{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,17]],"date-time":"2025-05-17T04:50:28Z","timestamp":1747457428392},"reference-count":5,"publisher":"Scientific Scholar","content-domain":{"domain":["surgicalneurologyint.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"abstract":"\nBackground: <\/jats:title>\nVertebral body stenting systems (VBSs) are superior to balloon kyphoplasty for performing vertebral augmentation and height restoration. However, VBS may likely result in more material-related complications that have been under-reported. Here, an 84-year-old female\u2019s vertebral stents \u201ctoppled over\u201d before the filling cement was fully applied, thus necessitating an additional posterior fusion.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n\nCase Description: <\/jats:title>\nAn 84-year-old female presented with low back pain after a fall. Dynamic standing and decubitus X-rays revealed a vertebral compression fracture at T12 resulting in an intravertebral vacuum cleft (i.e., the lowermost level of diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis). When the VBS was performed, the stents \u201ctoppled over\u201d just after removing the balloon catheters; we successfully restored with the cement volume in one stent but not the other, thus warranting an additional posterior fusion to maintain stability.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n\nConclusion: <\/jats:title>\nThe proper injection of cement into a VBS requires dual correct stent positioning, and careful control of requisite stent expansion. In an 84-year-old female with a T12 vertebral body fracture and a remarkable vacuum cleft, the VBS procedure resulted in an inadvertent injection into one stent thus warranting a secondary posterior fusion.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.25259\/sni_299_2023","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,28]],"date-time":"2023-04-28T08:51:58Z","timestamp":1682671918000},"page":"156","update-policy":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.25259\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Intraoperative complications of vertebral body stenting system"],"prefix":"10.25259","volume":"14","author":[{"given":"Ryo","family":"Kanematsu","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Junya","family":"Hanakita","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Toshiyuki","family":"Takahashi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Manabu","family":"Minami","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sho","family":"Nakamura","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Shinya","family":"Tokunaga","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Izumi","family":"Suda","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"10894","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,28]]},"reference":[{"key":"10.25259\/SNI_299_2023\/ref-1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"233","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2474-14-233","article-title":"Radiographic and safety details of vertebral body stenting: Results from a multicenter chart review","volume":"14","author":"Diel","year":"2013","journal-title":"BMC Musculoskelet Disord"},{"key":"10.25259\/SNI_299_2023\/ref-2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E1147","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000470","article-title":"Cement augmentation in a thoracolumbar fracture model: Reduction and stability after balloon kyphoplasty versus vertebral body stenting","volume":"39","author":"Disch","year":"2014","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"10.25259\/SNI_299_2023\/ref-3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"934","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-023-07537-3","article-title":"Anterior thoracolumbar column reconstruction with the vertebral body stent-safety and efficacy","volume":"32","author":"Oswald","year":"2023","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"10.25259\/SNI_299_2023\/ref-4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"916","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-010-1341-x","article-title":"Vertebral body stenting: A new method for vertebral augmentation versus kyphoplasty","volume":"19","author":"Rotter","year":"2010","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"10.25259\/SNI_299_2023\/ref-5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"577","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.L.00024","article-title":"Vertebral body stenting versus kyphoplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: A randomized trial","volume":"95","author":"Werner","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"}],"container-title":["Surgical Neurology International"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/surgicalneurologyint.com\/intraoperative-complications-of-vertebral-body-stenting-system\/","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/surgicalneurologyint.com\/surgicalint-articles\/intraoperative-complications-of-vertebral-body-stenting-system\/","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,28]],"date-time":"2023-04-28T08:52:05Z","timestamp":1682671925000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/surgicalneurologyint.com\/surgicalint-articles\/intraoperative-complications-of-vertebral-body-stenting-system\/"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,28]]},"references-count":5,"alternative-id":["10.25259\/SNI_299_2023"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.25259\/sni_299_2023","relation":{},"ISSN":["2152-7806","2229-5097"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2152-7806","type":"electronic"},{"value":"2229-5097","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,28]]},"article-number":"156"}}