{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,13]],"date-time":"2026-02-13T13:34:32Z","timestamp":1770989672370,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":20,"publisher":"Scientific Scholar","content-domain":{"domain":["surgicalneurologyint.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"abstract":"<jats:sec id=\"st1\">\n                    <jats:title>Background:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The Standard of Care (SOC) for treating significant spinal epidural abscesses (SEA) is STAT surgery for patients with the new-onset of neurological deficits following STAT contrast MR studies confirming significant neural (i.e. mild\/moderate, moderate, or marked cord\/nerve root) compression. Too many health care professionals, including physicians, and select spine surgeons still wrongly believe delaying \u201cacute\u201d spinal decompressions in patients with SEA for up to 8, 12, and even 24 hours is acceptable even in paralyzed patients.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"st2\">\n                    <jats:title>Methods:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Here we review the fact that the standard of care for treating SEA is STAT surgery for patients demonstrating the new-onset of neurological deficits following STAT contrast MR scans confirming significant neural compression.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"st3\">\n                    <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>STAT surgery for newly neurologically symptomatic patients with SEA following STAT contrast MR scans documenting significant neural compression yields the best results. Notably, select patients without neural deficits or significant MR neural compression may be considered for non-surgical treatment. The \u201cgold standard\u201d for diagnosing SEA is the contrast MR, while non-contrast CT studies almost uniformly fail to diagnose SEA, and Myelogram-CT studies have significant limitations (i.e. risk of causing meningitis, and may fail to document cephalad extent of SEA if there is a distal total block to intrathecal contrast).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec id=\"st4\">\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>STAT surgery is the SOC and treatment of choice for patient with SEA demonstrating significant new-onset neurological deficits with significant STAT contrast MR findings of neural compression. Further, STAT means STAT, no waiting period is acceptable (i.e. 8, 12 or up to &lt; 24 hours) particularly in paralyzed patients.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.25259\/sni_35_2026","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,13]],"date-time":"2026-02-13T12:28:47Z","timestamp":1770985727000},"page":"80","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.25259\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Perspective\/short review: STAT surgery is the standard of care for treating significant spinal epidural abscesses"],"prefix":"10.25259","volume":"17","author":[{"given":"Nancy E.","family":"Epstein","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Professor of Clinical Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, State University of NY at Stony Brook, NY, c\/o Dr. Marc Agulnick 1122 Franklin Avenue Suite 106, Garden City, NY 11530, USA and Editor-in-Chief Surgical Neurology International"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jamie","family":"Baisden","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Neurosurgeon, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Marc A.","family":"Agulnick","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Assistant Clinical Professor of Orthopedics, NYU Langone Hospital Long Island, NY, USA, 1122 Franklin Avenue, Suite 106, Garden City, NY 11530, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"10894","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,13]]},"reference":[{"key":"10.25259\/SNI_35_2026\/ref-1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2014.06.010","article-title":"Is there a difference in neurologic outcome in medical versus early operative management of cervical epidural abscesses?","volume":"15","author":"Alton","year":"2015","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"10.25259\/SNI_35_2026\/ref-2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"117","DOI":"10.1016\/S1474-4422(20)30406-3","article-title":"The influence of timing of surgical decompression for acute spinal cord injury: A pooled analysis of individual patient data","volume":"20","author":"Badhiwala","year":"2021","journal-title":"Lancet Neurol"},{"key":"10.25259\/SNI_35_2026\/ref-3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"757","DOI":"10.3340\/jkns.2019.0230","article-title":"Early versus delayed surgery for spinal epidural abscess: Clinical outcome and health-related quality of life","volume":"63","author":"Behmanesh","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Korean Neurosurg Soc"},{"key":"10.25259\/SNI_35_2026\/ref-4","first-page":"1341","article-title":"Spinal epidural abscess: A diagnostic challenge","volume":"65","author":"Chao","year":"2002","journal-title":"Am Fam Physician"},{"key":"10.25259\/SNI_35_2026\/ref-5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S475","DOI":"10.4103\/2152-7806.166887","article-title":"Timing and prognosis of surgery for spinal epidural abscess: A review","volume":"6","author":"Epstein","year":"2015","journal-title":"Surg Neurol Int"},{"key":"10.25259\/SNI_35_2026\/ref-6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S504","DOI":"10.4103\/2152-7806.166894","article-title":"What are we waiting for? An argument for early surgery for spinal epidural abscesses","volume":"6","author":"Epstein","year":"2015","journal-title":"Surg Neurol Int"},{"key":"10.25259\/SNI_35_2026\/ref-7","first-page":"13","article-title":"Review\/perspective: Operations for Cauda Equina Syndromes- \u201cthe sooner the better\u201d","author":"Epstein","year":"2022","journal-title":"Surg Neurol Int"},{"key":"10.25259\/SNI_35_2026\/ref-8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e32037","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0032037","article-title":"Early versus delayed decompression for traumatic cervical spinal cord injury: Results of the surgical timing in acute spinal cord injury study (STASCIS)","volume":"7","author":"Fehlings","year":"2012","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"10.25259\/SNI_35_2026\/ref-9","first-page":"117","article-title":"A systematic review: Characteristics, complications and treatment of spondylodiscitis","volume":"23","author":"Gentile","year":"2019","journal-title":"Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci"},{"key":"10.25259\/SNI_35_2026\/ref-10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E1","DOI":"10.3171\/2014.6.FOCUS14120","article-title":"Timing in the surgical evacuation of spinal epidural abscesses","volume":"37","author":"Ghobrial","year":"2014","journal-title":"Neurosurg Focus"},{"key":"10.25259\/SNI_35_2026\/ref-11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"482","DOI":"10.3897\/folmed.62.e49902","article-title":"Outcome of surgical treatment of spontaneous spinal epidural abscesses for a 10-year period","volume":"62","author":"Kitov","year":"2020","journal-title":"Folia Med (Plovdiv)"},{"key":"10.25259\/SNI_35_2026\/ref-12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1483","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjmed.2021.07.021","article-title":"Evaluation and management of Cauda equina syndrome","volume":"134","author":"Kuris","year":"2021","journal-title":"Am J Med"},{"key":"10.25259\/SNI_35_2026\/ref-13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"169","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajem.2025.01.055","article-title":"Emergency medicine updates: Evaluation and diagnosis of sepsis and septic shock","volume":"90","author":"Long","year":"2025","journal-title":"Am J Emerg Med"},{"key":"10.25259\/SNI_35_2026\/ref-14","first-page":"S26","article-title":"Spinal epidural abscess","volume":"5","author":"Luo","year":"2020","journal-title":"J Educ Teach Emerg Med"},{"key":"10.25259\/SNI_35_2026\/ref-15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"586","DOI":"10.1186\/s12891-023-06703-4","article-title":"Spinal epidural abscess as predicting factor for the necessity of early surgical intervention in patients with pyogenic spondylitis","volume":"24","author":"Park","year":"2023","journal-title":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disord"},{"key":"10.25259\/SNI_35_2026\/ref-16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S144","DOI":"10.1016\/j.acra.2025.04.027","article-title":"Spinal epidural abscess and medical malpractice: The role of diagnostic imaging in legal cases","volume":"32","author":"Rothwell","year":"2025","journal-title":"Acad Radiol"},{"key":"10.25259\/SNI_35_2026\/ref-17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"642","DOI":"10.3171\/2023.11.SPINE23810","article-title":"Effect of urgent surgery within 8 hours compared to surgery between 8 and 24 hours on perioperative complications and neurological prognosis in patients older than 70 years with cervical spinal cord injury: A propensity score-matched analysis","volume":"40","author":"Shimizu","year":"2024","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"10.25259\/SNI_35_2026\/ref-18","first-page":"e68710","article-title":"Streptococcus pneumoniae spinal epidural abscess in an immunocompetent patient","volume":"16","author":"Sinnasone","year":"2024","journal-title":"Cureus"},{"key":"10.25259\/SNI_35_2026\/ref-19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"59S","DOI":"10.1177\/2192568218772048","article-title":"Etiology and Surgical management of cervical spinal epidural abscess (SEA): A systematic review","volume":"8","author":"Stricsek","year":"2018","journal-title":"Global Spine J"},{"key":"10.25259\/SNI_35_2026\/ref-20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"20","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2016.05.074","article-title":"How best to manage the spinal epidural abscess? A current systematic review","volume":"93","author":"Suppiah","year":"2016","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"}],"container-title":["Surgical Neurology International"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/surgicalneurologyint.com\/perspective-short-review-stat-surgery-is-the-standard-of-care-for-treating-significant-spinal-epidural-abscesses\/","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/surgicalneurologyint.com\/surgicalint-articles\/perspective-short-review-stat-surgery-is-the-standard-of-care-for-treating-significant-spinal-epidural-abscesses\/","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,13]],"date-time":"2026-02-13T12:28:50Z","timestamp":1770985730000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/surgicalneurologyint.com\/surgicalint-articles\/perspective-short-review-stat-surgery-is-the-standard-of-care-for-treating-significant-spinal-epidural-abscesses\/"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,13]]},"references-count":20,"alternative-id":["10.25259\/SNI_35_2026"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.25259\/sni_35_2026","relation":{},"ISSN":["2152-7806","2229-5097"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2152-7806","type":"electronic"},{"value":"2229-5097","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,13]]},"article-number":"80"}}