{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,3]],"date-time":"2026-03-03T20:41:37Z","timestamp":1772570497722,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":103,"publisher":"MJS Publishing, Medical Journals Sweden AB","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,7]],"date-time":"2025-05-07T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1746576000000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["JRM"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Objective: To ensure wider use of the internationally recommended Fugl\u2013Meyer Assessment (FMA) of sensorimotor function for people with stroke, official translations of the scale are needed. This study aimed to perform a translation and cross-cultural adaptation\/validation of the FMA into the Czech language.\nDesign: Translation and cross-cultural adaptation\/validation.\nSubjects\/Patients: Five clinical experts and 1 external expert participated as reviewers; 11 individuals with stroke in the early subacute phase were included in the pilot testing.\nMethods: A standardized process using forward\u2013backward translations, expert panel reviews, and pilot testing between and within the raters (inter- and intra-rater reliability) were employed to ensure conceptual, semantic, and operational validity of the new Czech FMA. Agreement between raters was assessed in 11 individuals with stroke on 2 consecutive days at University Hospital Olomouc by using Svensson\u2019s rank-based statistics.\nResults: Percentage of agreement between and within raters ranged between 70\u2013100% and 55\u2013100%, respectively. Systematic disagreements, found in 7 out of 96 FMA items, were discussed and revised in the final version.\nConclusion: The Czech FMA offers a more unified and standardized assessment of sensorimotor impairment in clinical and research settings. This will improve stroke rehabilitation care and allow for wider international collaboration.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.2340\/jrm.v57.43010","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,8]],"date-time":"2025-05-08T05:41:10Z","timestamp":1746682870000},"page":"jrm43010","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["The Czech Fugl\u2013Meyer assessment for post-stroke sensorimotor function: translation and cross-cultural adaptation and validation"],"prefix":"10.2340","volume":"57","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4317-8557","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Barbora","family":"Kol\u00e1\u0159ov\u00e1","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8199-4283","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Petra","family":"Gaul-Al\u00e1\u010dov\u00e1","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6209-5517","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Nicole","family":"Musilov\u00e1","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Anna","family":"Majerov\u00e1","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3192-7787","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Margit","family":"Alt Murphy","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"1183","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,7]]},"reference":[{"key":"110151","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Feigin VL, Brainin M, Norrving B, et al. World Stroke Organization: Global Stroke Fact Sheet 2025. Int J Stroke 2025; 20: 132\u2013144.","DOI":"10.1177\/17474930241308142"},{"key":"110152","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/17474930241308142","DOI":"10.1177\/17474930241308142"},{"key":"110153","unstructured":"Gialanella B, Santoro R, Ferlucci C. Predicting outcome after stroke: the role of basic activities of daily living predicting outcome after stroke. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2013; 49: 629\u2013637."},{"key":"110154","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bryndziar T, \u0160edov\u00e1 P, Mikul\u00edk R. Stroke incidence in Europe: a systematic review. Cesk Slov Neurol N 2017; 80: 180\u2013189.","DOI":"10.14735\/amcsnn2017180"},{"key":"110155","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.14735\/amcsnn2017180","DOI":"10.14735\/amcsnn2017180"},{"key":"110156","unstructured":"Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic (\u00daZIS). Zdravotnick\u00e1 ro\u010denka 2021 [retrieved 2023 June 23]. Available from: https:\/\/www.uzis.cz\/index.php?pg=aktuality&aid=8619"},{"key":"110157","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Thayabaranathan T, Kim J, Cadilhac DA, Thrift AG, Donnan GA, Howard G, et al. Global stroke statistics 2022. Int J Stroke 2022; 17: 946\u2013956.","DOI":"10.1177\/17474930221123175"},{"key":"110158","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/17474930221123175","DOI":"10.1177\/17474930221123175"},{"key":"110159","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Langhorne P, Coupar F, Pollock A. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol 2009; 8: 741\u2013754.","DOI":"10.1016\/S1474-4422(09)70150-4"},{"key":"110160","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S1474-4422(09)70150-4","DOI":"10.1016\/S1474-4422(09)70150-4"},{"key":"110161","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Alt Murphy M, Danielsson A, Sunnerhagen KS. Letter by Murphy et al. regarding article, \u201cFugl\u2013Meyer assessment of sensorimotor function after stroke: standardized training procedure for clinical practice and clinical trials\u201d. Stroke 2011; 42: e402.","DOI":"10.1161\/STROKEAHA.111.619304"},{"key":"110162","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1161\/STROKEAHA.111.619304","DOI":"10.1161\/STROKEAHA.111.619304"},{"key":"110163","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Burridge J, Alt Murphy M, Buurke J, Feys P, Keller T, Klamroth-Marganska V, et al. A systematic review of international clinical guidelines for rehabilitation of people with neurological conditions: what recommendations are made for upper limb assessment? Front Neurol 2019; 10: 567.","DOI":"10.3389\/fneur.2019.00567"},{"key":"110164","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fneur.2019.00567","DOI":"10.3389\/fneur.2019.00567"},{"key":"110165","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Santisteban L, T\u00e9r\u00e9metz M, Bleton JP, Baron JC, Maier MA, Lindberg PG. Upper limb outcome measures used in stroke rehabilitation studies: a systematic literature review. PLoS One 2016; 11: e0154792.","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0154792"},{"key":"110166","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0154792","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0154792"},{"key":"110167","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hern\u00e1ndez ED, Galeano CP, Barbosa NE, Forero SM, Nordin \u00c5, Sunnerhagen KS, et al. Intra- and inter-rater reliability of Fugl\u2013Meyer Assessment of Upper Extremity in stroke. J Rehabil Med 2019; 51: 652\u2013659.","DOI":"10.2340\/16501977-2590"},{"key":"110168","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2340\/16501977-2590","DOI":"10.2340\/16501977-2590"},{"key":"110169","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hern\u00e1ndez ED, Forero SM, Galeano CP, Barbosa NE, Sunnerhagen KS, Alt Murphy M. Intra- and inter-rater reliability of Fugl\u2013Meyer Assessment of Lower Extremity early after stroke. Braz J Phys Ther 2020; 25: 709\u2013718.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bjpt.2020.12.002"},{"key":"110170","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.bjpt.2020.12.002","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bjpt.2020.12.002"},{"key":"110171","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"See J, Dodakian L, Chou C, Chan V, McKenzie A, Reinkensmeyer DJ, et al. A standardized approach to the Fugl\u2013Meyer assessment and its implications for clinical trials. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2013; 27: 732\u2013741.","DOI":"10.1177\/1545968313491000"},{"key":"110172","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1545968313491000","DOI":"10.1177\/1545968313491000"},{"key":"110173","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Amano S, Umeji A, Uchita A, Hashimoto Y, Takebayashi T, Kanata Y, et al. Reliability of remote evaluation for the Fugl\u2013Meyer assessment and the action research arm test in hemiparetic patients after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil 2018; 25: 43\u201347.","DOI":"10.1080\/10749357.2018.1484987"},{"key":"110174","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/10749357.2018.1484987","DOI":"10.1080\/10749357.2018.1484987"},{"key":"110175","unstructured":"International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2001."},{"key":"110176","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kwakkel G, Lannin NA, Borschmann K, English C, Ali M, Churilov L, et al. Standardized measurement of sensorimotor recovery in stroke trials: consensus-based core recommendations from the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2017; 31: 784\u2013792.","DOI":"10.1177\/1545968317732662"},{"key":"110177","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1545968317732662","DOI":"10.1177\/1545968317732662"},{"key":"110178","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lee HC, Kuo FL, Lin YN, Liou TH, Lin JC, Huang SW. Effects of robot-assisted rehabilitation on hand function of people with stroke: a randomized, crossover-controlled, assessor-blinded study. Am J Occup Ther 2021; 75: 7501205020p1\u20137501205020p11.","DOI":"10.5014\/ajot.2021.038232"},{"key":"110179","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5014\/ajot.2021.038232","DOI":"10.5014\/ajot.2021.038232"},{"key":"110180","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hernandez A, Bubyr L, Archambault PS, Higgins J, Levin MF, Kairy D. Virtual reality-based rehabilitation as a feasible and engaging tool for the management of chronic poststroke upper-extremity function recovery: randomized controlled trial. JMIR Serious Games 2022; 10: e37506.","DOI":"10.2196\/37506"},{"key":"110181","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2196\/37506","DOI":"10.2196\/37506"},{"key":"110182","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Park J, Lee N, Cho M, Kim D, Yang Y. Effects of mental practice on stroke patients\u2019 upper extremity function and daily activity performance. J Phys Ther Sci 2015; 27: 1075\u20131077.","DOI":"10.1589\/jpts.27.1075"},{"key":"110183","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1589\/jpts.27.1075","DOI":"10.1589\/jpts.27.1075"},{"key":"110184","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rocha LSO, Gama GCB, Rocha RSB, Rocha LB, Dias CP, Santos LLS, et al. Constraint induced movement therapy increases functionality and quality of life after stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2021; 30: 105774.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105774"},{"key":"110185","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105774","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105774"},{"key":"110186","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hara T, Niimi M, Yamada N, Shimamoto Y, Masuda G, Hara H, et al. Prognosis prediction of the effect of botulinum toxin therapy and intensive rehabilitation on the upper arm function in post-stroke patients using hierarchical cluster analysis. Disabil Rehabil 2022; 44: 6815\u20136823.","DOI":"10.1080\/09638288.2021.1977394"},{"key":"110187","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/09638288.2021.1977394","DOI":"10.1080\/09638288.2021.1977394"},{"key":"110188","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fugl\u2013Meyer AR, J\u00e4\u00e4sk\u00f6 L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med 1975; 7: 13\u201331.","DOI":"10.2340\/1650197771331"},{"key":"110189","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2340\/1650197771331","DOI":"10.2340\/1650197771331"},{"key":"110190","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sullivan JE, Crowner BE, Kluding PM, Nichols D, Rose DK, Yoshida R, et al. Outcome measures for individuals with stroke: process and recommendations from the American Physical Therapy Association neurology section task force. Phys Ther 2013; 93: 1383\u20131396.","DOI":"10.2522\/ptj.20120492"},{"key":"110191","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2522\/ptj.20120492","DOI":"10.2522\/ptj.20120492"},{"key":"110192","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cruchinho P, L\u00f3pez-Franco MD, Capelas ML, Almeida S, Bennett PM, Miranda da Silva M, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of measurement instruments: a practical guideline for novice researchers. J Multidiscip Healthc 2024; 17: 2701\u20132728.","DOI":"10.2147\/JMDH.S419714"},{"key":"110193","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2147\/JMDH.S419714","DOI":"10.2147\/JMDH.S419714"},{"key":"110194","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Busk H, Alt Murphy M, Korsman R, Skou ST, Wienecke T. Cross-cultural translation and adaptation of the Danish version of the Fugl\u2013Meyer assessment for post stroke sensorimotor function. Disabil Rehabil 2022; 44: 4888\u20134895.","DOI":"10.1080\/09638288.2021.1919215"},{"key":"110195","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/09638288.2021.1919215","DOI":"10.1080\/09638288.2021.1919215"},{"key":"110196","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cecchi F, Carrabba C, Bertolucci F, Castagnoli C, Falsini C, Gnetti B, et al. Transcultural translation and validation of Fugl\u2013Meyer assessment to Italian. Disabil Rehabil 2021; 43: 3717\u20133722.","DOI":"10.1080\/09638288.2020.1746844"},{"key":"110197","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/09638288.2020.1746844","DOI":"10.1080\/09638288.2020.1746844"},{"key":"110198","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kim TL, Hwang SH, Lee WJ, Hwang JW, Cho I, Kim EH, et al. The Korean version of the Fugl\u2013Meyer Assessment: reliability and validity evaluation. Ann Rehabil Med 2021; 45: 83\u201398.","DOI":"10.5535\/arm.20225"},{"key":"110199","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5535\/arm.20225","DOI":"10.5535\/arm.20225"},{"key":"110200","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Onose G, Anghelescu A, Ionescu A, Tataranu LG, Sp\u00eenu A, Bumbea AM, et al. Translation of the Fugl\u2013Meyer assessment into Romanian: transcultural and semantic-linguistic adaptations and clinical validation. Front Neurol 2023; 13: 1022546.","DOI":"10.3389\/fneur.2022.1022546"},{"key":"110201","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fneur.2022.1022546","DOI":"10.3389\/fneur.2022.1022546"},{"key":"110202","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Barbosa NE, Forero SM, Galeano CP, Hern\u00e1ndez ED, Landinez NS, Sunnerhagen KS, et al. Translation and cultural validation of clinical observational scales: the Fugl\u2013Meyer assessment for post stroke sensorimotor function in Colombian Spanish. Disabil Rehabil 2019; 41: 2317\u20132323.","DOI":"10.1080\/09638288.2018.1464604"},{"key":"110203","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/09638288.2018.1464604","DOI":"10.1080\/09638288.2018.1464604"},{"key":"110204","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ikram M, Rehman S, Sunnerhagen K, Alt Murphy M. Urdu translation and cross-cultural validation of the Fugl\u2013Meyer assessment in people with stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2022; 44: 8048\u20138053.","DOI":"10.1080\/09638288.2021.2003449"},{"key":"110205","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/09638288.2021.2003449","DOI":"10.1080\/09638288.2021.2003449"},{"key":"110206","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 2000; 25: 3186\u20133191.","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-200012150-00014"},{"key":"110207","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/00007632-200012150-00014","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-200012150-00014"},{"key":"110208","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sousa VD, Rojjanasrirat W. Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: a clear and user-friendly guideline. J Eval Clin Pract 2011; 17: 268\u2013274.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2753.2010.01434.x"},{"key":"110209","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1365-2753.2010.01434.x","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2753.2010.01434.x"},{"key":"110210","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Svensson E. Different ranking approaches defining association and agreement measures of paired ordinal data. Stat Med 2012; 31: 3104\u20133117.","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.5382"},{"key":"110211","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/sim.5382","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.5382"},{"key":"110212","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Svensson E, Holm S. Separation of systematic and random differences in ordinal rating scales. Stat Med 1994; 13: 2437\u20132453.","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.4780132308"},{"key":"110213","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/sim.4780132308","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.4780132308"},{"key":"110214","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Duncan Millar J, van Wijck F, Pollock A, Ali M. Outcome measures in post-stroke arm rehabilitation trials: do existing measures capture outcomes that are important to stroke survivors, carers, and clinicians? Clin Rehabil 2019; 33: 737\u2013749.","DOI":"10.1177\/0269215518823248"},{"key":"110215","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0269215518823248","DOI":"10.1177\/0269215518823248"},{"key":"110216","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kim H, Her J, Ko J, Park DS, Woo JH, You Y, et al. Reliability, concurrent validity, and responsiveness of the Fugl\u2013Meyer Assessment (FMA) for hemiplegic patients. J Phys Ther Sci 2012; 24: 893\u2013899.","DOI":"10.1589\/jpts.24.893"},{"key":"110217","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1589\/jpts.24.893","DOI":"10.1589\/jpts.24.893"},{"key":"110218","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gladstone DJ, Danells CJ, Black SE. The Fugl\u2013Meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke: a critical review of its measurement properties. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2002; 16: 232\u2013240.","DOI":"10.1177\/154596802401105171"},{"key":"110219","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/154596802401105171","DOI":"10.1177\/154596802401105171"},{"key":"110220","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lee HH, Kim DY, Sohn MK, Shin YI, Oh GJ, Lee YS, et al. Revisiting the proportional recovery model in view of the ceiling effect of Fugl\u2013Meyer Assessment. Stroke 2021; 52: 3167\u20133175.","DOI":"10.1161\/STROKEAHA.120.032409"},{"key":"110221","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1161\/STROKEAHA.120.032409","DOI":"10.1161\/STROKEAHA.120.032409"},{"key":"110222","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hawe RL, Scott SH, Dukelow SP. Taking proportional out of stroke recovery. Stroke 2019; 50: 204\u2013211.","DOI":"10.1161\/STROKEAHA.118.023006"},{"key":"110223","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1161\/STROKEAHA.118.023006","DOI":"10.1161\/STROKEAHA.118.023006"},{"key":"110224","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kristersson T, Persson HC, Alt Murphy M. Evaluation of a short assessment for upper extremity activity capacity early after stroke. J Rehabil Med 2019; 51: 257\u2013263.","DOI":"10.2340\/16501977-2534"},{"key":"110225","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2340\/16501977-2534","DOI":"10.2340\/16501977-2534"},{"key":"110226","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sullivan KJ, Tilson JK, Cen SY, Rose DK, Hershberg J, Correa A, et al. Fugl\u2013Meyer assessment of sensorimotor function after stroke: standardized training procedure for clinical practice and clinical trials. Stroke 2011; 42: 427\u2013432.","DOI":"10.1161\/STROKEAHA.110.592766"},{"key":"110227","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1161\/STROKEAHA.110.592766","DOI":"10.1161\/STROKEAHA.110.592766"},{"key":"110228","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Boyd LA, Hayward KS, Ward NS, Stinear CM, Rosso C, Fisher RJ, et al. Biomarkers of stroke recovery: consensus-based core recommendations from the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable. Int J Stroke 2017; 12: 480\u2013493.","DOI":"10.1177\/1747493017714176"},{"key":"110229","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1747493017714176","DOI":"10.1177\/1747493017714176"},{"key":"110230","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Woytowicz EJ, Rietschel JC, Goodman RN, Conroy SS, Sorkin JD, Whitall J, et al. Determining levels of upper extremity movement impairment by applying a cluster analysis to the Fugl\u2013Meyer Assessment of the upper extremity in chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2017; 98: 456\u2013462.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2016.06.023"},{"key":"110231","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.apmr.2016.06.023","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2016.06.023"},{"key":"110232","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Huynh BP, DiCarlo JA, Vora I, Ranford J, Gochyyev P, Lin DJ, et al. Sensitivity to change and responsiveness of the upper extremity Fugl\u2013Meyer assessment in individuals with moderate to severe acute stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2023; 37: 545\u2013553.","DOI":"10.1177\/15459683231186985"},{"key":"110233","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/15459683231186985","DOI":"10.1177\/15459683231186985"},{"key":"110234","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hiragami S, Inoue Y, Harada K. Minimal clinically important difference for the Fugl\u2013Meyer assessment of the upper extremity in convalescent stroke patients with moderate to severe hemiparesis. J Phys Ther Sci 2019; 31: 917\u2013921.","DOI":"10.1589\/jpts.31.917"},{"key":"110235","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1589\/jpts.31.917","DOI":"10.1589\/jpts.31.917"},{"key":"110236","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pandian S, Arya KN, Kumar D. Minimal clinically important difference of the lower-extremity Fugl\u2013Meyer assessment in chronic-stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil 2016; 23: 233\u2013239.","DOI":"10.1179\/1945511915Y.0000000003"},{"key":"110237","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1179\/1945511915Y.0000000003","DOI":"10.1179\/1945511915Y.0000000003"},{"key":"110238","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Prabhakaran S, Zarahn E, Riley C, Speizer A, Chong JY, Lazar RM, et al. Inter-individual variability in the capacity for motor recovery after ischemic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008; 22: 64\u201371.","DOI":"10.1177\/1545968307305302"},{"key":"110239","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1545968307305302","DOI":"10.1177\/1545968307305302"},{"key":"110240","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Winters C, van Wegen EE, Daffertshofer A, Kwakkel G. Generalizability of the proportional recovery model for the upper extremity after an ischemic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2015; 29: 614\u2013622.","DOI":"10.1177\/1545968314562115"},{"key":"110241","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1545968314562115","DOI":"10.1177\/1545968314562115"},{"key":"110242","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Smith MC, Byblow WD, Barber PA, Stinear CM. Proportional recovery from lower limb motor impairment after stroke. Stroke 2017; 48: 1400\u20131403.","DOI":"10.1161\/STROKEAHA.116.016478"},{"key":"110243","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1161\/STROKEAHA.116.016478","DOI":"10.1161\/STROKEAHA.116.016478"},{"key":"110244","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ghaziani E, Coupp\u00e9 C, Siersma V, Christensen H, Magnusson SP, Sunnerhagen KS, et al. Easily conducted tests during the first week post-stroke can aid the prediction of arm functioning at 6 months. Front Neurol 2019; 10: 1371.","DOI":"10.3389\/fneur.2019.01371"},{"key":"110245","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fneur.2019.01371","DOI":"10.3389\/fneur.2019.01371"},{"key":"110246","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hochleitner I, Pellicciari L, Castagnoli C, Paperini A, Politi AM, Campagnini S, et al. Intra- and inter-rater reliability of the Italian Fugl\u2013Meyer assessment of upper and lower extremity. Disabil Rehabil 2023; 45: 2989\u20132999.","DOI":"10.1080\/09638288.2022.2114553"},{"key":"110247","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/09638288.2022.2114553","DOI":"10.1080\/09638288.2022.2114553"},{"key":"110248","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wiesner K, Schwarz A, Meya L, Kaufmann JE, Traenka C, Luft AR, et al. Interrater reliability of the Fugl\u2013Meyer Motor assessment in stroke patients: a quality management project within the ESTREL study. Front Neurol 2024; 15: 1335375.","DOI":"10.3389\/fneur.2024.1335375"},{"key":"110249","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fneur.2024.1335375","DOI":"10.3389\/fneur.2024.1335375"},{"key":"110250","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Prange-Lasonder GB, Alt Murphy M, Lamers I, Hughes AM, Buurke JH, Feys P, et al. European evidence-based recommendations for clinical assessment of upper limb in neurorehabilitation (CAULIN): data synthesis from systematic reviews, clinical practice guidelines and expert consensus. J NeuroEngineering Rehabil 2021; 18: 162.","DOI":"10.1186\/s12984-021-00951-y"},{"key":"110251","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12984-021-00951-y","DOI":"10.1186\/s12984-021-00951-y"},{"key":"110252","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Van Criekinge T, Heremans C, Burridge J, et al. Standardized measurement of balance and mobility post-stroke: consensus-based core recommendations from the third Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2023; 38: 41\u201351.","DOI":"10.1177\/15459683231209154"},{"key":"110253","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/15459683231209154","DOI":"10.1177\/15459683231209154"}],"container-title":["Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/medicaljournalssweden.se\/jrm\/article\/download\/43010\/50054","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/medicaljournalssweden.se\/jrm\/article\/download\/43010\/50054","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,8]],"date-time":"2025-05-08T05:41:40Z","timestamp":1746682900000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/medicaljournalssweden.se\/jrm\/article\/view\/43010"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,7]]},"references-count":103,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2340\/jrm.v57.43010","relation":{},"ISSN":["1651-2081"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1651-2081","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,7]]}}}