{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,17]],"date-time":"2026-10-17T00:06:57Z","timestamp":1792195617395,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":67,"publisher":"JMIR Publications Inc.","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Med Internet Res"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"background\">\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Generative AI (GAI) is rapidly transforming research practices, including qualitative methods in health research. While these tools offer efficiency in processing large volumes of textual data, concerns remain regarding their methodological rigor, interpretive capacity, equity, and ethical implications.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"objective\">\n                    <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This rapid review aimed to synthesize the current evidence on the use of GAI in health-related qualitative research, focusing on its applications, performance relative to human analysis, and implications for rigor, ethics, and equity.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"methods\">\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>We conducted a rapid review following Joanna Briggs Institute and PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Peer-reviewed studies published between 2022 and December 2025 were identified through searches in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus. Eligible studies included qualitative or mixed methods research that used GAI tools (eg, ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude) during qualitative analysis, including studies that compared GAI-generated outputs with human researchers, coders, or traditional qualitative analytic approaches. Data were extracted using a structured template and synthesized descriptively. Study quality was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist. This rapid review was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; CRD420261280832). The review adhered to the registered PROSPERO protocol; no deviations occurred.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"results\">\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A total of 42 studies met the inclusion criteria; 71.4% (n=30) were published in 2025, and 81% (n=34) used qualitative designs. Thematic analysis (n=20, 40%) and content analysis (n=10, 20%) were the most common qualitative approaches. GAI was most applied during data familiarization, coding, and theme development, with ChatGPT being the most frequently reported GAI, accounting for nearly two-thirds of all model occurrences (n=37, 62.7%). Among studies evaluating GAI performance relative to human qualitative analysis, performance was strongest in inductive thematic and content analyses, with agreement often exceeding 80% for descriptive themes but dropping to approximately 30% for culturally nuanced themes. Several studies reported time to complete analyses up to 97% faster than human-led analyses. However, performance declined for reflexive and theory-driven analyses, particularly when interpreting culturally nuanced or emotionally complex data. Across studies, GAI improved efficiency but frequently produced superficial interpretations, misapplied theoretical frameworks, and generated occasional inaccuracies, including fabricated quotes. Human oversight was consistently identified as essential to ensure validity, contextual accuracy, and ethical integrity. Concerns related to bias, transparency, and data privacy were widely reported.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"conclusions\">\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>GAI can effectively support early-stage qualitative analysis and enhance efficiency in health research; however, it cannot replace the interpretive and reflexive functions central to qualitative inquiry. A hybrid human-AI approach is recommended, in which GAI assists with data processing while researchers retain responsibility for interpretation, contextualization, and ethical oversight. Future research should prioritize developing guidelines that address equity, transparency, and responsible integration of GAI into qualitative methodologies.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.2196\/98551","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,2]],"date-time":"2026-09-02T14:39:55Z","timestamp":1788359995000},"page":"e98551-e98551","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Generative Artificial Intelligence for Qualitative Methods in Health Research: Rapid Review"],"prefix":"10.2196","volume":"28","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9970-9356","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ra\u00fal D","family":"Gierbolini-Rivera","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2340-6671","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Milena","family":"Franco Silva","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0442-4938","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Alexandre","family":"Augusto de Paula da Silva","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4260-2205","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ross C","family":"Brownson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9797-6231","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Diana C","family":"Parra","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5971-9189","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Maura M","family":"Kepper","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8417-1656","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Amy A","family":"Eyler","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1010","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,31]]},"reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"R1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.15367\/vd6f8w75","article-title":"AI-empowered qualitative data analysis","volume":"6","author":"Wheldon","journal-title":"CH"},{"issue":"4","key":"R2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"237","DOI":"10.1177\/17579139221083814","article-title":"The value of qualitative methods to public health research, policy and practice","volume":"142","author":"Stickley","journal-title":"Perspect Public Health"},{"key":"R3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Owoahene Acheampong I Nyaaba M . Review of qualitative research in the era of generative artificial intelligence. SSRN. [doi: 10.2139\/ssrn.4686920]","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.4686920"},{"key":"R4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.chbah.2025.100144","article-title":"Harnessing the power of AI in qualitative research: exploring, using and redesigning ChatGPT","volume":"4","author":"Zhang","journal-title":"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans"},{"issue":"1","key":"R5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"63","DOI":"10.1007\/s12525-023-00680-1","article-title":"Generative artificial intelligence","volume":"33","author":"Banh","journal-title":"Electron Markets"},{"key":"R6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/10778004251401851","article-title":"We reject the use of generative artificial intelligence for reflexive qualitative research","author":"Jowsey","journal-title":"Qualitative Inquiry"},{"key":"R7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/54482","article-title":"Comparing the efficacy and efficiency of human and generative AI: qualitative thematic analyses","volume":"3","author":"Prescott","journal-title":"JMIR AI"},{"key":"R8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/71521","article-title":"Evaluating ChatGPT in qualitative thematic analysis with human researchers in the Japanese clinical context and its cultural interpretation challenges: comparative qualitative study","volume":"27","author":"Sakaguchi","journal-title":"J Med Internet Res"},{"issue":"2-3","key":"R9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"166","DOI":"10.1177\/10497323251365198","article-title":"Generative artificial intelligence and the craft of qualitative health research: observations from a techno-negative stance","volume":"36","author":"Monforte","journal-title":"Qual Health Res"},{"key":"R10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.48550\/arXiv.2506.08872v2","article-title":"Your brain on ChatGPT: accumulation of cognitive debt when using an AI assistant for essay writing task","author":"Kosmyna","journal-title":"arXiv"},{"issue":"1","key":"R11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"6","DOI":"10.3390\/soc15010006","article-title":"AI tools in society: impacts on cognitive offloading and the future of critical thinking","volume":"15","author":"Gerlich","journal-title":"Societies"},{"key":"R12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.24215\/18509959.37.e24","article-title":"Artificial. La nueva inteligencia y el contorno de lo humano","author":"Dellepiane","journal-title":"TEyET"},{"key":"R13","unstructured":"Sigman M Bilinkis S . Artificial: La Nueva Inteligencia y El Contorno de Lo Humano. Debate; 2023. ISBN: 9788419642806"},{"issue":"5","key":"R14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1433","DOI":"10.1111\/isj.12504","article-title":"The ethics of using generative AI for qualitative data analysis","volume":"34","author":"Davison","journal-title":"Information Systems Journal"},{"key":"R15","unstructured":"Brereton E . Colleges and universities offer faculty development for AI use in the classroom. EdTech Magazine. 2025. URL: https:\/\/edtechmagazine.com\/higher\/article\/2025\/05\/colleges-and-universities-offer-faculty-development-ai-use-classroom [Accessed 25-07-2026]"},{"key":"R16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.n71","article-title":"The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews","volume":"372","author":"Page","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"4","key":"R17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"944","DOI":"10.11124\/JBIES-21-00371","article-title":"Rapid reviews and the methodological rigor of evidence synthesis: a JBI position statement","volume":"20","author":"Tricco","journal-title":"JBI Evid Synth"},{"issue":"10","key":"R18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1435","DOI":"10.1177\/1049732312452938","article-title":"Beyond PICO: the SPIDER tool for qualitative evidence synthesis","volume":"22","author":"Cooke","journal-title":"Qual Health Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"R19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s13643-016-0384-4","article-title":"Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews","volume":"5","author":"Ouzzani","journal-title":"Syst Rev"},{"key":"R20","unstructured":"CASP Qualitative Studies Checklist. CASP. URL: https:\/\/casp-uk.net\/casp-tools-checklists\/qualitative-studies-checklist\/ [Accessed 03-02-2026]"},{"issue":"1","key":"R21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1177\/2632084320947559","article-title":"Optimising the value of the critical appraisal skills programme (CASP) tool for quality appraisal in qualitative evidence synthesis","volume":"1","author":"Long","journal-title":"Research Methods in Medicine & Health Sciences"},{"key":"R22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3389\/fpubh.2025.1512537","article-title":"Deductively coding psychosocial autopsy interview data using a few-shot learning large language model","volume":"13","author":"Balt","journal-title":"Front Public Health"},{"key":"R23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/64447","article-title":"Large language models for thematic summarization in qualitative health care research: comparative analysis of model and human performance","volume":"4","author":"Castellanos","journal-title":"JMIR AI"},{"issue":"2-3","key":"R24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"191","DOI":"10.1177\/10497323251365211","article-title":"Reflecting on LLM support in reflexive thematic analysis: an exploratory study","volume":"36","author":"Vikan","journal-title":"Qual Health Res"},{"key":"R25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/62909","article-title":"Summarizing online patient conversations using generative language models: experimental and comparative study","volume":"13","author":"Nair","journal-title":"JMIR Med Inform"},{"issue":"4","key":"R26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"620","DOI":"10.18999\/nagjms.86.4.620","article-title":"A mixed-methods study comparing human-led and ChatGPT-driven qualitative analysis in medical education research","volume":"86","author":"Kondo","journal-title":"Nagoya J Med Sci"},{"key":"R27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3233\/SHTI240530","article-title":"Applying large language models to interpret qualitative interviews in healthcare","volume":"316","author":"Wosny","journal-title":"Stud Health Technol Inform"},{"issue":"3","key":"R28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/aphw.70038","article-title":"Generative AI for thematic analysis in a maternal health study: coding semistructured interviews using large language models","volume":"17","author":"Qiao","journal-title":"Appl Psychol Health Well Being"},{"key":"R29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/20552076251337345","article-title":"Exploring large language models for summarizing and interpreting an online brain tumor support forum","volume":"11","author":"Muasher-Kerwin","journal-title":"Digit Health"},{"issue":"9","key":"R30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"951","DOI":"10.1177\/10497323241244669","article-title":"Prompts, pearls, imperfections: comparing ChatGPT and a human researcher in qualitative data analysis","volume":"35","author":"Wachinger","journal-title":"Qual Health Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"R31","first-page":"126","volume":"35","author":"Ferguson","journal-title":"Issues Educ Res"},{"issue":"2-3","key":"R32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"206","DOI":"10.1177\/10497323251321712","article-title":"Query-based analysis: a strategy for analyzing qualitative data using ChatGPT","volume":"36","author":"Morgan","journal-title":"Qual Health Res"},{"key":"R33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/76335","article-title":"Free-text responses in a nationally representative experimental survey about end-of-life care choices: ChatGPT-4o-assisted qualitative analytical study","volume":"8","author":"Goldberg","journal-title":"JMIR Aging"},{"key":"R34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/69892","article-title":"Exploring young adults\u2019 experiences and beliefs in asthma medication management: pilot qualitative study comparing human and multiple AI thematic analysis","volume":"9","author":"Jeminiwa","journal-title":"JMIR Form Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"R35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/s41746-025-01747-3","article-title":"When investigator meets large language models: a qualitative analysis of cancer patient decision-making journeys","volume":"8","author":"Shanwetter Levit","journal-title":"NPJ Digit Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"R36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"205","DOI":"10.1080\/17538068.2025.2487378","article-title":"A comparative analysis of CDC and AI-generated health information using computer-aided text analysis","volume":"18","author":"Young","journal-title":"J Commun Healthc"},{"issue":"1","key":"R37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"171","DOI":"10.1007\/s44163-025-00441-3","article-title":"Can large language models be used to code text for thematic analysis? An explorative study","volume":"5","author":"Han","journal-title":"Discov Artif Intell"},{"issue":"10","key":"R38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.95719","article-title":"Evaluating Microsoft Copilot in qualitative health research: accurate for manifest content coding but limited in latent interpretation","volume":"17","author":"Lund-Tonnesen","journal-title":"Cureus"},{"issue":"5","key":"R39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/jamiaopen\/ooaf102","article-title":"Automating inductive thematic analyses of health content using large language models: a proof-of-concept study using social media data","volume":"8","author":"Hairston","journal-title":"JAMIA Open"},{"key":"R40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/59641","article-title":"Large language models can enable inductive thematic analysis of a social media corpus in a single prompt: human validation study","volume":"4","author":"Deiner","journal-title":"JMIR Infodemiology"},{"key":"R41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/70122","article-title":"A practical guide and assessment on using ChatGPT to conduct grounded theory: tutorial","volume":"27","author":"Yue","journal-title":"J Med Internet Res"},{"key":"R42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pecinn.2024.100371","article-title":"\u201cHaving providers who are trained and have empathy is life-saving\u201d: improving primary care communication through thematic analysis with ChatGPT and human expertise","volume":"6","author":"Stage","journal-title":"PEC Innov"},{"issue":"2","key":"R43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"161","DOI":"10.1037\/spq0000715","article-title":"Human versus machine: a comparative analysis of qualitative coding by humans and ChatGPT-4","volume":"41","author":"Lockwood","journal-title":"Sch Psychol"},{"issue":"11","key":"R44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3394","DOI":"10.1007\/s10461-025-04786-9","article-title":"HIV prevention and treatment information from four artificial intelligence platforms: a thematic analysis","volume":"29","author":"Beegle","journal-title":"AIDS Behav"},{"issue":"3","key":"R45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"294","DOI":"10.1097\/JNC.0000000000000468","article-title":"\u201cWhat did you say, ChatGPT?\u201d The use of AI in Black Women\u2019s HIV self-education: an inductive qualitative data analysis","volume":"35","author":"Chandler","journal-title":"J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care"},{"issue":"3","key":"R46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"488","DOI":"10.1177\/08944393251349541","article-title":"A practical guide and case study on how to instruct LLMs for automated coding during content analysis","volume":"44","author":"Farjam","journal-title":"Soc Sci Comput Rev"},{"issue":"1","key":"R47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s13049-024-01266-2","article-title":"Evaluating the accuracy and reliability of AI chatbots in disseminating the content of current resuscitation guidelines: a comparative analysis between the ERC 2021 guidelines and both ChatGPTs 3.5 and 4","volume":"32","author":"Beck","journal-title":"Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med"},{"key":"R48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/59050","article-title":"ChatGPT for automated qualitative research: content analysis","volume":"26","author":"Bijker","journal-title":"J Med Internet Res"},{"key":"R49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/52499","article-title":"Using large language models to support content analysis: a case study of ChatGPT for adverse event detection","volume":"26","author":"Leas","journal-title":"J Med Internet Res"},{"key":"R50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cmpb.2024.108356","article-title":"Inductive thematic analysis of healthcare qualitative interviews using open-source large language models: How does it compare to traditional methods?","volume":"255","author":"Mathis","journal-title":"Comput Methods Programs Biomed"},{"issue":"2","key":"R51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"354","DOI":"10.1038\/s41433-024-03419-0","article-title":"Unravelling ChatGPT\u2019s potential in summarising qualitative in-depth interviews","volume":"39","author":"Kon","journal-title":"Eye (Lond)"},{"key":"R52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/66896","article-title":"Assessing the adherence of ChatGPT chatbots to public health guidelines for smoking cessation: content analysis","volume":"27","author":"Abroms","journal-title":"J Med Internet Res"},{"issue":"2-3","key":"R53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"231","DOI":"10.1177\/10497323251367177","article-title":"To leave or stay? Influences on early exit and completion in a New Zealand residential drug rehabilitation service","volume":"36","author":"Chubb","journal-title":"Qual Health Res"},{"issue":"3","key":"R54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/sdr.1772","article-title":"Integrating AI language models in qualitative research: replicating interview data analysis with ChatGPT","volume":"40","author":"Jalali","journal-title":"Syst Dyn Rev"},{"key":"R55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/56500","article-title":"Comparing GPT-4 and human researchers in health care data analysis: qualitative description study","volume":"26","author":"Li","journal-title":"J Med Internet Res"},{"issue":"12","key":"R56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5247","DOI":"10.1007\/s11695-025-08341-2","article-title":"Clinical obesity through the lens of context-aware large language models","volume":"35","author":"Kermansaravi","journal-title":"Obes Surg"},{"key":"R57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/55762","article-title":"Assessing the accuracy of generative conversational artificial intelligence in debunking sleep health myths: mixed methods comparative study with expert analysis","volume":"8","author":"Bragazzi","journal-title":"JMIR Form Res"},{"key":"R58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/78625","article-title":"Evaluating large language models and retrieval-augmented generation enhancement for delivering guideline-adherent nutrition information for cardiovascular disease prevention: cross-sectional study","volume":"27","author":"Parameswaran","journal-title":"J Med Internet Res"},{"issue":"2-3","key":"R59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"218","DOI":"10.1177\/10497323251359445","article-title":"Human analysis vs. artificial intelligence: analyzing of qualitative medical students\u2019 narratives","volume":"36","author":"Misgav","journal-title":"Qual Health Res"},{"issue":"7","key":"R60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"821","DOI":"10.1089\/tmj.2024.0555","article-title":"Artificial intelligence and qualitative analysis of emergency department telemental health care implementation survey","volume":"31","author":"Keating","journal-title":"Telemed J E Health"},{"issue":"1","key":"R61","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12889-025-23206-0","article-title":"Assessing the accuracy and explainability of using ChatGPT to evaluate the quality of health news","volume":"25","author":"Liu","journal-title":"BMC Public Health"},{"issue":"1","key":"R62","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.2105\/AJPH.2007.126847","article-title":"The importance of external validity","volume":"98","author":"Steckler","journal-title":"Am J Public Health"},{"issue":"3","key":"R63","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"92","DOI":"10.1177\/15562646241262659","article-title":"The ethics of using artificial intelligence in qualitative research","volume":"19","author":"Marshall","journal-title":"J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics"},{"issue":"1","key":"R64","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"38","DOI":"10.1093\/polsoc\/puae040","article-title":"Responsible governance of generative AI: conceptualizing GenAI as complex adaptive systems","volume":"44","author":"Janssen","journal-title":"Policy and Society"},{"issue":"1","key":"R65","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1093\/polsoc\/puaf001","article-title":"Governance of generative AI","volume":"44","author":"Taeihagh","journal-title":"Policy and Society"},{"key":"R66","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"LaFrance J . Governing generative artificial intelligence: institutional policies and guidelines at America\u2019s flagship universities. Educational Policy. 2026. [doi: 10.1177\/08959048261450995]","DOI":"10.1177\/08959048261450995"},{"key":"R67","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ese.2024.100520","article-title":"A social-environmental impact perspective of generative artificial intelligence","volume":"23","author":"Hosseini","journal-title":"Environmental Science and Ecotechnology"}],"container-title":["Journal of Medical Internet Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,9]],"date-time":"2026-09-09T14:51:29Z","timestamp":1788965489000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.jmir.org\/2026\/1\/e98551"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,31]]},"references-count":67,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2196\/98551","relation":{},"ISSN":["1438-8871"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1438-8871","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,31]]},"article-number":"v28i1e98551"}}