{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,21]],"date-time":"2025-12-21T17:52:37Z","timestamp":1766339557241},"reference-count":8,"publisher":"Becaris Publishing Limited","issue":"3","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J. Compar. Effect. Res."],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,5]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>\n            <jats:bold>\n              Evaluation of: Mol F, van Mello NM, Strandell A\n              <jats:italic>et al<\/jats:italic>\n              . Salpingotomy versus salpingectomy in women with tubal pregnancy (ESEP study): an open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial.\n              <jats:italic>Lancet<\/jats:italic>\n              383(9927), 1483\u20131439 (2014)\n            <\/jats:bold>\n            . Ectopic pregnancy can still manifest itself as a life-threatening condition and, hence, the establishment of accurate evidence-based treatment modalities remain paramount. Surgical treatment has long been a mainstay of ectopic pregnancy treatment. To date, there is a wealth of data establishing laparoscopic treatment as the \u2018gold standard\u2019; however, paradoxically, the evidence behind choosing the two main treatment methods of salpingotomy and salpingectomy, especially with regards to future fertility potential, remain unclear. This article is a summary of a randomized controlled trial of salpingotomy versus salpingectomy in patients with an apparent contralateral healthy tube and the impact on future fertility. It attempts to answer the clinical question whether preservation of tube by salpingotomy increases the futures chances of natural conception as opposed to salpingectomy.\n          <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.2217\/cer.14.12","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,6,27]],"date-time":"2014-06-27T11:59:17Z","timestamp":1403870357000},"page":"241-243","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["Salpingotomy versus salpingectomy in women with tubal pregnancy"],"prefix":"10.57264","volume":"3","author":[{"given":"Funlayo","family":"Odejinmi","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Whipps Cross University Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Reeba","family":"Oliver","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Whipps Cross University Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"36897","reference":[{"issue":"6","key":"e_1_3_2_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1218","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000127595.54974.0c","article-title":"Sudden death: ectopic pregnancy mortality","volume":"103","author":"Anderson FW","year":"2004","unstructured":"Anderson FW , Hogan JG , Ansbacher R . Sudden death: ectopic pregnancy mortality . Obstet Gynecol. 103 ( 6 ), 1218 \u2013 1223 ( 2004 ).","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol."},{"issue":"5","key":"e_1_3_2_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1247","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/det037","article-title":"Fertility after ectopic pregnancy: the DEMETER randomized trial. GROG","volume":"28","author":"Fernandez H","year":"2013","unstructured":"Fernandez H , Capmas P , Lucot JP , Resch B , Panel P , Bouyer J . Fertility after ectopic pregnancy: the DEMETER randomized trial. GROG . Hum. Reprod. 28 ( 5 ), 1247 \u2013 1253 ( 2013 ).","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_4_2","article-title":"Interventions for tubal ectopic pregnancy","volume":"1","author":"Hajenius PJ","year":"2007","unstructured":"Hajenius PJ , Mol F , Mol BW , Bossuyt PM , Ankum WM , van der Veen F . Interventions for tubal ectopic pregnancy . Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 1 , CD000324 ( 2007 ).","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst. Rev."},{"issue":"2","key":"e_1_3_2_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"97","DOI":"10.3109\/13645706.2012.708346","article-title":"Surgical treatment of ectopic pregnancy associated with predisposing factors of tuboperitoneal infertility","volume":"22","author":"Calcagno A","year":"2013","unstructured":"Calcagno A , Londero AP , Haag T , Driul L , Bertozzi S , Grassi T , Marchesoni D , Manhes H . Surgical treatment of ectopic pregnancy associated with predisposing factors of tuboperitoneal infertility . Minim. Invasive Ther. Allied Technol. 22 ( 2 ), 97 \u2013 103 ( 2013 ).","journal-title":"Minim. Invasive Ther. Allied Technol."},{"issue":"5","key":"e_1_3_2_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1271","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.06.041","article-title":"Fertility after tubal ectopic pregnancy: results of a population-based study","volume":"98","author":"de Bennetot M","year":"2012","unstructured":"de Bennetot M , Rabischong B , Aublet-Cuvelier B Fertility after tubal ectopic pregnancy: results of a population-based study . Fertil. Steril. 98 ( 5 ), 1271 \u2013 1276 . e1 \u2013 3 ( 2012 ).","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_7_2","first-page":"710","article-title":"Reproductive outcome after 143 laparoscopic procedures for ectopic pregnancy","volume":"81","author":"Silva P","year":"1993","unstructured":"Silva P , Schaper A , Rooney B . Reproductive outcome after 143 laparoscopic procedures for ectopic pregnancy . Fertil. Steril. 81 , 710 \u2013 715 ( 1993 ).","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1804","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/13.7.1804","article-title":"Fertility after conservative and radical surgery for tubal pregnancy","volume":"13","author":"Mol B","year":"1998","unstructured":"Mol B , Matthijsse H , Tinga D Fertility after conservative and radical surgery for tubal pregnancy . Hum. Reprod. 13 , 1804 \u2013 1809 ( 1998 ).","journal-title":"Hum. Reprod."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"765","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2003.02253.x","article-title":"Improved fertility following conservative surgical treatment of ectopic pregnancy","volume":"110","author":"Bangsgaard N","year":"2003","unstructured":"Bangsgaard N , Lund C , Ottesen B , Nilas L . Improved fertility following conservative surgical treatment of ectopic pregnancy . Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 110 , 765 \u2013 770 ( 2003 ).","journal-title":"Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol."}],"container-title":["Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/becarispublishing.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.2217\/cer.14.12","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,3,19]],"date-time":"2023-03-19T12:44:52Z","timestamp":1679229892000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/becarispublishing.com\/doi\/10.2217\/cer.14.12"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2014,5]]},"references-count":8,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,5]]}},"alternative-id":["10.2217\/cer.14.12"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2217\/cer.14.12","relation":{},"ISSN":["2042-6305","2042-6313"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2042-6305","type":"print"},{"value":"2042-6313","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2014,5]]}}}