{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,7]],"date-time":"2026-08-07T16:33:12Z","timestamp":1786120392207,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":39,"publisher":"JMIR Publications Inc.","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["JMIR Res Protoc"],"abstract":"Abstract<\/jats:title>\n \n Background<\/jats:title>\n Young adults aged 18 to 25 years in rural communities face barriers to sexual and reproductive health (SRH) information, including clinician shortages, clinic closures, and privacy concerns in close-knit communities. Many rely on online sources of varying quality; one analysis found that 40% of birth control video content is inaccurate or misleading. AI-enabled conversational health tools (chatbots) may provide scalable SRH information, but implementation may be constrained by low institutional trust, privacy concerns, and rural users\u2019 underrepresentation in AI development. SARHAchat is an AI-enabled SRH conversational health tool developed through prior work. This protocol describes a study to co-design and evaluate SARHAchat with rural young adults, treating trust as a design input rather than a postdeployment outcome.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Objective<\/jats:title>\n This study aims to (1) identify multilevel determinants of trust and acceptability for AI-enabled conversational health tools among rural pregnancy-capable individuals aged 18 to 25 years in North and South Carolina; (2) co-design a SARHAchat prototype with rural stakeholders using human-centered design; and (3) evaluate its feasibility, acceptability, usability, trust, and implementation outcomes in a pilot. The goal is to develop methods that support responsible implementation of conversational AI health tools in rural and underserved communities.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Methods<\/jats:title>\n This protocol uses a 3-phase mixed methods design with exploratory sequential logic. In phase 1, we will conduct semistructured interviews (target n=24) with pregnancy-capable individuals aged 18 to 25 years living in Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA)-designated rural counties in North and South Carolina to identify determinants of trust and acceptability and develop a conceptual framework. In phase 2, we will convene 5 to 8 stakeholders per session across 2 community feedback sessions to co-design and refine SARHAchat. In phase 3, we will conduct a nonrandomized mixed methods feasibility pilot with 75 pregnancy-capable individuals aged 18 to 25 years from rural counties, recruited through community-identified social media platforms.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Results<\/jats:title>\n This proposal was funded in February 2026. All 3 phases have been approved by the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Institutional Review Board (26-0669). A total of 14 participants have enrolled in phase 1. Phase 2 co-design activities are planned for August to October 2026, and phase 3 pilot recruitment is expected to begin in January 2027, with data collection concluding in October 2027. Findings are anticipated to be submitted for publication in April 2028.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n This protocol describes a feasibility study of a community-informed AI-enabled conversational SRH tool for rural young adults. By identifying trust-related design needs, refining a prototype through co-design, and generating preliminary feasibility, acceptability, usability, and implementation data, the study aims to establish trust-by-design methods that guide future effectiveness testing and may transfer to other sensitive health domains and underserved communities.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.2196\/97653","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,22]],"date-time":"2026-07-22T08:25:09Z","timestamp":1784708709000},"page":"e97653-e97653","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Trust-Centered Design and Feasibility Evaluation of an AI-Enabled Conversational Health Tool for Sexual and Reproductive Health Among Rural Young Adults: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study"],"prefix":"10.2196","volume":"15","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8729-7828","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Kandyce","family":"Brennan","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1010","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,6]]},"reference":[{"key":"R1","unstructured":"Contraceptive deserts. Power to Decide. URL: https:\/\/powertodecide.org\/what-we-do\/contraceptive-deserts [Accessed 06-02-2026]"},{"issue":"4","key":"R2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"208","DOI":"10.1097\/OLQ.0000000000001355","article-title":"Sexually transmitted infections among US women and men: prevalence and incidence estimates, 2018","volume":"48","author":"Kreisel","journal-title":"Sex Transm Dis"},{"key":"R3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rossen LM Hamilton BE Abma JC Gregory EC Beresovsky V Resendez AV et al. Updated methodology to estimate overall and unintended pregnancy rates in the United States. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics; 2023. URL: https:\/\/stacks.cdc.gov\/view\/cdc\/124395 [Accessed 28-07-2026]","DOI":"10.15620\/cdc:124395"},{"key":"R4","unstructured":"Unintended pregnancy. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. URL: https:\/\/www.cdc.gov\/reproductive-health\/hcp\/unintended-pregnancy\/index.html [Accessed 06-02-2026]"},{"key":"R5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3389\/frph.2024.1444111","article-title":"Unveiling barriers to reproductive health awareness among rural adolescents: a systematic review","volume":"6","author":"Wahyuningsih","journal-title":"Front Reprod Health"},{"key":"R6","unstructured":"Healthcare access in rural communities. Rural Health Information Hub. URL: https:\/\/www.ruralhealthinfo.org\/topics\/healthcare-access [Accessed 02-06-2026]"},{"issue":"18","key":"R7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/healthcare11182511","article-title":"A meta-analysis of the effects of comprehensive sexuality education programs on children and adolescents","volume":"11","author":"Kim","journal-title":"Healthcare (Basel)"},{"issue":"14","key":"R8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3336","DOI":"10.1080\/10410236.2022.2149091","article-title":"What do social media influencers say about birth control? A content analysis of YouTube vlogs about birth control","volume":"38","author":"Pfender","journal-title":"Health Commun"},{"key":"R9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3233\/SHTI250667","article-title":"Acceptability of academic large language model for patients seeking health information","volume":"328","author":"Khairat","journal-title":"Stud Health Technol Inform"},{"issue":"10","key":"R10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pdig.0000313","article-title":"Digital determinants of health: health data poverty amplifies existing health disparities-a scoping review","volume":"2","author":"Paik","journal-title":"PLOS Digit Health"},{"key":"R11","unstructured":"Lyles CR Aguilera A Nguyen O Sarkar U . Bridging the digital health divide: how providers and plans can help communities better adopt digital health tools. California Health Care Foundation. 2022. URL: https:\/\/www.chcf.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/BridgingDigitalDivideProvidersPlans.pdf [Accessed 05-02-2026]"},{"issue":"10","key":"R12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/37341","article-title":"The limitations of user- and human-centered design in an eHealth context and how to move beyond them","volume":"24","author":"van Velsen","journal-title":"J Med Internet Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"R13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/jrh.12903","article-title":"Rural health research in the 21st century: a commentary on challenges and the role of digital technology","volume":"41","author":"Moloney","journal-title":"J Rural Health"},{"key":"R14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Brennan K Chen T Baker M . Feasibility and acceptability of SARHAchat\u2122: an AI-powered chatbot for sexual and reproductive health education and decision support. SSRN. Preprint posted online on Dec 2, 2024. [doi: 10.2139\/ssrn.5028418]","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.5028418"},{"key":"R15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/46761","article-title":"Chatbots to improve sexual and reproductive health: realist synthesis","volume":"25","author":"Mills","journal-title":"J Med Internet Res"},{"key":"R16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/20552076241308994","article-title":"Feasibility of using an artificially intelligent chatbot to increase access to information and sexual and reproductive health services","volume":"10","author":"Bull","journal-title":"Digit Health"},{"issue":"5","key":"R17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"385","DOI":"10.1071\/SH21123","article-title":"Barriers and facilitators to engagement with artificial intelligence (AI)-based chatbots for sexual and reproductive health advice: a qualitative analysis","volume":"18","author":"Nadarzynski","journal-title":"Sex Health"},{"issue":"1","key":"R18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/cts.2021.813","article-title":"Participation of rural patients in clinical trials at a multisite academic medical center","volume":"5","author":"Bharucha","journal-title":"J Clin Transl Sci"},{"key":"R19","unstructured":"Yang J Zhao X Chen T Brennan K . SARHAchat: an LLM-based chatbot for sexual and reproductive health counseling. arXiv. Preprint posted online on Oct 17, 2025. [doi: 10.48550\/arXiv.2510.16081]"},{"issue":"4","key":"R20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"351","DOI":"10.1177\/109019818801500401","article-title":"An ecological perspective on health promotion programs","volume":"15","author":"McLeroy","journal-title":"Health Educ Q"},{"issue":"8","key":"R21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pdig.0000591","article-title":"How to design equitable digital health tools: a narrative review of design tactics, case studies, and opportunities","volume":"3","author":"Bucher","journal-title":"PLOS Digit Health"},{"issue":"5","key":"R22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pdig.0000492","article-title":"Achieving health equity through conversational AI: a roadmap for design and implementation of inclusive chatbots in healthcare","volume":"3","author":"Nadarzynski","journal-title":"PLOS Digit Health"},{"key":"R23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5888\/pcd15.170271","article-title":"Pragmatic applications of RE-AIM for health care initiatives in community and clinical settings","volume":"15","author":"Glasgow","journal-title":"Prev Chronic Dis"},{"issue":"3","key":"R24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"342","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jadohealth.2020.04.025","article-title":"Young men\u2019s communication with partners and contraception use: a systematic review","volume":"67","author":"Lalas","journal-title":"J Adolesc Health"},{"key":"R25","unstructured":"How we define rural. Health Resources and Services Administration. URL: https:\/\/www.hrsa.gov\/rural-health\/about-us\/what-is-rural [Accessed 04-06-2026]"},{"key":"R26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2021.114523","article-title":"Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: a systematic review of empirical tests","volume":"292","author":"Hennink","journal-title":"Soc Sci Med"},{"issue":"9","key":"R27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2023.33642","article-title":"Pilot trial characteristics, postpilot design modifications, and feasibility of full-scale trials","volume":"6","author":"Ying","journal-title":"JAMA Netw Open"},{"issue":"1","key":"R28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"80","DOI":"10.1177\/160940690600500107","article-title":"Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: a hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development","volume":"5","author":"Fereday","journal-title":"Int J Qual Methods"},{"key":"R29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.psychres.2019.112516","article-title":"Qualitative methods in implementation research: an introduction","volume":"280","author":"Hamilton","journal-title":"Psychiatry Res"},{"issue":"13","key":"R30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1802","DOI":"10.1177\/1049732316654870","article-title":"Member checking: a tool to enhance trustworthiness or merely a nod to validation?","volume":"26","author":"Birt","journal-title":"Qual Health Res"},{"issue":"4","key":"R31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/jmir.8.4.e27","article-title":"eHEALS: the eHealth Literacy Scale","volume":"8","author":"Norman","journal-title":"J Med Internet Res"},{"key":"R32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00779-021-01582-9","article-title":"The Chatbot Usability Scale: the design and pilot of a usability scale for interaction with AI-based conversational agents","volume":"26","author":"Borsci","journal-title":"Pers Ubiquit Comput"},{"issue":"1","key":"R33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s13012-017-0635-3","article-title":"Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures","volume":"12","author":"Weiner","journal-title":"Implement Sci"},{"issue":"1","key":"R34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"53","DOI":"10.1207\/S15327566IJCE0401_04","article-title":"Foundations for an empirically determined scale of trust in automated systems","volume":"4","author":"Jian","journal-title":"Int J Cogn Ergon"},{"key":"R35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"O\u2019Connor AM . User manual \u2013 Decision Self-Efficacy Scale. Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. 1995. URL: https:\/\/decisionaid.ohri.ca\/docs\/develop\/user_manuals\/UM_decision_selfefficacy.pdf [Accessed 10-06-2026]","DOI":"10.1037\/t23888-000"},{"issue":"1","key":"R36","first-page":"15","volume":"39","author":"Wilson","journal-title":"Can J Couns"},{"issue":"6","key":"R37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"554","DOI":"10.1370\/afm.1865","article-title":"Integrating quantitative and qualitative results in health science mixed methods research through joint displays","volume":"13","author":"Guetterman","journal-title":"Ann Fam Med"},{"issue":"6 Pt 2","key":"R38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2134","DOI":"10.1111\/1475-6773.12117","article-title":"Achieving integration in mixed methods designs-principles and practices","volume":"48","author":"Fetters","journal-title":"Health Serv Res"},{"issue":"5","key":"R39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"452","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amepre.2009.02.002","article-title":"How we design feasibility studies","volume":"36","author":"Bowen","journal-title":"Am J Prev Med"}],"container-title":["JMIR Research Protocols"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,6]],"date-time":"2026-08-06T20:43:47Z","timestamp":1786049027000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.researchprotocols.org\/2026\/1\/e97653"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,6]]},"references-count":39,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2196\/97653","relation":{},"ISSN":["1929-0748"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1929-0748","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,6]]},"article-number":"v15i4e97653"}}