{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,26]],"date-time":"2026-04-26T22:55:34Z","timestamp":1777244134379,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":50,"publisher":"Walter de Gruyter GmbH","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,14]],"date-time":"2022-10-14T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1665705600000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The 5th Plenary Session of the 19th Communist Party of China (CPC) Central Committee clearly states that developing science and technology through self-reliance and self-strengthening provides the strategic underpinning for China's development. Based on this background, this paper explores a metric model for assessing national scientific research strength through collaboration on research papers.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Design\/methodology\/approach<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      We propose a novel metric model for assessing national scientific research strength, which sets two indicators, national scientific self-reliance (\n                      <jats:italic>SR<\/jats:italic>\n                      ) and national academic contribution (\n                      <jats:italic>CT<\/jats:italic>\n                      ), to reflect \u201cself-reliance\u201d and \u201cself-strengthening\u201d respectively. Taking the research papers in quantum technology as an example, this study analyzes the scientific research strength of various countries around the world, especially China in quantum technology.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Findings<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      The results show that the research of quantum technology in China has always been relatively independent with fewer international collaboration papers and located in a more marginal position in cooperation networks. China's academic contribution (\n                      <jats:italic>CT<\/jats:italic>\n                      ) to global quantum technology research is increasing and has been greater than that of the United States in 2020. Combining the two indicators,\n                      <jats:italic>CT<\/jats:italic>\n                      and\n                      <jats:italic>SR<\/jats:italic>\n                      , China's research strength in the quantum field closely follows the United States, and the United States is the most powerful with high research autonomy.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Research limitations<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This paper only reflects China's scientific research strength in quantum technology from collaboration on research papers and doesn\u2019t consider the segmentation of quantum technology and the industrial upstream and downstream aspects, which need further study.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Practical implications<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The model is helpful to better understand the national scientific research strength in a certain field from \u201cself-reliance\u201d and \u201cself-strengthening\u201d.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Originality\/value<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>We propose a novel metric model to measure the national scientific research strength from the perspective of \u201cself-reliance\u201d and \u201cself-strengthening\u201d, which provides a solid basis for the assessment of the strength level of scientific research in countries\/regions and institutions.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.2478\/jdis-2022-0019","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,13]],"date-time":"2022-10-13T19:02:24Z","timestamp":1665687744000},"page":"39-60","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["A Novel Metric for Assessing National Strength in Scientific Research: Understanding China's Research Output in Quantum Technology through Collaboration"],"prefix":"10.2478","volume":"7","author":[{"given":"Yuqi","family":"Wang","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"WISE Lab , Institute of Science of Science and S&T management , Dalian University of Technology , Dalian , China"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Yue","family":"Chen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"WISE Lab , Institute of Science of Science and S&T management , Dalian University of Technology , Dalian , China"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Zhiqi","family":"Wang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"WISE Lab , Institute of Science of Science and S&T management , Dalian University of Technology , Dalian , China"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Kang","family":"Wang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"WISE Lab , Institute of Science of Science and S&T management , Dalian University of Technology , Dalian , China"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Kai","family":"Song","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"WISE Lab , Institute of Science of Science and S&T management , Dalian University of Technology , Dalian , China"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"374","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,14]]},"reference":[{"key":"2026020218341394298_j_jdis-2022-0019_ref_001","unstructured":"Abbas, A.M. (2010). Generalized Linear Weights for Sharing Credits Among Multiple Authors. arXiv:1012.5477 [cs]. http:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/1012.5477"},{"key":"2026020218341394298_j_jdis-2022-0019_ref_002","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Abbas, A.M. (2011). Weighted indices for evaluating the quality of research with multiple authorship. Scientometrics, 88(1), 107\u2013131. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-011-0389-7","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-011-0389-7"},{"key":"2026020218341394298_j_jdis-2022-0019_ref_003","unstructured":"BINOSI, D., & CALARCO, T. (2017). Quantum Information Classification Scheme-QICS. http:\/\/qurope.eu\/content\/qics-book"},{"key":"2026020218341394298_j_jdis-2022-0019_ref_004","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bornmann, Lutz, Leydesdorff, Loet, Wagner, Caroline, & S. (2015). Recent Developments in China-US Cooperation in Science. Minerva: A Review of Science, Learning and Policy, 53(3), 199\u2013214.","DOI":"10.1007\/s11024-015-9273-6"},{"key":"2026020218341394298_j_jdis-2022-0019_ref_005","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Brandes, U. (2001). A faster algorithm for betweenness centrality. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 25(2), 163\u2013177. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/0022250X.2001.9990249","DOI":"10.1080\/0022250X.2001.9990249"},{"key":"2026020218341394298_j_jdis-2022-0019_ref_006","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Charles & Oppenheim. (1998). Fractional counting of multiauthored publications. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(5), 482\u2013482. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/(sici)1097-4571(19980415)49:5<482::aid-asi11>3.3.co;2-8","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1097-4571(19980415)49:5<482::AID-ASI11>3.3.CO;2-8"},{"key":"2026020218341394298_j_jdis-2022-0019_ref_007","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chen, K.H., Zhang, Y., & Fu, X.L. (2019). International research collaboration: An emerging domain of innovation studies? Research Policy, 48(1), 149\u2013168. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.respol.2018.08.005","DOI":"10.1016\/j.respol.2018.08.005"},{"key":"2026020218341394298_j_jdis-2022-0019_ref_008","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cho, C.-C., Hu, M.-W., & Liu, M.-C. (2010). Improvements in productivity based on co-authorship: A case study of published articles in China. Scientometrics, 85(2), 463\u2013470. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-010-0263-z","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-010-0263-z"},{"key":"2026020218341394298_j_jdis-2022-0019_ref_009","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cole, J.R., & Cole, S. (1974). Social Stratification in Science. American Journal of Physics, 42(10), 923\u2013924. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1119\/1.1987897","DOI":"10.1119\/1.1987897"},{"key":"2026020218341394298_j_jdis-2022-0019_ref_010","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"D\u00edaz-Faes, A.A., Costas, R., Galindo, M.P., & Bordons, M. (2015). Unravelling the performance of individual scholars: Use of Canonical Biplot analysis to explore the performance of scientists by academic rank and scientific field. Journal of Informetrics, 9(4), 722\u2013733. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.joi.2015.04.006","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joi.2015.04.006"},{"key":"2026020218341394298_j_jdis-2022-0019_ref_011","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Edler, J. (2010). International Policy Coordination for Collaboration in S&T (SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 1542583). Social Science Research Network. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2139\/ssrn.1542583","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.1542583"},{"key":"2026020218341394298_j_jdis-2022-0019_ref_012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Egghe, L. (1991). Theory of collaboration and collaborative measures. Information Processing & Management, 27(2), 177\u2013202. https:\/\/doi.org\/10\/b84gmq","DOI":"10.1016\/0306-4573(91)90048-Q"},{"key":"2026020218341394298_j_jdis-2022-0019_ref_013","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Egghe, L., Rousseau, R., & Van Hooydonk, G. (2000). Methods for accrediting publications to authors or countries: Consequences for evaluation studies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(2), 145\u2013157. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/(SICI)1097-4571(2000)51:2<145::AID-ASI6>3.0.CO;2-9","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1097-4571(2000)51:2<145::AID-ASI6>3.0.CO;2-9"},{"key":"2026020218341394298_j_jdis-2022-0019_ref_014","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fedorov, A.K., Akimov, A.V., Biamonte, J.D., Kavokin, A.V., Khalili, F.Y., Kiktenko, E.O., Kolachevsky, N.N., Kurochkin, Y.V., Lvovsky, A.I., Rubtsov, A.N., Shlyapnikov, G.V., Straupe, S.S., Ustinov, A.V., & Zheltikov, A.M. (2019). Quantum technologies in Russia. Quantum Science and Technology, 4(4), 040501. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1088\/2058-9565\/ab4472","DOI":"10.1088\/2058-9565\/ab4472"},{"key":"2026020218341394298_j_jdis-2022-0019_ref_015","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gonz\u00e1lez-Alcaide, G., Park, J., Huaman\u00ed, C., & Ramos, J.M. (2017). Dominance and leadership in research activities: Collaboration between countries of differing human development is reflected through authorship order and designation as corresponding authors in scientific publications. PLOS ONE, 12(8), e0182513. https:\/\/doi.org\/10\/gbqt6b","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0182513"},{"key":"2026020218341394298_j_jdis-2022-0019_ref_016","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Haeffner-Cavaillon, N., & Graillot-Gak, C. (2009). The use of bibliometric indicators to help peer-review assessment. Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis, 57(1), 33. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00005-009-0004-2","DOI":"10.1007\/s00005-009-0004-2"},{"key":"2026020218341394298_j_jdis-2022-0019_ref_017","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hagen, N.T. (2010). Harmonic publication and citation counting: Sharing authorship credit equitably\u2014not equally, geometrically or arithmetically. Scientometrics, 84(3), 785\u2013793. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-009-0129-4","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-009-0129-4"},{"key":"2026020218341394298_j_jdis-2022-0019_ref_018","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Harnad, S. (2008). Validating Research Performance Metrics Against Peer Rankings. Ethics in Science & Environmental Politics, 8(1), 111\u2013120. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3354\/esep00088","DOI":"10.3354\/esep00088"},{"key":"2026020218341394298_j_jdis-2022-0019_ref_019","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"He, T.W. (2009). International scientific collaboration of China with the G7 countries. Scientometrics, 80(3), 571\u2013582. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-007-2043-y","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-007-2043-y"},{"key":"2026020218341394298_j_jdis-2022-0019_ref_020","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hodge, S.E., Greenberg, D.A., & Challice, C.E. (1981). Publication Credit. Science, 213(4511), 950\u2013952.","DOI":"10.1126\/science.213.4511.950.c"},{"key":"2026020218341394298_j_jdis-2022-0019_ref_021","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Inglesi-Lotz, R., & Pouris, A. (2011). Scientometric impact assessment of a research policy instrument: The case of rating researchers on scientific outputs in South Africa. Scientometrics, 88(3), 747. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-011-0440-8.","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-011-0440-8"},{"key":"2026020218341394298_j_jdis-2022-0019_ref_022","unstructured":"International Monetary Fund. (2018). World Economic Outlook, April 2018: Cyclical Upswing Structural Change. IMF. https:\/\/www.imf.org\/en\/Publications\/WEO\/Issues\/2018\/03\/20\/world-economic-outlook-april-2018"},{"key":"2026020218341394298_j_jdis-2022-0019_ref_023","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jia, Z.J., Hong, B., Chen, D.M., Huang, Q.H., Yang, Z.G., Yin, C., Deng, X.Q., & Liu, J.M. (2014). China's Growing Contribution to Global Intracranial Aneurysm Research (1991\u20132012): A Bibliometric Study. PLOS ONE, 9(3), e91594. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0091594","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0091594"},{"key":"2026020218341394298_j_jdis-2022-0019_ref_024","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kato, M., & Ando, A. (2017). National ties of international scientific collaboration and researcher mobility found in Nature and Science. Scientometrics, 110(2), 673\u2013694. https:\/\/doi.org\/10\/f9vc64","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-016-2183-z"},{"key":"2026020218341394298_j_jdis-2022-0019_ref_025","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kim, J., & Diesner, J. (2014). A network-based approach to coauthorship credit allocation. Scientometrics, 101(1), 587\u2013602. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-014-1253-3","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-014-1253-3"},{"key":"2026020218341394298_j_jdis-2022-0019_ref_026","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lindsey, D. (1980). Production and Citation Measures in the Sociology of Science: The Problem of Multiple Authorship. Social Studies of Science, 10(2), 145\u2013162. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/030631278001000202","DOI":"10.1177\/030631278001000202"},{"key":"2026020218341394298_j_jdis-2022-0019_ref_027","unstructured":"Liu, J., & Mei, Y.E. (2015). Research on the Subject Development Forecast Based on ESl and lnCites\u2014Taking China University of Geosciences as an Example. Sci-Tech Information Development & Economy. http:\/\/en.cnki.com.cn\/Article_en\/CJFDTotal-KJQB201506056.htm"},{"key":"2026020218341394298_j_jdis-2022-0019_ref_028","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Liu, X.Z., & Fang, H. (2012a). Fairly sharing the credit of multi-authored papers and its application in the modification of h-index and g-index. Scientometrics, 91(1), 37\u201349. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-011-0571-y","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-011-0571-y"},{"key":"2026020218341394298_j_jdis-2022-0019_ref_029","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Liu, X.Z., & Fang, H. (2012b). Modifying h-index by allocating credit of multi-authored papers whose author names rank based on contribution. Journal of Informetrics, 6(4), 557\u2013565. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.joi.2012.05.002","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joi.2012.05.002"},{"key":"2026020218341394298_j_jdis-2022-0019_ref_030","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lukovits, I., & Vinkler, P. (1995). Correct credit distribution: A model for sharing credit... Social Indicators Research. http:\/\/search.ebscohost.com\/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=9601233217&site=ehost-live","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01079398"},{"key":"2026020218341394298_j_jdis-2022-0019_ref_031","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ma, T.C., Li, R.N., Ou, G.Y., & Yue, M.L. (2018). Topic based research competitiveness evaluation. Scientometrics, 117(2), 789\u2013803. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-018-2891-7","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-018-2891-7"},{"key":"2026020218341394298_j_jdis-2022-0019_ref_032","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mallapaty, S. (2021). China's five-year plan focuses on scientific self-reliance. Nature, 591(7850), 353\u2013354. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/d41586-021-00638-3","DOI":"10.1038\/d41586-021-00638-3"},{"key":"2026020218341394298_j_jdis-2022-0019_ref_033","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mokhnacheva, Yu, V., & Kharybina, T.N. (2011). Research performance of RAS institutions and Russian universities: A comparative bibliometric analysis. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 81(6), 569\u2013574. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1134\/S1019331611060104","DOI":"10.1134\/S1019331611060104"},{"key":"2026020218341394298_j_jdis-2022-0019_ref_034","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Morris, S.A., Yen, G., Wu, Z., & Asnake, B. (2003). Time line visualization of research fronts. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(5), 413\u2013422.","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.10227"},{"key":"2026020218341394298_j_jdis-2022-0019_ref_035","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Padma, T.V. (2020). India bets big on quantum technology [News]. Nature. https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/d41586-020-00288-x","DOI":"10.1038\/d41586-020-00288-x"},{"key":"2026020218341394298_j_jdis-2022-0019_ref_036","unstructured":"Salehi, A.A. (2021). Iran has started developing quantum technology, Salehi says. Tehran Times. https:\/\/www.tehrantimes.com\/news\/457400\/Iran-has-started-developing-quantum-technology-Salehi-says"},{"key":"2026020218341394298_j_jdis-2022-0019_ref_037","unstructured":"Salton, G., & Mcgill, M.J. Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval[M]. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Copany, 1983."},{"key":"2026020218341394298_j_jdis-2022-0019_ref_038","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Shibata, N., Kajikawa, Y., Takeda, Y., & Matsushima, K. (2008). Detecting emerging research fronts based on topological measures in citation networks of scientific publications. Technovation, 28(11), 758\u2013775. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.technovation.2008.03.009","DOI":"10.1016\/j.technovation.2008.03.009"},{"key":"2026020218341394298_j_jdis-2022-0019_ref_039","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Small, H., Boyack, K.W., & Klavans, R. (2014). Identifying emerging topics in science and technology. Research Policy, 43(8), 1450\u20131467. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.respol.2014.02.005","DOI":"10.1016\/j.respol.2014.02.005"},{"key":"2026020218341394298_j_jdis-2022-0019_ref_040","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Small, H., & Upham, P. (2009). Citation structure of an emerging research area on the verge of application. Scientometrics, 79(2), 365\u2013375. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-009-0424-0","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-009-0424-0"},{"key":"2026020218341394298_j_jdis-2022-0019_ref_041","unstructured":"Smith-Goodson, P. (2019). Quantum USA Vs. Quantum China: The World's Most Important Technology Race. https:\/\/www.forbes.com\/sites\/moorinsights\/2019\/10\/10\/quantum-usa-vs-quantum-china-the-worlds-most-important-technology-race\/?sh=6f76589e72de"},{"key":"2026020218341394298_j_jdis-2022-0019_ref_042","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tollefson, J. (2018). China declared world's largest producer of scientific articles. Nature, 553(7689), 390\u2013390. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/d41586-018-00927-4","DOI":"10.1038\/d41586-018-00927-4"},{"key":"2026020218341394298_j_jdis-2022-0019_ref_043","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Van Hooydonk, G. (1997). Fractional counting of multiauthored publications: Consequences for the impact of authors. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(10), 944\u2013945. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/(SICI)1097-4571(199710)48:10<944::AID-ASI8>3.0.CO;2-1","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1097-4571(199710)48:10<944::AID-ASI8>3.0.CO;2-1"},{"key":"2026020218341394298_j_jdis-2022-0019_ref_044","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wang, L.L., & Wang, X.W. (2017). Who sets up the bridge? Tracking scientific collaborations between China and the European Union. Research Evaluation, 2. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/reseval\/rvx009","DOI":"10.1093\/reseval\/rvx009"},{"key":"2026020218341394298_j_jdis-2022-0019_ref_045","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wang, X.W., Xu, S.M., Wang, Z., Peng, L., & Wang, C.L. (2013). International scientific collaboration of China: Collaborating countries, institutions and individuals. Scientometrics, 95(3), 885\u2013894. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-012-0877-4","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-012-0877-4"},{"key":"2026020218341394298_j_jdis-2022-0019_ref_046","unstructured":"Wang, W.P. (2014). Study on the Patterns and Impacts of China's International Scientific and Technological Collaboration Based on Scientometrics. Doctoral dissertation, Beijing Institute of Technology."},{"key":"2026020218341394298_j_jdis-2022-0019_ref_047","unstructured":"Zhang, Z.Q., Chen, Y.W., Tao, C., Xu, J., & TIAN, Q.F. (2018). Bibliometric Analysis on International Competitive Situation of Quantum Information Research. WORLD SCI-TECH R&D, 40(1), 37\u201349."},{"key":"2026020218341394298_j_jdis-2022-0019_ref_048","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zheng, J., Zhao, Z.Y., Zhang, X., Chen, D.Z., & Huang, M.H. (2014). International collaboration development in nanotechnology: A perspective of patent network analysis. Scientometrics, 98(1), 683\u2013702. https:\/\/doi.org\/10\/f5ns65","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-013-1081-x"},{"key":"2026020218341394298_j_jdis-2022-0019_ref_049","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zhou, P., & Gl\u00e4nzel, W. (2010). In-depth analysis on China's international cooperation in science. Scientometrics, 82(3), 597\u2013612. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-010-0174-z","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-010-0174-z"},{"key":"2026020218341394298_j_jdis-2022-0019_ref_050","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zou, Y.W., & Laubichler, M.D. (2017). Measuring the contributions of Chinese scholars to the research field of systems biology from 2005 to 2013. Scientometrics, 110(3), 1615\u20131631. https:\/\/doi.org\/10\/f9vfz2","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-016-2213-x"}],"container-title":["Journal of Data and Information Science"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.degruyterbrill.com\/document\/doi\/10.2478\/jdis-2022-0019\/xml","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.degruyterbrill.com\/document\/doi\/10.2478\/jdis-2022-0019\/pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,2]],"date-time":"2026-02-02T18:34:22Z","timestamp":1770057262000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.degruyterbrill.com\/document\/doi\/10.2478\/jdis-2022-0019\/html"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,14]]},"references-count":50,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,14]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,1]]}},"alternative-id":["10.2478\/jdis-2022-0019"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2478\/jdis-2022-0019","relation":{},"ISSN":["2543-683X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2543-683X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,14]]}}}