{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,22]],"date-time":"2026-03-22T02:23:34Z","timestamp":1774146214811,"version":"3.50.1"},"publisher-location":"California","reference-count":0,"publisher":"International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,8]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>Notwithstanding the extensive work on iterated belief revision, there is, still, no fully satisfactory solution within the classical AGM paradigm. The seminal work of Darwiche and Pearl (DP approach, for short) remains the most dominant, despite its well-documented shortcomings. In this article, we make further observations on the DP approach. Firstly, we prove that the DP postulates are, in a strong sense, inconsistent with Parikh's relevance-sensitive axiom (P), extending previous initial conflicts. Immediate consequences of this result are that an entire class of intuitive revision operators, which includes Dalal's operator, violates the DP postulates, as well as that  the Independence postulate and Spohn's conditionalization are inconsistent with (P). Lastly, we show that the DP postulates allow for more revision polices than the ones that can be captured by identifying belief states with total preorders over possible worlds, a fact implying that a preference ordering (over possible worlds) is an insufficient representation for a belief state.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.24963\/ijcai.2019\/209","type":"proceedings-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,7,28]],"date-time":"2019-07-28T03:46:05Z","timestamp":1564285565000},"page":"1509-1515","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["Observations on Darwiche and Pearl's Approach for Iterated Belief Revision"],"prefix":"10.24963","author":[{"given":"Theofanis","family":"Aravanis","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Patras, Greece"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Pavlos","family":"Peppas","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Patras, Greece"},{"name":"University of Technology Sydney, Australia"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Mary-Anne","family":"Williams","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Technology Sydney, Australia"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"10584","event":{"name":"Twenty-Eighth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence {IJCAI-19}","theme":"Artificial Intelligence","location":"Macao, China","acronym":"IJCAI-2019","number":"28","sponsor":["International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization (IJCAI)"],"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,8,10]]},"end":{"date-parts":[[2019,8,16]]}},"container-title":["Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence"],"original-title":[],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,7,28]],"date-time":"2019-07-28T03:47:35Z","timestamp":1564285655000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ijcai.org\/proceedings\/2019\/209"}},"subtitle":[],"proceedings-subject":"Artificial Intelligence Research Articles","short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,8]]},"references-count":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.24963\/ijcai.2019\/209","relation":{},"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,8]]}}}