{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,30]],"date-time":"2026-05-30T04:03:54Z","timestamp":1780113834775,"version":"3.54.0"},"reference-count":44,"publisher":"Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research","issue":"3","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Spine Surg Relat Res"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,27]]},"DOI":"10.22603\/ssrr.2025-0297","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,9]],"date-time":"2025-12-09T22:07:50Z","timestamp":1765318070000},"page":"322-330","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Practical Strategies for Bone Graft Selection in Spinal Fusion: A Narrative Review with Regional Perspectives"],"prefix":"10.22603","volume":"10","author":[{"given":"Masashi","family":"Miyazaki","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Tetsutaro","family":"Abe","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Noriaki","family":"Sako","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Nobuhiro","family":"Kaku","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"9891","reference":[{"key":"1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"1. Deyo RA, Nachemson A, Mirza SK. Spinal-fusion surgery-the case for restraint. N Engl J Med. 2004;350 (7):722-6.","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMsb031771"},{"key":"2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"2. Epstein NE. Iliac crest autograft versus alternative constructs for anterior cervical spine surgery: pros, cons, and costs. Surg Neurol Int. 2012;3 (suppl 3):S143-S56.","DOI":"10.4103\/2152-7806.98575"},{"key":"3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"3. Pape HC, Evans A, Kobbe P. Autologous bone graft: properties and techniques. J Orthop Trauma. 2010;24 (suppl 1):S36-S40.","DOI":"10.1097\/BOT.0b013e3181cec4a1"},{"key":"4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"4. Khan SN, Cammisa FP Jr, Sandhu HS, et al. The biology of bone grafting. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2005;13 (1):77-86.","DOI":"10.5435\/00124635-200501000-00010"},{"key":"5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"5. Kim YH, Kim KW, Rhyu KW, et al. Bone fusion materials: past, present, and future. Asian Spine J. 2025;19 (3):490-500.","DOI":"10.31616\/asj.2024.0520"},{"key":"6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"6. Spanninga BJ, Hoelen TA, Johnson S, et al. Clinical efficacy and safety of P-15 peptide enhanced bone graft substitute in surgical bone regenerative procedures in adult maxillofacial, spine, and trauma patients: a systematic literature review. Bone Joint Res. 2025;14 (2):77-92.","DOI":"10.1302\/2046-3758.142.BJR-2024-0033.R2"},{"key":"7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"7. Katsuura Y, Shafi K, Jacques C, et al. New strategies in enhancing spinal fusion. HSS J. 2020;16 (2):177-82.","DOI":"10.1007\/s11420-020-09749-5"},{"key":"8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"8. Asamoto T, Osawa Y, Takegami Y, et al. The survey of bone allograft transplantation in a Japanese regional bone bank. J Orthop Sci. 2024;29 (6):1528-33.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jos.2023.11.001"},{"key":"9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"9. Cabrera JP, Muthu S, Mesregah MK, et al. Complications with demineralized bone matrix, hydroxyapatite and \u03b2-tricalcium phosphate in single- and two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery. Glob Spine J. 2024;14 (2) (suppl 1):78S-85S.","DOI":"10.1177\/21925682231157320"},{"key":"10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"10. Meisel HJ, Jain A, Wu Y, et al. AO Spine guideline for the use of osteobiologics (AOGO) in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for spinal degenerative cases. Glob Spine J. 2024;14 (2) (suppl 1):6S-13S.","DOI":"10.1177\/21925682231201601"},{"key":"11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"11. Phani Kiran S, Sudhir G. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion-a narrative review on the present status. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021;22:101592.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcot.2021.101592"},{"key":"12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"12. Plantz MA, Gerlach EB, Hsu WK. Synthetic bone graft materials in spine fusion: current evidence and future trends. Int J Spine Surg. 2021;15 (s1):104-12.","DOI":"10.14444\/8058"},{"key":"13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"13. Formica M, Vallerga D, Zanirato A, et al. Fusion rate and influence of surgery-related factors in lumbar interbody arthrodesis for degenerative spine diseases: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Musculoskelet Surg. 2020;104 (1):1-15.","DOI":"10.1007\/s12306-019-00634-x"},{"key":"14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"14. Feng JT, Yang XG, Wang F, et al. Efficacy and safety of bone substitutes in lumbar spinal fusion: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur Spine J. 2020;29 (6):1261-76.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-019-06257-x"},{"key":"15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"15. Zeitouni D, Pfortmiller D, Coric D, et al. Does type of bone graft matter? A retrospective review of the use of biological bone grafts in patients undergoing elective 1-3 level spinal interbody fusion. Eur Spine J. 2024;33 (4):1340-6.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-023-08108-2"},{"key":"16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"16. D'Souza M, Macdonald NA, Gendreau JL, et al. Graft materials and biologics for spinal interbody fusion. Biomedicines. 2019;7 (4):75.","DOI":"10.3390\/biomedicines7040075"},{"key":"17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"17. Westerlund LE, Borden M. Clinical experience with the use of a spherical bioactive glass putty for cervical and lumbar interbody fusion. J Spine Surg. 2020;6 (1):49-61.","DOI":"10.21037\/jss.2020.03.06"},{"key":"18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"18. Smith KA, Russo GS, Vaccaro AR, et al. Scientific, clinical, regulatory, and economic aspects of choosing bone graft\/biological options in spine surgery. Neurosurgery. 2019;84 (4):827-35.","DOI":"10.1093\/neuros\/nyy322"},{"key":"19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"19. Morris MT, Tarpada SP, Cho W. Bone graft materials for posterolateral fusion made simple: a systematic review. Eur Spine J. 2018;27 (8):1856-67.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-018-5511-6"},{"key":"20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"20. Kadam A, Millhouse PW, Kepler CK, et al. Bone substitutes and expanders in spine surgery: a review of their fusion efficacies. Int J Spine Surg. 2016;10:33.","DOI":"10.14444\/3033"},{"key":"21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"21. Bishop RC, Moore KA, Hadley MN. Anterior cervical interbody fusion using autogeneic and allogeneic bone graft substrate: a prospective comparative analysis. J Neurosurg. 1996;85 (2):206-10.","DOI":"10.3171\/jns.1996.85.2.0206"},{"key":"22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"22. An HS, Simpson JM, Glover JM, et al. Comparison between allograft plus demineralized bone matrix versus autograft in anterior cervical fusion. A prospective multicenter study. Spine. 1995;20 (20):2211-6.","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-199510001-00006"},{"key":"23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"23. Savolainen S, Usenius JP, Hernesniemi J. Iliac crest versus artificial bone grafts in 250 cervical fusions. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1994;129 (1-2):54-7.","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01400873"},{"key":"24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"24. Brown MD, Malinin TI, Davis PB. A roentgenographic evaluation of frozen allografts versus autografts in anterior cervical spine fusions. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976;118 (119):231-6.","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-197609000-00035"},{"key":"25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"25. Kang J, An H, Hilibrand A, et al. Grafton and local bone have comparable outcomes to iliac crest bone in instrumented single-level lumbar fusions. Spine. 2012;37 (12):1083-91.","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31823ed817"},{"key":"26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"26. Kim DH, Lee N, Shin DA, et al. Matched comparison of fusion rates between hydroxyapatite demineralized bone matrix and autograft in lumbar interbody fusion. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2016;59 (4):363-7.","DOI":"10.3340\/jkns.2016.59.4.363"},{"key":"27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"27. Bae HW, Zhao L, Kanim LE, et al. Intervariability and intravariability of bone morphogenetic proteins in commercially available demineralized bone matrix products. Spine. 2006;31 (12):1299-307.","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000218581.92992.b7"},{"key":"28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"28. Korovessis P, Koureas G, Zacharatos S, et al. Correlative radiological, self-assessment and clinical analysis of evolution in instrumented dorsal and lateral fusion for degenerative lumbar spine disease. Autograft versus coralline hydroxyapatite. Eur Spine J. 2005;14 (7):630-8.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-004-0855-5"},{"key":"29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"29. Yoshii T, Yuasa M, Sotome S, et al. Porous\/dense composite hydroxyapatite for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine. 2013;38 (10):833-40.","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3182801390"},{"key":"30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"30. Yoo JS, Min SH, Yoon SH. Fusion rate according to mixture ratio and volumes of bone graft in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: minimum 2-year follow-up. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015;25 (suppl 1):S183-S9.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00590-014-1529-6"},{"key":"31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"31. Dai LY, Jiang LS. Single-level instrumented posterolateral fusion of lumbar spine with \u03b2-tricalcium phosphate versus autograft: a prospective, randomized study with 3-year follow-up. Spine. 2008;33 (12):1299-304.","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181732a8e"},{"key":"32","unstructured":"32. Li Y, Fu G, Gong Y, et al. BMP-2 promotes osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells by enhancing mitochondrial activity. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2022;22 (1):123-31."},{"key":"33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"33. Boden SD, Zdeblick TA, Sandhu HS, et al. The use of rhBMP-2 in interbody fusion cages. Definitive evidence of osteoinduction in humans: a preliminary report. Spine. 2000;25 (3):376-81.","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-200002010-00020"},{"key":"34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"34. Burkus JK, Transfeldt EE, Kitchel SH, et al. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of anterior lumbar interbody fusion using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2. Spine. 2002;27 (21):2396-408.","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-200211010-00015"},{"key":"35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"35. Kerezoudis P, Alvi MA, Freedman BA, et al. Utilization trends of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein in the United States. Spine. 2021;46 (13):874-81.","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000003919"},{"key":"36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"36. Tannoury CA, An HS. Complications with the use of bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2) in spine surgery. Spine J. 2014;14 (3):552-9.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2013.08.060"},{"key":"37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"37. Fu R, Selph S, McDonagh M, et al. Effectiveness and harms of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 in spine fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158 (12):890-902.","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-158-12-201306180-00006"},{"key":"38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"38. Simmonds MC, Brown JV, Heirs MK, et al. Safety and effectiveness of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 for spinal fusion: a meta-analysis of individual-participant data. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158 (12):877-89.","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-158-12-201306180-00005"},{"key":"39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"39. Arnold PM, Sasso RC, Janssen ME, et al. i-Factor\u2122 Bone Graft vs Autograft in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: 2-year Follow-up of the Randomized Single-Blinded Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption Study. Neurosurgery. 2018;83 (3):377-84.","DOI":"10.1093\/neuros\/nyx432"},{"key":"40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"40. Mobbs RJ, Maharaj M, Rao PJ. Clinical outcomes and fusion rates following anterior lumbar interbody fusion with bone graft substitute i-FACTOR, an anorganic bone matrix\/P-15 composite. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014;21 (6):867-76.","DOI":"10.3171\/2014.9.SPINE131151"},{"key":"41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"41. Eastlack RK, Garfin SR, Brown CR, et al. Osteocel Plus cellular allograft in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: evaluation of clinical and radiographic outcomes from a prospective multicenter study. Spine. 2014;39 (22):E1331-7.","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000557"},{"key":"42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"42. Vanichkachorn J, Peppers T, Bullard D, et al. A prospective clinical and radiographic 12-month outcome study of patients undergoing single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for symptomatic cervical degenerative disc disease utilizing a novel viable allogeneic, cancellous, bone matrix (trinity evolution\u2122) with a comparison to historical controls. Eur Spine J. 2016;25 (7):2233-8.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-016-4414-7"},{"key":"43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"43. Gordon A, Newsome F, Ahern DP, et al. Iliac crest bone graft versus cell-based grafts to augment spinal fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J. 2024;33 (1):253-63.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-023-07941-9"},{"key":"44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"44. Li J, Li S, Zhang S, et al. Comparative efficacy of autologous iliac bone versus allogeneic demineralized bone matrix in lateral lumbar interbody fusion using a novel minimally invasive iliac bone retrieval tool: a self-controlled study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2025;20 (1):665.","DOI":"10.1186\/s13018-025-06073-8"}],"container-title":["Spine Surgery and Related Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.jstage.jst.go.jp\/article\/ssrr\/10\/3\/10_2025-0297\/_pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,30]],"date-time":"2026-05-30T03:24:51Z","timestamp":1780111491000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.jstage.jst.go.jp\/article\/ssrr\/10\/3\/10_2025-0297\/_article"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,27]]},"references-count":44,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.22603\/ssrr.2025-0297","relation":{},"ISSN":["2432-261X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2432-261X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,27]]},"article-number":"2025-0297"}}