{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,30]],"date-time":"2026-06-30T04:25:49Z","timestamp":1782793549546,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":33,"publisher":"MJS Publishing, Medical Journals Sweden AB","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,15]],"date-time":"2025-08-15T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1755216000000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["ActaO"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Background and purpose:\u00a0Return to work is an important objective and measure of treatment success in the working-age population. Many patient-related factors have been shown to be associated with failure to resume working postoperatively. The aim of this longitudinal database study was to determine return to work rates in a 24-month follow-up after lumbar fusion. We also evaluated whether return to work was affected by the physical demand of work or the preoperative dominance of leg or back pain.Methods:\u00a0348 consecutive patients available to the workforce underwent lumbar fusion. Return to work at 12 and 24 months was evaluated by patient questionnaires. Patients rated the physical demand of work into 3 categories: light, moderately demanding, or demanding. The surgeon identified the predominant symptom preoperatively, dividing patients into back and leg pain groups.Results:\u00a0Return to work was 69% (95% confidence interval [CI] 64\u201373) and 76% (CI 71\u201381), at 12- and 24-month follow-ups, respectively. Patients in physically demanding work were less likely to resume working than patients in light work (63% vs 86% at 24 months, respectively). The predominant symptom did not affect return to work.Conclusion:\u00a0In patients of working age, three-quarters of lumbar spine fusion patients returned to work within 2 years of surgery. Work absenteeism was higher in physically demanding occupations and only 60% of the patients with predominant leg pain returned to their physically heavy occupation in the first year following lumbar fusion.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.2340\/17453674.2025.43751","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,15]],"date-time":"2025-08-15T10:29:48Z","timestamp":1755253788000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Return to work within 2 years of lumbar fusion: a prospective cohort study"],"prefix":"10.2340","volume":"96","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-7509-4465","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jenna L C","family":"Laur\u00e9n","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1195-913X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Leevi A","family":"Toivonen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jussi P","family":"Repo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0786-0858","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Hannu","family":"Kautiainen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Arja H","family":"H\u00e4kkinen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Marko H","family":"Neva","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1183","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,15]]},"reference":[{"key":"121122","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Anderson P A, Schwaegler P E, Cizek D, Leverson G. Work status as a predictor of surgical outcome of discogenic low back pain. Spine 2006; 31: 2510-15. doi: 10.1097\/01.brs.0000239180.14933.b7.","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000239180.14933.b7"},{"key":"121123","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Huysmans E, Goudman L, Van Belleghem G, De Jaeger M, Moens M, Nijs J, et al. Return to work following surgery for lumbar radiculopathy: a systematic review. Spine J 2018; 18: 1694-714. doi: 10.1016\/j.spinee.2018.05.030.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2018.05.030"},{"key":"121124","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lee Y-P, Farhan S-D, Kiester D, Rosen C, Pendi A, Bhatia N. Variables affecting return to work after spinal surgery in a non-workers\u2019 compensation population: a retrospective cohort study. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2017; 25: e282-8. doi: 10.5435\/JAAOS-D-17-00098.","DOI":"10.5435\/JAAOS-D-17-00098"},{"key":"121125","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fayssoux R, Goldfarb N I, Vaccaro A R, Harrop J. Indirect costs associated with surgery for low back pain: a secondary analysis of clinical trial data. Popul Health Manag 2010; 13: 9-13. doi: 10.1089\/pop.2009.0061.","DOI":"10.1089\/pop.2009.0061"},{"key":"121126","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hah J M, Lee E, Shrestha R, Pirrotta L, Huddleston J, Goodman S, et al. Return to work and productivity loss after surgery: a health economic evaluation. Int J Surg 2021; 95: 106100. doi: 10.1016\/j.ijsu.2021.106100.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijsu.2021.106100"},{"key":"121127","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chou R. Will this patient develop persistent disabling low back pain? JAMA 2010; 303: 1295. doi: 10.1001\/jama.2010.344.","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2010.344"},{"key":"121128","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Stewart W F. Lost productive time and cost due to common pain conditions in the US workforce. JAMA 2003; 290: 2443. doi: 10.1001\/jama.290.18.2443.","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.290.18.2443"},{"key":"121129","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dagenais S, Caro J, Haldeman S. A systematic review of low back pain cost of illness studies in the United States and internationally. Spine J 2008; 8: 8-20. doi: 10.1016\/j.spinee.2007.10.005.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2007.10.005"},{"key":"121130","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fontana M A, Islam W, Richardson M A, Medina C K, Kohilakis E C, Qureshi S A, et al. Presenteeism and absenteeism before and after single-level lumbar spine surgery. Spine J 2022; 22: 776-86. doi: 10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.10.017.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.10.017"},{"key":"121131","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ekman P, M\u00f6ller H, Hedlund R. Predictive factors for the outcome of fusion in adult isthmic spondylolisthesis. Spine 2009; 34: 1204-10. doi: 10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181a19e66.","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181a19e66"},{"key":"121132","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gehrchen M, Dahl B, Katonis P, Blyme P, T\u00f8ndevold E, Ki\u00e6r T. No difference in clinical outcome after posterolateral lumbar fusion between patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis and those with degenerative disc disease using pedicle screw instrumentation: a comparative study of 112 patients with 4 years of follow-up. Eur Spine J 2002; 11: 423-7. doi: 10.1007\/s00586-002-0401-2.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-002-0401-2"},{"key":"121133","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Khan I, Bydon M, Archer K R, Sivaganesan A, Asher A M, Alvi M A, et al. Impact of occupational characteristics on return to work for employed patients after elective lumbar spine surgery. Spine J 2019; 19: 1969-76. doi: 10.1016\/j.spinee.2019.08.007.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2019.08.007"},{"key":"121134","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nguyen T H, Randolph D C, Talmage J, Succop P, Travis R. Long-term outcomes of lumbar fusion among workers\u2019 compensation subjects: a historical cohort study. Spine 2011; 36: 320-31. doi: 10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181ccc220.","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181ccc220"},{"key":"121135","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Asher A L, Devin C J, Archer K R, Chotai S, Parker S L, Bydon M, et al. An analysis from the Quality Outcomes Database, Part 2. Predictive model for return to work after elective surgery for lumbar degenerative disease. J Neurosurg Spine 2017; 27: 370-81. doi: 10.3171\/2016.8.SPINE16527.","DOI":"10.3171\/2016.8.SPINE16527"},{"key":"121136","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Halicka M, Duarte R, Catherall S, Maden M, Coetsee M, Wilby M, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of predictors of return to work after spinal surgery for chronic low back and leg pain. J Pain 2022; 23: 1318-42. doi: 10.1016\/j.jpain.2022.02.003.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpain.2022.02.003"},{"key":"121137","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"McGirt M J, Bydon M, Archer K R, Devin C J, Chotai S, Parker S L, et al. An analysis from the Quality Outcomes Database, Part 1. Disability, quality of life, and pain outcomes following lumbar spine surgery: predicting likely individual patient outcomes for shared decision-making. J Neurosurg Spine 2017; 27: 357-69. doi: 10.3171\/2016.11.SPINE16526.","DOI":"10.3171\/2016.11.SPINE16526"},{"key":"121138","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Devin C J, Asher A L, Archer K R, Goyal A, Khan I, Kerezoudis P, et al. Impact of dominant symptom on 12-month patient-reported outcomes for patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery. Neurosurg 2020; 87: 1037-45. doi: 10.1093\/neuros\/nyaa240.","DOI":"10.1093\/neuros\/nyaa240"},{"key":"121139","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"DiGiorgio A M, Mummaneni P V, Park P, Chan A K, Bisson E F, Bydon M, et al. Correlation of return to work with patient satisfaction after surgery for lumbar spondylolisthesis: an analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database. Neurosurg Focus 2020; 48: E5. doi: 10.3171\/2020.2.FOCUS191022.","DOI":"10.3171\/2020.2.FOCUS191022"},{"key":"121140","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pearson A, Blood E, Lurie J, Abdu W, Sengupta D, Frymoyer J F, et al. Predominant leg pain is associated with better surgical outcomes in degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis: results from the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT). Spine 2011; 36: 219-29. doi: 10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181d77c21.","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181d77c21"},{"key":"121141","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Deyo R A, Gray D T, Kreuter W, Mirza S, Martin B I. United States trends in lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative conditions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005; 30: 1441-5; discussion 1446-7. doi: 10.1097\/01.brs.0000166503.37969.8a.","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000166503.37969.8a"},{"key":"121142","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ponkilainen V T, Huttunen T T, Neva M H, Pekkanen L, Repo J P, Mattila V M. National trends in lumbar spine decompression and fusion surgery in Finland, 1997\u20132018. Acta Orthop 2021; 92: 199-203. doi: 10.1080\/17453674.2020.1839244.","DOI":"10.1080\/17453674.2020.1839244"},{"key":"121143","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Taylor V M, Deyo R A, Cherkin D C, Kreuter W. Low back pain hospitalization: recent United States trends and regional variations. Spine 1994; 19: 1207-12. doi: 10.1097\/00007632-199405310-00002.","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-199405310-00002"},{"key":"121144","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Von Elm E, Altman D G, Egger M, Pocock S J, G\u00f8tzsche P C, Vandenbroucke J P. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 2007; 370: 1453-7. doi: 10.1016\/S0140-6736(07)61602-X.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(07)61602-X"},{"key":"121145","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Price D D, McGrath P A, Rafii A, Buckingham B. The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain: Pain 1983; 17: 45-56. doi: 10.1016\/0304-3959(83)90126-4.","DOI":"10.1016\/0304-3959(83)90126-4"},{"key":"121146","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pekkanen L, Kautiainen H, Ylinen J, Salo P, H\u00e4kkinen A. Reliability and validity study of the Finnish version 2.0 of the Oswestry Disability Index. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011; 36: 332-8. doi: 10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181cdd702.","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181cdd702"},{"key":"121147","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Repo J P, Ponkilainen V T, H\u00e4kkinen A H, Ylinen J, Bergman P, Kyr\u00f6l\u00e4 K. Assessment of construct validity of the Oswestry Disability Index and the Scoliosis Research Society-30 Questionnaire (SRS-30) in patients with degenerative spinal disease. Spine Deform 2019; 7: 929-36. doi: 10.1016\/j.jspd.2019.04.008.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jspd.2019.04.008"},{"key":"121148","unstructured":"Statistics Finland. Classification of Socio-economic Groups 1989; 1989. https:\/\/stat.fi\/en\/luokitukset\/sosioekon_asema\/sosioekon_asema_1_19890101"},{"key":"121149","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"McGirt M J, Sivaganesan A, Asher A L, Devin C J. Prediction model for outcome after low-back surgery: individualized likelihood of complication, hospital readmission, return to work, and 12-month improvement in functional disability. FOC 2015; 39: E13. doi: 10.3171\/2015.8.FOCUS15338.","DOI":"10.3171\/2015.8.FOCUS15338"},{"key":"121150","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Anderson J T, Haas A R, Percy R, Woods S T, Ahn U M, Ahn N U. Workers\u2019 compensation, return to work, and lumbar fusion for spondylolisthesis. Orthopedics 2016; 39. doi: 10.3928\/01477447-20151218-01.","DOI":"10.3928\/01477447-20151218-01"},{"key":"121151","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Schade V, Semmer N, Main C J, Hora J, Boos N. The impact of clinical, morphological, psychosocial and work-related factors on the outcome of lumbar discectomy. Pain 1999; 80: 239-49. doi: 10.1016\/S0304-3959(98)00210-3.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0304-3959(98)00210-3"},{"key":"121152","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Den Boer J J, Oostendorp R A B, Beems T, Munneke M, Evers A W M. Reduced work capacity after lumbar disc surgery: the role of cognitive-behavioral and work-related risk factors. Pain 2006; 126: 72-8. doi: 10.1016\/j.pain.2006.06.010.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pain.2006.06.010"},{"key":"121153","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sigmundsson F G, J\u00f6nsson B, Str\u00f6mqvist B. Preoperative pain pattern predicts surgical outcome more than type of surgery in patients with central spinal stenosis without concomitant spondylolisthesis: a register study of 9051 patients. Spine 2014; 39: E199-210. doi: 10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000101.","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000101"},{"key":"121154","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Alnaghmoosh N, Urquhart J, Raj R, Abraham E, Jacobs B, Phan P, et al. Back dominant pain has equal outcomes to radicular dominant pain following posterior lumbar fusion in adult isthmic spondylolisthesis: a CSORN study. Global Spine J 2022; 12: 1667-75. doi: 10.1177\/2192568220985471.","DOI":"10.1177\/2192568220985471"}],"container-title":["Acta Orthopaedica"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/actaorthop.org\/actao\/article\/download\/43751\/50980","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/actaorthop.org\/actao\/article\/download\/43751\/51015","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/actaorthop.org\/actao\/article\/download\/43751\/51016","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/actaorthop.org\/actao\/article\/download\/43751\/50980","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,15]],"date-time":"2025-08-15T10:29:56Z","timestamp":1755253796000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/actaorthop.org\/actao\/article\/view\/43751"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,15]]},"references-count":33,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2340\/17453674.2025.43751","relation":{},"ISSN":["1745-3682","1745-3674"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1745-3682","type":"electronic"},{"value":"1745-3674","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,15]]}}}