{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,1]],"date-time":"2025-06-01T22:29:41Z","timestamp":1748816981421},"reference-count":7,"publisher":"Scientific Scholar","content-domain":{"domain":["surgicalneurologyint.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"abstract":"<jats:sec id=\"st1\">\n<jats:title>Background: <\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>Airway management with cervical spine immobilization poses a particular challenge for intubation in the absence of neck extension and risks neurological damage in cases of unstable cervical spine injuries. Here, with manual inline stabilization (MILS) in patients with cervical spine injuries, we compared the safety\/efficacy of intubation utilizing the TruView versus King Vision video laryngoscopes.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec id=\"st2\">\n<jats:title>Methods: <\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>This prospective, single-blind, comparative study was conducted over a 3-year period. The study population included 60 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Grade I-III patients, aged 18\u201365 years, who underwent subaxial cervical spine surgery utilizing two intubation techniques; TruView (TV) versus King Vision (KV). For both groups, relative intubation difficulty scores (IDS), total duration of intubation, hemodynamic changes, and other complications (e.g., soft-tissue injury and neurological deterioration) were recorded.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec id=\"st3\">\n<jats:title>Results: <\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>With MILS, patients in the KV group had statistically significant lower IDS (0.70 \u00b1 1.02) and significantly shorter duration of intubation as compared to the TV group (1.67 \u00b1 1.27) with MILS (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic> = 0.0010); notably, the glottic exposure was similar in both groups. The complication rate (e.g., soft-tissue injury) was lower for the KV group, but this was not statistically significant. Interestingly, no patient from either group exhibited increased neurological deterioration attributable to the method of intubation.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec id=\"st4\">\n<jats:title>Conclusion: <\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>King Vision has several advantages over TruView for intubating patients who have sustained cervical spine trauma. Nevertheless, both laryngoscopes afford comparable glottic views and safety profiles with similar alterations in hemodynamics.<\/jats:p>\n<\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.25259\/sni_638_2020","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,11,6]],"date-time":"2020-11-06T08:42:11Z","timestamp":1604652131000},"page":"375","update-policy":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.25259\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Comparison of TruView and King Vision video laryngoscopes in subaxial cervical spine injury: A randomized controlled trial"],"prefix":"10.25259","volume":"11","author":[{"given":"Rupanwita","family":"Sen","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anesthesia, Indian Spinal Injuries Center, New Delhi, India."}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Abhinandan Reddy","family":"Mallepally","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Spine Services, Indian Spinal Injuries Centre, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, India."}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Gayatri","family":"Sakrikar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Anesthesia Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Seth Gordhandas Sunderdas Medical College, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India."}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Nandan","family":"Marathe","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Spine Services, Indian Spinal Injuries Centre, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, India."}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Tushar","family":"Rathod","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedics, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Seth Gordhandas Sunderdas Medical College, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India."}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"10894","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,11,6]]},"reference":[{"key":"10.25259\/SNI_638_2020\/ref-1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"70","DOI":"10.4038\/slja.v25i2.8200","article-title":"A comparative evaluation of king vision video laryngoscope (channelled blade), McCoy, and Macintosh laryngoscopes for tracheal intubation in patients with immobilized cervical spine","volume":"25","author":"Ali","year":"2017","journal-title":"Sri Lankan J Anaesthesiol"},{"key":"10.25259\/SNI_638_2020\/ref-2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"308","DOI":"10.4103\/0970-9185.117053","article-title":"Assessment of cervical spine movement during laryngoscopy with Macintosh and truview laryngoscopes","volume":"29","author":"Bhardwaj","year":"2013","journal-title":"J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol"},{"key":"10.25259\/SNI_638_2020\/ref-3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"188","DOI":"10.4103\/1658-354X.130705","article-title":"A comparison of McCoy, TruView, and Macintosh laryngoscopes for tracheal intubation in patients with immobilized cervical spine","volume":"8","author":"Bharti","year":"2014","journal-title":"Saudi J Anaesth"},{"key":"10.25259\/SNI_638_2020\/ref-4","first-page":"1","article-title":"COVID-19: Current knowledge and best practices for orthopaedic surgeons","volume":"54","author":"Chhabra","year":"2020","journal-title":"Indian J Orthop"},{"key":"10.25259\/SNI_638_2020\/ref-5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"682","DOI":"10.1213\/01.ane.0000492920.95559.ff","article-title":"Abstract PR537: Does king vision\u2122 videolaryngoscope reduce cervical spine motion during endotracheal intubation? A crossover study","volume":"123","author":"El Tahan","year":"2016","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"key":"10.25259\/SNI_638_2020\/ref-6","first-page":"723","article-title":"Comparison of king vision and truview laryngoscope for postextubation visualization of vocal cord mobility in patients undergoing thyroid and major neck surgeries: A randomized clinical trial","volume":"101","author":"Priyanka","year":"2017","journal-title":"Anesth Essays Res"},{"key":"10.25259\/SNI_638_2020\/ref-7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"644","DOI":"10.4103\/ajns.AJNS_45_20","article-title":"Incidence and outcome analysis of vertebral artery injury in posttraumatic cervical spine","volume":"15","author":"Rathod","year":"2020","journal-title":"Asian J Neurosurg"}],"container-title":["Surgical Neurology International"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/surgicalneurologyint.com\/comparison-of-truview-and-king-vision-video-laryngoscopes-in-subaxial-cervical-spine-injury-a-randomized-controlled-trial\/","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/surgicalneurologyint.com\/surgicalint-articles\/comparison-of-truview-and-king-vision-video-laryngoscopes-in-subaxial-cervical-spine-injury-a-randomized-controlled-trial\/","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2020,11,6]],"date-time":"2020-11-06T08:42:14Z","timestamp":1604652134000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/surgicalneurologyint.com\/surgicalint-articles\/comparison-of-truview-and-king-vision-video-laryngoscopes-in-subaxial-cervical-spine-injury-a-randomized-controlled-trial\/"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,11,6]]},"references-count":7,"alternative-id":["10.25259\/SNI_638_2020"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.25259\/sni_638_2020","relation":{},"ISSN":["2152-7806"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2152-7806","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,11,6]]},"article-number":"375"}}