{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,29]],"date-time":"2025-09-29T15:45:27Z","timestamp":1759160727239},"publisher-location":"California","reference-count":0,"publisher":"International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,8]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>Model selection is treated as a standard performance boosting step in many machine learning applications. Once all other properties of a learning problem are fixed, the model is selected by grid search on a held-out validation set. This is strictly inapplicable to active learning. Within the standardized workflow, the acquisition function is chosen among available heuristics a priori, and its success is observed only after the labeling budget is already exhausted. More importantly, none of the earlier studies report a unique consistently successful acquisition heuristic to the extent to stand out as the unique best choice. We present a method to break this vicious circle by defining the acquisition function as a learning predictor and training it by reinforcement feedback collected from each labeling round. As active learning is a scarce data regime, we bootstrap from a well-known heuristic that filters the bulk of data points on which all heuristics would agree, and learn a policy to warp the top portion of this ranking in the most beneficial way for the character of a specific data distribution. Our system consists of a Bayesian neural net, the predictor, a bootstrap acquisition function, a probabilistic state definition, and another Bayesian policy network that can effectively incorporate this input distribution. We observe on three benchmark data sets that our method always manages to either invent a new superior acquisition function or to adapt itself to the a priori unknown best performing heuristic for each specific data set.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.24963\/ijcai.2019\/343","type":"proceedings-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,7,28]],"date-time":"2019-07-28T03:46:05Z","timestamp":1564285565000},"page":"2470-2476","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":20,"title":["Deep Active Learning with Adaptive Acquisition"],"prefix":"10.24963","author":[{"given":"Manuel","family":"Haussmann","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"HCI\/IWR, Heidelberg University, Germany"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Fred","family":"Hamprecht","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"HCI\/IWR, Heidelberg University, Germany"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Melih","family":"Kandemir","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Bosch Center for Artificial Intelligence, Renningen, Germany"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"10584","event":{"number":"28","sponsor":["International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization (IJCAI)"],"acronym":"IJCAI-2019","name":"Twenty-Eighth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence {IJCAI-19}","start":{"date-parts":[[2019,8,10]]},"theme":"Artificial Intelligence","location":"Macao, China","end":{"date-parts":[[2019,8,16]]}},"container-title":["Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence"],"original-title":[],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,7,28]],"date-time":"2019-07-28T03:48:41Z","timestamp":1564285721000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ijcai.org\/proceedings\/2019\/343"}},"subtitle":[],"proceedings-subject":"Artificial Intelligence Research Articles","short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,8]]},"references-count":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.24963\/ijcai.2019\/343","relation":{},"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,8]]}}}