{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,17]],"date-time":"2026-06-17T11:53:26Z","timestamp":1781697206019,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":35,"publisher":"MJS Publishing, Medical Journals Sweden AB","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,17]],"date-time":"2026-06-17T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1781654400000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["JRM"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Objective: To identify factors associated with the achievement of independent gait after the robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) with an exoskeletal wearable robot in subacute stroke patients.\nDesign: An international, multicentre, randomized, controlled trial.\nSubjects\/Patients: This prespecified analysis was performed on 58 and 69 subacute stroke patients in the RAGT and control groups.\nMethods: Each RAGT and the conventional gait training was provided 5 times per week for a period of 4 weeks. A Functional Ambulation Categories score of &gt;\u20093 immediately post-intervention was defined as independent ambulation and clinical significance. Univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression models were used to determine possible predictors of clinically significant response to the RAGT and the conventional gait training.\nResults: The 2 independent factors with the greatest impact on the response to RAGT for the achievement of independent gait were initial cognitive function and affected lower extremity power (p\u2009&lt;\u20090.05). However, in the control group, stroke duration from onset to treatment and affected lower extremity power were significant independent factors (p\u2009&lt;\u20090.05).\nConclusion: This prespecified analysis suggests that the efficacy of RAGT with a wearable exoskeleton appears to be less dependent on time since onset within the early subacute phase, highlighting the importance of preserved cognitive function.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.2340\/jrm.v58.45822","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,17]],"date-time":"2026-06-17T11:11:02Z","timestamp":1781694662000},"page":"jrm45822","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Who may benefit from robot-assisted gait training with an exoskeleton in subacute stroke patients? A prespecified analysis"],"prefix":"10.2340","volume":"58","author":[{"given":"Won Hyuk","family":"Chang","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Tae-Woo","family":"Kim","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hyoung Seop","family":"Kim","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Fazah Akhtar","family":"Hanapiah","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jong Weon","family":"Lee","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Seung-Hyeon","family":"Han","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Chai Wen","family":"Jia","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Dae Hyun","family":"Kim","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"family":"Deog Young Kim","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1183","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,17]]},"reference":[{"key":"159376","unstructured":"Colombo G, Joerg M, Schreier R, Dietz V. Treadmill training of paraplegic patients using a robotic orthosis. J Rehabil Res Dev 2000; 37: 693\u2013700."},{"key":"159377","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chang WH, Kim YH. Robot-assisted therapy in stroke rehabilitation. J Stroke 2013; 15: 174\u2013181.","DOI":"10.5853\/jos.2013.15.3.174"},{"key":"159378","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mehrholz J, Kugler J, Pohl M, Elsner B. Electromechanical-assisted training for walking after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2025; 5: CD006185.","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006185.pub6"},{"key":"159379","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Morone G, Bragoni M, Iosa M, De Angelis D, Venturiero V, Coiro P, et al. Who may benefit from robotic-assisted gait training? A randomized clinical trial in patients with subacute stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2011; 25: 636\u2013644.","DOI":"10.1177\/1545968311401034"},{"key":"159380","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lam T, Pauhl K, Krassioukov A, Eng JJ. Using robot-applied resistance to augment body-weight-supported treadmill training in an individual with incomplete spinal cord injury. Phys Ther 2011; 91: 143\u2013151.","DOI":"10.2522\/ptj.20100026"},{"key":"159381","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Goffredo M, Guanziroli E, Pournajaf S, Gaffuri M, Gasperini G, Filoni S, et al. Overground wearable powered exoskeleton for gait training in subacute stroke subjects: clinical and gait assessments. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2019; 55: 710\u2013721.","DOI":"10.23736\/S1973-9087.19.05574-6"},{"key":"159382","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chang WH, Kim TW, Kim HS, Hanapiah FA, Lee JW, Han SH, et al. Efficacy of wearable exoskeleton for gait recovery in patients with stroke: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Stroke 2025; 10.1161\/STROKEAHA.125.052763.","DOI":"10.1161\/STROKEAHA.125.052763"},{"key":"159383","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chang WH, Kim TW, Kim HS, Hanapiah FA, Kim DH, Kim DY. Exoskeletal wearable robot on ambulatory function in patients with stroke: a protocol for an international, multicentre, randomised controlled study. BMJ Open 2023; 13: e065298.","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2022-065298"},{"key":"159384","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bernhardt J, Hayward KS, Kwakkel G, Ward NS, Wolf SL, Borschmann K, et al. Agreed definitions and a shared vision for new standards in stroke recovery research: the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable Taskforce. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2017; 31: 793\u2013799.","DOI":"10.1177\/1545968317732668"},{"key":"159385","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Burn JP. Reliability of the modified Rankin Scale. Stroke 1992; 23: 438.","DOI":"10.1161\/str.23.3.438b"},{"key":"159386","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Collin C, Wade D. Assessing motor impairment after stroke: a pilot reliability study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1990; 53: 576\u2013579.","DOI":"10.1136\/jnnp.53.7.576"},{"key":"159387","unstructured":"Kang Y, Na DL, Hahn S. A validity study on the Korean Mini-Mental State Examination (K-MMSE) in dementia patients. J Korean Neurol Assoc 1997; 15: 300\u2013308."},{"key":"159388","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Blackburn M, van Vliet P, Mockett SP. Reliability of measurements obtained with the modified Ashworth scale in the lower extremities of people with stroke. Phys Ther 2002; 82: 25\u201334.","DOI":"10.1093\/ptj\/82.1.25"},{"key":"159389","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chang WH, Sohn MK, Lee J, Kim DY, Lee SG, Shin YI, et al. Predictors of functional level and quality of life at 6 months after a first-ever stroke: the KOSCO study. J Neurol 2016; 263: 1166\u20131177.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00415-016-8119-y"},{"key":"159390","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Morone G, Iosa M, Paolucci T, Muzzioli L, Paolucci S. Relationship between body mass index and rehabilitation outcomes in subacute stroke with dysphagia. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2019; 98: 608\u2013612.","DOI":"10.1097\/PHM.0000000000001159"},{"key":"159391","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Stinear CM. Prediction of motor recovery after stroke: advances in biomarkers. Lancet Neurol 2017; 16: 826\u2013836.","DOI":"10.1016\/S1474-4422(17)30283-1"},{"key":"159392","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Stinear C. Prediction of recovery of motor function after stroke. Lancet Neurol 2010; 9: 1228\u20131232.","DOI":"10.1016\/S1474-4422(10)70247-7"},{"key":"159393","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Holden MK, Gill KM, Magliozzi MR, Nathan J, Piehl-Baker L. Clinical gait assessment in the neurologically impaired: reliability and meaningfulness. Phys Ther 1984; 64: 35\u201340.","DOI":"10.1093\/ptj\/64.1.35"},{"key":"159394","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med 1975; 7: 13\u201331.","DOI":"10.2340\/1650197771331"},{"key":"159395","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Demeurisse G, Demol O, Robaye E. Motor evaluation in vascular hemiplegia. Eur Neurol 1980; 19: 382\u2013389.","DOI":"10.1159\/000115178"},{"key":"159396","unstructured":"Jung HY, Park JH, Shim JJ, Kim MJ, Hwang MR, Kim SH. Reliability test of Korean version of Berg Balance Scale. J Korean Acad Rehabil Med 2006; 30: 611\u2013618."},{"key":"159397","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lesher EL, Berryhill JS. Validation of the Geriatric Depression Scale \u2013 Short Form among inpatients. J Clin Psychol 1994; 50: 256\u2013260.","DOI":"10.1002\/1097-4679(199403)50:2<256::AID-JCLP2270500218>3.0.CO;2-E"},{"key":"159398","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Greiner W, Claes C, Busschbach JJ, von der Schulenburg JM. Validating the EQ-5D with time trade off for the German population. Eur J Health Econ 2005; 6: 124\u2013130.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10198-004-0264-z"},{"key":"159399","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mickey RM, Greenland S. The impact of confounder selection criteria on effect estimation. Am J Epidemiol 1989; 129: 125\u2013137.","DOI":"10.1093\/oxfordjournals.aje.a115101"},{"key":"159400","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Veerbeek JM, van Wegen E, van Peppen R, van der Wees PJ, Hendriks E, Rietberg M, et al. What is the evidence for physical therapy poststroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2014; 9: e87987.","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0087987"},{"key":"159401","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Van Criekinge T, Truijen S, Schroder J, Maebe Z, Blanckaert K, van der Waal C, et al. The effectiveness of trunk training on trunk control, sitting and standing balance and mobility post-stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil 2019; 33: 992\u20131002.","DOI":"10.1177\/0269215519830159"},{"key":"159402","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Woollacott M, Shumway-Cook A. Attention and the control of posture and gait: a review of an emerging area of research. Gait Posture 2002; 16: 1\u201314.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0966-6362(01)00156-4"},{"key":"159403","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Comani S, Velluto L, Schinaia L, Cerroni G, Serio A, Buzzelli S, et al. Monitoring neuro-motor recovery from stroke with high-resolution EEG, robotics and virtual reality: a proof of concept. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2015; 23: 1106\u20131116.","DOI":"10.1109\/TNSRE.2015.2425474"},{"key":"159404","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Preston E, Ada L, Stanton R, Mahendran N, Dean CM. Prediction of independent walking in people who are nonambulatory early after stroke: a systematic review. Stroke 2021; 52: 3217\u20133224.","DOI":"10.1161\/STROKEAHA.120.032345"},{"key":"159405","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Murphy TH, Corbett D. Plasticity during stroke recovery: from synapse to behaviour. Nat Rev Neurosci 2009; 10: 861\u2013872.","DOI":"10.1038\/nrn2735"},{"key":"159406","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Belda-Lois JM, Mena-del Horno S, Bermejo-Bosch I, Moreno JC, Pons JL, Farina D, et al. Rehabilitation of gait after stroke: a review towards a top-down approach. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2011; 8: 66.","DOI":"10.1186\/1743-0003-8-66"},{"key":"159407","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kleim JA, Jones TA. Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity: implications for rehabilitation after brain damage. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2008; 51: S225\u2013239.","DOI":"10.1044\/1092-4388(2008\/018)"},{"key":"159408","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Calabro RS, Sorrentino G, Cassio A, Mazzoli D, Andrenelli E, Bizzarini E, et al. Robotic-assisted gait rehabilitation following stroke: a systematic review of current guidelines and practical clinical recommendations. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2021; 57: 460\u2013471.","DOI":"10.23736\/S1973-9087.21.06887-8"},{"key":"159409","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Awad LN, Binder-Macleod SA, Pohlig RT, Reisman DS. Paretic propulsion and trailing limb angle are key determinants of long-distance walking function after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2015; 29: 499\u2013508.","DOI":"10.1177\/1545968314554625"},{"key":"159410","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Patterson KK, Parafianowicz I, Danells CJ, Closson V, Verrier MC, Staines WR, et al. Gait asymmetry in community-ambulating stroke survivors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008; 89: 304\u2013310.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2007.08.142"}],"container-title":["Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/medicaljournalssweden.se\/jrm\/article\/download\/45822\/54406","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/medicaljournalssweden.se\/jrm\/article\/download\/45822\/54406","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,17]],"date-time":"2026-06-17T11:11:31Z","timestamp":1781694691000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/medicaljournalssweden.se\/jrm\/article\/view\/45822"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,17]]},"references-count":35,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2340\/jrm.v58.45822","relation":{},"ISSN":["1651-2081"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1651-2081","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,17]]}}}