{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,6]],"date-time":"2026-06-06T14:07:04Z","timestamp":1780754824222,"version":"3.54.1"},"reference-count":11,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2011,1,11]],"date-time":"2011-01-11T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1294704000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":8045,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[1989,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>In a prospective randomized study comprising 90 women undergoing vaginal plastic surgery, suprapubic and transurethral catheter drainage of the bladder were compared regarding urinary tract infection and asymptomatic bacteriuria. No statistically significant differences were found. The mean duration of catheterization was 4.9 days for suprapubic vs 3.3 days for transurethral catheter patients. Postoperative urinary tract infection was diagnosed in 23.7% of patients with suprapubic and in 27.5% of patients with transurethral catheters. Asymptomatic bacteriuria at catheter removal was found in 21.0% of suprapubic and in 12.5% of transurethral catheter patients. More mechanical complications were seen with SPCsthan with TUCs. It is concluded that the two methods involve similar risks of infectious complications but that SPCs have a higher rate of mechanical complications.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3109\/00016348909021020","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2007,11,13]],"date-time":"2007-11-13T19:06:50Z","timestamp":1194980810000},"page":"453-455","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":39,"title":["Urinary Tract Infections and Asymptomatic Bacteriuria after Vaginal Plastic Surgery: A Comparison of Suprapubic and Transurethral Catheters"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"68","author":[{"given":"Hjalmar A.","family":"Schi\u00f8tz","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Paul A.","family":"Malme","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Tom G.","family":"Tanbo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2011,1,11]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_1_2_1","first-page":"65","article-title":"Management of bladder drainage following vaginal plastic repairs","volume":"44","author":"Wiser WL","year":"1974","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(66)90673-9"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/00016348509154707"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(16)33996-5"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.281.6250.1261"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM196605262742101"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/014107688007301011"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.3.5557.90"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0039-6109(16)42046-3"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"739","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-5347(17)65257-1","article-title":"Experiments with induced bacteriuria vesical emptying and bacterial growth on the mechanism of bladder defense to infection","volume":"86","author":"Cox CE","year":"1961","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_12_1","first-page":"239","article-title":"Comparison of suprapubic versus Foley drains","volume":"38","author":"Frymire LJ","year":"1971","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.3109%2F00016348909021020","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.3109\/00016348909021020","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,22]],"date-time":"2023-10-22T07:53:38Z","timestamp":1697961218000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.3109\/00016348909021020"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[1989,1]]},"references-count":11,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[1989,1]]}},"alternative-id":["10.3109\/00016348909021020"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3109\/00016348909021020","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0001-6349","1600-0412"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0001-6349","type":"print"},{"value":"1600-0412","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[1989,1]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2011-01-11","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}