{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"institution":[{"name":"Authorea, Inc."}],"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,3]],"date-time":"2025-06-03T16:39:53Z","timestamp":1748968793625,"version":"3.41.0"},"posted":{"date-parts":[[2023,7,26]]},"group-title":"Preprints","reference-count":0,"publisher":"Wiley","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"accepted":{"date-parts":[[2023,7,26]]},"abstract":"<jats:p id=\"p1\">Although the role of multiple cues in mate choice have been widely\nstudied, the consequences thereof for receivers remain poorly\nunderstood, especially when there is a mismatch between cues. We address\nthis using the spider mite Tetranychus urticae, in which virgin females\nare highly valuable mates compared to mated females, given first male\nsperm precedence. We tested how the presence of females of different\nmating status, and of cues they left in the substrate affected mating\nbehaviour as well as male costs. Male mating attempts were solely\naffected by substrate cues, being more frequent on patches with cues of\nvirgins, while female acceptance and number of mating events were\nindependently affected by both female identity and substrate cues, being\nhigher when cues stemmed from virgins. Once copulation started, its\nduration depended mainly on the mating status of the female being\nfertilized, with the overall amount of time spent mating being higher in\nmatings with virgins than in those with mated females. Male survival\ncosts mirrored their investment in mating, with patches with a mismatch\nbetween cues showing intermediate survival costs. The substrate cues\nleft by females are thus instrumental for males to find their mates, but\nthey can also lead to males paying a high survival cost while not\nreaping the benefit of mating effectively, which suggest they are less\nreliable but more efficient than cues on females. The benefit of using\nredundant cues will then hinge upon the frequency of mismatch between\ncues, which itself should vary with the dynamics of populations.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.22541\/au.169035519.93062042\/v1","type":"posted-content","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,7,26]],"date-time":"2023-07-26T07:06:41Z","timestamp":1690355201000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Fake news? The impact of cue mismatch in mating behaviour"],"prefix":"10.22541","author":[{"given":"Leonor","family":"Rodrigues","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Centre for Ecology Evolution and Environmental Changes"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8609-7768","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Sara","family":"Magalhaes","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Faculdade de Ci\u00eancias, Universidade de Lisboa"}]}],"member":"311","container-title":[],"original-title":[],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,7,26]],"date-time":"2023-07-26T07:06:42Z","timestamp":1690355202000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.authorea.com\/users\/398457\/articles\/656745-fake-news-the-impact-of-cue-mismatch-in-mating-behaviour?commit=a2e080c85e0a0a4de8df96b193b7ce7e5ec3f882"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,7,26]]},"references-count":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.22541\/au.169035519.93062042\/v1","relation":{},"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,7,26]]},"subtype":"preprint"}}