{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,23]],"date-time":"2025-08-23T05:16:50Z","timestamp":1755926210524},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"Victoria University of Wellington Library","issue":"2","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["AJL"],"abstract":"<jats:p>&#x0D;\n&#x0D;\n&#x0D;\nI examine the basic logical character of \u2018the last man example\u2019, as well as the logical character of one of its more important variants. Although it has one striking antecedent in recent philosophy \u2013 of which more later \u2013 it\u2019s fair to regard it as an example first presented to a contemporary audience by Richard Routley in his 1973 paper, \u2018Is There a Need for a New, an Environmental, Ethic?\u2019.\u00a0 I want to determine exactly how the example goes and what it shows. I want to determine what it does not show. One reason for engaging in this exercise is the striking and engaging character of the last man example itself. Another is that a large number of environmental philosophers have since referred to the last man but have drawn different, sometimes contrary, lessons from it \u2013 though we won\u2019t have time here to visit any but the earliest of these responses. It seems to me time to patiently revisit the example and time to attempt a conclusive understanding of its significance. A second, and broader, purpose I have is to describe the meta-ethical views it led Routley to adopt \u2013 or manufacture! \u2013 in an attempt to philosophically position his normative stance within a more fundamental, explanatory, framework. &#x0D;\n&#x0D;\n&#x0D;\n<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.26686\/ajl.v15i2.4871","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,7,5]],"date-time":"2018-07-05T05:14:57Z","timestamp":1530767697000},"page":"513-591","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["The Last Man"],"prefix":"10.26686","volume":"15","author":[{"given":"Roger","family":"Lamb","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"11224","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2018,7,5]]},"container-title":["The Australasian Journal of Logic"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/ojs.victoria.ac.nz\/ajl\/article\/download\/4871\/4326","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/ojs.victoria.ac.nz\/ajl\/article\/download\/4871\/4326","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,12]],"date-time":"2023-04-12T22:40:57Z","timestamp":1681339257000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/ojs.victoria.ac.nz\/ajl\/article\/view\/4871"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,7,5]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2018,7,5]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.26686\/ajl.v15i2.4871","relation":{},"ISSN":["1448-5052"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1448-5052","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,7,5]]}}}