{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,8]],"date-time":"2026-08-08T01:44:07Z","timestamp":1786153447492,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":74,"publisher":"JMIR Publications Inc.","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["JMIR Res Protoc"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"background\">\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Quality indicators in primary care remain predominantly disease-specific and professionally defined, with limited incorporation of what matters most to people living with multiple long-term conditions (MLTCs) and their caregivers. Existing frameworks and quality standards provide important conceptual direction, but few produce a pragmatic set of ready-to-use indicators.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"objective\">\n                    <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This study aims to codevelop a disease-agnostic set of quality of care indicators with people living with MLTCs, caregivers, and health care professionals, including preliminary operational specifications to support future feasibility testing and service improvement in general practices within the National Health Service in England.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"methods\">\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This protocol describes a 3-round modified RAND\/UCLA Appropriateness Method (RAM) study. The first round will evaluate the importance of candidate indicators through an online questionnaire to an expert panel of patients, caregivers, and health care professionals. Indicators without agreement or requiring revision will proceed to a structured consensus meeting (round 2) with subsequent rerating rounds (round 3) for feasibility and measurability.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"results\">\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>As of July 2026, 10 patient and caregiver participants and 12 health care professionals have consented to join an expert panel. The expected RAM study completion, including data analysis and reporting, is early 2027. Fifty-four candidate quality indicators have been generated through triangulation of findings between a scoping review of published quality indicators in MLTCs and a qualitative study with 21 patients and caregivers with lived experience of MLTCs. Ongoing patient and public involvement and engagement with four community partners have further informed the study design, interpretation of multistage findings, and refinement of candidate indicators. The indicators have been mapped to a structure-process-outcome quality framework and will be taken forward into a modified 3-staged RAM study.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec sec-type=\"conclusions\">\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This study will generate a co-designed and implementation-oriented set of primary care quality indicators for MLTCs. The final indicator set is intended to support future measurement, quality improvement, and later field testing in real-world primary care systems.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.2196\/99217","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,22]],"date-time":"2026-07-22T08:40:07Z","timestamp":1784709607000},"page":"e99217-e99217","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Codeveloping a Set of Quality of Care Indicators for People Living With Multiple Long-Term Conditions in Primary Care: Protocol for a Modified RAND\/UCLA Study"],"prefix":"10.2196","volume":"15","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8684-8939","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Sara","family":"Tavares","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9709-7264","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Thomas","family":"Beaney","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4902-4105","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Arad","family":"Reisberg","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ania","family":"Henley","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Angela","family":"Edwards","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"David","family":"Belsey","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9563-7113","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Laura","family":"Downey","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1010","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,7]]},"reference":[{"issue":"9","key":"R1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e447","DOI":"10.1016\/S2468-2667(18)30118-X","article-title":"Forecasting the care needs of the older population in England over the next 20 years: estimates from the Population Ageing and Care Simulation (PACSim) modelling study","volume":"3","author":"Kingston","journal-title":"Lancet Public Health"},{"key":"R2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pmedr.2018.10.008","article-title":"The global burden of multiple chronic conditions: a narrative review","volume":"12","author":"Hajat","journal-title":"Prev Med Rep"},{"key":"R3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eclinm.2023.101860","article-title":"Global and regional prevalence of multimorbidity in the adult population in community settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis","volume":"57","author":"Chowdhury","journal-title":"EClinicalMedicine"},{"issue":"597","key":"R4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e297","DOI":"10.3399\/bjgp12X636146","article-title":"Multimorbidity in primary care: a systematic review of prospective cohort studies","volume":"62","author":"France","journal-title":"Br J Gen Pract"},{"key":"R5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arr.2019.04.005","article-title":"Multimorbidity and quality of life: systematic literature review and meta-analysis","volume":"53","author":"Makovski","journal-title":"Ageing Res Rev"},{"issue":"9836","key":"R6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"37","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(12)60240-2","article-title":"Epidemiology of multimorbidity and implications for health care, research, and medical education: a cross-sectional study","volume":"380","author":"Barnett","journal-title":"The Lancet"},{"key":"R7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/26335565241240820","article-title":"Perceptions and experiences of living with and providing care for multimorbidity: a qualitative interview study","volume":"14","author":"Simpson","journal-title":"J Multimorb Comorb"},{"issue":"5","key":"R8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1081","DOI":"10.1111\/hex.12081","article-title":"Drivers of overall satisfaction with primary care: evidence from the English General Practice Patient Survey","volume":"18","author":"Paddison","journal-title":"Health Expect"},{"issue":"4","key":"R9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"358","DOI":"10.1136\/qhc.11.4.358","article-title":"Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care","volume":"11","author":"Campbell","journal-title":"Qual Saf Health Care"},{"issue":"1","key":"R10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12875-024-02586-z","article-title":"Treatment burden in multimorbidity: an integrative review","volume":"25","author":"Lee","journal-title":"BMC Prim Care"},{"issue":"1","key":"R11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12889-024-20763-8","article-title":"The impact of living with multiple long-term conditions (multimorbidity) on everyday life\u2014a qualitative evidence synthesis","volume":"24","author":"Holland","journal-title":"BMC Public Health"},{"issue":"11","key":"R12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"875","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjqs-2018-008593","article-title":"Patients\u2019 perspective on how to improve the care of people with chronic conditions in France: a citizen science study within the ComPaRe e-cohort","volume":"28","author":"Tran","journal-title":"BMJ Qual Saf"},{"issue":"2","key":"R13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2019-033445","article-title":"Priorities of patients with multimorbidity and of clinicians regarding treatment and health outcomes: a systematic mixed studies review","volume":"10","author":"Sathanapally","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"issue":"3","key":"R14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"289","DOI":"10.1111\/joim.12881","article-title":"Quality of care assessment for people with multimorbidity","volume":"285","author":"Valderas","journal-title":"J Intern Med"},{"issue":"6","key":"R15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1311","DOI":"10.1111\/hex.12571","article-title":"\u201cIt\u2019s a fight to get anything you need\u201d\u2014Accessing care in the community from the perspectives of people with multimorbidity","volume":"20","author":"Ho","journal-title":"Health Expect"},{"issue":"4","key":"R16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjoq-2025-003477","article-title":"A systematic review of international performance indicators and metrics relevant to UK general practice","volume":"14","author":"Chambers","journal-title":"BMJ Open Qual"},{"key":"R17","unstructured":"CKS via NICE is only available to eligible users within the UK. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). 2023. URL: https:\/\/cks.nice.org.uk\/topics\/multimorbidity\/goals-outcome-measures\/nice-quality-standards\/ [Accessed 29-07-2023]"},{"key":"R18","unstructured":"Quality and outcomes framework guidance for 2026\/27. NHS England; 2026. URL: https:\/\/www.england.nhs.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/prn02356-quality-outcomes-framework-guidance-2026-27-july-update.pdf [Accessed 29-07-2026]"},{"issue":"5","key":"R19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"778","DOI":"10.1177\/0898264317691166","article-title":"Perspectives of patients, clinicians, and health system leaders on changes needed to improve the health care and outcomes of older adults with multiple chronic conditions","volume":"30","author":"Ferris","journal-title":"J Aging Health"},{"issue":"2","key":"R20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"147","DOI":"10.1177\/1742395310393365","article-title":"Shifting priorities in multimorbidity: a longitudinal qualitative study of patient\u2019s prioritization of multiple conditions","volume":"7","author":"Morris","journal-title":"Chronic Illn"},{"issue":"5","key":"R21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"368","DOI":"10.2471\/BLT.16.179309","article-title":"Understanding and measuring quality of care: dealing with complexity","volume":"95","author":"Hanefeld","journal-title":"Bull World Health Organ"},{"issue":"9","key":"R22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1839","DOI":"10.1111\/jgs.14248","article-title":"Using electronic health record data to measure care quality for individuals with multiple chronic medical conditions","volume":"64","author":"Bayliss","journal-title":"J Am Geriatr Soc"},{"issue":"8","key":"R23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2021-060441","article-title":"Informing the implementation and use of person-centred quality indicators: a mixed methods study on the readiness, barriers and facilitators to implementation in Canada","volume":"12","author":"Manalili","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"issue":"4","key":"R24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E643","DOI":"10.9778\/cmajo.20170143","article-title":"Identifying Canadian patient-centred care measurement practices and quality indicators: a survey","volume":"6","author":"Doktorchik","journal-title":"CMAJ Open"},{"issue":"1","key":"R25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12913-023-09604-3","article-title":"Developing quality indicators for cross-sectoral psycho-oncology in Germany: combining the RAND\/UCLA appropriateness method with a Delphi technique","volume":"23","author":"Derendorf","journal-title":"BMC Health Serv Res"},{"issue":"9","key":"R26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2023-072232","article-title":"Development of practice-based quality indicators for the primary care of older adults: a RAND\/UCLA Appropriateness Method study protocol","volume":"13","author":"Correia","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"issue":"1","key":"R27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12913-016-1941-1","article-title":"Quality indicators for the referral process from primary to specialised mental health care: an explorative study in accordance with the RAND appropriateness method","volume":"17","author":"Hartveit","journal-title":"BMC Health Serv Res"},{"issue":"10","key":"R28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2020-037323","article-title":"Improving the quality of person-centred healthcare from the patient perspective: development of person-centred quality indicators","volume":"10","author":"Santana","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"issue":"2","key":"R29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjoq-2022-002156","article-title":"Development of quality indicators for the diagnosis and treatment of urinary tract infections in general practice: a RAND appropriateness method","volume":"12","author":"Saust","journal-title":"BMJ Open Qual"},{"issue":"4","key":"R30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"291","DOI":"10.1080\/00015385.2018.1492659","article-title":"Defining quality indicators for heart failure in general practice","volume":"74","author":"Smets","journal-title":"Acta Cardiol"},{"issue":"1","key":"R31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12882-020-01788-8","article-title":"Developing quality indicators for chronic kidney disease in primary care, extractable from the electronic medical record. A RAND-modified Delphi method","volume":"21","author":"Van den Bulck","journal-title":"BMC Nephrol"},{"issue":"1","key":"R32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjhci-2021-100469","article-title":"Towards a harmonised framework for developing quality of care indicators for global health: a scoping review of existing conceptual and methodological practices","volume":"29","author":"Dudley","journal-title":"BMJ Health Care Inform"},{"key":"R33","unstructured":"Fitch KB Bernstein SJ Aguilar MD et al. The RAND\/UCLA appropriateness method user\u2019s manual. RAND Corporation; 2001. URL: https:\/\/www.rand.org\/content\/dam\/rand\/pubs\/monograph_reports\/2011\/MR1269.pdf [Accessed 29-07-2026]"},{"issue":"8","key":"R34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0304651","article-title":"Delphi studies in social and health sciences\u2014recommendations for an interdisciplinary standardized reporting (DELPHISTAR). Results of a Delphi study","volume":"19","author":"Niederberger","journal-title":"PLOS One"},{"issue":"5","key":"R35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"369","DOI":"10.1080\/01446193.2021.1894654","article-title":"Applying constructivist grounded theory in co-production research: a case study exploring its potential and lessons for construction management research","volume":"39","author":"Rodr\u00edguez-Labajos","journal-title":"Constr Manag Econ"},{"issue":"9","key":"R36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"255","DOI":"10.3390\/socsci8090255","article-title":"Pragmatism as a research paradigm and its implications for social work research","volume":"8","author":"Kaushik","journal-title":"Soc Sci"},{"issue":"6","key":"R37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"797","DOI":"10.1002\/sres.2739","article-title":"Pragmatism in professional practice","volume":"38","author":"Ormerod","journal-title":"Syst Res Behav Sci"},{"issue":"4","key":"R38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"14","DOI":"10.7748\/nr.2018.e1466","article-title":"Introduction to positivism, interpretivism and critical theory","volume":"25","author":"Ryan","journal-title":"Nurse Res"},{"key":"R39","unstructured":"Improving how we partner with patients, carers and the public. NIHR (National Institute for Health and Care Research). 2024. URL: https:\/\/www.nihr.ac.uk\/about-us\/what-we-do\/improving-partner-patients-carers-public [Accessed 29-07-2026]"},{"key":"R40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.j3453","article-title":"GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research","volume":"358","author":"Staniszewska","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"1","key":"R41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2018-023596","article-title":"Measuring patient-centred system performance: a scoping review of patient-centred care quality indicators","volume":"9","author":"Santana","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"issue":"3","key":"R42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/intqhc\/mzab107","article-title":"What makes a good quality indicator set? A systematic review of criteria","volume":"33","author":"Schang","journal-title":"Int J Qual Health Care"},{"key":"R43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/26335565261451686","article-title":"The content and processes of patient-derived quality of care indicators for people living with multiple long-term conditions (MLTC): a scoping review","volume":"16","author":"Tavares","journal-title":"J Multimorb Comorb"},{"issue":"4","key":"R44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"116","DOI":"10.5662\/wjm.v11.i4.116","article-title":"Delphi methodology in healthcare research: how to decide its appropriateness","volume":"11","author":"Nasa","journal-title":"World J Methodol"},{"key":"R45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.mex.2021.101401","article-title":"Preparing, conducting, and analyzing Delphi surveys: cross-disciplinary practices, new directions, and advancements","volume":"8","author":"Beiderbeck","journal-title":"MethodsX"},{"issue":"5","key":"R46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"398","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ypmed.2012.07.003","article-title":"Qualitative research sample design and sample size: resolving and unresolved issues and inferential imperatives","volume":"55","author":"Trotter","journal-title":"Prev Med"},{"key":"R47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2020.09.034","article-title":"Two different invitation approaches for consecutive rounds of a Delphi survey led to comparable final outcome","volume":"129","author":"Boel","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"issue":"12","key":"R48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1743","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.260.12.1743","article-title":"The quality of care. How can it be assessed?","volume":"260","author":"Donabedian","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"5","key":"R49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1159","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-018-1829-0","article-title":"COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study","volume":"27","author":"Terwee","journal-title":"Qual Life Res"},{"key":"R50","unstructured":"Quentin W Partanen VM Brownwood I Klazinga N . Measuring healthcare quality. In: Busse R Klazinga N Panteli D Quentin W , editors. Improving Healthcare Quality in Europe: Characteristics, Effectiveness and Implementation of Different Strategies. European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2019:39-63. URL: https:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/books\/NBK549260\/ [Accessed 29-07-2026]"},{"key":"R51","unstructured":"Busse R Klazinga N Panteli D Quentin W , editors. Improving Healthcare Quality in Europe: Characteristics, Effectiveness and Implementation of Different Strategies. European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2019. ISBN: 9789289051750"},{"key":"R52","unstructured":"Building a roadmad from patient-reported outcome measures to patient-reported outcome performance measures. National Quality Forum (NQF); 2021. URL: https:\/\/digitalassets.jointcommission.org\/api\/public\/content\/c0c7bed4c69b41eb9c782bf1fbc8ed3e?v=09abe566 [Accessed 29-07-2026]"},{"issue":"8","key":"R53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/33898","article-title":"Planning and reporting effective web-based RAND\/UCLA appropriateness method panels: literature review and preliminary recommendations","volume":"24","author":"Sparks","journal-title":"J Med Internet Res"},{"issue":"4","key":"R54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2018-024942","article-title":"Reporting quality of the Delphi technique in reporting guidelines: a protocol for a systematic analysis of the EQUATOR Network Library","volume":"9","author":"Banno","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"R55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.techfore.2017.10.005","article-title":"The future and social impact of Big Data Analytics in Supply Chain Management: results from a Delphi study","volume":"130","author":"Ro\u00dfmann","journal-title":"Technol Forecast Soc Change"},{"issue":"4","key":"R56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"293","DOI":"10.1136\/jech.35.4.293","article-title":"Investigating non-response bias in mail surveys","volume":"35","author":"Sheikh","journal-title":"J Epidemiol Community Health"},{"issue":"6","key":"R57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"741","DOI":"10.1177\/1049732316631510","article-title":"In-person versus online focus group discussions: a comparative analysis of data quality","volume":"26","author":"Woodyatt","journal-title":"Qual Health Res"},{"issue":"12","key":"R58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3147","DOI":"10.1007\/s11606-022-07454-z","article-title":"Quality indicators for high-need patients: a systematic review","volume":"37","author":"Schneberk","journal-title":"J Gen Intern Med"},{"issue":"8","key":"R59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1135","DOI":"10.1093\/geront\/gnac013","article-title":"Measuring the quality of care for older adults with multimorbidity: results of the MULTIqual project","volume":"62","author":"Schulze","journal-title":"Gerontologist"},{"key":"R60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2147\/PPA.S39803","article-title":"Involving patients in quality indicator development\u2014a systematic review","volume":"7","author":"K\u00f6tter","journal-title":"Patient Prefer Adherence"},{"issue":"9","key":"R61","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2021-051066","article-title":"Patient participation in Delphi surveys to develop core outcome sets: systematic review","volume":"11","author":"Barrington","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"R62","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2147\/PPA.S74064","article-title":"The professional perspective on patient involvement in the development of quality indicators: a qualitative analysis using the example of chronic heart failure in the German health care setting","volume":"9","author":"Pohontsch","journal-title":"Patient Prefer Adherence"},{"issue":"8","key":"R63","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"529","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjqs-2024-017301","article-title":"Development of the Patient-Reported Indicator Surveys (PaRIS) conceptual framework to monitor and improve the performance of primary care for people living with chronic conditions","volume":"34","author":"Valderas","journal-title":"BMJ Qual Saf"},{"issue":"12","key":"R64","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1057","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjqs.2010.048371","article-title":"Identifying unintended consequences of quality indicators: a qualitative study","volume":"20","author":"Lester","journal-title":"BMJ Qual Saf"},{"issue":"1","key":"R65","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12916-023-02856-0","article-title":"Validation of patient- and GP-reported core sets of quality indicators for older adults with multimorbidity in primary care: results of the cross-sectional observational MULTIqual validation study","volume":"21","author":"Sch\u00e4fer","journal-title":"BMC Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"R66","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"484","DOI":"10.1093\/eurpub\/ckr165","article-title":"The validity of indicators for assessing quality of care: a review of the European literature on hospital readmission rate","volume":"22","author":"Fischer","journal-title":"Eur J Public Health"},{"issue":"1","key":"R67","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.1016\/j.healthpol.2017.06.002","article-title":"The SELFIE framework for integrated care for multi-morbidity: development and description","volume":"122","author":"Leijten","journal-title":"Health Policy"},{"issue":"3","key":"R68","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"102516","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ipm.2021.102516","article-title":"What patients like or dislike in physicians: analyzing drivers of patient satisfaction and dissatisfaction using a digital topic modeling approach","volume":"58","author":"Shah","journal-title":"Inf Process Manag"},{"issue":"7","key":"R69","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"577","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjqs-2020-011219","article-title":"Priorities to improve the care for chronic conditions and multimorbidity: a survey of patients and stakeholders nested within the ComPaRe e-cohort","volume":"30","author":"Tran","journal-title":"BMJ Qual Saf"},{"issue":"10","key":"R70","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2020-037547","article-title":"Comparing patients\u2019 and other stakeholders\u2019 preferences for outcomes of integrated care for multimorbidity: a discrete choice experiment in eight European countries","volume":"10","author":"Rutten-van M\u00f6lken","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"R71","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.q230","article-title":"Is consensus attainable on the definition of multiple long term conditions?","volume":"384","author":"Beaney","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"R72","unstructured":"Structured medication reviews and medicines optimisation. NHS England. 2026. URL: https:\/\/www.england.nhs.uk\/primary-care\/pharmacy\/smr\/ [Accessed 29-07-2026]"},{"key":"R73","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/21501319251363783","article-title":"RADAR-ES: a methodological framework for conducting environmental scans in health services delivery research","volume":"16","author":"Nagel","journal-title":"J Prim Care Community Health"},{"issue":"1195","key":"R74","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"481","DOI":"10.1093\/postmj\/qgae166","article-title":"Using freedom of information requests to access novel data sources in health professions education research","volume":"101","author":"Yale","journal-title":"Postgrad Med J"}],"container-title":["JMIR Research Protocols"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,8]],"date-time":"2026-08-08T01:13:05Z","timestamp":1786151585000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.researchprotocols.org\/2026\/1\/e99217"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,7]]},"references-count":74,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2196\/99217","relation":{},"ISSN":["1929-0748"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1929-0748","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,7]]},"article-number":"v15i9e99217"}}