{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,14]],"date-time":"2026-10-14T12:46:23Z","timestamp":1791981983390,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":67,"publisher":"JMIR Publications Inc.","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["JMIR AI"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"background\">\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>AI technologies are currently experiencing significant growth in development and use in health care. The AI model lifecycle includes several stages, all of which should be adequately described. Reporting standards are commonly used for this purpose. However, the plain-text structure of these standards prevents transparent machine-readability of this information.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"objective\">\n                    <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This systematic review aims to investigate AI model reporting standards from clinical databases and technical documents published since 2016.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"methods\">\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The methodological systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 guidelines. The inclusion criteria of this systematic review were papers published from 2016 to April 2026 in English and in a peer-reviewed journal with open access. We aimed to include standards for different data types (structured, images, and text-based). The exclusion criteria were specific medical domain, incomplete reports, and reviews. The following libraries have been consulted: Scopus and Web of Science, MEDLINE and Embase, the IEEE Xplore digital library, and the ACM Digital Library. We applied an Automated Systematic Review software tool (Utrecht University) to find relevant papers after records retrieval. Two reviewers (EA, DS) screened relevant papers independently and invited a third reviewer (JvS) to reach a consensus. All included papers were analyzed to extract relevant lifecycle stage, publication type, data type, and reporting questions. The results were presented and synthesized in a consolidated list by grouping questions and ordering them in a logical sequence according to the AI model lifecycle.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"results\">\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The total number of included studies was 25 from clinical and technical databases (22 and 3, respectively). The consolidated list includes 134 questions ordered in 7 groups: \u201cProblem identification,\u201d \u201cData collection and processing,\u201d \u201cModel development,\u201d \u201cTechnical validation,\u201d \u201cFunctional validation,\u201d \u201cOperation &amp; Monitoring,\u201d and one additional group with \u201cStatements.\u201d Groups according to the lifecycle stages contain all relevant information for each stage. Both clinical and technical papers reflect information for \u201cProblem identification\u201d (s=5), \u201cData collection and processing\u201d (s=25), \u201cModel development\u201d (s=13), \u201cTechnical validation\u201d (s=14). While \u201cFunctional validation\u201d (s=30) was represented mostly in clinical papers and \u201cOperation &amp; Monitoring\u201d (s=18) in technical ones. In the \u201cStatements\u201d (s=29), all general questions were summarized, describing reusability and reproducibility of the model, and highlighting ethical considerations, such as model fairness, explainability, interpretability, and related risk. It was shown that only 10 out of 15 FAIR (findable, accessible, interoperable, reusable) principles were addressed in the consolidated list, with focus on providing rich metadata (F2) and accurate and relevant descriptions (R1).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"conclusions\">\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>We furthermore considered the mapping of the consolidated questions with FAIR principles. In future, we aim to incorporate the results of our work into a metadata schema for AI models developed according to FAIR principles.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.2196\/92329","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,14]],"date-time":"2026-10-14T11:55:25Z","timestamp":1791978925000},"page":"e92329-e92329","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["AI Model Reporting Standards in Health Care: Systematic Review and Consolidation"],"prefix":"10.2196","volume":"5","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8235-9361","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ekaterina","family":"Akhmad","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0002-2084-5660","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Dani\u00ebl","family":"Slob","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4670-6036","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Aiara Lobo","family":"Gomes","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0000-9848-2391","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Simone","family":"Mingels","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0422-7996","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Andre","family":"Dekker","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2548-0330","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Johan van","family":"Soest","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1010","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,9]]},"reference":[{"issue":"10","key":"R1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e834","DOI":"10.1002\/mp.12811","article-title":"Machine learning and modeling: data, validation, communication challenges","volume":"45","author":"El Naqa","journal-title":"Med Phys"},{"issue":"1","key":"R2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"348","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-023-09991-5","article-title":"Clinical use of artificial intelligence products for radiology in the Netherlands between 2020 and 2022","volume":"34","author":"van Leeuwen","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"R3","unstructured":"The AI lifecycle expanded to illustrate per-phase considerations. FDA. URL: https:\/\/www.fda.gov\/media\/180310\/download?attachment [Accessed 23-09-2026]"},{"key":"R4","unstructured":"What is a reporting guideline? Equator Network. URL: https:\/\/www.equator-network.org\/about-us\/what-is-a-reporting-guideline\/ [Accessed 08-08-2025]"},{"issue":"1","key":"R5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/s43856-024-00492-0","article-title":"Reporting guidelines in medical artificial intelligence: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"4","author":"Kolbinger","journal-title":"Commun Med (Lond)"},{"issue":"1","key":"R6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/s41597-022-01712-9","article-title":"FAIR principles for AI models with a practical application for accelerated high energy diffraction microscopy","volume":"9","author":"Ravi","journal-title":"Sci Data"},{"issue":"1","key":"R7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/sdata.2016.18","article-title":"The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship","volume":"3","author":"Wilkinson","journal-title":"Sci Data"},{"issue":"4","key":"R8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/jamiaopen\/ooae105","article-title":"CALIFRAME: a proposed method of calibrating reporting guidelines with FAIR principles to foster reproducibility of AI research in medicine","volume":"7","author":"Shiferaw","journal-title":"JAMIA Open"},{"issue":"3","key":"R9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1148\/ryai.230055","article-title":"AI reporting guidelines: how to select the best one for your research","volume":"5","author":"Klontzas","journal-title":"Radiol Artif Intell"},{"issue":"5","key":"R10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"470","DOI":"10.1111\/ceo.13943","article-title":"Reporting guidelines for artificial intelligence in healthcare research","volume":"49","author":"Ibrahim","journal-title":"Clin Exp Ophthalmol"},{"key":"R11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.n71","article-title":"The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews","volume":"372","author":"Page","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"R12","unstructured":"Akhmad E . Data for MIE 2025. OSF. Apr 15, 2026. URL: https:\/\/osf.io\/fmgza\/ [Accessed 01-10-2026]"},{"issue":"1","key":"R13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s13063-020-04951-6","article-title":"Reporting guidelines for clinical trials of artificial intelligence interventions: the SPIRIT-AI and CONSORT-AI guidelines","volume":"22","author":"Ibrahim","journal-title":"Trials"},{"issue":"3","key":"R14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"240","DOI":"10.5195\/jmla.2016.24","article-title":"De-duplication of database search results for systematic reviews in EndNote","volume":"104","author":"Bramer","journal-title":"jmla"},{"issue":"2","key":"R15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.1038\/s42256-020-00287-7","article-title":"An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews","volume":"3","author":"van de Schoot","journal-title":"Nat Mach Intell"},{"key":"R16","unstructured":"FAIR Data maturity model. Specification and guidelines. Zenodo. Jun 25, 2020. URL: https:\/\/zenodo.org\/records\/3909563 [Accessed 23-09-2026]"},{"key":"R17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj-2023-078378","article-title":"TRIPOD+AI statement: updated guidance for reporting clinical prediction models that use regression or machine learning methods","volume":"385","author":"Collins","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"4","key":"R18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1148\/ryai.240300","article-title":"Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (CLAIM): 2024 Update","volume":"6","author":"Tejani","journal-title":"Radiol Artif Intell"},{"key":"R19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj-2022-070904","article-title":"Reporting guideline for the early stage clinical evaluation of decision support systems driven by artificial intelligence: DECIDE-AI","volume":"377","author":"Vasey","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"9","key":"R20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1351","DOI":"10.1038\/s41591-020-1037-7","article-title":"Guidelines for clinical trial protocols for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the SPIRIT-AI extension","volume":"26","author":"Cruz Rivera","journal-title":"Nat Med"},{"key":"R21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.m3164","article-title":"Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI Extension","volume":"370","author":"Liu","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"18","key":"R22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1126\/sciadv.adk3452","article-title":"REFORMS: consensus-based recommendations for machine-learning-based science","volume":"10","author":"Kapoor","journal-title":"Sci Adv"},{"issue":"12","key":"R23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/jmir.5870","article-title":"Guidelines for developing and reporting machine learning predictive models in biomedical research: a multidisciplinary view","volume":"18","author":"Luo","journal-title":"J Med Internet Res"},{"issue":"4","key":"R24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1664","DOI":"10.1007\/s10278-024-01065-2","article-title":"Checklist for reproducibility of deep learning in medical imaging","volume":"37","author":"Moassefi","journal-title":"J Imaging Inform Med"},{"issue":"9","key":"R25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1196","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jval.2024.05.006","article-title":"Consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards for interventions that use artificial intelligence (CHEERS-AI)","volume":"27","author":"Elvidge","journal-title":"Value Health"},{"issue":"1","key":"R26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"60","DOI":"10.1038\/s41591-024-03425-5","article-title":"The TRIPOD-LLM reporting guideline for studies using large language models","volume":"31","author":"Gallifant","journal-title":"Nat Med"},{"issue":"10","key":"R27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3283","DOI":"10.1038\/s41591-025-03953-8","article-title":"The STARD-AI reporting guideline for diagnostic accuracy studies using artificial intelligence","volume":"31","author":"Sounderajah","journal-title":"Nat Med"},{"issue":"5","key":"R28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"389","DOI":"10.1370\/afm.250386","article-title":"Reporting guideline for chatbot health advice studies: Chatbot Assessment Reporting Tool (CHART) Statement","volume":"23","author":"CHART Collaborative","journal-title":"Ann Fam Med"},{"issue":"6","key":"R29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"390","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjebm-2025-113825","article-title":"Reporting guideline for the use of generative artificial intelligence tools in medical research: the GAMER statement","volume":"30","author":"Luo","journal-title":"BMJ Evid Based Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"R30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"957","DOI":"10.1007\/s11096-025-01906-2","article-title":"Explanation and elaboration of MedinAI: guidelines for reporting artificial intelligence studies in medicines, pharmacotherapy, and pharmaceutical services","volume":"47","author":"Bottacin","journal-title":"Int J Clin Pharm"},{"issue":"9","key":"R31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1320","DOI":"10.1038\/s41591-020-1041-y","article-title":"Minimum information about clinical artificial intelligence modeling: the MI-CLAIM checklist","volume":"26","author":"Norgeot","journal-title":"Nat Med"},{"issue":"5","key":"R32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"513","DOI":"10.1080\/17453674.2021.1918389","article-title":"Presenting artificial intelligence, deep learning, and machine learning studies to clinicians and healthcare stakeholders: an introductory reference with a guideline and a Clinical AI Research (CAIR) checklist proposal","volume":"92","author":"Olczak","journal-title":"Acta Orthop"},{"key":"R33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijmedinf.2021.104510","article-title":"The need to separate the wheat from the chaff in medical informatics: introducing a comprehensive checklist for the (self)-assessment of medical AI studies","volume":"153","author":"Cabitza","journal-title":"Int J Med Inform"},{"issue":"10","key":"R34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1161\/CIRCOUTCOMES.120.006556","article-title":"Recommendations for reporting machine learning analyses in clinical research","volume":"13","author":"Stevens","journal-title":"Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes"},{"issue":"1","key":"R35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/s41746-020-0253-3","article-title":"Presenting machine learning model information to clinical end users with model facts labels","volume":"3","author":"Sendak","journal-title":"NPJ Digit Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"R36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"199","DOI":"10.4097\/kja.25075","article-title":"Comprehensive reporting guidelines and checklist for studies developing and utilizing artificial intelligence models","volume":"78","author":"Kwak","journal-title":"Korean J Anesthesiol"},{"issue":"12","key":"R37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1123","DOI":"10.3348\/kjr.2025.1522","article-title":"Minimum reporting items for Clear Evaluation of Accuracy Reports of Large Language Models in Healthcare (MI-CLEAR-LLM): 2025 updates","volume":"26","author":"Park","journal-title":"Korean J Radiol"},{"issue":"4","key":"R38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2524","DOI":"10.1007\/s10278-024-01282-9","article-title":"RIDGE: reproducibility, integrity, dependability, generalizability, and efficiency assessment of medical image segmentation models","volume":"38","author":"Maleki","journal-title":"J Digit Imaging Inform med"},{"key":"R39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mitchell M Wu S Zaldivar A et al. Model cards for model reporting. In: FAT* \u201919: Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. Association for Computing Machinery; 2019:220-229. [doi: 10.1145\/3287560.3287596]","DOI":"10.1145\/3287560.3287596"},{"key":"R40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mccradden M Odusi O Joshi S et al. What\u2019s fair is\u2026 fair? Presenting JustEFAB, an ethical framework for operationalizing medical ethics and social justice in the integration of clinical machine learning. In: FAccT \u201923: The 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. Association for Computing Machinery; 2023:1505-1519. [doi: 10.1145\/3593013.3594096]","DOI":"10.1145\/3593013.3594096"},{"key":"R41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Arnold M Bellamy RKE Hind M et al. FactSheets: increasing trust in AI services through supplier\u2019s declarations of conformity. arXiv. Preprint posted online on Feb 7, 2019. URL: http:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/1808.07261 [Accessed 23-09-2024] [doi: 10.1147\/JRD.2019.2942288]","DOI":"10.1147\/JRD.2019.2942288"},{"key":"R42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj-2022-071058","article-title":"Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models developed or validated using clustered data (TRIPOD-Cluster): explanation and elaboration","volume":"380","author":"Debray","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"1","key":"R43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7326\/M20-0193","article-title":"Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models in journal and conference abstracts: TRIPOD for abstracts","volume":"173","author":"Heus","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"R44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj-2022-073538","article-title":"Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models for individual prognosis or diagnosis: checklist for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (TRIPOD-SRMA)","volume":"381","author":"Snell","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"2","key":"R45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1148\/ryai.2020200029","article-title":"Checklist for artificial intelligence in medical Imaging (CLAIM): a guide for authors and reviewers","volume":"2","author":"Mongan","journal-title":"Radiol Artif Intell"},{"issue":"4","key":"R46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"544","DOI":"10.1515\/cclm-2022-1151","article-title":"Diagnostic quality model (DQM): an integrated framework for the assessment of diagnostic quality when using AI\/ML","volume":"61","author":"Lennerz","journal-title":"Clin Chem Lab Med"},{"key":"R47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/48763","article-title":"Consolidated reporting guidelines for prognostic and diagnostic machine learning modeling studies: development and validation","volume":"25","author":"Klement","journal-title":"J Med Internet Res"},{"issue":"12","key":"R48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2011","DOI":"10.1093\/jamia\/ocaa088","article-title":"MINIMAR (MINimum Information for Medical AI Reporting): developing reporting standards for artificial intelligence in health care","volume":"27","author":"Hernandez-Boussard","journal-title":"J Am Med Inform Assoc"},{"issue":"1","key":"R49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/jamiaopen\/ooae155","article-title":"Guidelines and standard frameworks for artificial intelligence in medicine: a systematic review","volume":"8","author":"Shiferaw","journal-title":"JAMIA Open"},{"issue":"3","key":"R50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1148\/ryai.230055","article-title":"AI reporting guidelines: how to select the best one for your research","volume":"5","author":"Klontzas","journal-title":"Radiol Artif Intell"},{"issue":"2","key":"R51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1148\/ryai.210127","article-title":"Assessing methods and tools to improve reporting, increase transparency, and reduce failures in machine learning applications in health care","volume":"4","author":"Garbin","journal-title":"Radiol Artif Intell"},{"issue":"12","key":"R52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"86","DOI":"10.1145\/3458723","article-title":"Datasheets for datasets","volume":"64","author":"Gebru","journal-title":"Commun ACM"},{"issue":"1","key":"R53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"55","DOI":"10.1038\/s41746-020-0260-4","article-title":"Verification, analytical validation, and clinical validation (V3): the foundation of determining fit-for-purpose for Biometric Monitoring Technologies (BioMeTs)","volume":"3","author":"Goldsack","journal-title":"NPJ Digit Med"},{"key":"R54","unstructured":"Devaraju A Huber R Mokrane M et al. FAIRsFAIR Data object assessment metrics. Zenodo. Preprint posted online on Apr 14, 2022. [doi: 10.5281\/ZENODO.3934401]"},{"key":"R55","unstructured":"Hong NPC Katz DS Barker M et al. FAIR Principles for research software (FAIR4RS principles). Zenodo. Preprint posted online on Mar 24, 2022. URL: https:\/\/zenodo.org\/records\/6623556 [Accessed 23-09-2026] [doi: 10.15497\/RDA00065]"},{"key":"R56","unstructured":"Limani F Tofik L Latif A Tochtermann K . FAIR for machine learning model: principles and assessment metrics. Zenodo; Sep 24, 2024. URL: https:\/\/zenodo.org\/records\/13835105 [Accessed 31-01-2025]"},{"issue":"10","key":"R57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1464","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2019.06.009","article-title":"Bending the artificial intelligence curve for radiology: informatics tools from ACR and RSNA","volume":"16","author":"Kohli","journal-title":"J Am Coll Radiol"},{"key":"R58","unstructured":"RDES126 - Acute aortic syndrome. RadElement. URL: https:\/\/radelement.org\/home\/sets\/set\/RDES126 [Accessed 01-04-2025]"},{"issue":"1","key":"R59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"622","DOI":"10.1038\/s41597-022-01710-x","article-title":"Introducing the FAIR principles for research software","volume":"9","author":"Barker","journal-title":"Sci Data"},{"key":"R60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3233\/SHTI250351","article-title":"What to report? a systematic review of medical AI reporting guidelines: preliminary results","volume":"327","author":"Akhmad","journal-title":"Stud Health Technol Inform"},{"issue":"18","key":"R61","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E839","DOI":"10.1503\/cmaj.090449","article-title":"AGREE II: Advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care","volume":"182","author":"Brouwers","journal-title":"Can Med Assoc J"},{"issue":"2","key":"R62","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"128","DOI":"10.7326\/M16-1565","article-title":"A reporting tool for practice guidelines in health care: the RIGHT statement","volume":"166","author":"Chen","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"R63","unstructured":"Annex IV. AI Act. URL: https:\/\/artificialintelligenceact.eu\/annex\/4\/ [Accessed 29-09-2026]"},{"key":"R64","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Brereton TA Malik MM Rost LM et al. AImedReport: a prototype tool to facilitate research reporting and translation of artificial intelligence technologies in health care. medRxiv. Preprint posted online on Mar 29, 2024. URL: https:\/\/www.medrxiv.org\/content\/10.1101\/2024.01.16.24301358v2 [Accessed 23-09-2026] [doi: 10.1016\/j.mcpdig.2024.03.008]","DOI":"10.1016\/j.mcpdig.2024.03.008"},{"issue":"1","key":"R65","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/lrh2.10271","article-title":"Categorizing metadata to help mobilize computable biomedical knowledge","volume":"6","author":"Alper","journal-title":"Learn Health Syst"},{"issue":"1","key":"R66","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/s41597-023-02298-6","article-title":"FAIR for AI: an interdisciplinary and international community building perspective","volume":"10","author":"Huerta","journal-title":"Sci Data"},{"key":"R67","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Adhikari A Wenink E van der Waa J Bouter C Tolios I Raaijmakers S . Towards FAIR Explainable AI: a standardized ontology for mapping XAI solutions to use cases, explanations, and AI systems. In: PETRA \u201922: The15th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments. Association for Computing Machinery; 2022:562-568. [doi: 10.1145\/3529190.3535693]","DOI":"10.1145\/3529190.3535693"}],"container-title":["JMIR AI"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,14]],"date-time":"2026-10-14T11:55:34Z","timestamp":1791978934000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/ai.jmir.org\/2026\/1\/e92329"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,9]]},"references-count":67,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2196\/92329","relation":{},"ISSN":["2817-1705"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2817-1705","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,9]]},"article-number":"v5i10e92329"}}