{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,7]],"date-time":"2026-08-07T14:53:11Z","timestamp":1786114391520,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":44,"publisher":"JMIR Publications Inc.","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Med Internet Res"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"background\">\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Routine monitoring of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) during cancer treatment improves symptom control and quality of life, yet real-world uptake and sustained engagement with PRO monitoring remain suboptimal. Gamification has been shown to improve engagement with digital health interventions. User-centered design approaches are needed to ensure that gamified PRO tools are acceptable, usable, and responsive to patient and clinician needs, especially for older adult users.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"objective\">\n                    <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This study aimed to develop a gamified symptom monitoring web application for older adult patients with cancer using a multiphase, iterative, and user-centered approach.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"methods\">\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The overall study design was a mixed-methods user-centered design study involving 3 phases. From 2022 to 2026, participants were recruited across online and clinical settings using multiple strategies, including ResearchMatch (Vanderbilt University Medical Center), clinician referrals, professional networks, and outreach through the electronic health record at an academic medical center. Phase 1 was a survey of older adults with chronic health conditions. They reported on symptom severity, mobile health (mHealth) preferences, and gamification preferences, which were analyzed descriptively. Phases 2 and 3 involved semistructured interviews with older adult cancer survivors and clinicians, respectively, to identify actionable feedback, followed by iterative usability testing with older adult cancer survivors.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"results\">\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>In Phase 1, older adults (n=216) with chronic conditions reported high frequency of mobile phone use (across 11 mobile phone behaviors, mean 6.1, SD 1.63 where 6 indicates daily use) and generally favorable attitudes toward gamification (across 18 gameful design elements, means ranged from 2.8\u20104.3 on a 1\u20105 scale and SDs ranged from 0.75\u20101.12), with learning elements rated most appealing (mean 4.3\/5, SD 0.75). Concerns about a gamified mHealth app included data privacy and perceived trivialization of health. Phase 2 interviews (n=7) demonstrated strong interest in longitudinal symptom visualization and clinician-sharable reports; gamified content was viewed as engaging by most participants but was preferred as optional. In Phase 3, iterative clinician interviews (n=5) and patient usability testing (n=9) led to substantial refinements, including simplified navigation, enhanced visual accessibility, further guidance on score interpretation with embedded educational videos, and de-emphasis of the gamified travel learning component. Across usability testing rounds, the number of user experience problems per interview decreased from 17 to 4, indicating improved usability.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"conclusions\">\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Using a multiphase, mixed methods, user-centered design process, we developed AthenaCompanion (Northwestern University with The Ohio State University), a gamified web application for PRO monitoring tailored to older adults undergoing cancer treatment. Across surveys and interviews, patients emphasized the importance of clinical utility, clarity of symptom feedback, and low-pressure, optional gamification elements. This work demonstrates the feasibility of integrating gamification into PRO monitoring and provides a foundation for future work evaluating long-term usability, engagement, and clinical effectiveness in real-world oncology care.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.2196\/94017","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,26]],"date-time":"2026-06-26T17:45:07Z","timestamp":1782495907000},"page":"e94017-e94017","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Symptom Tracking for Patient-Reported Outcomes in Cancer: User-Centered Design of the AthenaCompanion Web Application"],"prefix":"10.2196","volume":"28","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8481-4655","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Kyle","family":"Nolla","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6144-6266","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Laura M","family":"Perry","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0002-3764-5569","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Anvitha","family":"Gogineni","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3429-6378","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Sheetal","family":"Kircher","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5913-1716","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Nisha","family":"Mohindra","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-7732-6557","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Michael","family":"Bass","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0004-2605-9614","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Macy K","family":"Tetrick","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1000-1643","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Gabriela","family":"Sanchez-Petitto","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8083-8492","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Anne","family":"Noonan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2607-5639","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Carolyn","family":"Presley","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9881-4541","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"David","family":"Cella","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8634-6472","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Roberto M","family":"Benzo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1010","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,5]]},"reference":[{"issue":"10","key":"R1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1229","DOI":"10.6004\/jnccn.2019.0048","article-title":"Distress management, version 3.2019, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology","volume":"17","author":"Riba","journal-title":"J Natl Compr Canc Netw"},{"issue":"3","key":"R2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"213","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2019.19970","article-title":"Adding patient-reported outcomes to medicare\u2019s oncology value-based payment model","volume":"323","author":"Basch","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"6","key":"R3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"557","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.2015.63.0830","article-title":"Symptom monitoring with patient-reported outcomes during routine cancer treatment: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"34","author":"Basch","journal-title":"J Clin Oncol"},{"issue":"1","key":"R4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s41687-023-00578-8","article-title":"Effectiveness of routine provision of feedback from patient-reported outcome measurements for cancer care improvement: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"7","author":"Lu","journal-title":"J Patient Rep Outcomes"},{"issue":"10","key":"R5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1436","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jval.2024.05.013","article-title":"Patient-reported outcome measures as an intervention: a comprehensive overview of systematic reviews on the effects of feedback","volume":"27","author":"Wittich","journal-title":"Value Health"},{"issue":"21","key":"R6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/cancers14215470","article-title":"The effects of patient-reported outcome screening on the survival of people with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"14","author":"Caminiti","journal-title":"Cancers (Basel)"},{"issue":"22","key":"R7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4059","DOI":"10.1002\/cncr.32172","article-title":"Implementing electronic health record-integrated screening of patient-reported symptoms and supportive care needs in a comprehensive cancer center","volume":"125","author":"Garcia","journal-title":"Cancer"},{"issue":"2","key":"R8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"285","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.22.01038","article-title":"Symptoms and needs monitoring in diverse ambulatory oncology patients: usage characteristics and impact on emergency room visits and hospitalization","volume":"41","author":"Natori","journal-title":"J Clin Oncol"},{"issue":"9","key":"R9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e1454","DOI":"10.1200\/OP.21.00855","article-title":"Real-world adherence to patient-reported outcome monitoring as a cancer care quality metric","volume":"18","author":"Takvorian","journal-title":"JCO Oncol Pract"},{"issue":"3","key":"R10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1145\/3196830","article-title":"Digital behaviour change interventions to break and form habits","volume":"25","author":"Pinder","journal-title":"ACM Trans Comput-Hum Interact"},{"issue":"2","key":"R11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"214","DOI":"10.1080\/17437199.2020.1718529","article-title":"A meta-analysis of self-determination theory-informed intervention studies in the health domain: effects on motivation, health behavior, physical, and psychological health","volume":"15","author":"Ntoumanis","journal-title":"Health Psychol Rev"},{"key":"R12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"De Croon R Geuens J Verbert K Vanden Abeele V . A systematic review of the effect of gamification on adherence across disciplines. In: Fang X , editor. HCI in Games: Experience Design and Game Mechanics Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer International Publishing; 2021:168-184. [doi: 10.1007\/978-3-030-77277-2_14]","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-77277-2_14"},{"issue":"1","key":"R13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/39019","article-title":"The use of gamification in the self-management of patients with chronic diseases: scoping review","volume":"11","author":"Huang","journal-title":"JMIR Serious Games"},{"issue":"7","key":"R14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e360","DOI":"10.1093\/geront\/gnaa047","article-title":"Gamification for older adults: a systematic literature review","volume":"61","author":"Koivisto","journal-title":"Gerontologist"},{"key":"R15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jbi.2016.02.002","article-title":"A user-centered model for designing consumer mobile health (mHealth) applications (apps)","volume":"60","author":"Schnall","journal-title":"J Biomed Inform"},{"issue":"8","key":"R16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0237910","article-title":"A user-centred design framework for mHealth","volume":"15","author":"Farao","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"issue":"4","key":"R17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"320","DOI":"10.1197\/jamia.m0822","article-title":"A user-centered model for web site design: needs assessment, user interface design, and rapid prototyping","volume":"9","author":"Kinzie","journal-title":"J Am Med Inform Assoc"},{"issue":"3","key":"R18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/jmir.6.3.e34","article-title":"Improving the quality of web surveys: the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES)","volume":"6","author":"Eysenbach","journal-title":"J Med Internet Res"},{"key":"R19","unstructured":"National health interview survey, 2023 survey description. National Center for Health Statistics; 2024. URL: https:\/\/ftp.cdc.gov\/pub\/Health_Statistics\/NCHS\/Dataset_Documentation\/NHIS\/2023\/srvydesc-508.pdf [Accessed 22-07-2026]"},{"issue":"6","key":"R20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"595","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2004.10.018","article-title":"The development of a comorbidity index with physical function as the outcome","volume":"58","author":"Groll","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"issue":"6","key":"R21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2501","DOI":"10.1016\/j.chb.2013.06.006","article-title":"The media and technology usage and attitudes scale: an empirical investigation","volume":"29","author":"Rosen","journal-title":"Comput Human Behav"},{"key":"R22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tondello GF Mora A Nacke LE . Elements of gameful design emerging from user preferences. Presented at: CHI PLAY \u201917; Oct 15, 2017:129-142; Amsterdam The Netherlands. Oct 15, 2017.URL: https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/proceedings\/10.1145\/3116595 [Accessed 13-07-2026] [doi: 10.1145\/3116595.3116627]","DOI":"10.1145\/3116595.3116627"},{"issue":"9","key":"R23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1277","DOI":"10.1177\/1049732305276687","article-title":"Three approaches to qualitative content analysis","volume":"15","author":"Hsieh","journal-title":"Qual Health Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"R24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"107","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x","article-title":"The qualitative content analysis process","volume":"62","author":"Elo","journal-title":"J Adv Nurs"},{"issue":"11","key":"R25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1179","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2010.04.011","article-title":"The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008","volume":"63","author":"Cella","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"issue":"1","key":"R26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"213","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-019-02312-8","article-title":"A comparison of computer adaptive tests (CATs) and short forms in terms of accuracy and number of items administrated using PROMIS profile","volume":"29","author":"Segawa","journal-title":"Qual Life Res"},{"issue":"10","key":"R27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2017-019993","article-title":"Can rapid approaches to qualitative analysis deliver timely, valid findings to clinical leaders? A mixed methods study comparing rapid and thematic analysis","volume":"8","author":"Taylor","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"issue":"112516","key":"R28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"112516","DOI":"10.1016\/j.psychres.2019.112516","article-title":"Qualitative methods in implementation research: an introduction","volume":"280","author":"Hamilton","journal-title":"Psychiatry Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"R29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"71","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1009855231530","article-title":"The usability problem taxonomy: a framework for classification and analysis","volume":"4","author":"Keenan","journal-title":"Empir Softw Eng"},{"key":"R30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lewis JR Sauro J . Usability and user experience: design and evaluation. In: Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics. John Wiley and Sons, Ltd; 2021:972-1015. [doi: 10.1002\/9781119636113]","DOI":"10.1002\/9781119636113.ch38"},{"key":"R31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Economic well-being of US households in 2023. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System; 2024. URL: https:\/\/doi.org\/10.17016\/8960 [Accessed 13-07-2026]","DOI":"10.17016\/8960"},{"issue":"2","key":"R32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"192","DOI":"10.1177\/0163278705275341","article-title":"General population and cancer patient norms for the functional assessment of cancer therapy-general (FACT-G)","volume":"28","author":"Brucker","journal-title":"Eval Health Prof"},{"issue":"1","key":"R33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"145","DOI":"10.1055\/a-2235-9557","article-title":"Seamless integration of computer-adaptive patient reported outcomes into an electronic health record","volume":"15","author":"Nolla","journal-title":"Appl Clin Inform"},{"issue":"2","key":"R34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"531","DOI":"10.1007\/s11747-023-00944-4","article-title":"Defining, and understanding commitment to, activity streaks","volume":"52","author":"Weathers","journal-title":"J of the Acad Mark Sci"},{"issue":"2","key":"R35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"212","DOI":"10.1093\/jamia\/ocz189","article-title":"Patient preferences for visualization of longitudinal patient-reported outcomes data","volume":"27","author":"Stonbraker","journal-title":"J Am Med Inform Assoc"},{"issue":"1","key":"R36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s41687-025-00984-0","article-title":"Quantitative assessment of visual designs for communicating patient-reported outcomes in breast cancer care to patients","volume":"10","author":"Doppelbauer","journal-title":"J Patient Rep Outcomes"},{"issue":"4","key":"R37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0267030","article-title":"Patients\u2019 experiences and perspectives of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical care: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis","volume":"17","author":"Carfora","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"issue":"10","key":"R38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2190","DOI":"10.1093\/jamia\/ocae180","article-title":"Shared decision-making and disease management in advanced cancer and chronic kidney disease using patient-reported outcome dashboards","volume":"31","author":"Cella","journal-title":"J Am Med Inform Assoc"},{"issue":"1","key":"R39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjoq-2024-002837","article-title":"Implementation of patient-reported outcome dashboards within the electronic health record to support shared decision-making in serious chronic illness","volume":"14","author":"Perry","journal-title":"BMJ Open Qual"},{"key":"R40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pec.2026.109628","article-title":"Comprehension of and preferences for visualization of patient-reported outcome data to support clinical decision making: a systematic review","volume":"149","author":"Kannan","journal-title":"Patient Educ Couns"},{"issue":"1","key":"R41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s41687-022-00424-3","article-title":"Visualization formats of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice: a systematic review about preferences and interpretation accuracy","volume":"6","author":"Albers","journal-title":"J Patient Rep Outcomes"},{"issue":"2","key":"R42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"100333","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apro.2026.100333","article-title":"Evaluation and redesign of longitudinal patient-reported outcome score visualizations for improved trend interpretability: a randomized experimental study","volume":"2","author":"Fygenson","journal-title":"Adv Patient Rep Outcomes"},{"issue":"1","key":"R43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"108","DOI":"10.1093\/rheumatology\/keaa202","article-title":"Patient adherence with a smartphone app for patient-reported outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis","volume":"60","author":"Colls","journal-title":"Rheumatology (Oxford)"},{"issue":"9","key":"R44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1200\/CCI-25-00178","article-title":"Patient portal engagement in oncology: results from the NU IMPACT study in a large health care system","volume":"9","author":"Nolla","journal-title":"JCO Clin Cancer Inform"}],"container-title":["Journal of Medical Internet Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,5]],"date-time":"2026-08-05T20:52:04Z","timestamp":1785963124000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.jmir.org\/2026\/1\/e94017"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,5]]},"references-count":44,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2196\/94017","relation":{},"ISSN":["1438-8871"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1438-8871","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,5]]},"article-number":"v28i10e94017"}}