{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,4]],"date-time":"2022-04-04T05:22:19Z","timestamp":1649049739838},"reference-count":23,"publisher":"Walter de Gruyter GmbH","issue":"1","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,1,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Scenarios for Evaluating a Semantic Project Management Approach<\/jats:title><jats:p>Knowledge regarding closed projects is not sufficiently reused while planning new projects to improve the quality of project management processes. The reason is that current project management systems mainly support the ongoing project phase and do not explicitly consider the initiating and closing phase of a project management life cycle. By implementing semantic technologies within an existing open source project management system, these weaknesses can be improved. This system incorporates and links historical project knowledge that contributes to a more effective setup of upcoming projects. To design, develop and implement such a system we conducted interviews with IT companies regarding the strengths and weaknesses of the project management systems in use. On the basis of the interviews we identified three scenarios, which deal with the most common problems of project management, such as consistent data storage and how to retrieve information. These scenarios, described in this paper, are used as requirements and to evaluate the designed prototype.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.2478\/v10143-011-0009-2","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2011,10,20]],"date-time":"2011-10-20T01:07:54Z","timestamp":1319072874000},"page":"65-71","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Scenarios for Evaluating a Semantic Project Management Approach"],"prefix":"10.2478","volume":"43","author":[{"given":"Birgit","family":"Dippelreiter","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Michael","family":"P\u00fcttler","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"374","reference":[{"key":"1","first-page":"813","volume-title":"PROMONT-A Project Management Ontology as a Reference for Virtual Project Organizations","author":"S. Abels","year":"2006"},{"issue":"12","key":"2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"130","DOI":"10.1145\/1610252.1610286","article-title":"Why did your project fail?","volume":"52","author":"N. Cerpa","year":"2009","journal-title":"Communications of the ACM"},{"key":"3","article-title":"IRIS: Integrate. Relate. Infer. Share","author":"A. Cheyer","year":"2005"},{"key":"4","article-title":"The social semantic desktop","author":"S. Decker","year":"2004"},{"key":"5","article-title":"A \u2018State of the Art\u2019 Evaluation of PM-Systems Exploring their missing Functionalities","author":"B. Dippelreiter","year":"2010"},{"key":"6","article-title":"Semantic Technologies for the Project Management Life Cycle Improvement","author":"B. Dippelreiter","year":"2011"},{"key":"7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1109\/ICWMC.2007.54","article-title":"Multi-site Project Organisation Knowledge Sharing Ontology","author":"H. Dong","year":"2007"},{"key":"8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"84","DOI":"10.1109\/MS.2008.107","article-title":"A replicated Survey of IT Software Project Failures","volume":"25","author":"K. Emam","year":"2008","journal-title":"IEEE Software"},{"key":"9","article-title":"Methodology for the Design and Evaluation of Ontologies","author":"M. Gr\u00fcninger","year":"1995"},{"issue":"5","key":"10","article-title":"Using Ontologies to Model and Understand Product DeveloPMent","author":"A. Hahn","year":"2007","journal-title":"IBIS-Interoperability in Business Information Systems"},{"key":"11","article-title":"Practical applications of Semantic MediaWiki in commercial environments-Case Study: semantic-based project management","author":"D. Hansch","year":"2009"},{"key":"12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"75","DOI":"10.2307\/25148625","article-title":"Design Science in Information Systems Research","volume":"28","author":"A. Hevner","year":"2004","journal-title":"MIS Quarterly"},{"key":"13","first-page":"132","article-title":"Committee meeting for exit criteria at early phase of IT project","author":"Y. Honda","year":"2009"},{"key":"14","article-title":"Design of OWL Ontology in R&D Project Management Meeting","author":"M. Kwon","year":"2006"},{"key":"15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1109\/CIT.2008.Workshops.6","article-title":"A Semantic Web Service-Oriented Model for Project Management","author":"S. Mohammadi","year":"2008"},{"issue":"4","key":"16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"269","DOI":"10.1109\/17.62322","article-title":"The causes of project failure","volume":"37","author":"J. Pinto","year":"1990","journal-title":"IN: IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management"},{"key":"17","unstructured":"Project Management Institute (2008): A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK). 4<sup>th<\/sup> Edition. Newtown Square"},{"key":"18","article-title":"Collaboration on the Social Semantic Desktop","author":"G. Reif","year":"2007"},{"key":"19","article-title":"The semantic desktop-a basis for personal knowledge management","author":"L. Sauermann","year":"2005"},{"key":"20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1007\/11926078_64","article-title":"Semantic Desktop 2.0: The Gnowsis Experience","author":"L. Sauermann","year":"2006"},{"key":"21","article-title":"Towards a Methodology for Building Ontologies","author":"M. Uschold","year":"1995"},{"issue":"1","key":"22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1017\/S0269888998001088","article-title":"The Enterprise Ontology","volume":"13","author":"M. Uschold","year":"1998","journal-title":"The Knowledge Engineering Review"},{"key":"23","volume-title":"Research Methods for Leisure and Tourism: a Practical Guide","author":"A. Veal","year":"2006"}],"container-title":["Scientific Journal of Riga Technical University. Computer Sciences"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/content.sciendo.com\/view\/journals\/acss\/43\/1\/article-p65.xml","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.degruyter.com\/view\/j\/acss.2011.43.issue--1\/v10143-011-0009-2\/v10143-011-0009-2.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2020,5,30]],"date-time":"2020-05-30T16:14:15Z","timestamp":1590855255000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/content.sciendo.com\/doi\/10.2478\/v10143-011-0009-2"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2011,1,1]]},"references-count":23,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1"},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2478\/v10143-011-0009-2","relation":{},"ISSN":["1407-7493"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1407-7493","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2011,1,1]]}}}