{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,6]],"date-time":"2026-10-06T05:57:31Z","timestamp":1791266251366,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":21,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,1]],"date-time":"2021-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1609459200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,1]],"date-time":"2021-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1609459200000},"content-version":"am","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"name":"Royal College of Surgeons of England Bristol Surgical Trials Centre"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["lww.com","ovid.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>\n                    <jats:bold>ABSTRACT<\/jats:bold>\n                  <\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Introduction:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Innovation in surgery drives improvements to patient care. New surgical procedures and devices typically undergo a series of modifications as they are developed and refined during their introduction into clinical practice. These changes should ideally be reported and shared between surgeon-innovators to promote efficient, safe and transparent innovation. Currently, agreement on how modifications should be defined, conceptualised and classified, so they can be reported and shared efficiently and transparently, is lacking. The aim of this review is to examine and summarise existing literature on definitions, perceptions and classifications of modifications to surgical procedures\/devices, including views on how to measure and report them. The findings will inform future work to standardise reporting and sharing of modifications in surgical innovation.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Materials and Methods:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A systematic scoping review will be conducted adhering to PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Included articles will focus on review articles and opinion pieces relevant to modifications to new surgical procedures or devices introduced to clinical practice. Methods to identify relevant literature will include systematic searches in MEDLINE (Ovid version), targeted internet searches (Google Scholar) and snowball searches. A two-stage screening process (titles\/abstracts\/keywords and full-texts) will use specified exclusion\/inclusion criteria to identify eligible articles. Data on how modifications are i) defined, ii) perceived, and iii) classified, and iv) views on how modifications should be measured and reported, will be extracted verbatim. Inductive thematic analysis will be applied to extracted data where appropriate. Results will be presented as a narrative summary including descriptive characteristics of included articles. Findings will inform a preliminary conceptual framework to facilitate the systematic reporting and sharing of modifications to novel procedures and devices.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Highlights<\/jats:title>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.29337\/ijsp.167","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,11,12]],"date-time":"2021-11-12T04:43:06Z","timestamp":1636692186000},"page":"250-256","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/lww.0000000000001000","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":7,"title":["Reporting Modifications in Surgical Innovation: A Systematic Scoping Review Protocol"],"prefix":"10.1097","volume":"25","author":[{"given":"CHRISTIN","family":"HOFFMANN","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"SINA","family":"HOSSAINI","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"SIAN","family":"COUSINS","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"NATALIE","family":"BLENCOWE","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"ANGUS G. K.","family":"MCNAIR","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"JANE M.","family":"BLAZEBY","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"KERRY N. L.","family":"AVERY","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"SHELLEY","family":"POTTER","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"RHIANNON","family":"MACEFIELD","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","reference":[{"key":"R1-36-20260820","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"221","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0036-1584499","article-title":"Future of Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery","volume":"29","author":"Whealon","year":"2016","journal-title":"Clin. Colon Rectal Surg"},{"key":"R2-36-20260820","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1638","DOI":"10.1007\/s00268-014-2568-1","article-title":"Ethical issues in surgical innovation","volume":"38","author":"Miller","year":"2014","journal-title":"World J. Surg"},{"key":"R3-36-20260820","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1089","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(09)61083-7","article-title":"Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations","volume":"374","author":"Barkun","year":"2009","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"R4-36-20260820","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"685","DOI":"10.1001\/jamasurg.2019.0903","article-title":"The IDEAL Framework for Evaluating Surgical Innovation: How It Can Be Used to Improve the Quality of Evidence","volume":"154","author":"Dimick","year":"2019","journal-title":"JAMA Surg"},{"key":"R5-36-20260820","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S2","DOI":"10.1016\/S1743-9191(13)60003-5","article-title":"Professor, Ethics and surgical innovation: challenges to the professionalism of surgeons","volume":"11","author":"Angelos","year":"2013","journal-title":"Int. J. Surg"},{"key":"R6-36-20260820","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"107","DOI":"10.1093\/bjs\/znaa162","article-title":"Double-edged sword of surgical innovation: ethical issues of early and late adoption of novel techniques","volume":"108","author":"Angelos","year":"2021","journal-title":"Br. J. Surg"},{"key":"R7-36-20260820","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1105","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(09)61116-8","article-title":"No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations","volume":"374","author":"McCulloch","year":"2009","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"R9-36-20260820","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1072","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs5.50358","article-title":"Outcome selection, measurement and reporting for new surgical procedures and devices: a systematic review of IDEAL\/IDEAL-D studies to inform development of a core outcome set","volume":"4","author":"Macefield","year":"2020","journal-title":"BJS Open"},{"key":"R10-36-20260820","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1862","DOI":"10.1111\/codi.15347","article-title":"A systematic review and in-depth analysis of outcome reporting in early phase studies of colorectal cancer surgical innovation","volume":"22","author":"Hoffmann","year":"2020","journal-title":"Color. Dis"},{"key":"R11-36-20260820","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"84","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijsu.2018.07.008","article-title":"Appraising the uptake and use of the IDEAL Framework and Recommendations: A review of the literature","volume":"57","author":"Khachane","year":"2018","journal-title":"Int. J. Surg"},{"key":"R12-36-20260820","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e029574","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2019-029574","article-title":"Development of reporting guidance and core outcome sets for seamless, standardised evaluation of innovative surgical procedures and devices: A study protocol for content generation and a Delphi consensus process (COHESIVE study)","volume":"9","author":"Avery","year":"2019","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"R13-36-20260820","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"28576","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2018-028576","article-title":"What is an invasive procedure? A definition to inform study design, evidence synthesis and research tracking","volume":"9","author":"Cousins","year":"2019","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"R14-36-20260820","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"949","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000001174","article-title":"Getting Clearer About Surgical Innovation: A New Definition and a New Tool to Support Responsible Practice","volume":"262","author":"Hutchison","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ann. Surg"},{"key":"R15-36-20260820","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"273","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0b013e31829ccc5f","article-title":"Identifying surgical innovation: A qualitative study of surgeons\u2019 views","volume":"259","author":"Rogers","year":"2014","journal-title":"Ann. Surg"},{"key":"R16-36-20260820","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"73","DOI":"10.1007\/s10728-019-00380-y","article-title":"Conceptualising Surgical Innovation: An Eliminativist Proposal","volume":"28","author":"Birchley","year":"2019","journal-title":"Heal. Care Anal"},{"key":"R20-36-20260820","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1080\/1364557032000119616","article-title":"Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework","volume":"8","author":"Arksey","year":"2005","journal-title":"Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol"},{"key":"R21-36-20260820","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/s12874-016-0116-4","article-title":"A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews","volume":"16","author":"Tricco","year":"2016","journal-title":"BMC Med. Res. Methodol"},{"key":"R23-36-20260820","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"91","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x","article-title":"A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies","volume":"26","author":"Grant","year":"2009","journal-title":"Heal. Inf. Libr. J"},{"key":"R25-36-20260820","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1064","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.38636.593461.68","article-title":"Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sources","volume":"331","author":"Greenhalgh","year":"2005","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"R26-36-20260820","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"467","DOI":"10.7326\/M18-0850","article-title":"PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation","volume":"169","author":"Tricco","year":"2018","journal-title":"Ann. Intern. Med"},{"key":"R27-36-20260820","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1191\/1478088706qp063oa","article-title":"Using thematic analysis in psychology","volume":"3","author":"Braun","year":"2006","journal-title":"Qual. Res. Psychol"}],"container-title":["International Journal of Surgery Protocols"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.29337\/ijsp.167","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,20]],"date-time":"2026-08-20T10:00:35Z","timestamp":1787220035000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/10.29337\/ijsp.167"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,1]]},"references-count":21,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.29337\/ijsp.167","relation":{},"ISSN":["2468-3574"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2468-3574","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,1]]}}}