{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,1]],"date-time":"2026-08-01T00:43:42Z","timestamp":1785545022124,"version":"3.56.0"},"reference-count":26,"publisher":"JMIR Publications Inc.","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["JMIR Cancer"],"abstract":"Abstract<\/jats:title>\n \n Background<\/jats:title>\n Digital health interventions are increasingly being integrated into oncological care to support patients in managing treatment-related symptoms and psychological distress. In a randomized controlled pilot trial, we investigated the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a digital health app (SOFIA) among patients with cancer, including those in palliative care. SOFIA consists of an electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) assessment and coaching component. We showed good feasibility and high acceptability of SOFIA in routine clinical care.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Objective<\/jats:title>\n This pilot study aimed to evaluate user experiences and behavior with SOFIA. We applied a mixed methods design, combining a qualitative exploration of patients\u2019 experiences and a quantitative analysis of app usage patterns. The integrated findings are intended to inform the refinement and further development of digital health interventions to better address the needs, preferences, and engagement behaviors of this patient population.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Methods<\/jats:title>\n Patients randomly assigned to the intervention group participated in semistructured interviews at 2 time points during the 12-week intervention period: midway through the intervention (at week 6) (T1) and postintervention (at week 12) (T2). Qualitative data were analyzed using content analysis. User data were descriptively analyzed with Python and the Pandas library (version 2.2.3).<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Results<\/jats:title>\n Our qualitative analysis of 29 patients revealed benefits regarding the ePRO assessment (empowerment, support, user-friendliness, and facilitation of patient-physician communication), as well as some criticism (inflexible design and insufficient use by physicians). Benefits of the coaching tool included the availability of helpful information and design aspects such as clarity and user-friendliness. Quantitative data from 32 active users of the app showed that 16 (50%) of patients read articles, 28 (87.5%) started journeys, and 15 (46.9%) completed exercises at any point during the study.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n The results of this mixed methods study may provide important indications for digital interventions, including ePRO assessment, for patients with cancer. From the patients\u2019 perspective, key features include intuitive design, relevant symptom items, reliable reminder functions, the translation of ePROs into clinically actionable information, clear symptom visualizations, seamless integration into electronic health records, and effective physician engagement. Both our qualitative and quantitative data show the importance of therapy-specific content. These results might increase acceptance and usage, and thereby also the clinical benefit, of future digital interventions for patients with cancer.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.2196\/91416","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,7]],"date-time":"2026-05-07T16:15:07Z","timestamp":1778170507000},"page":"e91416-e91416","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Digital Intervention for Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes in Advanced Cancer: Mixed Methods Study"],"prefix":"10.2196","volume":"12","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3628-9056","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Christina","family":"Sauer","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0004-8517-6490","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Simeon","family":"Sauer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0004-5118-6404","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Elena Sophia","family":"Doll","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8917-3263","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Stefanie","family":"Zsch\u00e4bitz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5209-1213","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jan Simon","family":"Raue","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0003-0884-4670","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Maik","family":"Turni","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8287-2635","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Till Johannes","family":"Bugaj","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0008-9081-9971","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Kiriaki","family":"Hiller","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8030-1182","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Imad","family":"Maatouk","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1010","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,18]]},"reference":[{"issue":"16","key":"R1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2441","DOI":"10.1002\/cncr.34844","article-title":"Getting ready for real-world use of electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) for patients with cancer: a National Comprehensive Cancer Network ePRO Workgroup paper","volume":"129","author":"Cracchiolo","journal-title":"Cancer"},{"key":"R2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1200\/CCI.20.00081","article-title":"Clinical utility and user perceptions of a digital system for electronic patient-reported symptom monitoring during routine cancer care: findings from the PRO-TECT trial","volume":"4","author":"Basch","journal-title":"JCO Clin Cancer Inform"},{"issue":"12","key":"R3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"842","DOI":"10.1007\/s00520-024-09026-9","article-title":"Effectiveness of ePRO-based symptom management for cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies","volume":"32","author":"Hang","journal-title":"Support Care Cancer"},{"key":"R4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijnurstu.2023.104588","article-title":"The effectiveness of symptom management interventions based on electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) for symptom burden, quality of life, and overall survival among patients with cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","volume":"147","author":"Li","journal-title":"Int J Nurs Stud"},{"issue":"6","key":"R5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"557","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.2015.63.0830","article-title":"Symptom monitoring with patient-reported outcomes during routine cancer treatment: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"34","author":"Basch","journal-title":"J Clin Oncol"},{"issue":"8","key":"R6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"660","DOI":"10.1016\/j.annonc.2023.05.003","article-title":"Significantly longer time to deterioration of quality of life due to CANKADO PRO-React eHealth support in HR+ HER2- metastatic breast cancer patients receiving palbociclib and endocrine therapy: primary outcome analysis of the multicenter randomized AGO-B WSG PreCycle trial","volume":"34","author":"Harbeck","journal-title":"Ann Oncol"},{"issue":"2","key":"R7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"197","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2017.7156","article-title":"Overall survival results of a trial assessing patient-reported outcomes for symptom monitoring during routine cancer treatment","volume":"318","author":"Basch","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"R8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/77567","article-title":"Acceptability of the RecoverEsupport digital health intervention among patients undergoing breast cancer surgery: qualitative study","volume":"27","author":"Sansalone","journal-title":"J Med Internet Res"},{"key":"R9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/53117","article-title":"Evaluation of the e-Mental health intervention Make It Training from patients\u2019 perspectives: qualitative analysis within the Reduct Trial","volume":"10","author":"Krakowczyk","journal-title":"JMIR Cancer"},{"key":"R10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1200\/CCI.22.00185","article-title":"The feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of electronic patient-reported outcome symptom monitoring for immune checkpoint inhibitor toxicities: a systematic review","volume":"7","author":"Lai-Kwon","journal-title":"JCO Clin Cancer Inform"},{"issue":"14","key":"R11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2503","DOI":"10.1002\/cncr.35300","article-title":"Electronic health intervention to manage symptoms of immunotherapy in patients with cancer (SOFIA): results from a randomized controlled pilot trial","volume":"130","author":"Sauer","journal-title":"Cancer"},{"issue":"4","key":"R12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00520-026-10631-z","article-title":"User experiences of digital health interventions among older adults with cancer: a systematic review of qualitative data","volume":"34","author":"Zhang","journal-title":"Support Care Cancer"},{"issue":"4","key":"R13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/14896","article-title":"Patient-reported outcomes during immunotherapy for metastatic melanoma: mixed methods study of patients\u2019 and clinicians\u2019 experiences","volume":"22","author":"Tolstrup","journal-title":"J Med Internet Res"},{"key":"R14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/57659","article-title":"Usability and usefulness of a symptom management coaching system for patients with cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: comparative mixed methods study","volume":"9","author":"Glaser","journal-title":"JMIR Form Res"},{"issue":"6 Pt 2","key":"R15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2134","DOI":"10.1111\/1475-6773.12117","article-title":"Achieving integration in mixed methods designs-principles and practices","volume":"48","author":"Fetters","journal-title":"Health Serv Res"},{"issue":"7","key":"R16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2020-047277","article-title":"eHealth intervention to manage symptoms for patients with cancer on immunotherapy (SOFIA): a study protocol for a randomised controlled external pilot trial","volume":"11","author":"Sauer","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"R17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/1745-6215-15-264","article-title":"Sample size requirements to estimate key design parameters from external pilot randomised controlled trials: a simulation study","volume":"15","author":"Teare","journal-title":"Trials"},{"issue":"suppl_4","key":"R18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"iv119","DOI":"10.1093\/annonc\/mdx225","article-title":"Management of toxicities from immunotherapy: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up","volume":"28","author":"Haanen","journal-title":"Ann Oncol"},{"issue":"6","key":"R19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"349","DOI":"10.1093\/intqhc\/mzm042","article-title":"Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups","volume":"19","author":"Tong","journal-title":"Int J Qual Health Care"},{"issue":"1","key":"R20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"107","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x","article-title":"The qualitative content analysis process","volume":"62","author":"Elo","journal-title":"J Adv Nurs"},{"key":"R21","unstructured":"Health promotion glossary of terms 2021. World Health Organization; 2021. URL: https:\/\/www.who.int\/publications\/i\/item\/9789240038349 [Accessed 04-06-2026]"},{"issue":"11","key":"R22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2023-078283","article-title":"Patient and clinician perspectives of an eHealth intervention for supporting cancer treatment in the UK: mixed methods evaluation of the eRAPID randomised controlled trial","volume":"14","author":"Warrington","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"issue":"1","key":"R23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1016\/j.critrevonc.2014.01.002","article-title":"Systematic review of the side effects associated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors used in the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumours on behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Group","volume":"91","author":"Sodergren","journal-title":"Crit Rev Oncol Hematol"},{"issue":"6","key":"R24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"572","DOI":"10.1002\/pon.1943","article-title":"Screening for distress and depression in cancer settings: 10 lessons from 40 years of primary-care research","volume":"20","author":"Mitchell","journal-title":"Psychooncology"},{"issue":"4","key":"R25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00432-024-05715-4","article-title":"Unmet supportive care needs among cancer patients: exploring cancer entity-specific needs and associated factors","volume":"150","author":"Springer","journal-title":"J Cancer Res Clin Oncol"},{"issue":"4","key":"R26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1893","DOI":"10.1007\/s11135-017-0574-8","article-title":"Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization","volume":"52","author":"Saunders","journal-title":"Qual Quant"}],"container-title":["JMIR Cancer"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/cancer.jmir.org\/2026\/1\/e91416","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,31]],"date-time":"2026-07-31T22:24:10Z","timestamp":1785536650000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/cancer.jmir.org\/2026\/1\/e91416"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,18]]},"references-count":26,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2196\/91416","relation":{},"ISSN":["2369-1999"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2369-1999","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,18]]},"article-number":"v12i16e91416"}}