{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,12]],"date-time":"2025-09-12T18:28:58Z","timestamp":1757701738314},"reference-count":10,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2011,1,11]],"date-time":"2011-01-11T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1294704000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":8045,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[1989,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>All second twins delivered by cesarean section (CS) after vaginal birth of the first twin (n = 38) and all breech\u2010extracted second twins (n = 282) in Sweden during 1973\u201381 were identified. Data from the medical records of all CS second twins were extracted and compared with breech\u2010extracted second twins from the same departments born within 2 years of the CS twin (n = 25). Second twins delivered after maternal general anesthesia had lower 5\u2010min Apgar scores, irrespective of mode of delivery. Maternal morbidity was substantial in the CS group. The results encourage the use of breech extraction under local anesthesia rather than CS when there is a need for a quick delivery of the second twin and when both alternatives are available.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3109\/00016348909021016","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2007,11,13]],"date-time":"2007-11-13T19:06:50Z","timestamp":1194980810000},"page":"435-438","update-policy":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":9,"title":["Breech Extraction Versus Cesarean Section for the Remaining Second Twin"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"68","author":[{"given":"Lars","family":"Berglund","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ove","family":"Axelsson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2011,1,11]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_1_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/00016348409154643"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_3_1","first-page":"696","article-title":"Reasons for the rising cesarean delivery rates: 1978\u20131984","volume":"69","author":"Shiono PH","year":"1987","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_4_1","first-page":"232","article-title":"Combined vaginal\u2014abdominal delivery of twins","volume":"73","author":"Berglund L.","year":"1984","journal-title":"An Chir Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(85)90456-9"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_6_1","first-page":"119","article-title":"Intraparturn management of twin gestation","volume":"65","author":"Chervenak FA","year":"1985","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_7_1","first-page":"135","article-title":"The rising cesarean section rate: Can it safely be reversed","volume":"56","author":"Minkoff HI","year":"1980","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_8_1","first-page":"358","article-title":"Intrapartum management of twin gestation: What is best for the second and the small","volume":"59","author":"Gandhi J.","year":"1983","journal-title":"Bull NY Acad Med"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1963.tb04212.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00003081-198006000-00022"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00003081-198006000-00021"}],"container-title":["Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.3109%2F00016348909021016","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.3109\/00016348909021016","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,22]],"date-time":"2023-10-22T07:53:27Z","timestamp":1697961207000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.3109\/00016348909021016"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[1989,1]]},"references-count":10,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[1989,1]]}},"alternative-id":["10.3109\/00016348909021016"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3109\/00016348909021016","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0001-6349","1600-0412"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0001-6349","type":"print"},{"value":"1600-0412","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[1989,1]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2011-01-11","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}