{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,25]],"date-time":"2025-06-25T07:32:32Z","timestamp":1750836752981},"reference-count":51,"publisher":"Becaris Publishing Limited","issue":"2","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J. Compar. Effect. Res."],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,3]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>Cardiac catheterization and coronary intervention via the radial approach is increasingly adopted as the preferred vascular access to avoid transfemoral vascular complications. Recent clinical trials have confirmed that radial access reduces vascular complications and local bleeding with similar procedural efficacy. Transradial access has inherent technical challenges, including smaller vessel size of the radial artery, arterial spasm and tortuosity involving the radial and subclavian arteries, which may undermine the procedural success of this approach. A number of strategies have been reported to minimize complications of radial access, including the use of hydrophilic introducer sheaths and smaller sheath sizes, administration of nitroglycerin and unfractionated heparin during the procedure, patent hemostasis of the radial artery and careful patient selection. Operators experienced in transradial percutaneous coronary intervention can achieve comparable clinical outcomes to the transfemoral approach and minimize vascular complications. Radial artery access is likely to become widely accepted as the preferred percutaneous coronary intervention approach.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.2217\/cer.12.79","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2013,2,28]],"date-time":"2013-02-28T21:27:50Z","timestamp":1362086870000},"page":"151-158","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Comparing radial and femoral access for coronary angiography and interventions"],"prefix":"10.57264","volume":"2","author":[{"given":"Victar","family":"Hsieh","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"McMaster University, 237 Barton Street East, Hamilton, ON, L8L 2X2, Canada"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sanjit","family":"Jolly","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"DBCVSRI Building, Hamilton General Hospital, 237 Barton St East, Hamilton, ON, L8L 2X2, Canada."}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"36897","reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_2_2_1_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1002\/ccd.1810160103","volume":"16","author":"Campeau","year":"1989","unstructured":"Campeau L. Percutaneous radial artery approach for coronary angiography. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Diagn. 16(1), 3\u20137 (1989).","journal-title":"Cathet. Cardiovasc. Diagn."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_2_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"173","DOI":"10.1002\/ccd.1810300220","volume":"30","author":"Kiemeneij","year":"1993","unstructured":"Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ. Percutaneous transradial artery approach for coronary stent implantation. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Diagn. 30(2), 173\u2013178 (1993).","journal-title":"Cathet. Cardiovasc. Diagn."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_2_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1409","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(11)60404-2","volume":"377","author":"Jolly","year":"2011","unstructured":"Jolly SS, Yusuf S, Cairns J et al. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial. Lancet 377(9775), 1409\u20131420 (2011).","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_2_4_2","first-page":"1200","volume":"44","author":"Nikolsky","year":"2004","unstructured":"Nikolsky E, Mehran R, Halkin A et al. Vascular complications associated with arteriotomy closure devices in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary procedures: a meta-analysis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 44(6), 1200\u20131209 (2004).","journal-title":"J. Am. Coll. Cardiol."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_2_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"518","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ahj.2009.12.027","volume":"159","author":"Biancari","year":"2010","unstructured":"Biancari F, D\u2019Andrea V, Di Marco C, Savino G, Tiozzo V, Catania A. Meta-analysis of randomized trials on the efficacy of vascular closure devices after diagnostic angiography and angioplasty. Am. Heart J. 159(4), 518\u2013531 (2010).","journal-title":"Am. Heart J."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_2_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1057","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcin.2009.07.014","volume":"2","author":"Dehghani","year":"2009","unstructured":"Dehghani P, Mohammad A, Bajaj R et al. Mechanism and predictors of failed transradial approach for percutaneous coronary interventions. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Interv. 2, 1057\u20131064 (2009).","journal-title":"J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Interv."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_2_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"410","DOI":"10.1136\/hrt.2008.150474","volume":"95","author":"Lo","year":"2009","unstructured":"Lo TS, Nolan J, Fountzopoulos E et al. Radial artery anomaly and its influence on transradial coronary procedural outcome. Heart 95(5), 410\u2013415 (2009).","journal-title":"Heart"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_2_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1126","DOI":"10.1097\/00029330-200806020-00017","volume":"121","author":"Cao","year":"2008","unstructured":"Cao Z, Zhou YJ, Zhao YX et al. Transradial approach for coronary angioplasty in Chinese elderly patients. Chin. Med. J. 121(12), 1126\u20131129 (2008).","journal-title":"Chin. Med. J."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_2_9_2","first-page":"S145","volume":"93","author":"Sansanayudh","year":"2010","unstructured":"Sansanayudh N, Champasri K, Piamsomboon C et al. The efficacy and safety of transradial approach in comparison with transfemoral approach for coronary angiography and ad hoc coronary angioplasty in Thailand. J. Med. Assoc. Thai. 93(6), S145\u2013S151 (2010).","journal-title":"J. Med. Assoc. Thai."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_2_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"84","DOI":"10.1007\/s12928-012-0098-z","volume":"27","author":"Natsuaki","year":"2012","unstructured":"Natsuaki M, Morimoto T, Furukawa Y et al. Comparison of 3-year clinical outcomes after transradial versus transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention. Cardiovasc. Interv. Ther. 27(2), 84\u201392 (2012).","journal-title":"Cardiovasc. Interv. Ther."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_2_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2481","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jacc.2012.06.017","volume":"60","author":"Romagnoli","year":"2012","unstructured":"Romagnoli E, Biondi-Zoccai G, Sciahbasi A et al. Radial versus femoral randomized investigation in st-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: the RIFLE-STEACS (Radial Versus Femoral Randomized Investigation in ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome) Study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 60(24), 2481\u20132489 (2012).","journal-title":"J. Am. Coll. Cardiol."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_2_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"597","DOI":"10.1002\/ccd.23134","volume":"79","author":"Coroleu","year":"2012","unstructured":"Coroleu SF, Burzotta F, Fernandez-Gomez C et al. Feasibility of complex coronary and peripheral interventions by trans-radial approach using large sheaths. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 79(4), 597\u2013600 (2012).","journal-title":"Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_2_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"383","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1540-8183.2011.00658.x","volume":"24","author":"Egred","year":"2011","unstructured":"Egred M. Feasibility and safety of 7-Fr radial approach for complex PCI. J. Interv. Cardiol. 24(5), 383\u2013388 (2011).","journal-title":"J. Interv. Cardiol."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_2_14_2","first-page":"204","volume":"38","author":"Zhou","year":"2009","unstructured":"Zhou BQ, Fu GS, Sun Y. [Treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions with 6F-guiding catheter by transradial approach]. Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban 38(2), 204\u2013207 (2009).","journal-title":"Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_2_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"412","DOI":"10.1002\/ccd.20179","volume":"63","author":"Lim","year":"2004","unstructured":"Lim PO, Dzavik V. Balloon crush: treatment of bifurcation lesions using the crush stenting technique as adapted for transradial approach of percutaneous coronary intervention. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 63(4), 412\u2013416 (2004).","journal-title":"Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_2_16_2","first-page":"234","volume":"62","author":"Bertrand","year":"2010","unstructured":"Bertrand OF, Bagur R, Costerousse O, Rodes-Cabau J. Transradial vs femoral percutaneous coronary intervention for left main disease in octogenarians. Indian Heart J. 62(3), 234\u2013237 (2010).","journal-title":"Indian Heart J."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_2_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1035","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcin.2010.09.003","volume":"3","author":"Yang","year":"2010","unstructured":"Yang Y-J, Kandzari DE, Gao Z et al. Transradial versus transfemoral method of percutaneous coronary revascularization for unprotected left main coronary artery disease: comparison of procedural and late-term outcomes. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 3(10), 1035\u20131042 (2010).","journal-title":"JACC Cardiovasc. Interv."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_2_18_2","first-page":"129","volume":"16","author":"Ziakas","year":"2004","unstructured":"Ziakas A, Klinke P, Mildenberger R et al. Comparison of the radial and femoral approaches in left main PCI: a retrospective study. J. Invasive Cardiol. 16(3), 129\u2013132 (2004).","journal-title":"J. Invasive Cardiol."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_2_19_2","unstructured":"Romagnoli\n\t\t\t\t\t\t EEA. Radial versus Femoral Randomized Investigation in ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome (RIFLE STEACS). Presented at: Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics 23rd Annual Scientific Symposium . San Francisco CA USA 7\u201311 November 2011."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_2_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"501","DOI":"10.4244\/EIJV8I4A78","volume":"8","author":"Jang","year":"2012","unstructured":"Jang JS, Jin HY, Seo JS et al. Transradial versus transfemoral approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. EuroIntervention 8(4), 501\u2013510 (2012).","journal-title":"EuroIntervention"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_2_21_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"813","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjcard.2011.11.007","volume":"109","author":"Joyal","year":"2012","unstructured":"Joyal D, Bertrand OF, Rinfret S, Shimony A, Eisenberg MJ. Meta-analysis of ten trials on the effectiveness of the radial versus the femoral approach in primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Am. J. Cardiol. 109(6), 813\u2013818 (2012).","journal-title":"Am. J. Cardiol."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_2_22_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"303","DOI":"10.1136\/heartjnl-2011-300558","volume":"98","author":"Mamas","year":"2012","unstructured":"Mamas MA, Ratib K, Routledge H et al. Influence of access site selection on PCI-related adverse events in patients with STEMI: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Heart 98(4), 303\u2013311 (2012).","journal-title":"Heart"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_2_23_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"132","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ahj.2008.08.023","volume":"157","author":"Jolly","year":"2009","unstructured":"Jolly SS, Amlani S, Hamon M, Yusuf S, Mehta SR. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention and the impact on major bleeding and ischemic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Am. Heart J. 157(1), 132\u2013140 (2009).","journal-title":"Am. Heart J."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_2_24_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"475","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcin.2010.03.009","volume":"3","author":"Rathore","year":"2010","unstructured":"Rathore S, Stables RH, Pauriah M et al. Impact of length and hydrophilic coating of the introducer sheath on radial artery spasm during transradial coronary intervention: a randomized study. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 3(5), 475\u2013483 (2010).","journal-title":"JACC Cardiovasc. Interv."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_2_25_2","first-page":"155","volume":"18","author":"Coppola","year":"2006","unstructured":"Coppola J, Patel T, Kwan T et al. Nitroglycerin, nitroprusside, or both, in preventing radial artery spasm during transradial artery catheterization. J. Invasive Cardiol. 18(4), 155\u2013158 (2006).","journal-title":"J. Invasive Cardiol."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_2_26_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"43","DOI":"10.1159\/000089246","volume":"105","author":"Chen","year":"2006","unstructured":"Chen CW, Lin CL, Lin TK, Lin CD. A simple and effective regimen for prevention of radial artery spasm during coronary catheterization. Cardiology 105(1), 43\u201347 (2006).","journal-title":"Cardiology"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_2_27_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"192","DOI":"10.1002\/ccd.20434","volume":"66","author":"Ruiz-Salmeron","year":"2005","unstructured":"Ruiz-Salmeron RJ, Mora R, Masotti M, Betriu A. Assessment of the efficacy of phentolamine to prevent radial artery spasm during cardiac catheterization procedures: a randomized study comparing phentolamine vs. verapamil. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 66(2), 192\u2013198 (2005).","journal-title":"Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_2_28_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"281","DOI":"10.1002\/ccd.10445","volume":"58","author":"Kiemeneij","year":"2003","unstructured":"Kiemeneij F, Vajifdar BU, Eccleshall SC, Laarman G, Slagboom T, van der Wieken R. Evaluation of a spasmolytic cocktail to prevent radial artery spasm during coronary procedures. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 58(3), 281\u2013284 (2003).","journal-title":"Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_2_29_2","first-page":"122","volume":"24","author":"Dharma","year":"2012","unstructured":"Dharma S, Shah S, Radadiya R, Vyas C, Pancholy S, Patel T. Nitroglycerin plus diltiazem versus nitroglycerin alone for spasm prophylaxis with transradial approach. J. Invasive Cardiol. 24(3), 122\u2013125 (2012).","journal-title":"J. Invasive Cardiol."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_2_30_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1151","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvir.2009.05.034","volume":"20","author":"Candemir","year":"2009","unstructured":"Candemir B, Kumbasar D, Turhan S et al. Facilitation of radial artery cannulation by periradial subcutaneous administration of nitroglycerin. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 20(9), 1151\u20131156 (2009).","journal-title":"J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_2_31_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"389","DOI":"10.1002\/ccd.20881","volume":"68","author":"Pancholy","year":"2006","unstructured":"Pancholy SB, Coppola J, Patel T. Subcutaneous administration of nitroglycerin to facilitate radial artery cannulation. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 68(3), 389\u2013391 (2006).","journal-title":"Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_2_32_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1698","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjcard.2011.01.056","volume":"107","author":"Bernat","year":"2011","unstructured":"Bernat I, Bertrand OF, Rokyta R et al. Efficacy and safety of transient ulnar artery compression to recanalize acute radial artery occlusion after transradial catheterization. Am. J. Cardiol. 107(11), 1698\u20131701 (2011).","journal-title":"Am. J. Cardiol."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_2_33_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"841","DOI":"10.1007\/s00392-010-0197-8","volume":"99","author":"Zankl","year":"2010","unstructured":"Zankl AR, Andrassy M, Volz C et al. Radial artery thrombosis following transradial coronary angiography: incidence and rationale for treatment of symptomatic patients with low-molecular-weight heparins. Clin. Res. Cardiol. 99(12), 841\u2013847 (2010).","journal-title":"Clin. Res. Cardiol."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_2_34_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"654","DOI":"10.1002\/ccd.22610","volume":"76","author":"Plante","year":"2010","unstructured":"Plante S, Cantor WJ, Goldman L et al. Comparison of bivalirudin versus heparin on radial artery occlusion after transradial catheterization. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 76(5), 654\u2013658 (2010).","journal-title":"Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_2_35_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"322","DOI":"10.1007\/s11239-009-0352-0","volume":"29","author":"Feray","year":"2010","unstructured":"Feray H, Izgi C, Cetiner D et al. Effectiveness of enoxaparin for prevention of radial artery occlusion after transradial cardiac catheterization. J. Thromb. Thrombolysis 29(3), 322\u2013325 (2010).","journal-title":"J. Thromb. Thrombolysis"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_2_36_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"36","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcin.2011.08.011","volume":"5","author":"Uhlemann","year":"2012","unstructured":"Uhlemann M, Mobius-Winkler S, Mende M et al. The Leipzig prospective vascular ultrasound registry in radial artery catheterization: impact of sheath size on vascular complications. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 5(1), 36\u201343 (2012).","journal-title":"JACC Cardiovasc. Interv."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_2_37_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"173","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjcard.2012.03.007","volume":"110","author":"Pancholy","year":"2012","unstructured":"Pancholy SB, Bertrand OF, Patel T. Comparison of a priori versus provisional heparin therapy on radial artery occlusion after transradial coronary angiography and patent hemostasis (from the PHARAOH study). Am. J. Cardiol. 110(2), 173\u2013176 (2012).","journal-title":"Am. J. Cardiol."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_2_38_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"335","DOI":"10.1002\/ccd.21639","volume":"72","author":"Pancholy","year":"2008","unstructured":"Pancholy S, Coppola J, Patel T, Roke-Thomas M. Prevention of radial artery occlusion-patent hemostasis evaluation trial (PROPHET study): a randomized comparison of traditional versus patency documented hemostasis after transradial catheterization. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 72(3), 335\u2013340 (2008).","journal-title":"Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_2_39_2","first-page":"1531","volume":"87","author":"Zhou","year":"2007","unstructured":"Zhou YJ, Zhao YX, Cao Z et al. [Incidence and risk factors of acute radial artery occlusion following transradial percutaneous coronary intervention]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 87(22), 1531\u20131534 (2007).","journal-title":"Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_2_40_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"247","DOI":"10.4244\/EIJV6I2A39","volume":"6","author":"Schiano","year":"2010","unstructured":"Schiano P, Barbou F, Chenilleau MC, Louembe J, Monsegu J. Adjusted weight anticoagulation for radial approach in elective coronarography: the AWARE coronarography study. EuroIntervention 6(2), 247\u2013250 (2010).","journal-title":"EuroIntervention"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_2_41_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"174","DOI":"10.1007\/s12928-012-0108-1","volume":"27","author":"Honda","year":"2012","unstructured":"Honda T, Fujimoto K, Miyao Y, Koga H, Hirata Y. Access site-related complications after transradial catheterization can be reduced with smaller sheath size and statins. Cardiovasc. Interv. Ther. 27(3), 174\u2013180 (2012).","journal-title":"Cardiovasc. Interv. Ther."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_2_42_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"173","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1522-726X(199902)46:2<173::AID-CCD12>3.0.CO;2-4","volume":"46","author":"Saito","year":"1999","unstructured":"Saito S, Ikei H, Hosokawa G, Tanaka S. Influence of the ratio between radial artery inner diameter and sheath outer diameter on radial artery flow after transradial coronary intervention. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 46(2), 173\u2013178 (1999).","journal-title":"Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_2_43_2","first-page":"339","volume":"24","author":"Velasco","year":"2012","unstructured":"Velasco A, Ono C, Nugent K, Tarwater P, Kumar A. Ultrasonic evaluation of the radial artery diameter in a local population from Texas. J. Invasive Cardiol. 24(7), 339\u2013341 (2012).","journal-title":"J. Invasive Cardiol."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_2_44_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"467","DOI":"10.1002\/ccd.21900","volume":"73","author":"Cubero","year":"2009","unstructured":"Cubero JM, Lombardo J, Pedrosa C et al. Radial compression guided by mean artery pressure versus standard compression with a pneumatic device (RACOMAP). Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 73(4), 467\u2013472 (2009).","journal-title":"Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_2_45_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"63","DOI":"10.1093\/eurheartj\/ehm508","volume":"29","author":"Brasselet","year":"2008","unstructured":"Brasselet C, Blanpain T, Tassan-Mangina S et al. Comparison of operator radiation exposure with optimized radiation protection devices during coronary angiograms and ad hoc percutaneous coronary interventions by radial and femoral routes. Eur. Heart J. 29(1), 63\u201370 (2008).","journal-title":"Eur. Heart J."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_2_46_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1047","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcin.2009.07.016","volume":"2","author":"Brueck","year":"2009","unstructured":"Brueck M, Bandorski D, Kramer W, Wieczorek M, Holtgen R, Tillmanns H. A randomized comparison of transradial versus transfemoral approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 2(11), 1047\u20131054 (2009).","journal-title":"JACC Cardiovasc. Interv."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_2_47_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.1002\/ccd.20451","volume":"67","author":"Lange","year":"2006","unstructured":"Lange HW, Von Boetticher H. Randomized comparison of operator radiation exposure during coronary angiography and intervention by radial or femoral approach. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 67(1), 12\u201316 (2006).","journal-title":"Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_2_48_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"445","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcin.2011.12.013","volume":"5","author":"Lange","year":"2012","unstructured":"Lange HW, Von Boetticher H. Reduction of operator radiation dose by a pelvic lead shield during cardiac catheterization by radial access: comparison with femoral access. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 5(4), 445\u2013449 (2012).","journal-title":"JACC Cardiovasc. Interv."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_2_49_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E338","DOI":"10.1016\/S0735-1097(12)60339-8","volume":"59","author":"Amin","year":"2012","unstructured":"Amin AP, Marso SP, Chhatriwalla A et al. Cost\u2013effectiveness of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention: a decision-analytic model. J. Am. College Cardiol. 59(13 Suppl. 1), E338\u2013E338 (2012).","journal-title":"J. Am. College Cardiol."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_2_50_2","first-page":"120","volume":"18","author":"Venkatesh","year":"2006","unstructured":"Venkatesh K, Mann T. Transitioning from heparin to bivalirudin in patients undergoing ad hoc transradial interventional procedures: a pilot study. J. Invasive Cardiol. 18(3), 120\u2013124 (2006).","journal-title":"J. Invasive Cardiol."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_2_51_2","first-page":"101","volume":"23","author":"Singh","year":"2011","unstructured":"Singh A, Edasery D, Noor A, Bhasin N, Kaplan B, Jauhar R. Use of low-dose heparin with bivalirudin for ad-hoc transradial coronary interventions: experience from a single center. J. Invasive Cardiol. 23, 101\u2013104 (2011).","journal-title":"J. Invasive Cardiol."}],"container-title":["Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/becarispublishing.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.2217\/cer.12.79","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,3,19]],"date-time":"2023-03-19T12:51:04Z","timestamp":1679230264000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/becarispublishing.com\/doi\/10.2217\/cer.12.79"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2013,3]]},"references-count":51,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,3]]}},"alternative-id":["10.2217\/cer.12.79"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2217\/cer.12.79","relation":{},"ISSN":["2042-6305","2042-6313"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2042-6305","type":"print"},{"value":"2042-6313","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2013,3]]}}}