descriptive statistics, cross-platform comparisons using\n \n chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis tests, and negative binomial regression models testing whether accuracy and stigma characteristics predict engagement.\n <\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Results<\/jats:title>\n Data collection began in October 2025 and is projected to be complete by July 2026. As of March 2026, data have been collected from 181 posts across 7 platforms. Results are expected to be published by December 2026. Findings will characterize accuracy patterns, stigma prevalence, benefit-harm framing, and engagement dynamics across platforms, informing clinical communication tools, navigator training, and digital intervention development.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n This protocol describes the first multiplatform, theory-informed analysis of lung cancer and LCS content on social media. The study will generate foundational evidence to inform stigma-informed communication strategies, decision support tools, and equitable dissemination approaches. The methodology provides a replicable framework for monitoring health information ecosystems across disease contexts.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.2196\/89479","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,24]],"date-time":"2026-02-24T09:20:07Z","timestamp":1771924807000},"page":"e89479-e89479","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["The Digital Information Environment of Lung Cancer and Lung Cancer Screening: Protocol for a Cross-Platform Social Media Content Analysis"],"prefix":"10.2196","volume":"15","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6448-6033","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Lisa","family":"Carter-Bawa","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0009-2196-0987","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ana Guadalupe","family":"Vielma","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0002-3930-1006","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Gia","family":"Nealy","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0008-1981-4916","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Diya","family":"Vemuganti","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0000-0533-5270","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Nidhi","family":"Patel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1010","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,30]]},"reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"R1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.3322\/caac.21820","article-title":"Cancer statistics, 2024","volume":"74","author":"Siegel","journal-title":"CA Cancer J Clin"},{"issue":"5","key":"R2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"395","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1102873","article-title":"Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening","volume":"365","author":"National Lung Screening Trial Research Team","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"6","key":"R3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"503","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1911793","article-title":"Reduced lung-cancer mortality with volume CT screening in a randomized trial","volume":"382","author":"de Koning","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"10","key":"R4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"962","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2021.1117","article-title":"Screening for lung cancer: US preventive services task force recommendation statement","volume":"325","author":"US Preventive Services Task Force","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"8","key":"R5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1044","DOI":"10.1093\/jnci\/djaa170","article-title":"State variation in low-dose computed tomography scanning for lung cancer screening in the United States","volume":"113","author":"Fedewa","journal-title":"J Natl Cancer Inst"},{"issue":"4","key":"R6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"299","DOI":"10.3322\/caac.21671","article-title":"Racial and socioeconomic disparities in lung cancer screening in the United States: a systematic review","volume":"71","author":"Sosa","journal-title":"CA Cancer J Clin"},{"issue":"11","key":"R7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1856","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jtho.2016.06.010","article-title":"Perceptions and utilization of lung cancer screening among primary care physicians","volume":"11","author":"Raz","journal-title":"J Thorac Oncol"},{"issue":"2","key":"R8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"239","DOI":"10.1093\/fampra\/cmw146","article-title":"A qualitative study exploring why individuals opt out of lung cancer screening","volume":"34","author":"Carter-Harris","journal-title":"Fam Pract"},{"issue":"1","key":"R9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.1002\/pon.3371","article-title":"Stigma among patients with lung cancer: a patient-reported measurement model","volume":"23","author":"Hamann","journal-title":"Psychooncology"},{"key":"R10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2407-12-184","article-title":"A systematic review of the impact of stigma and nihilism on lung cancer outcomes","volume":"12","author":"Chambers","journal-title":"BMC Cancer"},{"issue":"3","key":"R11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"264","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejon.2011.06.008","article-title":"Lung cancer stigma, depression, and quality of life among ever and never smokers","volume":"16","author":"Cataldo","journal-title":"Eur J Oncol Nurs"},{"issue":"3","key":"R12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"526","DOI":"10.1016\/j.lungcan.2012.05.095","article-title":"Beliefs and attitudes about lung cancer screening among smokers","volume":"77","author":"Jonnalagadda","journal-title":"Lung Cancer"},{"key":"R13","unstructured":"Social media fact sheet. Pew Research Center. Pew Research Center; 2024. URL: https:\/\/www.pewresearch.org\/internet\/fact-sheet\/social-media\/ [Accessed 01-11-2025]"},{"issue":"4","key":"R14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/jmir.1933","article-title":"A new dimension of health care: systematic review of the uses, benefits, and limitations of social media for health communication","volume":"15","author":"Moorhead","journal-title":"J Med Internet Res"},{"issue":"6380","key":"R15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1146","DOI":"10.1126\/science.aap9559","article-title":"The spread of true and false news online","volume":"359","author":"Vosoughi","journal-title":"Science"},{"issue":"2","key":"R16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"305","DOI":"10.1007\/s13187-019-01629-9","article-title":"Video-Based education in lung cancer screening","volume":"36","author":"Alban","journal-title":"J Cancer Educ"},{"key":"R17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3233\/SHTI190760","article-title":"Exploring lung cancer screening discussions on Twitter","volume":"264","author":"Zhao","journal-title":"Stud Health Technol Inform"},{"issue":"S3","key":"R18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S300","DOI":"10.2105\/AJPH.2020.305812","article-title":"Breast cancer prevention and treatment: misinformation on Pinterest, 2018","volume":"110","author":"Wilner","journal-title":"Am J Public Health"},{"issue":"2","key":"R19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"181","DOI":"10.1080\/10810730.2017.1421730","article-title":"Cancer and social media: a comparison of traffic about breast cancer, prostate cancer, and other reproductive cancers on Twitter and Instagram","volume":"23","author":"Vraga","journal-title":"J Health Commun"},{"issue":"1","key":"R20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"210","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2017.09.043","article-title":"Lung cancer messages on Twitter: content analysis","volume":"15","author":"Sutton","journal-title":"J Am Coll Radiol"},{"key":"R21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1146\/annurev.publhealth.012809.103604","article-title":"The role of behavioral science theory in development and implementation of public health interventions","volume":"31","author":"Glanz","journal-title":"Annu Rev Public Health"},{"key":"R22","unstructured":"Rogers EM . Diffusion of Innovations. 5th ed. Free Press; 2003."},{"issue":"5","key":"R23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"738","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-3514.55.5.738","article-title":"An attributional analysis of reactions to stigmas","volume":"55","author":"Weiner","journal-title":"J Pers Soc Psychol"},{"issue":"1","key":"R24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"363","DOI":"10.1146\/annurev.soc.27.1.363","article-title":"Conceptualizing stigma","volume":"27","author":"Link","journal-title":"Annu Rev Sociol"},{"key":"R25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2019.112552","article-title":"Systematic literature review on the spread of health-related misinformation on social media","volume":"240","author":"Wang","journal-title":"Soc Sci Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"R26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/17187","article-title":"Prevalence of health misinformation on social media: systematic review","volume":"23","author":"Suarez-Lledo","journal-title":"J Med Internet Res"},{"issue":"7321","key":"R27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1103","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.323.7321.1103","article-title":"Ethical issues in qualitative research on internet communities","volume":"323","author":"Eysenbach","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"1","key":"R28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e1","DOI":"10.2105\/AJPH.2016.303512","article-title":"Twitter as a tool for health research: a systematic review","volume":"107","author":"Sinnenberg","journal-title":"Am J Public Health"},{"issue":"5","key":"R29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/31739","article-title":"Developing Reporting Guidelines for Social Media Research (RESOME) by Using a Modified Delphi method: protocol for guideline development","volume":"11","author":"Kaushal","journal-title":"JMIR Res Protoc"},{"key":"R30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Krippendorff K . Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. 4th ed. Sage Publications; 2018. ISBN: 978-1506395661","DOI":"10.4135\/9781071878781"},{"key":"R31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/43349","article-title":"Methods for analyzing the contents of social media for health care: scoping review","volume":"25","author":"Fu","journal-title":"J Med Internet Res"},{"issue":"10","key":"R32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/11515","article-title":"Nature and diffusion of gynecologic cancer-related misinformation on social media: analysis of tweets","volume":"20","author":"Chen","journal-title":"J Med Internet Res"},{"issue":"6","key":"R33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1089","DOI":"10.1007\/s10900-020-00913-w","article-title":"Coverage of the COVID-19 pandemic in the online versions of highly circulated US daily newspapers","volume":"45","author":"Basch","journal-title":"J Community Health"},{"issue":"Pt 1","key":"R34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1348\/000711006X126600","article-title":"Computing inter-rater reliability and its variance in the presence of high agreement","volume":"61","author":"Gwet","journal-title":"Br J Math Stat Psychol"},{"key":"R35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Abidin C . Internet Celebrity: Understanding Fame Online. Emerald Publishing; 2018. ISBN: 978-1787560796","DOI":"10.1108\/9781787560765"},{"issue":"1","key":"R36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"90","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pubrev.2010.11.001","article-title":"Who are the social media influencers? a study of public perceptions of personality","volume":"37","author":"Freberg","journal-title":"Public Relat Rev"},{"issue":"1","key":"R37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12889-019-7387-8","article-title":"Selling health and happiness how influencers communicate on Instagram about dieting and exercise: mixed methods research","volume":"19","author":"Pilgrim","journal-title":"BMC Public Health"},{"issue":"5","key":"R38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"798","DOI":"10.1080\/02650487.2017.1348035","article-title":"Marketing through Instagram influencers: the impact of number of followers and product divergence on brand attitude","volume":"36","author":"De Veirman","journal-title":"International Journal of Advertising"},{"issue":"3","key":"R39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"496","DOI":"10.1080\/02650487.2016.1173765","article-title":"Getting the word out on Twitter: the role of influentials, information brokers and strong ties in building word-of-mouth for brands","volume":"36","author":"Araujo","journal-title":"International Journal of Advertising"},{"key":"R40","unstructured":"Israel BA Eng E Schulz AJ Parker EA . Methods for Community-Based Participatory Research for Health. 2nd ed. Jossey-Bass; 2012."}],"container-title":["JMIR Research Protocols"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.researchprotocols.org\/2026\/1\/e89479","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,30]],"date-time":"2026-06-30T17:15:24Z","timestamp":1782839724000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.researchprotocols.org\/2026\/1\/e89479"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,30]]},"references-count":40,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2196\/89479","relation":{},"ISSN":["1929-0748"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1929-0748","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,30]]},"article-number":"v15i1e89479"}}