{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,20]],"date-time":"2026-10-20T16:57:36Z","timestamp":1792515456106,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":23,"publisher":"Scientific Scholar","content-domain":{"domain":["surgicalneurologyint.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"abstract":"<jats:sec id=\"st1\">\n<jats:title>Background: <\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>Postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak is a major concern after posterior fossa surgery with significant clinical implications. It has been postulated that replacing the bone flap, performing a craniotomy, would reinforce the surgical closure and decrease rates of CSF leak. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the rate of CSF leak after posterior fossa craniotomies versus craniectomies.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec id=\"st2\">\n<jats:title>Methods: <\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>Three databases were searched for English studies comparing the primary outcome, rate of CSF leak, after adult posterior fossa craniotomies versus craniectomies. Secondary outcomes included the rate of postoperative pseudomeningocele formation, CSF leak and pseudomeningocele formation, CSF diversion, revision surgery, and infection. Pooled estimates and relative risks for dichotomous outcomes were calculated using Review Manager 5.4, with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs).<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec id=\"st3\">\n<jats:title>Results: <\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>A total of 1250 patients (635 craniotomies and 615 craniectomies), from nine studies, were included in the final analysis. Even though rates of CSF leak favored craniotomies, the difference did not reach statistical significance in our pooled analysis (Risk Ratio: 0.71, 95% Confidence Interval: 0.45-1.14, p-value = 0.15, Heterogeneity I-squared = 0%). On the other hand, comparing the rates of pseudomeningocele formation and CSF leak, as a combined outcome, or pseudomeningocele formation only showed a significant difference favoring craniotomies. The quality of evidence in this meta-analysis was graded as having a high risk of bias based on the risk of bias in non-randomized studies - of exposure criteria.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec id=\"st4\">\n<jats:title>Conclusion: <\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>Based on evidence with high risk of bias, rates of postoperative CSF leak and pseudomeningocele formation favored posterior fossa craniotomies over craniectomies. Further research with more robust methodology is required to validate these findings.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.25259\/sni_125_2023","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,28]],"date-time":"2023-04-28T06:57:51Z","timestamp":1682665071000},"page":"140","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.25259\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":9,"title":["Rates of cerebrospinal fluid leak and pseudomeningocele formation after posterior fossa craniotomy versus craniectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis"],"prefix":"10.25259","volume":"14","author":[{"given":"Mohamed Rashed","family":"Alhantoobi","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurosurgery, Hamilton General Hospital, McMaster University Medical Centre, Ontario, Canada,"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mohamad Ali","family":"Kesserwan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurosurgery, Hamilton General Hospital, McMaster University Medical Centre, Ontario, Canada,"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hassan A.","family":"Khayat","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurosurgery, Hamilton General Hospital, McMaster University Medical Centre, Ontario, Canada,"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mohammad","family":"Lawasi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Faculty of Medicine and Medical Sciences, University of Balamand, El-Koura, Lebanon."}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sunjay","family":"Sharma","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurosurgery, Hamilton General Hospital, McMaster University Medical Centre, Ontario, Canada,"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"10894","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,21]]},"reference":[{"key":"10.25259\/SNI_125_2023\/ref-1","first-page":"1439","article-title":"Management of cerebrospinal fluid leak following posterior cranial fossa surgery","volume":"32","author":"Altaf","year":"2016","journal-title":"Pak J Med Sci"},{"key":"10.25259\/SNI_125_2023\/ref-2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"107","DOI":"10.1097\/00129492-200301000-00021","article-title":"Cerebrospinal fluid leak after acoustic neuroma surgery: A comparison of the translabyrinthine, middle fossa, and retrosigmoid approaches","volume":"24","author":"Becker","year":"2003","journal-title":"Otol Neurotol"},{"key":"10.25259\/SNI_125_2023\/ref-3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"380","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0038-1675589","article-title":"Approach selection and surgical planning in posterior cranial fossa Meningiomas: How I do it","volume":"80","author":"Beer-Furlan","year":"2019","journal-title":"J Neurol Surg B Skull Base"},{"key":"10.25259\/SNI_125_2023\/ref-4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"242","DOI":"10.1186\/s13643-018-0915-2","article-title":"The risk of bias in observational studies of exposures (ROBINS-E) tool: Concerns arising from application to observational studies of exposures","volume":"7","author":"Bero","year":"2018","journal-title":"Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.25259\/SNI_125_2023\/ref-5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"217","DOI":"10.3171\/jns.2001.94.2.0217","article-title":"Cerebrospinal fluid leak after acoustic neuroma surgery: Influence of tumor size and surgical approach on incidence and response to treatment","volume":"94","author":"Brennan","year":"2001","journal-title":"J Neurosurg"},{"key":"10.25259\/SNI_125_2023\/ref-6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"147","DOI":"10.1097\/MAO.0000000000001252","article-title":"Cost analysis of cerebrospinal fluid leaks and cerebrospinal fluid leak prevention in patients undergoing cerebellopontine angle surgery","volume":"38","author":"Chern","year":"2017","journal-title":"Otol Neurotol"},{"key":"10.25259\/SNI_125_2023\/ref-7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2255","DOI":"10.1007\/s00701-011-1113-3","article-title":"Craniotomy repair with the retrosigmoid approach: The impact on quality of life of meticulous reconstruction of anatomical layers","volume":"153","author":"della Pepa","year":"2011","journal-title":"Acta Neurochir (Wien)"},{"key":"10.25259\/SNI_125_2023\/ref-8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"369","DOI":"10.1016\/j.surneu.2009.04.001","article-title":"Complications of posterior cranial fossa surgery-an institutional experience of 500 patients","volume":"72","author":"Dubey","year":"2009","journal-title":"Surg Neurol"},{"key":"10.25259\/SNI_125_2023\/ref-9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"490","DOI":"10.1016\/j.surneu.2005.03.041","article-title":"Costs of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage: 1-year, retrospective analysis of 412 consecutive nontrauma cases","volume":"64","author":"Grotenhuis","year":"2005","journal-title":"Surg Neurol"},{"key":"10.25259\/SNI_125_2023\/ref-10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"193","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2016.01.076","article-title":"Craniectomy versus craniotomy for posterior fossa metastases: Complication profile","volume":"89","author":"Hadanny","year":"2016","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"key":"10.25259\/SNI_125_2023\/ref-11","article-title":"Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, Version 6.3","author":"Higgins","year":"2022"},{"key":"10.25259\/SNI_125_2023\/ref-12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1171","DOI":"10.1097\/MAO.0b013e318229d301","article-title":"Resorbable plate cranioplasty after the translabyrinthine approach","volume":"32","author":"Hillman","year":"2011","journal-title":"Otol Neurotol"},{"key":"10.25259\/SNI_125_2023\/ref-13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1515\/ins-2012-0002","article-title":"CSF leaks after cranial surgery-a prospective multicenter analysis","volume":"1","author":"Kehler","year":"2013","journal-title":"Innov Neurosurg"},{"key":"10.25259\/SNI_125_2023\/ref-14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006","article-title":"The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration","volume":"62","author":"Liberati","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.25259\/SNI_125_2023\/ref-15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1585","DOI":"10.1007\/s00701-019-04177-9","article-title":"Tonsillectomy with modified reconstruction of the cisterna magna with and without craniectomy for the treatment of adult Chiari malformation Type I with syringomyelia","volume":"162","author":"Liu","year":"2020","journal-title":"Acta Neurochir (Wien)"},{"key":"10.25259\/SNI_125_2023\/ref-16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"586","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jss.2022.06.012","article-title":"Are kids more than just little adults? A comparison of surgical outcomes","volume":"279","author":"McMullin","year":"2022","journal-title":"J Surg Res"},{"key":"10.25259\/SNI_125_2023\/ref-17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"258","DOI":"10.25259\/SNI_42_2021","article-title":"Factors associated with cerebrospinal fluid leak after a retrosigmoid approach for cerebellopontine angle surgery","volume":"12","author":"Montano","year":"2021","journal-title":"Surg Neurol Int"},{"key":"10.25259\/SNI_125_2023\/ref-18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"959","DOI":"10.1288\/00005537-199309000-00003","article-title":"Factors affecting the development of cerebrospinal fluid leak and meningitis after translabyrinthine acoustic tumor surgery","volume":"103","author":"Rodgers","year":"1993","journal-title":"Laryngoscope"},{"key":"10.25259\/SNI_125_2023\/ref-19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e1094","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2022.05.102","article-title":"Incidence, characteristics, and outcomes of pseudomeningocele and cerebrospinal fluid fistula after posterior fossa surgery","volume":"164","author":"Sastry","year":"2022","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"key":"10.25259\/SNI_125_2023\/ref-20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"100865","DOI":"10.1016\/j.inat.2020.100865","article-title":"Risk factors associated with CSF leakage and complications after retrosigmoid surgery","volume":"22","author":"Sathaporntheera","year":"2020","journal-title":"Interdiscip Neurosurg"},{"key":"10.25259\/SNI_125_2023\/ref-21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"171","DOI":"10.4103\/2152-7806.146154","article-title":"Two alternative dural sealing techniques in posterior fossa surgery: (Polylactide-co-glycolide) self-adhesive resorbable membrane versus polyethylene glycol hydrogel","volume":"5","author":"Schiariti","year":"2014","journal-title":"Surg Neurol Int"},{"key":"10.25259\/SNI_125_2023\/ref-22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"281","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0032-1312709","article-title":"Decreased rate of CSF leakage associated with complete reconstruction of Suboccipital cranial defects","volume":"73","author":"Stoker","year":"2012","journal-title":"J Neurol Surg B Skull Base"},{"key":"10.25259\/SNI_125_2023\/ref-23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"836","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2013.01.081","article-title":"Posterior fossa reconstruction using titanium plate for the treatment of cerebellar ptosis after decompression for Chiari malformation","volume":"81","author":"Udani","year":"2014","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"}],"container-title":["Surgical Neurology International"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/surgicalneurologyint.com\/rates-of-cerebrospinal-fluid-leak-and-pseudomeningocele-formation-after-posterior-fossa-craniotomy-versus-craniectomy-a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis\/","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/surgicalneurologyint.com\/surgicalint-articles\/rates-of-cerebrospinal-fluid-leak-and-pseudomeningocele-formation-after-posterior-fossa-craniotomy-versus-craniectomy-a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis\/","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,28]],"date-time":"2023-04-28T06:58:05Z","timestamp":1682665085000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/surgicalneurologyint.com\/surgicalint-articles\/rates-of-cerebrospinal-fluid-leak-and-pseudomeningocele-formation-after-posterior-fossa-craniotomy-versus-craniectomy-a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis\/"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,21]]},"references-count":23,"alternative-id":["10.25259\/SNI_125_2023"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.25259\/sni_125_2023","relation":{},"ISSN":["2152-7806","2229-5097"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2152-7806","type":"electronic"},{"value":"2229-5097","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,21]]},"article-number":"140"}}