{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,10]],"date-time":"2025-10-10T06:55:31Z","timestamp":1760079331660},"reference-count":13,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2011,1,11]],"date-time":"2011-01-11T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1294704000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":8045,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[1989,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of current methods in identifying fetuses with a weight \u2265 700 g, and to study the perinatal mortality and morbidity in relation to the mode of delivery. Between 1973 and 1984, 110 newborns in Sweden had a birthweight \u2265 700 g. These cases were identified using the National Medical Birth Registry, and from this data base, collecting antenatal, perinatal and infant data since 1973, a reference population was also selected. Tall, parous women with a high pre\u2010pregnancy weight and an abnormal weight gain constituted a high\u2010risk group, but the predictive potential of each of these variables was too low to allow identification of the individual case even in this extremely selected material. The obstetrician generally seemed to be unaware of the possibility of an extremely large fetus and only 7 (6.4%) women were delivered by an elective cesarean section, while 78 (70.9%) gave birth vaginally. Of 8 fetal deaths, 4 were related to shoulder dystocia, which occurred in almost 40% of all women who gave birth vaginally. Eleven newborns, all born vaginally, had a brachial plexus injury. The results of this study favor abdominal delivery for the extremely large fetus.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3109\/00016348909087691","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2007,11,27]],"date-time":"2007-11-27T13:05:25Z","timestamp":1196168725000},"page":"59-63","update-policy":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":26,"title":["The Extremely Large Fetus\u2010Antenatal Identification, Risks, And Proposed Management"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"68","author":[{"given":"H\u00e5kan","family":"Rydhstr\u00f6m","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Lngemar","family":"Lngemarsson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2011,1,11]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_1_2_1","first-page":"26","article-title":"The large fetus","volume":"52","author":"Golditch I M.","year":"1978","journal-title":"Management and outcome. Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.1984.tb01484.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_4_1","first-page":"715","article-title":"Fetal macrosomia: Prediction, risks, proposed management","volume":"61","author":"Boyd M E.","year":"1983","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_5_1","first-page":"158","article-title":"Macrosomia\u2010Maternal characteristics and infant complications","volume":"66","author":"Spellacy W N.","year":"1985","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_6_1","volume-title":"Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences","author":"Siegel S.","year":"1956"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/00016347709154978"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(87)90008-1"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_9_1","first-page":"268","article-title":"The large fetus. A study of 547 cases","volume":"5","author":"Posner A C.","year":"1955","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1986.tb07894.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_11_1","unstructured":"Eik\u2010NesS H..Ultrasonic assessment of human fetal weight growth and blood flow.Thesis.Litos Reprotryck Ltd Malm\u00f61980;33\u201340."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/1097-0096(199010)13:8<519::AID-JCU1870130802>3.0.CO;2-L"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_13_1","first-page":"407","article-title":"Macrosomia. A proposed indication for primary cesarean section","volume":"52","author":"Park D G.","year":"1978","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_14_1","unstructured":"SandmireHE (In discussion of paper by Gross TL et al) See reference no. 7."}],"container-title":["Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.3109%2F00016348909087691","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.3109\/00016348909087691","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,22]],"date-time":"2023-10-22T07:49:26Z","timestamp":1697960966000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.3109\/00016348909087691"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[1989,1]]},"references-count":13,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[1989,1]]}},"alternative-id":["10.3109\/00016348909087691"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3109\/00016348909087691","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0001-6349","1600-0412"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0001-6349","type":"print"},{"value":"1600-0412","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[1989,1]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2011-01-11","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}