{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,13]],"date-time":"2026-06-13T04:47:24Z","timestamp":1781326044419,"version":"3.54.1"},"reference-count":176,"publisher":"Verein zur Forderung des Open Access Publizierens in den Quantenwissenschaften","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,12,20]],"date-time":"2023-12-20T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1703030400000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"name":"US Department of Energy, Office of Science","award":["DE-SC0020271"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["DE-SC0020271"]}]},{"name":"US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Advanced Scientific Computing Research","award":["DE-SC0020312"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["DE-SC0020312"]}]},{"name":"US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Nuclear Physics","award":["DE-SC0020970"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["DE-SC0020970"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["quantum-journal.org"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Quantum"],"abstract":"<jats:p>With a focus on universal quantum computing for quantum simulation, and through the example of lattice gauge theories, we introduce rather general quantum algorithms that can efficiently simulate certain classes of interactions consisting of correlated changes in multiple (bosonic and fermionic) quantum numbers with non-trivial functional coefficients. In particular, we analyze diagonalization of Hamiltonian terms using a singular-value decomposition technique, and discuss how the achieved diagonal unitaries in the digitized time-evolution operator can be implemented. The lattice gauge theory studied is the SU(2) gauge theory in 1+1 dimensions coupled to one flavor of staggered fermions, for which a complete quantum-resource analysis within different computational models is presented. The algorithms are shown to be applicable to higher-dimensional theories as well as to other Abelian and non-Abelian gauge theories. The example chosen further demonstrates the importance of adopting efficient theoretical formulations: it is shown that an explicitly gauge-invariant formulation using loop, string, and hadron degrees of freedom simplifies the algorithms and lowers the cost compared with the standard formulations based on angular-momentum as well as the Schwinger-boson degrees of freedom. The loop-string-hadron formulation further retains the non-Abelian gauge symmetry despite the inexactness of the digitized simulation, without the need for costly controlled operations. Such theoretical and algorithmic considerations are likely to be essential in quantumly simulating other complex theories of relevance to nature.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.22331\/q-2023-12-20-1213","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,12,20]],"date-time":"2023-12-20T15:57:47Z","timestamp":1703087867000},"page":"1213","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.22331\/q-crossmark-policy-page","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":45,"title":["General quantum algorithms for Hamiltonian simulation with applications to a non-Abelian lattice gauge theory"],"prefix":"10.22331","volume":"7","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-7288-2810","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Zohreh","family":"Davoudi","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA"},{"name":"Maryland Center for Fundamental Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA"},{"name":"Joint Center for Quantum Information and Computer Science, National Institute of Standards and Technology and University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA"},{"name":"The NSF Institute for Robust Quantum Simulation, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alexander F.","family":"Shaw","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA"},{"name":"Joint Center for Quantum Information and Computer Science, National Institute of Standards and Technology and University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4968-7988","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jesse R.","family":"Stryker","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA"},{"name":"Maryland Center for Fundamental Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA"},{"name":"Physics Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"9598","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,12,20]]},"reference":[{"key":"0","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Richard P. Feynman. ``Simulating physics with computers&apos;&apos;. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 21, 467\u2013488 (1982).","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02650179"},{"key":"1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Seth Lloyd. ``Universal quantum simulators&apos;&apos;. Science 273, 1073\u20131078 (1996).","DOI":"10.1126\/science.273.5278.1073"},{"key":"2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"John Preskill. ``Quantum computing in the NISQ era and beyond&apos;&apos;. Quantum 2, 79 (2018). arXiv:1801.00862.","DOI":"10.22331\/q-2018-08-06-79"},{"key":"3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Iulia M Georgescu, Sahel Ashhab, and Franco Nori. ``Quantum simulation&apos;&apos;. Reviews of Modern Physics 86, 153 (2014). arXiv:1308.6253.","DOI":"10.1103\/RevModPhys.86.153"},{"key":"4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Dave Wecker, Matthew B Hastings, Nathan Wiebe, Bryan K Clark, Chetan Nayak, and Matthias Troyer. ``Solving strongly correlated electron models on a quantum computer&apos;&apos;. Physical Review A 92, 062318 (2015). arXiv:1506.05135.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevA.92.062318"},{"key":"5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Sam McArdle, Suguru Endo, Al\u00e1n Aspuru-Guzik, Simon C Benjamin, and Xiao Yuan. ``Quantum computational chemistry&apos;&apos;. Reviews of Modern Physics 92, 015003 (2020). arXiv:1808.10402.","DOI":"10.1103\/RevModPhys.92.015003"},{"key":"6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Yudong Cao, Jonathan Romero, Jonathan P Olson, Matthias Degroote, Peter D Johnson, M\u00e1ria Kieferov\u00e1, Ian D Kivlichan, Tim Menke, Borja Peropadre, Nicolas PD Sawaya, et al. ``Quantum chemistry in the age of quantum computing&apos;&apos;. Chemical Reviews 119, 10856\u201310915 (2019). arXiv:1812.09976.","DOI":"10.1021\/acs.chemrev.8b00803"},{"key":"7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ryan Babbush, Nathan Wiebe, Jarrod McClean, James McClain, Hartmut Neven, and Garnet Kin-Lic Chan. ``Low-depth quantum simulation of materials&apos;&apos;. Physical Review X 8, 011044 (2018). arXiv:1706.00023.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevX.8.011044"},{"key":"8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Bela Bauer, Sergey Bravyi, Mario Motta, and Garnet Kin-Lic Chan. ``Quantum algorithms for quantum chemistry and quantum materials science&apos;&apos;. Chemical Reviews 120, 12685\u201312717 (2020). arXiv:2001.03685.","DOI":"10.1021\/acs.chemrev.9b00829"},{"key":"9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Vera von Burg, Guang Hao Low, Thomas H\u00e4ner, Damian S Steiger, Markus Reiher, Martin Roetteler, and Matthias Troyer. ``Quantum computing enhanced computational catalysis&apos;&apos;. Physical Review Research 3, 033055 (2021). arXiv:2007.14460.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevResearch.3.033055"},{"key":"10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"He Ma, Marco Govoni, and Giulia Galli. ``Quantum simulations of materials on near-term quantum computers&apos;&apos;. npj Computat. Mater. 6, 85 (2020).","DOI":"10.1038\/s41524-020-00353-z"},{"key":"11","unstructured":"Matthew Dietrich, David Hertzog, Martin J. Savage, et al. ``Nuclear Physics and Quantum Information Science: Report by the NSAC QIS Subcommittee&apos;&apos;. Technical Report NSAC-QIS-2019. NSF & DOE Office of Science (2019). url: https:\/\/science.osti.gov\/-\/media\/np\/pdf\/Reports\/NSAC_QIS_Report.pdf."},{"key":"12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Christian W. Bauer et al. ``Quantum Simulation for High-Energy Physics&apos;&apos;. PRX Quantum 4, 027001 (2023). arXiv:2204.03381.","DOI":"10.1103\/PRXQuantum.4.027001"},{"key":"13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Simon Catterall et al. ``Report of the snowmass 2021 theory frontier topical group on quantum information science&apos;&apos;. In Snowmass 2021. (2022). arXiv:2209.14839.","DOI":"10.2172\/1892238"},{"key":"14","unstructured":"Travis S. Humble, Gabriel N. Perdue, and Martin J. Savage. ``Snowmass computational frontier: Topical group report on quantum computing&apos;&apos; (2022). arXiv:2209.06786."},{"key":"15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Tim Byrnes and Yoshihisa Yamamoto. ``Simulating lattice gauge theories on a quantum computer&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. A 73, 022328 (2006). arXiv:quant-ph\/0510027.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevA.73.022328"},{"key":"16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Stephen P. Jordan, Keith S.M. Lee, and John Preskill. ``Quantum Algorithms for Quantum Field Theories&apos;&apos;. Science 336, 1130\u20131133 (2012). arXiv:1111.3633.","DOI":"10.1126\/science.1217069"},{"key":"17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Stephen P. Jordan, Keith S. M. Lee, and John Preskill. ``Quantum Computation of Scattering in Scalar Quantum Field Theories&apos;&apos;. Quant. Inf. Comput. 14, 1014\u20131080 (2014). arXiv:1112.4833.","DOI":"10.26421\/QIC14.11-12-8"},{"key":"18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Erez Zohar and Benni Reznik. ``Confinement and lattice QED electric flux-tubes simulated with ultracold atoms&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 275301 (2011). arXiv:1108.1562.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevLett.107.275301"},{"key":"19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"L. Tagliacozzo, A. Celi, A. Zamora, and M. Lewenstein. ``Optical Abelian Lattice Gauge Theories&apos;&apos;. Annals Phys. 330, 160\u2013191 (2013). arXiv:1205.0496.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.aop.2012.11.009"},{"key":"20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"D. Banerjee, M. Dalmonte, M. Muller, E. Rico, P. Stebler, U.-J. Wiese, and P. Zoller. ``Atomic Quantum Simulation of Dynamical Gauge Fields coupled to Fermionic Matter: From String Breaking to Evolution after a Quench&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 175302 (2012). arXiv:1205.6366.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevLett.109.175302"},{"key":"21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Erez Zohar, J.Ignacio Cirac, and Benni Reznik. ``Cold-Atom Quantum Simulator for SU(2) Yang-Mills Lattice Gauge Theory&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 125304 (2013). arXiv:1211.2241.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevLett.110.125304"},{"key":"22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Erez Zohar, J. Ignacio Cirac, and Benni Reznik. ``Quantum simulations of gauge theories with ultracold atoms: local gauge invariance from angular momentum conservation&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. A 88, 023617 (2013). arXiv:1303.5040.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevA.88.023617"},{"key":"23","unstructured":"Stephen P. Jordan, Keith S. M. Lee, and John Preskill. ``Quantum Algorithms for Fermionic Quantum Field Theories&apos;&apos; (2014). arXiv:1404.7115."},{"key":"24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Erez Zohar and Michele Burrello. ``Formulation of lattice gauge theories for quantum simulations&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. D 91, 054506 (2015). arXiv:1409.3085.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevD.91.054506"},{"key":"25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Kevin Marshall, Raphael Pooser, George Siopsis, and Christian Weedbrook. ``Quantum simulation of quantum field theory using continuous variables&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. A 92, 063825 (2015). arXiv:1503.08121.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevA.92.063825"},{"key":"26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"A. Mezzacapo, E. Rico, C. Sabin, I.L. Egusquiza, L. Lamata, and E. Solano. ``Non-Abelian $SU(2)$ Lattice Gauge Theories in Superconducting Circuits&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 240502 (2015). arXiv:1505.04720.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevLett.115.240502"},{"key":"27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"E.A. Martinez et al. ``Real-time dynamics of lattice gauge theories with a few-qubit quantum computer&apos;&apos;. Nature 534, 516\u2013519 (2016). arXiv:1605.04570.","DOI":"10.1038\/nature18318"},{"key":"28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Erez Zohar, Alessandro Farace, Benni Reznik, and J. Ignacio Cirac. ``Digital quantum simulation of $\\mathbb{Z}_2$ lattice gauge theories with dynamical fermionic matter&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 070501 (2017). arXiv:1607.03656.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevLett.118.070501"},{"key":"29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Erez Zohar, Alessandro Farace, Benni Reznik, and J. Ignacio Cirac. ``Digital lattice gauge theories&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. A 95, 023604 (2017). arXiv:1607.08121.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevA.95.023604"},{"key":"30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ali Hamed Moosavian and Stephen Jordan. ``Faster Quantum Algorithm to Simulate Fermionic Quantum Field Theory&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. A 98, 012332 (2018). arXiv:1711.04006.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevA.98.012332"},{"key":"31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"T.V. Zache, F. Hebenstreit, F. Jendrzejewski, M.K. Oberthaler, J. Berges, and P. Hauke. ``Quantum simulation of lattice gauge theories using Wilson fermions&apos;&apos;. Sci. Technol. 3, 034010 (2018). arXiv:1802.06704.","DOI":"10.1088\/2058-9565\/aac33b"},{"key":"32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Frederik G\u00f6rg, Kilian Sandholzer, Joaqu\u00edn Minguzzi, R\u00e9mi Desbuquois, Michael Messer, and Tilman Esslinger. ``Realization of density-dependent Peierls phases to engineer quantized gauge fields coupled to ultracold matter&apos;&apos;. Nature Phys. 15, 1161\u20131167 (2019). arXiv:1812.05895.","DOI":"10.1038\/s41567-019-0615-4"},{"key":"33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Christian Schweizer, Fabian Grusdt, Moritz Berngruber, Luca Barbiero, Eugene Demler, Nathan Goldman, Immanuel Bloch, and Monika Aidelsburger. ``Floquet approach to Z2 lattice gauge theories with ultracold atoms in optical lattices&apos;&apos;. Nature Physics 15, 1168\u20131173 (2019). arXiv:1901.07103.","DOI":"10.1038\/s41567-019-0649-7"},{"key":"34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"N. Klco, E.F. Dumitrescu, A.J. McCaskey, T.D. Morris, R.C. Pooser, M. Sanz, E. Solano, P. Lougovski, and M.J. Savage. ``Quantum-classical computation of Schwinger model dynamics using quantum computers&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. A 98, 032331 (2018). arXiv:1803.03326.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevA.98.032331"},{"key":"35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Hsuan-Hao Lu et al. ``Simulations of Subatomic Many-Body Physics on a Quantum Frequency Processor&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. A 100, 012320 (2019). arXiv:1810.03959.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevA.100.012320"},{"key":"36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Arpan Bhattacharyya, Arvind Shekar, and Aninda Sinha. ``Circuit complexity in interacting QFTs and RG flows&apos;&apos;. JHEP 10, 140 (2018). arXiv:1808.03105.","DOI":"10.1007\/JHEP10(2018)140"},{"key":"37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Jesse R. Stryker. ``Oracles for Gauss&apos;s law on digital quantum computers&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. A 99, 042301 (2019). arXiv:1812.01617.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevA.99.042301"},{"key":"38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Indrakshi Raychowdhury and Jesse R. Stryker. ``Solving Gauss&apos;s Law on Digital Quantum Computers with Loop-String-Hadron Digitization&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033039 (2020). arXiv:1812.07554.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevResearch.2.033039"},{"key":"39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Di Luo, Jiayu Shen, Michael Highman, Bryan K. Clark, Brian DeMarco, Aida X. El-Khadra, and Bryce Gadway. ``Framework for simulating gauge theories with dipolar spin systems&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. A 102, 032617 (2020). arXiv:1912.11488.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevA.102.032617"},{"key":"40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Federica M. Surace, Paolo P. Mazza, Giuliano Giudici, Alessio Lerose, Andrea Gambassi, and Marcello Dalmonte. ``Lattice gauge theories and string dynamics in Rydberg atom quantum simulators&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. X 10, 021041 (2020). arXiv:1902.09551.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevX.10.021041"},{"key":"41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Alexander Mil, Torsten V. Zache, Apoorva Hegde, Andy Xia, Rohit P. Bhatt, Markus K. Oberthaler, Philipp Hauke, J\u00fcrgen Berges, and Fred Jendrzejewski. ``A scalable realization of local U(1) gauge invariance in cold atomic mixtures&apos;&apos;. Science 367, 1128\u20131130 (2020). arXiv:1909.07641.","DOI":"10.1126\/science.aaz5312"},{"key":"42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Natalie Klco, Jesse R. Stryker, and Martin J. Savage. ``SU(2) non-Abelian gauge field theory in one dimension on digital quantum computers&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. D 101, 074512 (2020). arXiv:1908.06935.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevD.101.074512"},{"key":"43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Natalie Klco and Martin J. Savage. ``Digitization of scalar fields for quantum computing&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. A 99, 052335 (2019). arXiv:1808.10378.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevA.99.052335"},{"key":"44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Christian W. Bauer, Wibe A. de Jong, Benjamin Nachman, and Davide Provasoli. ``Quantum Algorithm for High Energy Physics Simulations&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 062001 (2021). arXiv:1904.03196.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevLett.126.062001"},{"key":"45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Zohreh Davoudi, Mohammad Hafezi, Christopher Monroe, Guido Pagano, Alireza Seif, and Andrew Shaw. ``Towards analog quantum simulations of lattice gauge theories with trapped ions&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 023015 (2020). arXiv:1908.03210.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevResearch.2.023015"},{"key":"46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Natalie Klco and Martin J. Savage. ``Systematically Localizable Operators for Quantum Simulations of Quantum Field Theories&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. A 102, 012619 (2020). arXiv:1912.03577.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevA.102.012619"},{"key":"47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Henry Lamm, Scott Lawrence, and Yukari Yamauchi. ``Parton physics on a quantum computer&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 013272 (2020). arXiv:1908.10439.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevResearch.2.013272"},{"key":"48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Niklas Mueller, Andrey Tarasov, and Raju Venugopalan. ``Deeply inelastic scattering structure functions on a hybrid quantum computer&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. D 102, 016007 (2020). arXiv:1908.07051.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevD.102.016007"},{"key":"49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Henry Lamm, Scott Lawrence, and Yukari Yamauchi. ``General Methods for Digital Quantum Simulation of Gauge Theories&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. D 100, 034518 (2019). arXiv:1903.08807.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevD.100.034518"},{"key":"50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Andrei Alexandru, Paulo F. Bedaque, Siddhartha Harmalkar, Henry Lamm, Scott Lawrence, and Neill C. Warrington. ``Gluon Field Digitization for Quantum Computers&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. D 100, 114501 (2019). arXiv:1906.11213.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevD.100.114501"},{"key":"51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Natalie Klco and Martin J. Savage. ``Fixed-point quantum circuits for quantum field theories&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. A 102, 052422 (2020). arXiv:2002.02018.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevA.102.052422"},{"key":"52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Bing Yang, Hui Sun, Robert Ott, Han-Yi Wang, Torsten V. Zache, Jad C. Halimeh, Zhen-Sheng Yuan, Philipp Hauke, and Jian-Wei Pan. ``Observation of gauge invariance in a 71-site Bose\u2013Hubbard quantum simulator&apos;&apos;. Nature 587, 392\u2013396 (2020). arXiv:2003.08945.","DOI":"10.1038\/s41586-020-2910-8"},{"key":"53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Alexander F. Shaw, Pavel Lougovski, Jesse R. Stryker, and Nathan Wiebe. ``Quantum Algorithms for Simulating the Lattice Schwinger Model&apos;&apos;. Quantum 4, 306 (2020). arXiv:2002.11146.","DOI":"10.22331\/q-2020-08-10-306"},{"key":"54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Bipasha Chakraborty, Masazumi Honda, Taku Izubuchi, Yuta Kikuchi, and Akio Tomiya. ``Classically emulated digital quantum simulation of the Schwinger model with a topological term via adiabatic state preparation&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. D 105, 094503 (2022). arXiv:2001.00485.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevD.105.094503"},{"key":"55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Junyu Liu and Yuan Xin. ``Quantum simulation of quantum field theories as quantum chemistry&apos;&apos;. JHEP 12, 011 (2020). arXiv:2004.13234.","DOI":"10.1007\/JHEP12(2020)011"},{"key":"56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Michael Kreshchuk, William M. Kirby, Gary Goldstein, Hugo Beauchemin, and Peter J. Love. ``Quantum simulation of quantum field theory in the light-front formulation&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. A 105, 032418 (2022). arXiv:2002.04016.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevA.105.032418"},{"key":"57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Jan F. Haase, Luca Dellantonio, Alessio Celi, Danny Paulson, Angus Kan, Karl Jansen, and Christine A. Muschik. ``A resource efficient approach for quantum and classical simulations of gauge theories in particle physics&apos;&apos;. Quantum 5, 393 (2021). arXiv:2006.14160.","DOI":"10.22331\/q-2021-02-04-393"},{"key":"58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Danny Paulson et al. ``Towards simulating 2D effects in lattice gauge theories on a quantum computer&apos;&apos;. PRX Quantum 2, 030334 (2021). arXiv:2008.09252.","DOI":"10.1103\/PRXQuantum.2.030334"},{"key":"59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Raka Dasgupta and Indrakshi Raychowdhury. ``Cold-atom quantum simulator for string and hadron dynamics in non-Abelian lattice gauge theory&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. A 105, 023322 (2022). arXiv:2009.13969.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevA.105.023322"},{"key":"60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Simon V. Mathis, Guglielmo Mazzola, and Ivano Tavernelli. ``Toward scalable simulations of lattice gauge theories on quantum computers&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. D 102, 094501 (2020). arXiv:2005.10271.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevD.102.094501"},{"key":"61","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Yasar Y. Atas, Jinglei Zhang, Randy Lewis, Amin Jahanpour, Jan F. Haase, and Christine A. Muschik. ``SU(2) hadrons on a quantum computer via a variational approach&apos;&apos;. Nature Commun. 12, 6499 (2021). arXiv:2102.08920.","DOI":"10.1038\/s41467-021-26825-4"},{"key":"62","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Sarmed A Rahman, Randy Lewis, Emanuele Mendicelli, and Sarah Powell. ``SU(2) lattice gauge theory on a quantum annealer&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. D 104, 034501 (2021). arXiv:2103.08661.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevD.104.034501"},{"key":"63","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Zohreh Davoudi, Norbert M. Linke, and Guido Pagano. ``Toward simulating quantum field theories with controlled phonon-ion dynamics: A hybrid analog-digital approach&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 043072 (2021). arXiv:2104.09346.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevResearch.3.043072"},{"key":"64","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Jo\u00e3o Barata, Niklas Mueller, Andrey Tarasov, and Raju Venugopalan. ``Single-particle digitization strategy for quantum computation of a $\\phi^4$ scalar field theory&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. A 103, 042410 (2021). arXiv:2012.00020.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevA.103.042410"},{"key":"65","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Wibe A. de Jong, Kyle Lee, James Mulligan, Mateusz P\u0142osko\u0144, Felix Ringer, and Xiaojun Yao. ``Quantum simulation of nonequilibrium dynamics and thermalization in the Schwinger model&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. D 106, 054508 (2022). arXiv:2106.08394.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevD.106.054508"},{"key":"66","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Anthony N. Ciavarella and Ivan A. Chernyshev. ``Preparation of the SU(3) lattice Yang-Mills vacuum with variational quantum methods&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. D 105, 074504 (2022). arXiv:2112.09083.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevD.105.074504"},{"key":"67","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Anthony Ciavarella, Natalie Klco, and Martin J. Savage. ``Trailhead for quantum simulation of SU(3) Yang-Mills lattice gauge theory in the local multiplet basis&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. D 103, 094501 (2021). arXiv:2101.10227.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevD.103.094501"},{"key":"68","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Angus Kan and Yunseong Nam. ``Lattice Quantum Chromodynamics and Electrodynamics on a Universal Quantum Computer&apos;&apos; (2021). arXiv:2107.12769.","DOI":"10.1088\/2058-9565\/aca0b8"},{"key":"69","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Thomas D. Cohen, Henry Lamm, Scott Lawrence, and Yukari Yamauchi. ``Quantum algorithms for transport coefficients in gauge theories&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. D 104, 094514 (2021). arXiv:2104.02024.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevD.104.094514"},{"key":"70","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"B\u00e1rbara Andrade, Zohreh Davoudi, Tobias Gra\u00df, Mohammad Hafezi, Guido Pagano, and Alireza Seif. ``Engineering an effective three-spin Hamiltonian in trapped-ion systems for applications in quantum simulation&apos;&apos;. Quantum Sci. Technol. 7, 034001 (2022). arXiv:2108.01022.","DOI":"10.1088\/2058-9565\/ac5f5b"},{"key":"71","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"M. Sohaib Alam, Stuart Hadfield, Henry Lamm, and Andy C. Y. Li. ``Primitive quantum gates for dihedral gauge theories&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. D 105, 114501 (2022). arXiv:2108.13305.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevD.105.114501"},{"key":"72","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Nhung H. Nguyen, Minh C. Tran, Yingyue Zhu, Alaina M. Green, C. Huerta Alderete, Zohreh Davoudi, and Norbert M. Linke. ``Digital Quantum Simulation of the Schwinger Model and Symmetry Protection with Trapped Ions&apos;&apos;. PRX Quantum 3, 020324 (2022). arXiv:2112.14262.","DOI":"10.1103\/PRXQuantum.3.020324"},{"key":"73","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Jinglei Zhang, Ryan Ferguson, Stefan K\u00fchn, Jan F. Haase, C. M. Wilson, Karl Jansen, and Christine A. Muschik. ``Simulating gauge theories with variational quantum eigensolvers in superconducting microwave cavities&apos;&apos;. Quantum 7, 1148 (2023). arXiv:2108.08248.","DOI":"10.22331\/q-2023-10-23-1148"},{"key":"74","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Masazumi Honda, Etsuko Itou, Yuta Kikuchi, Lento Nagano, and Takuya Okuda. ``Classically emulated digital quantum simulation for screening and confinement in the Schwinger model with a topological term&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. D 105, 014504 (2022). arXiv:2105.03276.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevD.105.014504"},{"key":"75","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Zhao-Yu Zhou, Guo-Xian Su, Jad C. Halimeh, Robert Ott, Hui Sun, Philipp Hauke, Bing Yang, Zhen-Sheng Yuan, J\u00fcrgen Berges, and Jian-Wei Pan. ``Thermalization dynamics of a gauge theory on a quantum simulator&apos;&apos;. Science 377, 311\u2013314 (2022). arXiv:2107.13563.","DOI":"10.1126\/science.abl6277"},{"key":"76","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Daniel Gonz\u00e1lez-Cuadra, Torsten V. Zache, Jose Carrasco, Barbara Kraus, and Peter Zoller. ``Hardware Efficient Quantum Simulation of Non-Abelian Gauge Theories with Qudits on Rydberg Platforms&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 160501 (2022). arXiv:2203.15541.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevLett.129.160501"},{"key":"77","unstructured":"Jesse Osborne, Ian P. McCulloch, Bing Yang, Philipp Hauke, and Jad C. Halimeh. ``Large-Scale $2+1$D $\\mathrm{U}(1)$ Gauge Theory with Dynamical Matter in a Cold-Atom Quantum Simulator&apos;&apos; (2022). arXiv:2211.01380."},{"key":"78","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Zohreh Davoudi, Niklas Mueller, and Connor Powers. ``Towards Quantum Computing Phase Diagrams of Gauge Theories with Thermal Pure Quantum States&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 081901 (2023). arXiv:2208.13112.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevLett.131.081901"},{"key":"79","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Niklas Mueller, Joseph A. Carolan, Andrew Connelly, Zohreh Davoudi, Eugene F. Dumitrescu, and K\u00fcbra Yeter-Aydeniz. ``Quantum Computation of Dynamical Quantum Phase Transitions and Entanglement Tomography in a Lattice Gauge Theory&apos;&apos;. PRX Quantum 4, 030323 (2023). arXiv:2210.03089.","DOI":"10.1103\/PRXQuantum.4.030323"},{"key":"80","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Edison M. Murairi, Michael J. Cervia, Hersh Kumar, Paulo F. Bedaque, and Andrei Alexandru. ``How many quantum gates do gauge theories require?&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. D 106, 094504 (2022). arXiv:2208.11789.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevD.106.094504"},{"key":"81","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Roland C. Farrell, Ivan A. Chernyshev, Sarah J. M. Powell, Nikita A. Zemlevskiy, Marc Illa, and Martin J. Savage. ``Preparations for quantum simulations of quantum chromodynamics in 1+1 dimensions. I. Axial gauge&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. D 107, 054512 (2023). arXiv:2207.01731.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevD.107.054512"},{"key":"82","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Roland C. Farrell, Ivan A. Chernyshev, Sarah J. M. Powell, Nikita A. Zemlevskiy, Marc Illa, and Martin J. Savage. ``Preparations for quantum simulations of quantum chromodynamics in 1+1 dimensions. II. Singlebaryon \u03b2-decay in real time&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. D 107, 054513 (2023). arXiv:2209.10781.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevD.107.054513"},{"key":"83","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Giuseppe Clemente, Arianna Crippa, and Karl Jansen. ``Strategies for the determination of the running coupling of (2+1)-dimensional QED with quantum computing&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. D 106, 114511 (2022). arXiv:2206.12454.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevD.106.114511"},{"key":"84","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Guy Pardo, Tomer Greenberg, Aryeh Fortinsky, Nadav Katz, and Erez Zohar. ``Resource-efficient quantum simulation of lattice gauge theories in arbitrary dimensions: Solving for Gauss&apos;s law and fermion elimination&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 023077 (2023). arXiv:2206.00685.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevResearch.5.023077"},{"key":"85","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"M.C. Banuls et al. ``Simulating Lattice Gauge Theories within Quantum Technologies&apos;&apos;. Eur. Phys. J. D 74, 165 (2020). arXiv:1911.00003.","DOI":"10.1140\/epjd\/e2020-100571-8"},{"key":"86","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Natalie Klco, Alessandro Roggero, and Martin J. Savage. ``Standard model physics and the digital quantum revolution: thoughts about the interface&apos;&apos;. Rept. Prog. Phys. 85, 064301 (2022). arXiv:2107.04769.","DOI":"10.1088\/1361-6633\/ac58a4"},{"key":"87","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Erez Zohar. ``Quantum simulation of lattice gauge theories in more than one space dimension\u2014requirements, challenges and methods&apos;&apos;. Phil. Trans. A. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 380, 20210069 (2021). arXiv:2106.04609.","DOI":"10.1098\/rsta.2021.0069"},{"key":"88","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"E. F. Dumitrescu, A. J. McCaskey, G. Hagen, G. R. Jansen, T. D. Morris, T. Papenbrock, R. C. Pooser, D. J. Dean, and P. Lougovski. ``Cloud Quantum Computing of an Atomic Nucleus&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 210501 (2018). arXiv:1801.03897.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevLett.120.210501"},{"key":"89","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Omar Shehab, Kevin A. Landsman, Yunseong Nam, Daiwei Zhu, Norbert M. Linke, Matthew J. Keesan, Raphael C. Pooser, and Christopher R. Monroe. ``Toward convergence of effective field theory simulations on digital quantum computers&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. A 100, 062319 (2019). arXiv:1904.04338.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevA.100.062319"},{"key":"90","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Alessandro Roggero and Joseph Carlson. ``Dynamic linear response quantum algorithm&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. C 100, 034610 (2019). arXiv:1804.01505.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevC.100.034610"},{"key":"91","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Alessandro Roggero, Andy C. Y. Li, Joseph Carlson, Rajan Gupta, and Gabriel N. Perdue. ``Quantum Computing for Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. D 101, 074038 (2020). arXiv:1911.06368.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevD.101.074038"},{"key":"92","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Weijie Du, James P. Vary, Xingbo Zhao, and Wei Zuo. ``Quantum simulation of nuclear inelastic scattering&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. A 104, 012611 (2021). arXiv:2006.01369.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevA.104.012611"},{"key":"93","unstructured":"Weijie Du, James P. Vary, Xingbo Zhao, and Wei Zuo. ``Ab initio nuclear structure via quantum adiabatic algorithm&apos;&apos; (2021). arXiv:2105.08910."},{"key":"94","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Alessandro Roggero, Chenyi Gu, Alessandro Baroni, and Thomas Papenbrock. ``Preparation of excited states for nuclear dynamics on a quantum computer&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. C 102, 064624 (2020). arXiv:2009.13485.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevC.102.064624"},{"key":"95","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Eric T. Holland, Kyle A. Wendt, Konstantinos Kravvaris, Xian Wu, W. Erich Ormand, Jonathan L DuBois, Sofia Quaglioni, and Francesco Pederiva. ``Optimal Control for the Quantum Simulation of Nuclear Dynamics&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. A 101, 062307 (2020). arXiv:1908.08222.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevA.101.062307"},{"key":"96","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Dmitri E. Kharzeev and Yuta Kikuchi. ``Real-time chiral dynamics from a digital quantum simulation&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 023342 (2020). arXiv:2001.00698.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevResearch.2.023342"},{"key":"97","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Michael Kreshchuk, Shaoyang Jia, William M. Kirby, Gary Goldstein, James P. Vary, and Peter J. Love. ``Simulating Hadronic Physics on NISQ devices using Basis Light-Front Quantization&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. A 103, 062601 (2021). arXiv:2011.13443.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevA.103.062601"},{"key":"98","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Khadeejah Bepari, Sarah Malik, Michael Spannowsky, and Simon Williams. ``Towards a quantum computing algorithm for helicity amplitudes and parton showers&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. D 103, 076020 (2021). arXiv:2010.00046.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevD.103.076020"},{"key":"99","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Christian W. Bauer, Marat Freytsis, and Benjamin Nachman. ``Simulating Collider Physics on Quantum Computers Using Effective Field Theories&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 212001 (2021). arXiv:2102.05044.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevLett.127.212001"},{"key":"100","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Andrew M Childs and Yuan Su. ``Nearly optimal lattice simulation by product formulas&apos;&apos;. Physical review letters 123, 050503 (2019). arXiv:1901.00564.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevLett.123.050503"},{"key":"101","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Masuo Suzuki. ``General theory of fractal path integrals with applications to many-body theories and statistical physics&apos;&apos;. Journal of Mathematical Physics 32, 400\u2013407 (1991).","DOI":"10.1063\/1.529425"},{"key":"102","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Nathan Wiebe, Dominic Berry, Peter Hoyer, and Barry C Sanders. ``Higher order decompositions of ordered operator exponentials&apos;&apos;. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 43, 065203 (2010). arXiv:0812.0562.","DOI":"10.1088\/1751-8113\/43\/6\/065203"},{"key":"103","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Andrew M Childs, Yuan Su, Minh C Tran, Nathan Wiebe, and Shuchen Zhu. ``Theory of Trotter error with commutator scaling&apos;&apos;. Physical Review X 11, 011020 (2021). arXiv:1912.08854.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevX.11.011020"},{"key":"104","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Andrew M Childs and Nathan Wiebe. ``Hamiltonian simulation using linear combinations of unitary operations&apos;&apos;. Quantum Information and Computation 12, 901\u2013921 (2012). arXiv:1202.5822.","DOI":"10.26421\/QIC12.11-12-1"},{"key":"105","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Dominic W Berry, Andrew M Childs, Richard Cleve, Robin Kothari, and Rolando D Somma. ``Simulating Hamiltonian dynamics with a truncated Taylor series&apos;&apos;. Physical Review Letters 114, 090502 (2015). arXiv:1412.4687.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevLett.114.090502"},{"key":"106","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Guang Hao Low and Isaac L. Chuang. ``Optimal Hamiltonian Simulation by Quantum Signal Processing&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 010501 (2017). arXiv:1606.02685.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevLett.118.010501"},{"key":"107","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Guang Hao Low and Isaac L Chuang. ``Hamiltonian simulation by qubitization&apos;&apos;. Quantum 3, 163 (2019). arXiv:1610.06546.","DOI":"10.22331\/q-2019-07-12-163"},{"key":"108","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Shantanav Chakraborty, Andr\u00e1s Gily\u00e9n, and Stacey Jeffery. ``The power of block-encoded matrix powers: improved regression techniques via faster Hamiltonian simulation&apos;&apos;. Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs) 132, 33:1\u201333:14 (2019). arXiv:1804.01973.","DOI":"10.4230\/LIPIcs.ICALP.2019.33"},{"key":"109","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Andr\u00e1s Gily\u00e9n, Yuan Su, Guang Hao Low, and Nathan Wiebe. ``Quantum singular value transformation and beyond: Exponential improvements for quantum matrix arithmetics&apos;&apos;. In Proceedings of the 51st Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing. Page 193\u2013204. New York, NY, USA (2019). Association for Computing Machinery. arXiv:1806.01838.","DOI":"10.1145\/3313276.3316366"},{"key":"110","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Amir Kalev and Itay Hen. ``Quantum algorithm for simulating hamiltonian dynamics with an off-diagonal series expansion&apos;&apos;. Quantum 5, 426 (2021). arXiv:2006.02539.","DOI":"10.22331\/q-2021-04-08-426"},{"key":"111","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Abhishek Rajput, Alessandro Roggero, and Nathan Wiebe. ``Hybridized Methods for Quantum Simulation in the Interaction Picture&apos;&apos;. Quantum 6, 780 (2022). arXiv:2109.03308.","DOI":"10.22331\/q-2022-08-17-780"},{"key":"112","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Torin F. Stetina, Anthony Ciavarella, Xiaosong Li, and Nathan Wiebe. ``Simulating Effective QED on Quantum Computers&apos;&apos;. Quantum 6, 622 (2022). arXiv:2101.00111.","DOI":"10.22331\/q-2022-01-18-622"},{"key":"113","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Johann Ostmeyer. ``Optimised Trotter decompositions for classical and quantum computing&apos;&apos;. J. Phys. A 56, 285303 (2023). arXiv:2211.02691.","DOI":"10.1088\/1751-8121\/acde7a"},{"key":"114","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Peter W Shor. ``Fault-tolerant quantum computation&apos;&apos;. In Proceedings of 37th Conference on Foundations of Computer Science. Pages 56\u201365. IEEE (1996). arXiv:quant-ph\/9605011.","DOI":"10.1109\/SFCS.1996.548464"},{"key":"115","unstructured":"Jesse R. Stryker. ``Shearing approach to gauge invariant Trotterization&apos;&apos; (2021). arXiv:2105.11548."},{"key":"116","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Andrew M Childs and Wim Van Dam. ``Quantum algorithms for algebraic problems&apos;&apos;. Reviews of Modern Physics 82, 1 (2010). arXiv:0812.0380.","DOI":"10.1103\/RevModPhys.82.1"},{"key":"117","unstructured":"Thomas H\u00e4ner, Martin Roetteler, and Krysta M. Svore. ``Optimizing Quantum Circuits for Arithmetic&apos;&apos; (2018). arXiv:1805.12445."},{"key":"118","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Thomas Haener, Mathias Soeken, Martin Roetteler, and Krysta M Svore. ``Quantum circuits for floating-point arithmetic&apos;&apos;. In International Conference on Reversible Computation. Pages 162\u2013174. Springer (2018). arXiv:1807.02023.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-99498-7_11"},{"key":"119","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ian D Kivlichan, Nathan Wiebe, Ryan Babbush, and Al\u00e1n Aspuru-Guzik. ``Bounding the costs of quantum simulation of many-body physics in real space&apos;&apos;. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 50, 305301 (2017). arXiv:1608.05696.","DOI":"10.1088\/1751-8121\/aa77b8"},{"key":"120","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Yuan Su, Dominic W. Berry, Nathan Wiebe, Nicholas Rubin, and Ryan Babbush. ``Fault-Tolerant Quantum Simulations of Chemistry in First Quantization&apos;&apos;. PRX Quantum 2, 040332 (2021). arXiv:2105.12767.","DOI":"10.1103\/PRXQuantum.2.040332"},{"key":"121","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ryan Babbush, Dominic W Berry, Ian D Kivlichan, Annie Y Wei, Peter J Love, and Al\u00e1n Aspuru-Guzik. ``Exponentially more precise quantum simulation of fermions in second quantization&apos;&apos;. New Journal of Physics 18, 033032 (2016). arXiv:1506.01020.","DOI":"10.1088\/1367-2630\/18\/3\/033032"},{"key":"122","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Poul Jorgensen. ``Second quantization-based methods in quantum chemistry&apos;&apos;. Elsevier. (2012).","DOI":"10.1016\/B978-0-12-390220-7.X5001-6"},{"key":"123","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Nikolaj Moll, Andreas Fuhrer, Peter Staar, and Ivano Tavernelli. ``Optimizing qubit resources for quantum chemistry simulations in second quantization on a quantum computer&apos;&apos;. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 49, 295301 (2016). arXiv:1510.04048.","DOI":"10.1088\/1751-8113\/49\/29\/295301"},{"key":"124","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ryan Babbush, Dominic W Berry, Yuval R Sanders, Ian D Kivlichan, Artur Scherer, Annie Y Wei, Peter J Love, and Al\u00e1n Aspuru-Guzik. ``Exponentially more precise quantum simulation of fermions in the configuration interaction representation&apos;&apos;. Quantum Science and Technology 3, 015006 (2017). arXiv:1506.01029.","DOI":"10.1088\/2058-9565\/aa9463"},{"key":"125","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"John B. Kogut and Leonard Susskind. ``Hamiltonian Formulation of Wilson&apos;s Lattice Gauge Theories&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. D 11, 395\u2013408 (1975).","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevD.11.395"},{"key":"126","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"J. Schwinger. ``On angular momentum&apos;&apos;. Technical report. Harvard University (1952).","DOI":"10.2172\/4389568"},{"key":"127","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Manu Mathur. ``Harmonic oscillator prepotentials in SU(2) lattice gauge theory&apos;&apos;. J. Phys. A 38, 10015\u201310026 (2005). arXiv:hep-lat\/0403029.","DOI":"10.1088\/0305-4470\/38\/46\/008"},{"key":"128","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ramesh Anishetty, Manu Mathur, and Indrakshi Raychowdhury. ``Irreducible SU(3) Schwinger Bosons&apos;&apos;. J. Math. Phys. 50, 053503 (2009). arXiv:0901.0644.","DOI":"10.1063\/1.3122666"},{"key":"129","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Manu Mathur, Indrakshi Raychowdhury, and Ramesh Anishetty. ``SU(N) Irreducible Schwinger Bosons&apos;&apos;. J. Math. Phys. 51, 093504 (2010). arXiv:1003.5487.","DOI":"10.1063\/1.3464267"},{"key":"130","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Indrakshi Raychowdhury and Jesse R. Stryker. ``Loop, String, and Hadron Dynamics in SU(2) Hamiltonian Lattice Gauge Theories&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. D 101, 114502 (2020). arXiv:1912.06133.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevD.101.114502"},{"key":"131","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Zohreh Davoudi, Indrakshi Raychowdhury, and Andrew Shaw. ``Search for efficient formulations for Hamiltonian simulation of non-Abelian lattice gauge theories&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. D 104, 074505 (2021). arXiv:2009.11802.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevD.104.074505"},{"key":"132","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Jad C. Halimeh, Haifeng Lang, Julius Mildenberger, Zhang Jiang, and Philipp Hauke. ``Gauge-Symmetry Protection Using Single-Body Terms&apos;&apos;. PRX Quantum 2, 040311 (2021). arXiv:2007.00668.","DOI":"10.1103\/PRXQuantum.2.040311"},{"key":"133","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Minh C. Tran, Yuan Su, Daniel Carney, and Jacob M. Taylor. ``Faster Digital Quantum Simulation by Symmetry Protection&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. X. Quantum. 2, 010323 (2021). arXiv:2006.16248.","DOI":"10.1103\/PRXQuantum.2.010323"},{"key":"134","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Valentin Kasper, Torsten V. Zache, Fred Jendrzejewski, Maciej Lewenstein, and Erez Zohar. ``Non-Abelian gauge invariance from dynamical decoupling&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. D 107, 014506 (2023). arXiv:2012.08620.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevD.107.014506"},{"key":"135","unstructured":"Henry Lamm, Scott Lawrence, and Yukari Yamauchi. ``Suppressing Coherent Gauge Drift in Quantum Simulations&apos;&apos; (2020). arXiv:2005.12688."},{"key":"136","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Jad C. Halimeh, Haifeng Lang, and Philipp Hauke. ``Gauge protection in non-abelian lattice gauge theories&apos;&apos;. New J. Phys. 24, 033015 (2022). arXiv:2106.09032.","DOI":"10.1088\/1367-2630\/ac5564"},{"key":"137","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Saurabh V. Kadam, Indrakshi Raychowdhury, and Jesse R. Stryker. ``Loop-string-hadron formulation of an SU(3) gauge theory with dynamical quarks&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. D 107, 094513 (2023). arXiv:2212.04490.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevD.107.094513"},{"key":"138","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Yuan Su, Hsin-Yuan Huang, and Earl T. Campbell. ``Nearly tight Trotterization of interacting electrons&apos;&apos;. Quantum 5, 495 (2021). arXiv:2012.09194.","DOI":"10.22331\/q-2021-07-05-495"},{"key":"139","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Burak \u015eahino\u011flu and Rolando D. Somma. ``Hamiltonian simulation in the low-energy subspace&apos;&apos;. npj Quantum Inf. 7, 119 (2021). arXiv:2006.02660.","DOI":"10.1038\/s41534-021-00451-w"},{"key":"140","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Changhao Yi and Elizabeth Crosson. ``Spectral analysis of product formulas for quantum simulation&apos;&apos;. npj Quantum Information 8, 37 (2022). arXiv:2102.12655.","DOI":"10.1038\/s41534-022-00548-w"},{"key":"141","unstructured":"Wikipedia contributors. ``Logic synthesis \u2014 Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia&apos;&apos; (2013). [Online; accessed Dec-2022]."},{"key":"142","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Boris Golubov, Aleksandr Efimov, and Valentin Skvortsov. ``Walsh series and transforms: theory and applications&apos;&apos;. Volume 64. Springer Science & Business Media. (2012).","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-011-3288-6"},{"key":"143","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Rao K Yarlagadda and John E Hershey. ``Hadamard matrix analysis and synthesis: with applications to communications and signal\/image processing&apos;&apos;. Volume 383. Springer Science & Business Media. (2012).","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4615-6313-6"},{"key":"144","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Jonathan Welch, Daniel Greenbaum, Sarah Mostame, and Alan Aspuru-Guzik. ``Efficient quantum circuits for diagonal unitaries without ancillas&apos;&apos;. New Journal of Physics 16, 033040 (2014). arXiv:1306.3991.","DOI":"10.1088\/1367-2630\/16\/3\/033040"},{"key":"145","unstructured":"Christopher Kane, Dorota M. Grabowska, Benjamin Nachman, and Christian W. Bauer. ``Efficient quantum implementation of 2+1 U(1) lattice gauge theories with Gauss law constraints&apos;&apos; (2022). arXiv:2211.10497."},{"key":"146","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Manu Mathur and T. P. Sreeraj. ``Lattice Gauge Theories and Spin Models&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. D 94, 085029 (2016). arXiv:1604.00315.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevD.94.085029"},{"key":"147","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Manu Mathur and Atul Rathor. ``Exact duality and local dynamics in SU(N) lattice gauge theory&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. D 107, 074504 (2023). arXiv:2109.00992.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevD.107.074504"},{"key":"148","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"N. E. Ligterink, N. R. Walet, and R. F. Bishop. ``Towards a many body treatment of Hamiltonian lattice SU(N) gauge theory&apos;&apos;. Annals Phys. 284, 215\u2013262 (2000). arXiv:hep-lat\/0001028.","DOI":"10.1006\/aphy.2000.6070"},{"key":"149","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Pietro Silvi, Enrique Rico, Marcello Dalmonte, Ferdinand Tschirsich, and Simone Montangero. ``Finite-density phase diagram of a (1+1)-d non-abelian lattice gauge theory with tensor networks&apos;&apos;. Quantum 1, 9 (2017). arXiv:1606.05510.","DOI":"10.22331\/q-2017-04-25-9"},{"key":"150","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"R. Brower, S. Chandrasekharan, and U. J. Wiese. ``QCD as a quantum link model&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. D 60, 094502 (1999). arXiv:hep-th\/9704106.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevD.60.094502"},{"key":"151","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Stefan K\u00fchn, J. Ignacio Cirac, and Mari Carmen Ba\u00f1uls. ``Non-Abelian string breaking phenomena with Matrix Product States&apos;&apos;. JHEP 07, 130 (2015). arXiv:1505.04441.","DOI":"10.1007\/JHEP07(2015)130"},{"key":"152","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Mari Carmen Ba\u00f1uls, Krzysztof Cichy, J. Ignacio Cirac, Karl Jansen, and Stefan K\u00fchn. ``Efficient basis formulation for 1+1 dimensional SU(2) lattice gauge theory: Spectral calculations with matrix product states&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. X 7, 041046 (2017). arXiv:1707.06434.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevX.7.041046"},{"key":"153","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"P. Sala, T. Shi, S. K\u00fchn, M. C. Ba\u00f1uls, E. Demler, and J. I. Cirac. ``Variational study of U(1) and SU(2) lattice gauge theories with Gaussian states in 1+1 dimensions&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. D 98, 034505 (2018). arXiv:1805.05190.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevD.98.034505"},{"key":"154","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"C. J. Hamer, Wei-hong Zheng, and J. Oitmaa. ``Series expansions for the massive Schwinger model in Hamiltonian lattice theory&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. D 56, 55\u201367 (1997). arXiv:hep-lat\/9701015.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevD.56.55"},{"key":"155","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Yu Tong, Victor V. Albert, Jarrod R. McClean, John Preskill, and Yuan Su. ``Provably accurate simulation of gauge theories and bosonic systems&apos;&apos;. Quantum 6, 816 (2022). arXiv:2110.06942.","DOI":"10.22331\/q-2022-09-22-816"},{"key":"156","unstructured":"Frank Gray. ``Pulse code communication&apos;&apos;. U.S. Patent No. 2,632,058 (1953)."},{"key":"157","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Stephen S Bullock and Igor L Markov. ``Smaller circuits for arbitrary n-qubit diagonal computations&apos;&apos;. Quantum Information and Computation 4, 027\u2013047 (2004). arXiv:quant-ph\/0303039.","DOI":"10.26421\/QIC4.1-3"},{"key":"158","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Eyal Kushilevitz and Yishay Mansour. ``Learning decision trees using the fourier spectrum&apos;&apos;. In Proceedings of the twenty-third annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing. Pages 455\u2013464. (1991).","DOI":"10.1137\/0222080"},{"key":"159","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Alex Bocharov, Martin Roetteler, and Krysta M Svore. ``Efficient synthesis of universal repeat-until-success quantum circuits&apos;&apos;. Physical Review Letters 114, 080502 (2015). arXiv:1404.5320.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevLett.114.080502"},{"key":"160","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Adriano Barenco, Charles H. Bennett, Richard Cleve, David P. DiVincenzo, Norman Margolus, Peter Shor, Tycho Sleator, John Smolin, and Harald Weinfurter. ``Elementary gates for quantum computation&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. A 52, 3457 (1995). arXiv:quant-ph\/9503016.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevA.52.3457"},{"key":"161","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Yong He, Ming-Xing Luo, E. Zhang, Hong-Ke Wang, and Xiao-Feng Wang. ``Decompositions of n-qubit toffoli gates with linear circuit complexity&apos;&apos;. International Journal of Theoretical Physics 56, 2350\u20132361 (2017).","DOI":"10.1007\/s10773-017-3389-4"},{"key":"162","unstructured":"Z. Davoudi and J. R. Styker. ``On the quantum-computing cost of lattice quantum chromodynamics&apos;&apos;. work in progress (2023)."},{"key":"163","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Daniel C. Hackett, Kiel Howe, Ciaran Hughes, William Jay, Ethan T. Neil, and James N. Simone. ``Digitizing Gauge Fields: Lattice Monte Carlo Results for Future Quantum Computers&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. A 99, 062341 (2019). arXiv:1811.03629.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevA.99.062341"},{"key":"164","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Tobias Hartung, Timo Jakobs, Karl Jansen, Johann Ostmeyer, and Carsten Urbach. ``Digitising SU(2) gauge fields and the freezing transition&apos;&apos;. Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 237 (2022). arXiv:2201.09625.","DOI":"10.1140\/epjc\/s10052-022-10192-5"},{"key":"165","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Andrew M Childs, Dmitri Maslov, Yunseong Nam, Neil J Ross, and Yuan Su. ``Toward the first quantum simulation with quantum speedup&apos;&apos;. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115, 9456\u20139461 (2018). arXiv:1711.10980.","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.1801723115"},{"key":"166","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Dong An, Di Fang, and Lin Lin. ``Time-dependent unbounded Hamiltonian simulation with vector norm scaling&apos;&apos;. Quantum 5, 459 (2021). arXiv:2012.13105.","DOI":"10.22331\/q-2021-05-26-459"},{"key":"167","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Qi Zhao, You Zhou, Alexander F. Shaw, Tongyang Li, and Andrew M. Childs. ``Hamiltonian Simulation with Random Inputs&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 270502 (2022). arXiv:2111.04773.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevLett.129.270502"},{"key":"168","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Marcela Carena, Henry Lamm, Ying-Ying Li, and Wanqiang Liu. ``Lattice renormalization of quantum simulations&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. D 104, 094519 (2021). arXiv:2107.01166.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevD.104.094519"},{"key":"169","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Anthony Ciavarella. ``Algorithm for quantum computation of particle decays&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. D 102, 094505 (2020). arXiv:2007.04447.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevD.102.094505"},{"key":"170","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ra\u00fal A. Brice\u00f1o, Juan V. Guerrero, Maxwell T. Hansen, and Alexandru M. Sturzu. ``Role of boundary conditions in quantum computations of scattering observables&apos;&apos;. Phys. Rev. D 103, 014506 (2021). arXiv:2007.01155.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevD.103.014506"},{"key":"171","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Michael A Nielsen and Isaac Chuang. ``Quantum computation and quantum information&apos;&apos;. Cambridge University Press. (2002).","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511976667"},{"key":"172","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Craig Gidney. ``Halving the cost of quantum addition&apos;&apos;. Quantum 2, 74 (2018). arXiv:1709.06648.","DOI":"10.22331\/q-2018-06-18-74"},{"key":"173","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Cody Jones. ``Low-overhead constructions for the fault-tolerant toffoli gate&apos;&apos;. Physical Review A 87, 022328 (2013). arXiv:1212.5069.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevA.87.022328"},{"key":"174","unstructured":"Steven A. Cuccaro, Thomas G. Draper, Samuel A. Kutin, and David Petrie Moulton. ``A new quantum ripple-carry addition circuit&apos;&apos; (2004). arXiv:quant-ph\/0410184."},{"key":"175","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Mihir K Bhaskar, Stuart Hadfield, Anargyros Papageorgiou, and Iasonas Petras. ``Quantum algorithms and circuits for scientific computing&apos;&apos;. Quantum Information and Computation 16, 0197\u20130236 (2016). arXiv:1511.08253.","DOI":"10.26421\/QIC16.3-4-2"}],"container-title":["Quantum"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/quantum-journal.org\/papers\/q-2023-12-20-1213\/pdf\/","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,12,20]],"date-time":"2023-12-20T15:58:34Z","timestamp":1703087914000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/quantum-journal.org\/papers\/q-2023-12-20-1213\/"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,12,20]]},"references-count":176,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.22331\/q-2023-12-20-1213","archive":["CLOCKSS"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["2521-327X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2521-327X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,12,20]]},"article-number":"1213"}}