{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,14]],"date-time":"2025-05-14T07:57:04Z","timestamp":1747209424347,"version":"3.40.5"},"reference-count":21,"publisher":"National Library of Serbia","issue":"234","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,1]],"date-time":"2022-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1640995200000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Ekon an","EKON ANAL","ECON ANNAL"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>In order to improve economic growth, many governments use public policies to\n   promote their countries? degree of internationalisation. When designing\n   optimal public incentive schemes for internationalisation it is fundamental\n   to consider the characteristics of export markets, such as size, competition\n   degree, tax system, and product differentiation. This paper analyses whether\n   product differentiation has any impact on optimal internationalisation\n   incentive policies, focusing on export subsidy schemes. We develop a\n   two-stage game for three different scenarios: (1) no subsidy, (2) a\n   fixed-subsidy scheme, and (3) a subsidyper-quantity-exported scheme. Using\n   numerical analysis, we revisit the analysis of schemes designing optimal\n   public incentives for internationalisation and conclude that for export\n   markets with low product differentiation a subsidy-per-quantity exported\n   scheme is best at stimulating internationalisation, while for export markets\n   with high product differentiation a fixedsubsidy scheme is the preferable\n   policy.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.2298\/eka2234055p","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,2]],"date-time":"2022-12-02T14:18:47Z","timestamp":1669990727000},"page":"55-79","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Product differentiation and export incentive schemes: A game theory approach"],"prefix":"10.2298","volume":"67","author":[{"given":"Beatriz","family":"Pereira","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Aveiro, Department of Economics, Management, Industrial Engineering and Tourism (DEGEIT)"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0651-7433","authenticated-orcid":false,"suffix":"Ferreira","given":"S\u00edlvia","family":"Jorge","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Aveiro, Research Unit on Governance, Competitiveness and Public Policies (GOVCOPP) + Department of Economics, Management, Industrial Engineering and Tourism (DEGEIT)"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9356-0087","authenticated-orcid":false,"suffix":"Amorim","given":"Celeste","family":"Varum","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Aveiro, Research Unit on Governance, Competitiveness and Public Policies (GOVCOPP) + Department of Economics, Management, Industrial Engineering and Tourism (DEGEIT)"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2021-9141","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Micaela","family":"Pinho","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Portucalense University, Research on Economics, Management and Information Technologies (REMIT) + Portucalense Institute for Legal Research (IJP) + University of Aveiro, Research Unit on Governance, Competitiveness and Public Policies (GOVCOPP) + Department of Economics, Management, Industrial Engineering and Tourism (DEGEIT)"}]}],"member":"1078","reference":[{"key":"ref1","unstructured":"Alc\u00e2ntara, J., Calegario, C., Carneiro, J. & Buchbinder, F. (2013). Fatores determinantes da utiliza\u00e7ao de programas de apoio a exporta\u00e7ao: evidencia de PMEs do Estado de Minas Gerais. Revista de Administra\u00e7\u00e3o FACES Journal, 14(3), 114-132."},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Banker, R., Khosla I. & Sinha K. (1998). Quality and competition. Management Science, 44(9), 1179-1192.","DOI":"10.1287\/mnsc.44.9.1179"},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Banno, M. & Sgobbi, F. (2010). Firm participation in financial incentive programmes: The case of subsidies for outward internationalization. Journal of Policy Modeling, 32(6), 792-803.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpolmod.2010.08.001"},{"key":"ref4","unstructured":"Beenhakker, H. (2001). The Global Economy and International Financing. Westport CT: Quorum Books."},{"key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Brander, J., & Spencer, B. (1985). Export subsidies and international market share rivalry. Journal of International Economics, 18(1-2), 83-100.","DOI":"10.1016\/0022-1996(85)90006-6"},{"key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ciszewska-Mlinari\u010d, M. (2018). Export intensity, geographic diversification and the role of public support: The evidence from old and new Europe SMEs. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 6(2), 45-69.","DOI":"10.15678\/EBER.2018.060203"},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Criscuolo, C., Martin, R., Overman, H., & Van Reene, J. (2019). Some causal effects of an industrial policy. American Economic Review, 109(1), 48-85.","DOI":"10.1257\/aer.20160034"},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dixit, A. (1979). A model of duopoly suggesting a theory of entry barriers. The Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1), 20-32.","DOI":"10.2307\/3003317"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dixit, A., & Grossman, G. (1986). Target export promotion with several oligopolistic industries. Journal of International Economics, 21(2-4), 233-249.","DOI":"10.1016\/0022-1996(86)90038-3"},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dobre, C. (2008). Implication of game theory to international trade. Review Tinerilor Economi\u00fati, 1(10), 132-137","DOI":"10.1142\/S0219198908001820"},{"key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Eaton, J., & Grossman, G. (1986). Optimal trade and industrial policy under oligopoly. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101(2), 383-406.","DOI":"10.2307\/1891121"},{"key":"ref12","unstructured":"European Commission (2014) Internationalization of European SMEs. Brussels: European Commission."},{"key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hwang, H., Mai, C., & Yang, Y. (2015). Specific vs. ad valorem strategic export subsidies with taxation distortion. Review of Development Economics, 19(4), pp.820-828","DOI":"10.1111\/rode.12185"},{"key":"ref14","unstructured":"Krugman, P., Obstfeld, M., & Melitz, M. (2012). International Economics: Theory & Policy. 9th Edition. Pearson Education."},{"key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lin, M. (2021) Government intervention, nature of ownership and enterprise investment efficiency: An empirical research based on panel data analysis. 2nd International Conference on New Energy Technology and Industrial Development (NETID 2021) . https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1051\/ e3sconf\/202129202005","DOI":"10.1051\/e3sconf\/202129202005"},{"key":"ref16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Liu, Z., & Li, Q. (2014). The government subsidy strategy choice for firms\u2019 R&D: Input subsidy or product subsidy? Economics Research International, 4-5(1-2).","DOI":"10.1155\/2014\/632176"},{"key":"ref17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Maeseneire, W., & Claeys, T. (2007). SMEs, foreign direct investment and financial constraints. The case of Belgium. International Business Review, 21(3), 408-424.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ibusrev.2011.03.004"},{"key":"ref18","unstructured":"OECD (2021) OECD Science Technology and Innovation Outlook 2021: times of crisis and opportunities. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development"},{"key":"ref19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Varum, C. A., & Piscitello, L. (2011). The role of public policy in strengthening innovation through internationalization. In: M. G. Colombo, L. Grilli, L. Piscitello, & C. Rossi-Lamastra (Eds.), Science and Innovation Policy for the New Knowledge Economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 162-182","DOI":"10.4337\/9780857930538.00018"},{"key":"ref20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wilkinson, T. & Brouthers, L. (2006). Trade promotion and SME export performance. International Business Review, 15(3), 233-252.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ibusrev.2006.03.001"},{"key":"ref21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zaheer, S. (1995). Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 341-63.","DOI":"10.2307\/256683"}],"container-title":["Economic Annals","Ekonomski anali"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,29]],"date-time":"2023-05-29T08:10:18Z","timestamp":1685347818000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/doiserbia.nb.rs\/Article.aspx?ID=0013-32642234055P"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022]]},"references-count":21,"journal-issue":{"issue":"234","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2298\/eka2234055p","relation":{},"ISSN":["0013-3264","1820-7375"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0013-3264"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1820-7375"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022]]}}}