{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,11,6]],"date-time":"2026-11-06T22:16:32Z","timestamp":1794003392864,"version":"4.8.0"},"reference-count":92,"publisher":"The Japanese Society of Interventional Radiology","issue":"0","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,25]]},"DOI":"10.22575\/interventionalradiology.2024-0040","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,24]],"date-time":"2025-04-24T18:08:59Z","timestamp":1745518139000},"page":"e2024-0040-e2024-0040","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["A Review of Treatment for Type II Endoleak after Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair"],"prefix":"10.22575","volume":"10","author":[{"given":"Hiroki","family":"Horinouchi","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Radiology, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"9863","reference":[{"key":"1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"1. van Marrewijk CJ, Fransen G, Laheij RJ, Harris PL, Buth J; EUROSTAR Collaborators. Is a type II endoleak after EVAR a harbinger of risk? causes and outcome of open conversion and aneurysm rupture during follow-up. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2004; 27: 128-137.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejvs.2003.10.016"},{"key":"2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"2. Dijkstra ML, Zeebregts CJ, Verhagen HJM, et al. Incidence, natural course, and outcome of type II endoleaks in infrarenal endovascular aneurysm repair based on the ENGAGE registry data. J Vasc Surg. 2020; 71: 780-789.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvs.2019.04.486"},{"key":"3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"3. Seike Y, Matsuda H, Shimizu H, et al. Nationwide analysis of persistent type II endoleak and late outcomes of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in Japan: a propensity-matched analysis. Circulation. 2022; 145: 1056-1066.","DOI":"10.1161\/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.056581"},{"key":"4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"4. El Batti S, Cochennec F, Roudot-Thoraval F, Becquemin JP. Type II endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm are not always a benign condition. J Vasc Surg. 2013; 57: 1291-1297.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvs.2012.10.118"},{"key":"5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"5. Powell JT, Sweeting MJ, Ulug P, et al. Meta-analysis of individual-patient data from EVAR-1, DREAM, OVER and ACE trials comparing outcomes of endovascular or open repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm over 5 years. Br J Surg. 2017; 104: 166-178.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvs.2017.03.403"},{"key":"6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"6. Dangas G, O&apos;Connor D, Firwana B, et al. Open versus endovascular stent graft repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012; 5: 1071-1080.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcin.2012.06.015"},{"key":"7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"7. Sidloff DA, Stather PW, Choke E, Bown MJ, Sayers RD. Type II endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair. Br J Surg. 2013; 100: 1262-1270.","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.9181"},{"key":"8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"8. Sheehan MK, Ouriel K, Greenberg R, et al. Are type II endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair endograft dependent? J Vasc Surg. 2006; 43: 657-661.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvs.2005.12.044"},{"key":"9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"9. Silverberg D, Baril DT, Ellozy SH, et al. An 8-year experience with type II endoleaks: natural history suggests selective intervention is a safe approach. J Vasc Surg. 2006; 44: 453-459.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvs.2006.04.058"},{"key":"10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"10. Ultee KHJ, B\u00fcttner S, Huurman R, et al. Editor&apos;s choice - systematic review and meta-analysis of the outcome of treatment for type II endoleak following endovascular aneurysm repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018; 56: 794-807.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejvs.2018.06.009"},{"key":"11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"11. Schermerhorn ML, Buck DB, O&apos;Malley AJ, et al. Long-term outcomes of abdominal aortic aneurysm in the medicare population. N Engl J Med. 2015; 373: 328-338.","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1405778"},{"key":"12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"12. Antoniou GA, Antoniou SA, Torella F. Editor&apos;s choice - endovascular vs. open repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm: systematic review and meta-analysis of updated peri-operative and long-term data of randomised controlled trials. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020; 59: 385-397.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejvs.2019.11.030"},{"key":"13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"13. Schl\u00f6sser FJV, Gusberg RJ, Dardik A, et al. Aneurysm rupture after EVAR: can the ultimate failure be predicted? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009; 37: 15-22.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejvs.2008.10.011"},{"key":"14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"14. Lal BK, Zhou W, Li Z, et al. Predictors and outcomes of endoleaks in the Veterans Affairs Open Versus Endovascular Repair (OVER) Trial of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2015; 62: 1394-1404.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvs.2015.02.003"},{"key":"15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"15. Rokosh RS, Wu WW, Dalman RL, Chaikof EL. Society for Vascular Surgery implementation of clinical practice guidelines for patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm: endoleak management. J Vasc Surg. 2021; 74: 1792-1794.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvs.2021.04.042"},{"key":"16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"16. Cifuentes S, Mendes BC, Tabiei A, Scali ST, Oderich GS, DeMartino RR. Management of endoleaks after elective infrarenal aortic endovascular aneurysm repair: a review. JAMA Surg. 2023; 158: 965-973.","DOI":"10.1001\/jamasurg.2023.2934"},{"key":"17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"17. Chun JY, de Haan M, Maleux G, Osman A, Cannavale A, Morgan R. CIRSE standards of practice on management of endoleaks following endovascular aneurysm repair. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2024; 47: 161-176.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00270-023-03629-1"},{"key":"18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"18. Ameli-Renani S, Pavlidis V, Morgan RA. Secondary endoleak management following TEVAR and EVAR. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2020; 43: 1839-1854.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00270-020-02572-9"},{"key":"19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"19. Katada Y. Recent update of endovascular Type 2 endoleak management. Interv Radiol (Higashimatsuyama). 2020; 5: 114-119.","DOI":"10.22575\/interventionalradiology.2020-0016"},{"key":"20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"20. Avgerinos ED, Chaer RA, Makaroun MS. Type II endoleaks. J Vasc Surg. 2014; 60: 1386-1391.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvs.2014.07.100"},{"key":"21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"21. Chaikof EL, Dalman RL, Eskandari MK, et al. The Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines on the care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2018; 67: 2-77.e2.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvs.2017.10.044"},{"key":"22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"22. Wanhainen A, Verzini F, Van Herzeele I, et al. Editor&apos;s choice - European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2019 clinical practice guidelines on the management of abdominal aorto-iliac artery aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019; 57: 8-93.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejvs.2020.09.004"},{"key":"23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"23. Patel R, Sweeting MJ, Powell JT, Greenhalgh RM. Endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm in 15-years&apos; follow-up of the UK endovascular aneurysm repair trial 1 (EVAR trial 1): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016; 388: 2366-2374.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(16)31135-7"},{"key":"24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"24. Sarac TP, Gibbons C, Vargas L, et al. Long-term follow-up of type II endoleak embolization reveals the need for close surveillance. J Vasc Surg. 2012; 55: 33-40.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvs.2011.07.092"},{"key":"25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"25. Horinouchi H, Okada T, Yamaguchi M, et al. Mid-term outcomes and predictors of transarterial embolization for Type II endoleak after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2020; 43: 696-705.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00270-020-02436-2"},{"key":"26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"26. Iwakoshi S, Ogawa Y, Dake MD, et al. Outcomes of embolization procedures for type II endoleaks following endovascular abdominal aortic repair. J Vasc Surg. 2023; 77: 114-121.e2.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvs.2022.07.168"},{"key":"27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"27. Schanzer A, Greenberg RK, Hevelone N, et al. Predictors of abdominal aortic aneurysm sac enlargement after endovascular repair. Circulation. 2011; 123: 2848-2855.","DOI":"10.1161\/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.014902"},{"key":"28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"28. Antoniou GA, Georgiadis GS, Antoniou SA, Kuhan G, Murray D. A meta-analysis of outcomes of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in patients with hostile and friendly neck anatomy. J Vasc Surg. 2013; 57: 527-538.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvs.2012.09.050"},{"key":"29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"29. Choke E, Munneke G, Morgan R, et al. Outcomes of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in patients with hostile neck anatomy. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2006; 29: 975-980.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00270-006-0011-1"},{"key":"30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"30. Stather PW, Sayers RD, Cheah A, Wild JB, Bown MJ, Choke E. Outcomes of endovascular aneurysm repair in patients with hostile neck anatomy. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012; 44: 556-561.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejvs.2012.10.003"},{"key":"31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"31. Zarins CK, AneuRx Clinical Investigators. The US AneuRx Clinical Trial: 6-year clinical update 2002. J Vasc Surg. 2003; 37: 904-908.","DOI":"10.1067\/S0741-5214(03)70038-X"},{"key":"32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"32. Rajendran S, May J. Late rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysm after endovascular repair. J Vasc Surg. 2017; 65: 52-57.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvs.2016.05.090"},{"key":"33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"33. Nakai H, Iwakoshi S, Takimoto S, Taniguchi T. Preemptive embolization of the lumbar arteries and inferior mesenteric artery to prevent abdominal aortic aneurysm enlargement associated with Type 2 endoleak following endovascular aneurysm repair. Interv Radiol (Higashimatsuyama). 2023; 8: 146-153.","DOI":"10.22575\/interventionalradiology.2023-0007"},{"key":"34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"34. Madigan MC, Singh MJ, Chaer RA, Al-Khoury GE, Makaroun MS. Occult type I or III endoleaks are a common cause of failure of type II endoleak treatment after endovascular aortic repair. J Vasc Surg. 2019; 69: 432-439.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvs.2018.04.054"},{"key":"35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"35. Berczeli M, Chinnadurai P, Legeza P, et al. Dynamic, time-resolved CT angiography after EVAR: A quantitative approach to accurately characterize aortic endoleak type and identify inflow vessels. J Endovasc Ther. 2023; 30: 123-131.","DOI":"10.1177\/15266028211070970"},{"key":"36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"36. Berczeli M, Chinnadurai P, Osztrogon\u00e1cz P, et al. Dynamic computed tomography angiography is more accurate in diagnosing endoleaks than standard triphasic computed tomography angiography and enables targeted embolization. Ann Vasc Surg. 2023; 88: 318-326.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.avsg.2022.06.014"},{"key":"37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"37. Berczeli M, Lumsden AB, Chang SM, Bavare CS, Chinnadurai P. Dynamic, time-resolved computed tomography angiography technique to characterize aortic endoleak type, inflow and provide guidance for targeted treatment. J Endovasc Ther. 2022; 29: 11-22.","DOI":"10.1177\/15266028211037986"},{"key":"38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"38. Kouvelos G, Koutsoumpelis A, Lazaris A, Matsagkas M. Late open conversion after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2015; 61: 1350-1356.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvs.2015.02.019"},{"key":"39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"39. Vo\u00fbte MT, Bastos Gon\u00e7alves FM, Hendriks JM, et al. Treatment of post-implantation aneurysm growth by laparoscopic sac fenestration: long-term results. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012; 44: 40-44.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejvs.2012.04.022"},{"key":"40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"40. Wisselink W, Cuesta MA, Berends FJ, van den Berg FG, Rauwerda JA. Retroperitoneal endoscopic ligation of lumbar and inferior mesenteric arteries as a treatment of persistent endoleak after endoluminal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2000; 31: 1240-1244.","DOI":"10.1067\/mva.2000.105007"},{"key":"41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"41. Lin JC, Eun D, Shrivastava A, Shepard AD, Reddy DJ. Total robotic ligation of inferior mesenteric artery for type II endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair. Ann Vasc Surg. 2009; 23: 255.e19-255.e21.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.avsg.2008.02.019"},{"key":"42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"42. Ozawa H, Ohki T, Shukuzawa K, et al. Evolution of open aneurysmorrhaphy for management of sac expansion after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2023; 77: 760-768.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvs.2022.10.024"},{"key":"43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"43. Charitable JF, Patalano PI, Garg K, et al. Outcomes of translumbar embolization of type II endoleaks following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2021; 74: 1867-1873.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvs.2021.06.030"},{"key":"44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"44. Uthoff H, Katzen BT, Gandhi R, Pe\u00f1a CS, Benenati JF, Geisb\u00fcsch P. Direct percutaneous sac injection for postoperative endoleak treatment after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2012; 56: 965-972.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvs.2012.03.269"},{"key":"45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"45. Gelfand DV, White GH, Wilson SE. Clinical significance of type II endoleak after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Ann Vasc Surg. 2006; 20: 69-74.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10016-005-9382-z"},{"key":"46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"46. Flohr TR, Snow R, Aziz F. The fate of endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair and the impact of oral anticoagulation on their persistence. J Vasc Surg. 2021; 74: 1183-1192.e5.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvs.2021.04.033"},{"key":"47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"47. Aoki A, Suezawa T, Sangawa K, Tago M. Effect of type II endoleaks and antiplatelet therapy on abdominal aortic aneurysm shrinkage after endovascular repair. J Vasc Surg. 2011; 54: 947-951.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvs.2011.03.269"},{"key":"48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"48. Morisaki K, Matsubara Y, Furuyama T, et al. Effects of antithrombotic therapy on abdominal aortic aneurysm sac size after endovascular repair in patients with favorable neck anatomy. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2022; 33: 113-119.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvir.2021.10.025"},{"key":"49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"49. Imaeda Y, Ishibashi H, Orimoto Y, Maruyama Y, Mitsuoka H, Arima T. Randomized controlled trial of oral tranexamic acid intervention for the prevention of type II endoleak after endovascular abdominal aneurysm repair. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022; 28: 286-292.","DOI":"10.5761\/atcs.oa.22-00100"},{"key":"50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"50. Diss JK, Aldin Z. Resolution of a complex Type IIb endoleak with the use of translumbar direct injection of precipitating hydrophobic injectable liquid. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2019; 30: 613-616.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvir.2018.10.025"},{"key":"51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"51. Ogawa Y, Nishimaki H, Osuga K, et al. A multi-institutional survey of interventional radiology for type II endoleaks after endovascular aortic repair: questionnaire results from the Japanese Society of Endoluminal Metallic Stents and Grafts in Japan. Jpn J Radiol. 2016; 34: 564-571.","DOI":"10.1007\/s11604-016-0558-y"},{"key":"52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"52. Baum RA, Carpenter JP, Golden MA, et al. Treatment of type 2 endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: comparison of transarterial and translumbar techniques. J Vasc Surg. 2002; 35: 23-29.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0741-5214(02)32021-4"},{"key":"53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"53. Yu H, Desai H, Isaacson AJ, et al. Comparison of type II endoleak embolizations: embolization of endoleak nidus only versus embolization of endoleak nidus and branch vessels. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017; 28: 176-184.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvir.2016.10.002"},{"key":"54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"54. Solis MM, Ayerdi J, Babcock GA, et al. Mechanism of failure in the treatment of type II endoleak with percutaneous coil embolization. J Vasc Surg. 2002; 36: 485-491.","DOI":"10.1067\/mva.2002.126542"},{"key":"55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"55. Baum RA, Carpenter JP, Tuite CM, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of inferior mesenteric arterial endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Radiology. 2000; 215: 409-413.","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.215.2.r00ma17409"},{"key":"56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"56. Bryce Y, Schiro B, Cooper K, et al. Type II endoleaks: diagnosis and treatment algorithm. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2018; 8 (suppl 1): S131-S137.","DOI":"10.21037\/cdt.2017.08.06"},{"key":"57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"57. Stavropoulos SW, Park J, Fairman R, Carpenter J. Type 2 endoleak embolization comparison: translumbar embolization versus modified transarterial embolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009; 20: 1299-1302.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvir.2009.07.003"},{"key":"58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"58. Hongo N, Kiyosue H, Shuto R, et al. Double coaxial microcatheter technique for transarterial aneurysm sac embolization of type II endoleaks after endovascular abdominal aortic repair. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2014; 25: 709-716.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvir.2014.01.012"},{"key":"59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"59. Fujimura N, Obara H, Matsubara K, et al. Characteristics and risk factors for type 2 endoleak in an East Asian population from a Japanese multicenter database. Circ J. 2016; 80: 118-123.","DOI":"10.1253\/circj.CJ-15-0850"},{"key":"60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"60. Shimohira M, Nagai K, Ohta K, et al. Use of a steerable triaxial system for challenging catheterization. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2020; 29: 140-145.","DOI":"10.1080\/13645706.2019.1606018"},{"key":"61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"61. Inaba Y, Arai Y, Sone M, et al. Clinical trial for development of a steerable microcatheter. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2019; 28: 1-5.","DOI":"10.1080\/13645706.2018.1467458"},{"key":"62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"62. Soyama T, Yoshida D, Sakuhara Y, Morita R, Abo D, Kudo K. The steerable microcatheter: a new device for selective catheterisation. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2017; 40: 947-952.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00270-017-1579-3"},{"key":"63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"63. van Bindsbergen L, Braak SJ, van Strijen MJ, de Vries JP. Type II endoleak embolization after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair with use of real-time three-dimensional fluoroscopic needle guidance. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010; 21: 1443-1447.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvir.2010.05.016"},{"key":"64","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"64. Rhee R, Oderich G, Hertault A, et al. Multicenter experience in translumbar type II endoleak treatment in the hybrid room with needle trajectory planning and fusion guidance. J Vasc Surg. 2020; 72: 1043-1049.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvs.2019.10.076"},{"key":"65","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"65. Mastrorilli D, Mezzetto L, D&apos;Oria M, Simoncini F, Bergamaschi G, Veraldi GF. Early and late outcomes of ultrasound-guided direct transabdominal embolization of isolated Type 2 endoleaks after endovascular aortic repair. Ann Vasc Surg. 2020; 68: 252-260.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.avsg.2020.04.011"},{"key":"66","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"66. Okabe R, Morioka N, Katayama H, Nakamatsu S, Shirota K, Saitoh Y. Type II endoleak repair after endovascular abdominal aortic repair using a computed tomography-guided percutaneous transabdominal approach. J Vasc Surg Cases. 2015; 1: 236-238.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvsc.2015.08.002"},{"key":"67","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"67. Guo Q, Zhao J, Ma Y, et al. A meta-analysis of translumbar embolization versus transarterial embolization for type II endoleak after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2020; 71: 1029-1034.e1.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvs.2019.05.074"},{"key":"68","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"68. Zener R, Oreopoulos G, Beecroft R, Rajan DK, Jaskolka J, Tan KT. Transabdominal direct sac puncture embolization of Type II endoleaks after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2018; 29: 1167-1173.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvir.2018.04.002"},{"key":"69","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"69. Boks SS, Andhyiswara T, de Smet AA, Vroegindeweij D. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous transabdominal treatment of a type 2 endoleak. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2005; 28: 526-529.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00270-003-0151-5"},{"key":"70","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"70. Nana P, Spanos K, Heidemann F, et al. Systematic review on transcaval embolization for type II endoleak after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2022; 76: 282-291.e2.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvs.2022.02.032"},{"key":"71","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"71. Van Sickler AP, Smith AH, Ellis RC, et al. A novel technique and outcomes for transcaval endoleak embolization. Ann Vasc Surg. 2023; 93: 300-307.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.avsg.2023.01.013"},{"key":"72","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"72. Schwein A, Chinnadurai P, Bismuth J. Iliac limb perigraft access with robotic catheter assistance for Type 2 endoleak embolization. Ann Vasc Surg. 2017; 38: 317.e5-317.e7.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.avsg.2016.05.122"},{"key":"73","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"73. Coppi G, Saitta G, Coppi G, Gennai S, Lauricella A, Silingardi R. Transealing: a novel and simple technique for embolization of type 2 endoleaks through direct sac access from the distal stent-graft landing zone. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014; 47: 394-401.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejvs.2014.01.013"},{"key":"74","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"74. Scallan O, Kribs S, Power AH, DeRose G, Duncan A, Dubois L. Onyx versus coil embolization for the treatment of type II endoleaks. J Vasc Surg. 2021; 73: 1966-1972.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvs.2020.10.069"},{"key":"75","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"75. Abularrage CJ, Patel VI, Conrad MF, Schneider EB, Cambria RP, Kwolek CJ. Improved results using Onyx glue for the treatment of persistent type 2 endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2012; 56: 630-636.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvs.2012.02.038"},{"key":"76","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"76. Mozes GD, Pather K, Oderich GS, et al. Outcomes of Onyx<sup>\u00ae<\/sup> embolization of Type II endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg. 2020; 67: 223-231.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.avsg.2020.02.013"},{"key":"77","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"77. Fujitsuna R, Ueda T, Saito H, et al. Initial outcomes of embolization for Type II endoleak: comparison of n-butyl cyanoacrylate-ethiodized oil mixture with n-butyl cyanoacrylate-ethiodized oil-ethanol mixture. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2024; 35: 1673-1680.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvir.2024.07.023"},{"key":"78","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"78. Helmy A, Shaida N. Treatment of type II endoleaks with a novel agent: precipitating hydrophobic injectable liquid (PHIL). Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2017; 40: 1094-1098.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00270-017-1603-7"},{"key":"79","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"79. Smorenburg SPM, Lely RJ, Kelckhoven BV, et al. Initial clinical experience with AneuFix injectable biocompatible elastomer for translumbar embolization of type 2 endoleaks. J Endovasc Ther. 2025; 32: 57-67.","DOI":"10.1177\/15266028231165731"},{"key":"80","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"80. Alexander LF, Overfield CJ, Sella DM, et al. Contrast-enhanced US evaluation of endoleaks after endovascular stent repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. RadioGraphics. 2022; 42: 1758-1775.","DOI":"10.1148\/rg.220046"},{"key":"81","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"81. Steinmetz E, Rubin BG, Sanchez LA, et al. Type II endoleak after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a conservative approach with selective intervention is safe and cost-effective. J Vasc Surg. 2004; 39: 306-313.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvs.2003.10.026"},{"key":"82","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"82. Mulay S, Geraedts ACM, Koelemay MJW, Balm R. Type 2 endoleak with or without intervention and survival after endovascular aneurysm repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2021; 61: 779-786.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejvs.2021.01.017"},{"key":"83","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"83. Walker J, Tucker LY, Goodney P, et al. Type II endoleak with or without intervention after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair does not change aneurysm-related outcomes despite sac growth. J Vasc Surg. 2015; 62: 551-561.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvs.2015.04.389"},{"key":"84","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"84. Karthikesalingam A, Thrumurthy SG, Jackson D, et al. Current evidence is insufficient to define an optimal threshold for intervention in isolated type II endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair. J Endovasc Ther. 2012; 19: 200-208.","DOI":"10.1583\/11-3762R.1"},{"key":"85","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"85. Torikai H, Inoue M, Nakatsuka S, et al. Imaging findings of atypical type II endoleak through vasa vasorum after abdominal endovascular aneurysm repair. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2018; 41: 186-190.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00270-017-1778-y"},{"key":"86","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"86. Mansueto G, Cenzi D, Scuro A, et al. Treatment of type II endoleak with a transcatheter transcaval approach: results at 1-year follow-up. J Vasc Surg. 2007; 45: 1120-1127.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvs.2007.01.063"},{"key":"87","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"87. Ito T, Kurimoto Y, Kawaharada N, et al. Ischemic colitis following transarterial embolization for Type 2 endoleak of EVAR: report of a case. Ann Vasc Dis. 2012; 5: 92-95.","DOI":"10.3400\/avd.cr.11.00081"},{"key":"88","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"88. Saiga A, Koizumi J, Ueda H, et al. Ischemic lumbar plexopathy after transarterial embolization of type II endoleak using N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2022; 45: 536-538.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00270-021-03019-5"},{"key":"89","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"89. Das Gupta J, Rana MA, McGrew P, Delu A, Guliani S, Marek J. Ischemic lumbosacral plexopathy after extensive Onyx arterial embolization for type 2 endoleak. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2019; 30: 619-621.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvir.2018.09.025"},{"key":"90","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"90. Etienne H, Touma J, Becquemin JP. Unusual acute onset of abdominal aortic endograft infection by Propionibacterium acnes after coil embolization for type II endoleak. Ann Vasc Surg. 2016; 35: 204.e9-204.e11.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.avsg.2016.01.036"},{"key":"91","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"91. Bal\u00e9zeaux Q, Leroux A, Krug B, Rondelet B, Belhaj A. Early and severe aortic endograft infection after percutaneous coil embolization of type 2 endoleak: a case report. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2024; 122: 110140.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijscr.2024.110140"},{"key":"92","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"92. Wee IJY, Syn N, Choong AMTL. Transcaval approach for endovascular aortic interventions: a systematic review. J Cardiol. 2018; 72: 369-376.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jjcc.2018.04.009"}],"container-title":["Interventional Radiology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.jstage.jst.go.jp\/article\/interventionalradiology\/10\/0\/10_2024-0040\/_pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,26]],"date-time":"2025-04-26T00:48:05Z","timestamp":1745628485000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.jstage.jst.go.jp\/article\/interventionalradiology\/10\/0\/10_2024-0040\/_article"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,25]]},"references-count":92,"journal-issue":{"issue":"0","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.22575\/interventionalradiology.2024-0040","relation":{},"ISSN":["2432-0935"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2432-0935","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,25]]},"article-number":"2024-0040"}}