{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,15]],"date-time":"2025-11-15T09:57:52Z","timestamp":1763200672459,"version":"3.43.0"},"reference-count":62,"publisher":"MJS Publishing, Medical Journals Sweden AB","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,5]],"date-time":"2025-08-05T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1754352000000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["JRM"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Objective: To develop an official translation of the original Fugl-Meyer Assessment of upper and lower extremity sensorimotor function into Japanese by following a standardized cross-cultural adaptation process to ensure conceptual, linguistic, and semantic validity.\nDesign: Cross-cultural translation\/validation.\nSubjects\/Patients: Seven Japanese clinical experts and an external expert developed the translation. The pilot study included 10 participants with stroke.\nMethods: Following the Translation and Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Objectively Assessed Outcome Measures, the Fugl-Meyer Assessment was forward and backward translated and reviewed by an expert group and an external expert familiar with the original scale. The translation was tested in a pilot study with 10 patients with hemiparetic stroke to identify problematic items in intra- and inter-rater agreements.\nResults: Sufficient intra- and inter-rater agreements (&gt;\u200970% agreement) were reached for all items, and only 2 sensation items showed systematic disagreement. These results were incorporated to refine the translation and ensure conceptual, semantic, and linguistic equivalence with the original Fugl\u2013Meyer Assessment.\nConclusion: The culturally validated upper and lower extremity Fugl-Meyer Assessment supports the Japanese rehabilitation field and promotes international collaboration by improving the unified assessment of sensorimotor function in individuals with stroke.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.2340\/jrm.v57.43350","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,5]],"date-time":"2025-08-05T09:56:25Z","timestamp":1754387785000},"page":"jrm43350","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the japanese translation of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for upper and lower extremity sensorimotor function after stroke"],"prefix":"10.2340","volume":"57","author":[{"given":"Yukitaka","family":"Tomoda","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Toru","family":"Nagao","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Tomoko","family":"Uchida","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Hiroki","family":"Sato","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Masatoshi","family":"Oonishi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Takayuki","family":"Okamoto","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Maya","family":"Tajitsu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Margit","family":"Alt Murphy","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"1183","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,5]]},"reference":[{"key":"119783","unstructured":"Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990\u20132019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Neurol 2021; 20: 795\u2013820."},{"key":"119784","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s1474-4422(21)00252-0","DOI":"10.1016\/S1474-4422(21)00252-0"},{"key":"119785","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Langhorne P, Coupar F, Pollock A. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol 2009; 8:","DOI":"10.1016\/S1474-4422(09)70150-4"},{"key":"119786","unstructured":"741\u2013754."},{"key":"119787","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S1474-4422(09)70150-4","DOI":"10.1016\/S1474-4422(09)70150-4"},{"key":"119788","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Thayabaranathan T, Kim J, Cadilhac DA, Thrift AG, Donnan GA, Howard G, et al. Global stroke statistics 2022. Int J Stroke 2022; 17: 946\u2013956.","DOI":"10.1177\/17474930221123175"},{"key":"119789","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/17474930221123175","DOI":"10.1177\/17474930221123175"},{"key":"119790","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gadidi V, Katz-Leurer M, Carmeli E, Bornstein NM. Long-term outcome poststroke: predictors of activity limitation and participation restriction. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011; 92: 1802\u20131808.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2011.06.014"},{"key":"119791","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.apmr.2011.06.014","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2011.06.014"},{"key":"119792","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med 1975; 7: 13\u201331.","DOI":"10.2340\/1650197771331"},{"key":"119793","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Alt Murphy M, Resteghini C, Feys P, Lamers I. An overview of systematic reviews on upper extremity outcome measures after stroke. BMC Neurol 2015; 15: 29.","DOI":"10.1186\/s12883-015-0292-6"},{"key":"119794","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12883-015-0292-6","DOI":"10.1186\/s12883-015-0292-6"},{"key":"119795","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hsueh IP, Hsu MJ, Sheu CF, Lee S, Hsieh CL, Lin JH. Psychometric comparisons of 2 versions of the Fugl-Meyer Motor Scale and 2 versions of the Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008; 22: 737\u2013744.","DOI":"10.1177\/1545968308315999"},{"key":"119796","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1545968308315999","DOI":"10.1177\/1545968308315999"},{"key":"119797","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wiesner K, Schwarz A, Meya L, Kaufmann JE, Traenka C, Luft AR, et al. Interrater reliability of the Fugl-Meyer Motor assessment in stroke patients: a quality management project within the ESTREL study. Front Neurol 2024; 15: 1335375.","DOI":"10.3389\/fneur.2024.1335375"},{"key":"119798","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fneur.2024.1335375","DOI":"10.3389\/fneur.2024.1335375"},{"key":"119799","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hern\u00e1ndez ED, Forero SM, Galeano CP, Barbosa NE, Stibrant Sunnerhagen K, Alt Murphy M. Intra- and interrater reliability of Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Lower Extremity early after stroke. J Phys Ther 2021; 25:6, s. 709\u2013718.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bjpt.2020.12.002"},{"key":"119800","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.bjpt.2020.12.002","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bjpt.2020.12.002"},{"key":"119801","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hernandez ED, Galeano CP, Barbosa NE, Forero SM, Nordin A, Sunnerhagen KS, et al. Intra- and inter-rater reliability of Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Upper Extremity in stroke. J Rehabil Med 2019; 51: 652\u2013659.","DOI":"10.2340\/16501977-2590"},{"key":"119802","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2340\/16501977-2590","DOI":"10.2340\/16501977-2590"},{"key":"119803","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lin JH, Hsu MJ, Sheu CF, Wu TS, Lin RT, Chen CH, et al. Psychometric comparisons of 4 measures for assessing upper-extremity function in people with stroke. Phys Ther 2009; 89: 840\u2013850.","DOI":"10.2522\/ptj.20080285"},{"key":"119804","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2522\/ptj.20080285","DOI":"10.2522\/ptj.20080285"},{"key":"119805","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kim TL, Hwang SH, Lee WJ, Hwang JW, Cho I, Kim EH, et al. The Korean version of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment: reliability and validity evaluation. Ann Rehabil Med 2021; 45: 83\u201398.","DOI":"10.5535\/arm.20225"},{"key":"119806","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5535\/arm.20225","DOI":"10.5535\/arm.20225"},{"key":"119807","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lin JH, Hsueh IP, Sheu CF, Hsieh CL. Psychometric properties of the sensory scale of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment in stroke patients. Clin Rehabil 2004; 18: 391\u2013397.","DOI":"10.1191\/0269215504cr737oa"},{"key":"119808","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1191\/0269215504cr737oa","DOI":"10.1191\/0269215504cr737oa"},{"key":"119809","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pohl J, Held JPO, Verheyden G, Alt Murphy M, Engelter S, Floel A, et al. Consensus-based core set of outcome measures for clinical motor rehabilitation after stroke: a Delphi study. Front Neurol 2020; 11: 875.","DOI":"10.3389\/fneur.2020.00875"},{"key":"119810","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fneur.2020.00875","DOI":"10.3389\/fneur.2020.00875"},{"key":"119811","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kwakkel G, Lannin NA, Borschmann K, English C, Ali M, Churilov L, et al. Standardized measurement of sensorimotor recovery in stroke trials: consensus-based core recommendations from the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable. Int J Stroke 2017; 12: 451\u2013461.","DOI":"10.1177\/1747493017711813"},{"key":"119812","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1747493017711813","DOI":"10.1177\/1747493017711813"},{"key":"119813","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Barbosa NE, Forero SM, Galeano CP, Hernandez ED, Landinez NS, Sunnerhagen KS, et al. Translation and cultural validation of clinical observational scales: the Fugl-Meyer assessment for post stroke sensorimotor function in Colombian Spanish. Disabil Rehabil 2019; 41: 2317\u20132323.","DOI":"10.1080\/09638288.2018.1464604"},{"key":"119814","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/09638288.2018.1464604","DOI":"10.1080\/09638288.2018.1464604"},{"key":"119815","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cecchi F, Carrabba C, Bertolucci F, Castagnoli C, Falsini C, Gnetti B, et al. Transcultural translation and validation of Fugl-Meyer assessment to Italian. Disabil Rehabil 2021; 43: 3717\u20133722.","DOI":"10.1080\/09638288.2020.1746844"},{"key":"119816","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/09638288.2020.1746844","DOI":"10.1080\/09638288.2020.1746844"},{"key":"119817","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Busk H, Alt Murphy M, Korsman R, Skou ST, Wienecke T. Cross-cultural translation and adaptation of the Danish version of the Fugl-Meyer assessment for post stroke sensorimotor function. Disabil Rehabil 2022; 44: 4888\u20134895.","DOI":"10.1080\/09638288.2021.1919215"},{"key":"119818","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/09638288.2021.1919215","DOI":"10.1080\/09638288.2021.1919215"},{"key":"119819","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ikram M, Rehman SSU, Stibrant Sunnerhagen K, Alt Murphy M. Urdu translation and cross-cultural validation of the Fugl-Meyer assessment in people with stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2022; 44: 8048\u20138053.","DOI":"10.1080\/09638288.2021.2003449"},{"key":"119820","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/09638288.2021.2003449","DOI":"10.1080\/09638288.2021.2003449"},{"key":"119821","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Onose G, Anghelescu A, Ionescu A, Tataranu LG, Sp\u00eenu A, Bumbea AM, et al. Translation of the Fugl-Meyer assessment into Romanian: transcultural and semantic-linguistic adaptations and clinical validation. Front Neurol 2023; 13: 1022546.","DOI":"10.3389\/fneur.2022.1022546"},{"key":"119822","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fneur.2022.1022546","DOI":"10.3389\/fneur.2022.1022546"},{"key":"119823","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kol\u00e1\u0159ov\u00e1 B, Gaul-Al\u00e1\u010dov\u00e1 P, Musilov\u00e1 N, Majerov\u00e1 A, Alt Murphy M. The Czech Fugl-Meyer assessment for post-stroke sensorimotor function: translation and cross-cultural adaptation and validation. J Rehabil Med 2025; 57: jrm43010.","DOI":"10.2340\/jrm.v57.43010"},{"key":"119824","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2340\/jrm.v57.43010","DOI":"10.2340\/jrm.v57.43010"},{"key":"119825","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Schuster C, Hahn S, Ettlin T. Objectively-assessed outcome measures: a translation and cross-cultural adaptation procedure applied to the Chedoke McMaster Arm and Hand Activity Inventory (CAHAI). BMC Med Res Methodol 2010; 10: 106.","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-10-106"},{"key":"119826","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1471-2288-10-106","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-10-106"},{"key":"119827","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, Eremenco S, McElroy S, Verjee-Lorenz A, et al. Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Value Health 2005; 8: 94\u2013104.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x"},{"key":"119828","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x"},{"key":"119829","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Amano S, Umeji A, Uchita A, Hashimoto Y, Takebayashi T, Takahashi K, et al. Clinimetric properties of the Fugl-Meyer assessment with adapted guidelines for the assessment of arm function in hemiparetic patients after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil 2018; 25: 500\u2013508.","DOI":"10.1080\/10749357.2018.1484987"},{"key":"119830","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/10749357.2018.1484987","DOI":"10.1080\/10749357.2018.1484987"},{"key":"119831","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Platz T, Pinkowski C, van Wijck F, Kim IH, di Bella P, Johnson G. Reliability and validity of arm function assessment with standardized guidelines for the Fugl-Meyer Test, Action Research Arm Test and Box and Block Test: a multicentre study. Clin Rehabil 2005; 19: 404\u2013411.","DOI":"10.1191\/0269215505cr832oa"},{"key":"119832","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1191\/0269215505cr832oa","DOI":"10.1191\/0269215505cr832oa"},{"key":"119833","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nakazono T, Takahashi K, Suzuki Y, Mizuno K, Nomura Y, Hiraga Y, et al. Reliability and validity of Japanese version of Fugl-Meyer assessment for the lower extremities. Top Stroke Rehabil 2022; 29: 125\u2013132.","DOI":"10.1080\/10749357.2021.1899700"},{"key":"119834","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/10749357.2021.1899700","DOI":"10.1080\/10749357.2021.1899700"},{"key":"119835","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sullivan KJ, Tilson JK, Cen SY, Rose DK, Hershberg J, Correa A, et al. Fugl-Meyer assessment of sensorimotor function after stroke: standardized training procedure for clinical practice and clinical trials. Stroke 2011; 42: 427\u2013432.","DOI":"10.1161\/STROKEAHA.110.592766"},{"key":"119836","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1161\/strokeaha.110.592766","DOI":"10.1161\/STROKEAHA.110.592766"},{"key":"119837","unstructured":"Sugishita M, Koshizuka Y, Sudou S, Sugishita K, Hemmi I, Karasawa H, et al. The Validity and Reliability of the Japanese version of the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE-J) with the original procedure of the Attention and Calculation Task(2001). Jpn J Cogn Neurosci 2018; 20:91-110."},{"key":"119838","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.11253\/ninchishinkeikagaku.20.91"},{"key":"119839","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Svensson E. Different ranking approaches defining association and agreement measures of paired ordinal data. Stat Med 2012; 31: 3104\u20133117.","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.5382"},{"key":"119840","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/sim.5382","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.5382"},{"key":"119841","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kazdin AE. Artifact, bias, and complexity of assessment: the ABCs of reliability. J Appl Behav Anal 1977; 10: 141\u2013150.","DOI":"10.1901\/jaba.1977.10-141"},{"key":"119842","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Svensson E, Holm S. Separation of systematic and random differences in ordinal rating scales. Stat Med 1994; 13: 2437\u20132453.","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.4780132308"},{"key":"119843","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Alt Murphy M, Danielsson A, Sunnerhagen KS. Letter by Murphy et al. regarding article, \u201cFugl-Meyer assessment of sensorimotor function after stroke: standardized training procedure for clinical practice and clinical trials\u201d. Stroke 2011; 42: e402.","DOI":"10.1161\/STROKEAHA.111.619304"},{"key":"119844","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1161\/STROKEAHA.111.619304","DOI":"10.1161\/STROKEAHA.111.619304"}],"container-title":["Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/medicaljournalssweden.se\/jrm\/article\/download\/43350\/50934","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/medicaljournalssweden.se\/jrm\/article\/download\/43350\/50934","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,5]],"date-time":"2025-08-05T09:56:38Z","timestamp":1754387798000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/medicaljournalssweden.se\/jrm\/article\/view\/43350"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,5]]},"references-count":62,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2340\/jrm.v57.43350","relation":{},"ISSN":["1651-2081"],"issn-type":[{"type":"electronic","value":"1651-2081"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,5]]}}}