{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,21]],"date-time":"2025-02-21T20:34:53Z","timestamp":1740170093522,"version":"3.37.3"},"reference-count":27,"publisher":"MJS Publishing, Medical Journals Sweden AB","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,30]],"date-time":"2024-09-30T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1727654400000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100002794","name":"Cancerfonden","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["22 2211 Pj 01 H"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["22 2211 Pj 01 H"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100002794","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/100007212","name":"V\u00e4stra G\u00f6talandsregionen","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["ALFGBG-965031","VGFOUREG-929966"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["ALFGBG-965031","VGFOUREG-929966"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100007212","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["SJU"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Objective: To describe the study design and procedures of the incontinence post robot- assisted radical prostatectomy, anatomical and functional causes (IPA) trial. This trial aims to identify and study patient and procedure specific factors leading to urinary incontinence post robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP).\nMaterial and methods: The IPA study is a prospective, multicentre, open non-randomised surgical trial, including patients prior to RALP and registered on-line (ISRCTN67297115). IPA is administered from the Department of Urology at Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden. Patients undergo an anatomical and functional evaluation using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), urodynamics including cystometry, pressure-flow and urethral pressure profile, and dynamic transrectal ultrasound prior to and 3 months after RALP. The incontinence data are gathered using patient reported outcome measure questionnaires. The primary endpoint is incontinence at 3 months after RALP, defined as need of any pad. The secondary endpoints are incontinence 12 months post RALP defined as need of any pad, and 3- and 12-months post RALP, defined as use of more than a safety pad.\nResults: Until October 2023, 207 patients have been included of the stipulated 1,000, with an increasing rate of accrual. Out of these patients,187 have had a pre- and post-operative MRI and 177 have undergone pre- and post-operative urodynamics.\nConclusions: The design of the IPA study, together with promising accrual and coming multicentre inclusion, will hopefully result in the identification, and deeper understanding, of the various risk-factors for post-RALP incontinence. This could improve information and decision making regarding adequate treatment for patients with prostate cancer.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.2340\/sju.v59.40051","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,30]],"date-time":"2024-09-30T14:25:04Z","timestamp":1727706304000},"page":"156-161","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Study design and procedures in the incontinence post robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: anatomical and functional causes (IPA) \u2013 a prospective observational clinical trial"],"prefix":"10.2340","volume":"59","author":[{"given":"Katarina Koss","family":"Modig","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Rebecka","family":"Arnsrud Godtman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Fredrik","family":"Langkilde","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Marianne","family":"M\u00e5nsson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jonas","family":"Wallstr\u00f6m","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Johan","family":"Stranne","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"1183","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,30]]},"reference":[{"key":"78728","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209\u2013249. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3322\/caac.21660","DOI":"10.3322\/caac.21660"},{"key":"78729","unstructured":"Database on in-house surgery [Internet]. 2024 [cited 02-01-2024]. Available from: https:\/\/sdb.socialstyrelsen.se\/if_ope\/val.aspx"},{"key":"78730","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Haglind E, Carlsson S, Stranne J, et al. Urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction after robotic versus open radical prostatectomy: a prospective, controlled, nonrandomised trial. Eur Urol. 2015;68(2):216\u2013225. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.eururo.2015.02.029","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2015.02.029"},{"key":"78731","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cazzaniga W, Godtman RA, Carlsson S, et al. Population-based, nationwide registration of prostatectomies in Sweden. J Surg Oncol. 2019;120(4):803\u2013812. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jso.25643","DOI":"10.1002\/jso.25643"},{"key":"78732","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Du Y, Long Q, Guan B, et al. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy is more beneficial for prostate cancer patients: a system review and meta-analysis. Med Sci Monit. 2018;24:272\u2013287. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.12659\/MSM.907092","DOI":"10.12659\/MSM.907092"},{"key":"78733","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ficarra V, Novara G, Rosen RC, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012;62(3):405\u2013417. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.eururo.2012.05.045","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2012.05.045"},{"key":"78734","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wallerstedt A, Carlsson S, Nilsson AE, et al. Pad use and patient reported bother from urinary leakage after radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2012;187(1):196\u2013200. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.juro.2011.09.030","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2011.09.030"},{"key":"78735","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"van Stam MA, Aaronson NK, Bosch J, et al. Patient-reported outcomes following treatment of localised prostate cancer and their association with regret about treatment choices. Eur Urol Oncol. 2020;3(1):21\u201331. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.euo.2018.12.004","DOI":"10.1016\/j.euo.2018.12.004"},{"key":"78736","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nyberg M, Sjoberg DD, Carlsson SV, et al. Surgeon heterogeneity significantly affects functional and oncological outcomes after radical prostatectomy in the Swedish LAPPRO trial. BJU Int. 2021;127(3):361\u2013368. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/bju.15238","DOI":"10.1111\/bju.15238"},{"key":"78737","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Carlsson S, Berglund A, Sjoberg D, et al. Effects of surgeon variability on oncologic and functional outcomes in a population-based setting. BMC Urol. 2014;14:25. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1471-2490-14-25","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2490-14-25"},{"key":"78738","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Clements MB, Gmelich CC, Vertosick EA, et al. Have urinary function outcomes after radical prostatectomy improved over the past decade? Cancer. 2022;128(5):1066\u20131073. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/cncr.33994","DOI":"10.1002\/cncr.33994"},{"key":"78739","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Godtman RA, Persson E, Cazzaniga W, et al. Association of surgeon and hospital volume with short-term outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: nationwide, population-based study. PLoS One. 2021;16(6):e0253081. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0253081","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0253081"},{"key":"78740","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lardas M, Grivas N, Debray TPA, et al. Patient- and tumour-related prognostic factors for urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy for nonmetastatic prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol Focus. 2022;8(3):674\u2013689. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.euf.2021.04.020","DOI":"10.1016\/j.euf.2021.04.020"},{"key":"78741","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Steineck G, Bjartell A, Hugosson J, et al. Degree of preservation of the neurovascular bundles during radical prostatectomy and urinary continence 1 year after surgery. Eur Urol. 2015;67(3):559\u2013568. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.eururo.2014.10.011","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2014.10.011"},{"key":"78742","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dubbelman YD, Bosch JL. Urethral sphincter function before and after radical prostatectomy: systematic review of the prognostic value of various assessment techniques. Neurourol Urodyn. 2013;32(7):957\u2013963. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/nau.22355","DOI":"10.1002\/nau.22355"},{"key":"78743","unstructured":"EAU \u2013 EANM \u2013 ESTRO \u2013 ESUR \u2013 ISUP \u2013 SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer [Internet]. 2023 [cited 02-02-2024]. Available from: https:\/\/uroweb.org\/guidelines\/prostate-cancer"},{"key":"78744","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"van Dijk-de Haan MC, Boellaard TN, Tissier R, et al. Value of different magnetic resonance imaging-based measurements of anatomical structures on preoperative prostate imaging in predicting urinary continence after radical prostatectomy in men with prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol Focus. 2022;8(5):1211\u20131225. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.euf.2022.01.015","DOI":"10.1016\/j.euf.2022.01.015"},{"key":"78745","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tutolo M, Rosiello G, Stabile G, et al. The key role of levator ani thickness for early urinary continence recovery in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional study. Neurourol Urodyn. 2022;41(7):1563\u20131572. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/nau.25001","DOI":"10.1002\/nau.25001"},{"key":"78746","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lee SE, Byun SS, Lee HJ, et al. Impact of variations in prostatic apex shape on early recovery of urinary continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology. 2006;68(1):137\u2013141. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.urology.2006.01.021","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2006.01.021"},{"key":"78747","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Paparel P, Akin O, Sandhu JS, et al. Recovery of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy: association with urethral length and urethral fibrosis measured by preoperative and postoperative endorectal magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Urol. 2009;55(3):629\u2013637. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.eururo.2008.08.057","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2008.08.057"},{"key":"78748","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mungovan SF, Sandhu JS, Akin O, et al. Preoperative membranous urethral length measurement and continence recovery following radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2017;71(3):368\u2013378. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.eururo.2016.06.023","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2016.06.023"},{"key":"78749","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mungovan SF, Carlsson SV, Gass GC, et al. Preoperative exercise interventions to optimize continence outcomes following radical prostatectomy. Nat Rev Urol. 2021;18(5):259\u2013281. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41585-021-00445-5","DOI":"10.1038\/s41585-021-00445-5"},{"key":"78750","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tomic K, Berglund A, Robinson D, et al. Capture rate and representativity of the national prostate cancer register of Sweden. Acta Oncol. 2015;54(2):158\u2013163. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3109\/0284186X.2014.939299","DOI":"10.3109\/0284186X.2014.939299"},{"key":"78751","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Turkbey B, Rosenkrantz AB, Haider MA, et al. Prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2.1: 2019 update of prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2. Eur Urol. 2019;76(3):340\u2013351. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.eururo.2019.02.033","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2019.02.033"},{"key":"78752","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rosier P, Schaefer W, Lose G, et al. International continence society good urodynamic practices and terms 2016: urodynamics, uroflowmetry, cystometry, and pressure-flow study. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017;36(5):1243\u20131260. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/nau.23124","DOI":"10.1002\/nau.23124"},{"key":"78753","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Guangyong Zou. A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data Am J Eoidemiol. 2004 Apr 1;159(7):702-6. PMID: 15033648 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/aje\/kwh090","DOI":"10.1093\/aje\/kwh090"},{"key":"78754","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Heijnsdijk EA, Wever EM, Auvinen A, et al. Quality-of-life effects of prostate-specific antigen screening. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(7):595\u2013605. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1056\/NEJMoa1201637","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1201637"}],"container-title":["Scandinavian Journal of Urology"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/medicaljournalssweden.se\/SJU\/article\/download\/40051\/47847","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/medicaljournalssweden.se\/SJU\/article\/download\/40051\/47847","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,30]],"date-time":"2024-09-30T14:25:21Z","timestamp":1727706321000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/medicaljournalssweden.se\/SJU\/article\/view\/40051"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,30]]},"references-count":27,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2340\/sju.v59.40051","relation":{},"ISSN":["2168-1813","2168-1805"],"issn-type":[{"type":"electronic","value":"2168-1813"},{"type":"print","value":"2168-1805"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,30]]}}}