{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,4]],"date-time":"2023-10-04T04:48:10Z","timestamp":1696394890007},"reference-count":16,"publisher":"Walter de Gruyter GmbH","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,1]],"date-time":"2022-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1669852800000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n               <jats:p>In 1931 Husserl writes and publishes the Epilogue to his <jats:italic>Ideas<\/jats:italic>, where he aims to explain the core of his work. Aware that this is his a legacy which must be carried forward, he seeks to preserve it from what he calls \u201cthe mistaken views\u201d found in the new ways of conducting phenomenology. Our text underlines the polemic side of Husserl\u2019s project, which is basically but tacitly against Heidegger, and sustains that this auto-interpretive piece is a fundamental key within Husserl\u2019s corpus, where he defines the direction of his phenomenological project. At the center of the controversy are the answers to the objections of intellectualism and solipsism, and the disavowal of all forms of anthropologism in the conception of subjectivity.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.2478\/phainomenon-2022-0011","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,3,7]],"date-time":"2023-03-07T14:03:25Z","timestamp":1678197805000},"page":"57-80","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Husserl Et Heidegger de 1913 \u00c0 1931 : LA Postface de Husserl Aux <i>Ideen III<\/i>"],"prefix":"10.2478","volume":"34","author":[{"given":"Irene Borges","family":"Duarte","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Universit\u00e9 d\u2019\u00c9vora , \u00c9vora , Portugal"}]}],"member":"374","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,3,7]]},"reference":[{"key":"2023100309032354003_j_phainomenon-2022-0011_ref_001","unstructured":"Apel, Karl Otto (1989). \u201cSinnkonstitution und Geltungsrechfertigung. Heidegger und das Problem der Transzendentalphilosophie\u201d, in M. Heidegger: Innen- und Au\u00dfenansichten., Forum f\u00fcr Philosophie Bad Homburg (Ed.), Frankfurt, Suhrkamp, pp. 131-175."},{"key":"2023100309032354003_j_phainomenon-2022-0011_ref_002","unstructured":"Blankenburg, Wolfgang (2007). \u201eAns\u00e4tze zu einer Psychopathologie des Common sense\u201d, in Psychopathologie des Unscheinbaren, Berlin, Parodos, pp. 97-117."},{"key":"2023100309032354003_j_phainomenon-2022-0011_ref_003","unstructured":"Borges-Duarte, Irene (2006). \u201cPode adiar-se a Ontologia? Uma homenagem cr\u00edtica a Paul Ricoeur.\u201d In: F. Henriques (Org.), A Filosofia de Paul Ricoeur. Temas e percursos. Coimbra, Ariadne, pp. 115-121."},{"key":"2023100309032354003_j_phainomenon-2022-0011_ref_004","unstructured":"Borges-Duarte, Irene (2011). \u201cEl asedio como met\u00e1fora metodol\u00f3gica en Ortega y Gasset\u201d In: Xolocotzi, A. et alii (Coord.), La aventura de interpretar. Los impulsos filos\u00f3ficos de Franco Volpi. M\u00e9jico, Ed. Eon, pp. 109-123."},{"key":"2023100309032354003_j_phainomenon-2022-0011_ref_005","unstructured":"De Waelhens, Alphonse (1936). \u00ab Recension de E. Husserl, \u201cNachwort zu meinen \u00abIdeen zu einer reinen Ph\u00e4nomenologie und ph\u00e4nomenologischen Philosophie \u00bb\u201d, Revue n\u00e9o-scolastique de philosophie, Vol. 39, n\u00ba 52, pp. 566 - 567"},{"key":"2023100309032354003_j_phainomenon-2022-0011_ref_006","unstructured":"Funke, Gerhard (1966). Ph\u00e4nomenologie: Metaphysik oder Methode? Bonn, Bouvier. Funke, G., Seebohm, Th., Bucher, A., Drue, H. (Hrsg.) (1975). Bewusst Sein: Gerhard Funke Zu Eigen. Bonn, Bouvier."},{"key":"2023100309032354003_j_phainomenon-2022-0011_ref_007","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gurwitsch, Aron (2010). \u201cCritical Study of Husserl\u2019s Nachwort\u201d. In The Collected Works of Aron Gurwitsch (1910-1973), vol. II (Phaenomenologica Bd. 193), ed. F. Kersten. Dordrecht, Springer, pp.119-127.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-90-481-2942-3_5"},{"key":"2023100309032354003_j_phainomenon-2022-0011_ref_008","unstructured":"Heidegger, Martin (1975). Die Grundprobleme der Ph\u00e4nomenologie [1927], Gesamtausgabe Bd. 24, ed.de F.-W. von Herrmann, Frankfurt, Klostermann."},{"key":"2023100309032354003_j_phainomenon-2022-0011_ref_009","unstructured":"Heidegger, Martin (1990). Metaphysische Anfangsgr\u00fcnde der Logik im Ausgang aus Leibniz [1928]. Gesamtausgabe Bd. 26, ed. de Klaus Held. Frankfurt, Klostermann,"},{"key":"2023100309032354003_j_phainomenon-2022-0011_ref_0010","unstructured":"Herrmann, F.-W. von (2000). Hermeneutik und Reflexion. Der Begriff der Ph\u00e4nomenologie bei Heidegger und Husserl. Frankfurt, Klostermann."},{"key":"2023100309032354003_j_phainomenon-2022-0011_ref_0011","unstructured":"Husserl, Edmund (1952). \u201cNachwort zu meinen Ideen\u201d [1930]. In: Ideen zu einer reinen Ph\u00e4nomenologie und ph\u00e4nomenologischen Philosophie, III Buch, Husserliana Bd. V, von Marly Biemel herausgegeben, Den Haag, Martinus Nijhoff, 1952, pp. 138-162"},{"key":"2023100309032354003_j_phainomenon-2022-0011_ref_0012","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Husserl, Edmund (1988). \u201cPh\u00e4nomenologie und Anthropologie\u201d [1931], in Husserl, Edmund, Aufs\u00e4tze und Vortr\u00e4ge (1922-1937), Husserliana Bd. XXVII, von Th. Nenon und H.R. Sepp herausgegeben, pp. 164-181.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-009-2553-3_5"},{"key":"2023100309032354003_j_phainomenon-2022-0011_ref_0013","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Husserl, Edmund (1967). Briefe an Roman Ingarden, Phaenomenologica Bd. 25, Dordrecht, Springer.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-010-3434-0"},{"key":"2023100309032354003_j_phainomenon-2022-0011_ref_0014","unstructured":"Ortega y Gassey, Jos\u00e9 (1997). \u00bfQu\u00e9 es filosof\u00eda? [1929]. In: Obras Completas de Jos\u00e9 Ortega y Gasset, vol. VII, Madrid, Alianza Editorial \/ Revista de Occidente, pp. 275-421."},{"key":"2023100309032354003_j_phainomenon-2022-0011_ref_0015","unstructured":"Ricoeur, Paul (1969). Le conflit des Interpr\u00e9tations. Essais d\u2019herm\u00e9neutique. Paris, Seuil."},{"key":"2023100309032354003_j_phainomenon-2022-0011_ref_0016","unstructured":"Winnicott, Donald W. (1957). The Child and the outside World, London, Tavistock."}],"container-title":["Phainomenon"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.sciendo.com\/pdf\/10.2478\/phainomenon-2022-0011","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,3]],"date-time":"2023-10-03T09:05:09Z","timestamp":1696323909000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.sciendo.com\/article\/10.2478\/phainomenon-2022-0011"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,1]]},"references-count":16,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,3,7]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,1]]}},"alternative-id":["10.2478\/phainomenon-2022-0011"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2478\/phainomenon-2022-0011","relation":{},"ISSN":["2183-0142"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2183-0142","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,1]]}}}