{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,1]],"date-time":"2026-09-01T20:13:02Z","timestamp":1788293582339,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":27,"publisher":"JMIR Publications Inc.","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["JMIR Form Res"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"background\">\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>AI is increasingly integrated into medical education, offering new ways for students to acquire knowledge and support clinical reasoning. However, the extent, patterns, and implications of AI use among medical students remain incompletely understood. Prior studies have relied on retrospective surveys that are susceptible to recall bias and have not quantified AI use as a proportion of total study time.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"objective\">\n                    <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This pilot study aimed to quantify real-time AI use among medical students, including the proportion of study time devoted to AI, and how use varies by training stage and engagement style (active vs passive). Active use was defined as iterative, bidirectional engagement; passive use was defined as unidirectional consultation with limited interrogation.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"methods\">\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This longitudinal observational cohort study recruited medical students from 2 osteopathic medical schools (April-May 2025) to complete a baseline survey and 7 digital diary entries over a 21-day period, delivered via automated SMS every 3 days. Students reported total study time, AI use time, tools used, and purposes of use. The data were analyzed using Stata 19. Multiple linear regression models examined associations between AI use (total minutes and percentage of study time) and key variables, and a mixed-effects model using diary-level data with a random intercept per student addressed within-person variability across entries.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"results\">\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      A total of 71 of 1332 (response rate: 5.3%) eligible students completed the baseline survey (mean age 26.6, SD 2.8 y; n=39, 55% identified as men; n=32, 45% identified as women; n=55, 77% preclinical). On average, students reported using AI tools during 19% of their total study time (mean 35.8 of 185.6 min per diary, SD 35.8 min). The most used tool was ChatGPT (n=63, 89%), followed by Google Gemini (n=22, 31%). Clinical-phase students (MS3-MS4) used AI significantly more than preclinical students (MS1-MS2), with an adjusted increase of 19% (\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      =.003). Students classified as active users spent significantly more total time using AI than passive users (\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      =.002). Across groups, AI use was primarily passive, including simplifying complex concepts, answering practice questions, and generating summaries. In the multilevel models, preclinical students reported significantly lower AI use than clinical-phase students (\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      =.02). The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.47 (95% CI 0.34\u20100.60).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"conclusions\">\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Although preliminary, these findings suggest that medical students are incorporating AI into a substantial proportion of their study time, with greater use among clinical trainees and active users. Despite this, most use remains passive. Given mixed evidence on AI\u2019s impact on deep learning, further research on learning outcomes is needed. Institutions may consider providing guidance on responsible AI use, including critical evaluation and verification of outputs. The digital diary methodology offers a practical approach for capturing real-time AI use and may inform future educational research and intervention design.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.2196\/96895","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,5]],"date-time":"2026-08-05T17:50:06Z","timestamp":1785952206000},"page":"e96895-e96895","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["AI Tool Use Among Osteopathic Medical Students: Pilot Digital Diary Study"],"prefix":"10.2196","volume":"10","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9376-5528","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Carinne","family":"Brody","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0001-9922-4201","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Seth","family":"Schwindt","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0004-3835-7045","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Achint","family":"Thakur","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0002-9328-4251","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Pieter","family":"von Steinbergs","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1010","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,1]]},"reference":[{"issue":"3","key":"R1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.80852","article-title":"Artificial intelligence in medical education: transforming learning and practice","volume":"17","author":"Sriram","journal-title":"Cureus"},{"issue":"1","key":"R2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"22","DOI":"10.1186\/s41239-023-00392-8","article-title":"Artificial intelligence in higher education: the state of the field","volume":"20","author":"Crompton","journal-title":"Int J Educ Technol High Educ"},{"key":"R3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bommineni VL Bhagwagar S Balcarcel D Davatzikos C Boyer D . Performance of ChatGPT on the MCAT: the road to personalized and equitable premedical learning. medRxiv. Preprint posted online on Jun 6, 2023. [doi: 10.1101\/2023.03.05.23286533]","DOI":"10.1101\/2023.03.05.23286533"},{"issue":"2","key":"R4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pdig.0000198","article-title":"Performance of ChatGPT on USMLE: potential for AI-assisted medical education using large language models","volume":"2","author":"Kung","journal-title":"PLOS Digit Health"},{"key":"R5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wecks JO Voshaar J Plate BJ Zimmermann J . Generative AI usage and exam performance. Presented at: Proceedings of the 2025 European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS); Jun 12-18, 2025; Amman, Jordan. [doi: 10.2139\/ssrn.4812513]","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.4812513"},{"issue":"1","key":"R6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12909-025-07272-x","article-title":"AI usage among medical students in Palestine: a cross-sectional study and demonstration of AI-assisted research workflows","volume":"25","author":"Yousef","journal-title":"BMC Med Educ"},{"issue":"1","key":"R7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12909-025-07438-7","article-title":"Status and perceptions of ChatGPT utilization among medical students: a survey-based study","volume":"25","author":"Hu","journal-title":"BMC Med Educ"},{"issue":"5","key":"R8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0324698","article-title":"Shaping the future of medical education: a cross-sectional study on ChatGPT attitude and usage among medical students in Sudan","volume":"20","author":"Ahmed","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"issue":"4","key":"R9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"338","DOI":"10.1177\/10815589251322102","article-title":"Utilization and perception of generative artificial intelligence by medical students in residency applications","volume":"73","author":"Smith","journal-title":"J Investig Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"R10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"163","DOI":"10.1152\/advan.00188.2024","article-title":"Ethical engagement with artificial intelligence in medical education","volume":"49","author":"Mondal","journal-title":"Adv Physiol Educ"},{"key":"R11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj-2024-081554","article-title":"FUTURE-AI: international consensus guideline for trustworthy and deployable artificial intelligence in healthcare","volume":"388","author":"Lekadir","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"R12","unstructured":"Ethics and governance of artificial intelligence for health: WHO guidance. World Health Organization; 2021. URL: https:\/\/iris.who.int\/server\/api\/core\/bitstreams\/f780d926-4ae3-42ce-a6d6-e898a5562621\/content [Accessed 13-08-2026]"},{"issue":"3","key":"R13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/hsr2.1138","article-title":"Attitudes, knowledge, and skills towards artificial intelligence among healthcare students: a systematic review","volume":"6","author":"Mousavi Baigi","journal-title":"Health Sci Rep"},{"issue":"10","key":"R14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.71946","article-title":"A pilot study of medical student opinions on large language models","volume":"16","author":"Xu","journal-title":"Cureus"},{"issue":"9","key":"R15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pdig.0000596","article-title":"ChatGPT and large language models (LLMs) awareness and use. A prospective cross-sectional survey of U.S. medical students","volume":"3","author":"Ganjavi","journal-title":"PLOS Digit Health"},{"issue":"11","key":"R16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1222","DOI":"10.1097\/GME.0000000000000685","article-title":"Measuring hot flash phenomenonology using ambulatory prospective digital diaries","volume":"23","author":"Fisher","journal-title":"Menopause"},{"key":"R17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3389\/ijph.2024.1606912","article-title":"Soliciting diaries for \u201cReal-Time\u201d insights into the COVID-19 pandemic: methodological reflections on using digital technologies to engage the public","volume":"69","author":"Kaiser-Grolimund","journal-title":"Int J Public Health"},{"key":"R18","unstructured":"SimpleTexting. URL: https:\/\/simpletexting.com\/ [Accessed 16-08-2026]"},{"key":"R19","unstructured":"Stata statistical software: release 19. StataCorp. 2025. URL: https:\/\/www.stata.com\/new-in-stata\/ [Accessed 18-08-2026]"},{"key":"R20","unstructured":"What does it mean for students to use AI in active rather than passive ways. Mark Carrigan. URL: https:\/\/markcarrigan.net\/2026\/05\/26\/what-does-it-mean-for-students-to-use-ai-in-active-rather-than-passive-ways [Accessed 03-08-2026]"},{"issue":"4","key":"R21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"970","DOI":"10.1080\/13562517.2024.2332252","article-title":"From active learners to knowledge contributors: authentic assessment as a catalyst for students\u2019 epistemic agency","volume":"30","author":"Nieminen","journal-title":"Teach High Educ"},{"issue":"6","key":"R22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1390","DOI":"10.1002\/tea.21885","article-title":"AI and formative assessment: the train has left the station","volume":"60","author":"Zhai","journal-title":"J Res Sci Teach"},{"key":"R23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/72058","article-title":"Use of a large language model as a dermatology case narrator: exploring the dynamics of a chatbot as an educational tool in dermatology","volume":"8","author":"Karampinis","journal-title":"JMIR Dermatol"},{"key":"R24","unstructured":"Digital Education Council Global AI Student Survey 2024. Digital Education Council. 2024. URL: https:\/\/www.digitaleducationcouncil.com\/resource-library-items\/digital-education-council-global-ai-student-survey-2024 [Accessed 13-08-2026]"},{"issue":"1","key":"R25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12909-025-07556-2","article-title":"Enhancing AI literacy in undergraduate pre-medical education through student associations: an educational intervention","volume":"25","author":"Hopson","journal-title":"BMC Med Educ"},{"issue":"7","key":"R26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1126","DOI":"10.1080\/0142159X.2024.2413023","article-title":"Enhancing self-directed learning with custom GPT AI facilitation among medical students: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"47","author":"Shalong","journal-title":"Med Teach"},{"issue":"9","key":"R27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1949","DOI":"10.1007\/s00256-025-04927-0","article-title":"AI as teacher: effectiveness of an AI-based training module to improve trainee pediatric fracture detection","volume":"54","author":"O\u2019Rourke","journal-title":"Skeletal Radiol"}],"container-title":["JMIR Formative Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,1]],"date-time":"2026-09-01T19:14:12Z","timestamp":1788290052000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/formative.jmir.org\/2026\/1\/e96895"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,1]]},"references-count":27,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2196\/96895","relation":{},"ISSN":["2561-326X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2561-326X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,1]]},"article-number":"v10i3e96895"}}