{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,4]],"date-time":"2025-09-04T13:50:33Z","timestamp":1756993833783},"reference-count":24,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2011,1,11]],"date-time":"2011-01-11T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1294704000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":8776,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[1987,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>All women (n =223) scheduled for induction of labor were randomized into start with oxcytocin infusion (O) or amniotomy (A). After 4 h an assessment of the progress and prognosis was made. If the progress was not acceptable O was added to A and A to O.<\/jats:p><jats:p>Oxcytocin alone showed the lowest frequency of delivered patients. The \u201camniotomy only\u201d group showed the shortest duration of delivery. The frequency of complications was low but somewhat higher when the initial step was oxcytocin.<\/jats:p><jats:p>Oxcytocin alone is <jats:italic>not<\/jats:italic> a good method for induction. Early evaluation of the progress and prognosis of the induction is difficult. The combination of amniotomy and oxcytocin seem to be more essential than the choice of initial step. If, however, an infusion of oxcytocin is the first proceeding, amniotomy should be added on a routine basis and without delay.<\/jats:p><jats:p>Bishop score is not a conclusive measure of the readyness of uterus to go into labor. Parity may partly be the explanation but other today unknown factors are probably involved in the inducability.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3109\/00016348709015731","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2007,11,22]],"date-time":"2007-11-22T00:44:39Z","timestamp":1195692279000},"page":"537-541","update-policy":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":9,"title":["Induction of Labor: A Prospective, Randomized Study into Amniotomy and Oxcytocin as Induction Methods in a Total Unselected Population"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"66","author":[{"given":"Oddvar","family":"Bakos","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Torbj\u00f6rn","family":"B\u00e4ckstr\u00f6m","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2011,1,11]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_1_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1977.tb12465.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_3_1","first-page":"1167","article-title":"Induction of labor in hazarous pregnancies","volume":"75","author":"Bartsch F.","year":"1976","journal-title":"Lakartidningen"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_4_1","first-page":"266","article-title":"Pelvic scoring for elective induction","volume":"24","author":"Bishop E H.","year":"1964","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_5_1","first-page":"245","article-title":"Elective induction of labor: a controlled study","volume":"103","author":"Booth J H.","year":"1970","journal-title":"Can Med Ass J"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1968.tb01545.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1974.tb00362.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_8_1","article-title":"Use of oxytocin and incidence of neonatal jaundice","volume":"116","author":"Chalmers I.","year":"1975","journal-title":"Br Med J"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_9_1","article-title":"Influence of simultaneous low amniotomy and oxytocin infusion and after maternal factors on neonatal jaundice: a prospective study","volume":"72","author":"Chew W C.","year":"1977","journal-title":"Br Med J"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_10_1","article-title":"A time to be born","volume":"1183","author":"Editorial","year":"1974","journal-title":"The Lancet"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"356","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(74)90238-5","article-title":"Fetal and maternal monitoring in spontaneous labors and in elective inductions","volume":"120","author":"Editorial","year":"1974","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1970.tb03576.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_13_1","first-page":"115","article-title":"Elective induction of labor","volume":"1","author":"Hester L L.","year":"1969","journal-title":"Controversy in Obst and Gynec"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1970.tb04405.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(83)90262-4"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_16_1","first-page":"109","article-title":"Elective induction of labor","volume":"1","author":"Kattel W C.","year":"1969","journal-title":"Controversy in Obst and Gynec"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1982.tb05094.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_18_1","first-page":"137","article-title":"Prelabor evaluation of inducibility","volume":"60","author":"Lange A P.","year":"1982","journal-title":"Obstet Gynec"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_19_1","article-title":"Dangers of oxytocin\u2010induc\u2010ed labour to fetuses","volume":"606","author":"Campbrell A J.","year":"1974","journal-title":"Br Med J"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_20_1","first-page":"121","article-title":"Elective induction of labor","volume":"1","author":"Niswander K R.","year":"1969","journal-title":"Controversy in Obst and Gynec"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_21_1","article-title":"Selective induction of labour","volume":"727","author":"O'Driscoll K.","year":"1975","journal-title":"Br med J"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_22_1","article-title":"Routine induction of labour by amniotomy and simultaneous syntocinon (synthetic oxytocin) infusion","volume":"191","author":"Pawson M E.","year":"1970","journal-title":"Br Med J"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.2.6182.108"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_24_1","volume-title":"Non\u2010parametric Statistics","author":"Siegel S.","year":"1956"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_25_1","volume-title":"Introductory Statistics","author":"Wonnacott T H.","year":"1972"}],"container-title":["Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.3109%2F00016348709015731","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.3109\/00016348709015731","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,21]],"date-time":"2023-10-21T19:21:19Z","timestamp":1697916079000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.3109\/00016348709015731"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[1987,1]]},"references-count":24,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[1987,1]]}},"alternative-id":["10.3109\/00016348709015731"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3109\/00016348709015731","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0001-6349","1600-0412"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0001-6349","type":"print"},{"value":"1600-0412","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[1987,1]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2011-01-11","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}