{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,16]],"date-time":"2026-09-16T17:04:16Z","timestamp":1789578256209,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":44,"publisher":"JMIR Publications Inc.","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Med Internet Res"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"background\">\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Generative AI (GenAI) is increasingly used by health information consumers to interpret medical content and support decision-making. Although these systems provide accessible and timely information, they may also produce inaccurate or misleading outputs. Effective use of GenAI, therefore, depends on users\u2019 ability to calibrate trust based on information accuracy. However, little is known about how learned dependency on GenAI (the habitual reliance on AI systems for solving problems) influences trust calibration in health information contexts.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"objective\">\n                    <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This study examines how learned dependency on GenAI affects health information consumers\u2019 calibration of trust in AI-generated information, and whether text-based visual attention cues (TVCs), such as highlighting critical information in text, mitigate overreliance on incorrect outputs.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"methods\">\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>We conducted 2 randomized controlled experiments: the first involved 338 college students, and the second replicated the study with 563 Amazon Mechanical Turk participants. Both studies used a 2 \u00d7 2 between-participants design, manipulating (1) information accuracy (correct vs incorrect) and (2) TVCs (text highlight vs no text highlight). Participants evaluated AI-generated health information presented alongside source text. Trust was measured using a multi-item scale, and learned dependency on GenAI was assessed using a validated self-reported measure. Linear regression models were used to examine main and interaction effects.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"results\">\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Across both experiments, information accuracy had a significant positive effect on trust, with participants expressing greater trust in correct than in incorrect AI-generated information (experiment 1:\n                      <jats:italic>B<\/jats:italic>\n                      =2.107, 95% CI 1.337-2.878;\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      &lt;.001 and experiment 2:\n                      <jats:italic>B<\/jats:italic>\n                      =0.203, 95% CI 0.115-0.290;\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      &lt;.001). Learned dependency was positively associated with trust in both experiments (experiment 1:\n                      <jats:italic>B<\/jats:italic>\n                      =0.277, 95% CI 0.033-0.521;\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      =.03 and experiment 2:\n                      <jats:italic>B<\/jats:italic>\n                      =0.822, 95% CI 0.715-0.929;\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      &lt;.001), such that users with greater dependency trusted AI outputs more overall. Critically, the interaction between information accuracy and learned dependency was negative and significant in both experiments (experiment 1:\n                      <jats:italic>B<\/jats:italic>\n                      =\u22120.399, 95% CI \u22120.695 to \u22120.104;\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      &lt;.001 and experiment 2:\n                      <jats:italic>B<\/jats:italic>\n                      =\u22120.459, 95% CI \u22120.577 to \u22120.340;\n                      <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\n                      &lt;.001), indicating that higher dependency reduces users\u2019 sensitivity to information inaccuracy. Text highlighting did not significantly affect trust in either experiment, nor did it moderate the relationship between learned dependency and trust.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"conclusions\">\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This study demonstrates that while users generally trust accurate AI-generated health information more than inaccurate information, higher self-reported learned dependency is associated with weaker trust calibration, predicting greater susceptibility to incorrect outputs. TVCs, such as text highlighting, are insufficient to mitigate this effect. These findings highlight the need for more effective design interventions to support critical evaluation and reduce overreliance on GenAI in health information environments.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.2196\/98326","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,7]],"date-time":"2026-08-07T18:20:09Z","timestamp":1786126809000},"page":"e98326-e98326","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Trust in Generative AI for Health Information Consumption and the Effect of Learned Dependency: Randomized Controlled Experimental Study"],"prefix":"10.2196","volume":"28","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0003-5746-1975","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Arif","family":"Ahmed","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4751-6680","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Gondy","family":"Leroy","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0843-5899","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Agrim","family":"Sachdeva","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0290-4989","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Philip","family":"Harber","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1639-8557","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Stephen","family":"Rains","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2512-1736","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Seokjun","family":"Youn","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0003-5427-2300","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Prosanta","family":"Barai","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1010","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,16]]},"reference":[{"key":"R1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.chbah.2025.100127","article-title":"Using AI chatbots (e.g., ChatGPT) in seeking health-related information online: the case of a common ailment","volume":"3","author":"Esmaeilzadeh","journal-title":"Comput Hum Behav Artif Hum"},{"issue":"4","key":"R2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"210","DOI":"10.5694\/mja2.52598","article-title":"Use of ChatGPT to obtain health information in Australia, 2024: insights from a nationally representative survey","volume":"222","author":"Ayre","journal-title":"Med J Aust"},{"key":"R3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/47184","article-title":"Investigating the impact of user trust on the adoption and use of ChatGPT: survey analysis","volume":"25","author":"Choudhury","journal-title":"J Med Internet Res"},{"key":"R4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/55138","article-title":"Characterizing the adoption and experiences of users of artificial intelligence-generated health information in the United States: cross-sectional questionnaire study","volume":"26","author":"Ayo-Ajibola","journal-title":"J Med Internet Res"},{"key":"R5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/TEM.2025.3606352","article-title":"I can\u2019t take this anymore! Understanding the relationship between personality traits and tolerance of generative AI hallucinations","volume":"72","author":"Kadian","journal-title":"IEEE Trans Eng Manage"},{"issue":"1","key":"R6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/s41746-021-00423-6","article-title":"The potential of artificial intelligence to improve patient safety: a scoping review","volume":"4","author":"Bates","journal-title":"NPJ Digit Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"R7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"94","DOI":"10.7861\/futurehosp.6-2-94","article-title":"The potential for artificial intelligence in healthcare","volume":"6","author":"Davenport","journal-title":"Future Healthc J"},{"key":"R8","unstructured":"Topol E . Deep Medicine: How Artificial Intelligence Can Make Healthcare Human Again. Basic Books; 2019. ISBN: 9781541644649"},{"issue":"1","key":"R9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"71","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0039-1677907","article-title":"Human factors and usability for health information technology: old and new challenges","volume":"28","author":"Carayon","journal-title":"Yearb Med Inform"},{"issue":"10161","key":"R10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2263","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(18)32819-8","article-title":"Safety of patient-facing digital symptom checkers","volume":"392","author":"Fraser","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"12","key":"R11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1145\/3571730","article-title":"Survey of hallucination in natural language generation","volume":"55","author":"Ji","journal-title":"ACM Comput Surv"},{"issue":"1","key":"R12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12911-020-01332-6","article-title":"Explainability for artificial intelligence in healthcare: a multidisciplinary perspective","volume":"20","author":"Amann","journal-title":"BMC Med Inform Decis Mak"},{"issue":"4","key":"R13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"629","DOI":"10.1093\/jcr\/ucz013","article-title":"Resistance to medical artificial intelligence","volume":"46","author":"Longoni","journal-title":"J Consum Res"},{"issue":"9","key":"R14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/11510","article-title":"Patient and consumer safety risks when using conversational assistants for medical information: an observational study of Siri, Alexa, and Google Assistant","volume":"20","author":"Bickmore","journal-title":"J Med Internet Res"},{"key":"R15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/47479","article-title":"Reliability of medical information provided by ChatGPT: assessment against clinical guidelines and Patient Information Quality Instrument","volume":"25","author":"Walker","journal-title":"J Med Internet Res"},{"key":"R16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/60291","article-title":"Accuracy of prospective assessments of 4 large language model chatbot responses to patient questions about emergency care: experimental comparative study","volume":"26","author":"Yau","journal-title":"J Med Internet Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"R17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1037\/0033-2909.112.1.3","article-title":"The dependent personality: developmental, social, and clinical perspectives","volume":"112","author":"Bornstein","journal-title":"Psychol Bull"},{"issue":"2","key":"R18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"230","DOI":"10.1518\/001872097778543886","article-title":"Humans and automation: use, misuse, disuse, abuse","volume":"39","author":"Parasuraman","journal-title":"Hum Factors"},{"issue":"CSCW1","key":"R19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1145\/3449287","article-title":"To trust or to think: cognitive forcing functions can reduce overreliance on AI in AI-assisted decision-making","volume":"5","author":"Bu\u00e7inca","journal-title":"Proc ACM Hum Comput Interact"},{"issue":"4","key":"R20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"460","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jnlssr.2024.06.001","article-title":"Exploring the risks of automation bias in healthcare artificial intelligence applications: a Bowtie analysis","volume":"5","author":"Abdelwanis","journal-title":"J Saf Sci Resil"},{"issue":"1","key":"R21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/s41746-021-00385-9","article-title":"Do as AI say: susceptibility in deployment of clinical decision-aids","volume":"4","author":"Gaube","journal-title":"NPJ Digit Med"},{"key":"R22","unstructured":"Passi S Vorvoreanu M . Overreliance on AI: literature review. Microsoft Corporation; 2022. URL: https:\/\/www.microsoft.com\/en-Us\/research\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/Aether-Overreliance-on-AI-Review-Final-6.21.22.pdf [Accessed 26-08-2026]"},{"key":"R23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.techfore.2024.123389","article-title":"The impact of ChatGPT on human skills: a quantitative study on Twitter data","volume":"203","author":"Giordano","journal-title":"Technol Forecast Soc Change"},{"issue":"11","key":"R24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1730","DOI":"10.1080\/00140139.2023.2210793","article-title":"Automation complacency on the road","volume":"66","author":"Chu","journal-title":"Ergonomics"},{"issue":"9","key":"R25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1853","DOI":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2007.01.012","article-title":"How do patients evaluate and make use of online health information?","volume":"64","author":"Sillence","journal-title":"Soc Sci Med"},{"key":"R26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.chbr.2025.100845","article-title":"Generative artificial intelligence dependency: scale development, validation, and its motivational, behavioral, and psychological correlates","volume":"20","author":"Goh","journal-title":"Comput Hum Behav Rep"},{"issue":"1","key":"R27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"50","DOI":"10.1518\/hfes.46.1.50_30392","article-title":"Trust in automation: designing for appropriate reliance","volume":"46","author":"Lee","journal-title":"Hum Factors"},{"issue":"8","key":"R28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"7347","DOI":"10.1007\/s00146-026-03067-w","article-title":"Apologizing artificial intelligence: designing and evaluating effective AI apologies after errors","volume":"41","author":"Turel","journal-title":"AI & Soc"},{"key":"R29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/65567","article-title":"Trust and acceptance challenges in the adoption of AI applications in health care: quantitative survey analysis","volume":"27","author":"Kauttonen","journal-title":"J Med Internet Res"},{"key":"R30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/48600","article-title":"Acceptance of AI in health care for short- and long-term treatments: pilot development study of an integrated theoretical model","volume":"8","author":"Wichmann","journal-title":"JMIR Form Res"},{"key":"R31","unstructured":"Kahneman D . Attention and Effort. Prentice-Hall; 1973. ISBN: 0130505188"},{"key":"R32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pragma.2013.07.012","article-title":"Credibility and trust of information in online environments: the use of cognitive heuristics","volume":"59","author":"Metzger","journal-title":"J Pragmat"},{"issue":"1","key":"R33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"46","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02833.x","article-title":"The limited capacity model of mediated message processing","volume":"50","author":"Lang","journal-title":"J Commun"},{"issue":"3","key":"R34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/20563051231196871","article-title":"How do users examine online messages to determine if they are credible? An eye-tracking study of digital literacy, visual attention to metadata, and success in misinformation identification","volume":"9","author":"Steinfeld","journal-title":"Soc Media Soc"},{"key":"R35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chi EH Gumbrecht M Hong L . Visual foraging of highlighted text: an eye-tracking study. In: Jacko JA , editor. Human-Computer Interaction HCI Intelligent Multimodal Interaction Environments HCI 2007. Springer; 2007:589-598. [doi: 10.1007\/978-3-540-73110-8_64]","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-73110-8_64"},{"issue":"1","key":"R36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"111","DOI":"10.1007\/s10209-021-00827-x","article-title":"Effective highlighting modes of graphical user interfaces in visual information search","volume":"22","author":"Doi","journal-title":"Univ Access Inf Soc"},{"issue":"4","key":"R37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1369","DOI":"10.25300\/MISQ\/2022\/17961","article-title":"Prejudiced against the machine? Implicit associations and the transience of algorithm aversion","volume":"47","author":"Turel","journal-title":"MIS Q"},{"key":"R38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3389\/fcomp.2025.1662185","article-title":"Explicating the trust process for effective human interaction with artificial intelligence and machine learning systems","volume":"7","author":"Alarcon","journal-title":"Front Comput Sci"},{"issue":"3","key":"R39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"358","DOI":"10.1037\/h0036750","article-title":"Effectiveness of highlighting for retention of text material","volume":"59","author":"Fowler","journal-title":"J Appl Psychol"},{"issue":"1","key":"R40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"51","DOI":"10.1006\/ceps.1995.1003","article-title":"Effects of typographical cues on reading and recall of text","volume":"20","author":"Lorch","journal-title":"Contemp Educ Psychol"},{"key":"R41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.edurev.2017.11.001","article-title":"A meta-analysis of how signaling affects learning with media","volume":"23","author":"Schneider","journal-title":"Educ Res Rev"},{"issue":"3","key":"R42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3885","DOI":"10.1007\/s10639-024-12966-8","article-title":"The relationship between inert thinking and ChatGPT dependence: an I-PACE model perspective","volume":"30","author":"Ye","journal-title":"Educ Inf Technol"},{"issue":"1","key":"R43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.1177\/002224378101800104","article-title":"Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error","volume":"18","author":"Fornell","journal-title":"J Mark Res"},{"issue":"6","key":"R44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"589","DOI":"10.1001\/jamainternmed.2023.1838","article-title":"Comparing physician and artificial intelligence chatbot responses to patient questions posted to a public social media forum","volume":"183","author":"Ayers","journal-title":"JAMA Intern Med"}],"container-title":["Journal of Medical Internet Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,16]],"date-time":"2026-09-16T16:34:43Z","timestamp":1789576483000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.jmir.org\/2026\/1\/e98326"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,16]]},"references-count":44,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2196\/98326","relation":{},"ISSN":["1438-8871"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1438-8871","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,16]]},"article-number":"v28i4e98326"}}