{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,23]],"date-time":"2023-10-23T04:17:27Z","timestamp":1698034647796},"reference-count":11,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2011,1,7]],"date-time":"2011-01-07T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1294358400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":7676,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[1990,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>During a 3\u20104 year period, 324 women with a positive smear were registered consecutively and prospectively and divided into two groups according to the design of the investigation. In one group the smear was taken with an Ayre spatula and in the other group with a cotton swab. The purpose of this investigation has been to make a comparison between the endocervical smear and the smear taken from the surface of the portio and at the same time between the samples taken with a dry wooden Ayre spatula and with a cotton swab. No differences were found. The cytological findings have been registered and correlated both with the histological findings by colposcopically directed punch\u2010biopsies and endocervical curettings and with the final histological diagnosis obtained by punch\u2010biopsy, conization or hysterectomy.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3109\/00016349009006161","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2007,11,13]],"date-time":"2007-11-13T19:07:11Z","timestamp":1194980831000},"page":"147-151","update-policy":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Diagnostic Value of An Abnormal Sr in Non\u2010Pregnant Women: Evaluation of Positive Smear from the Surface of the Portio Obtained by the Cottonswab Method or by the Dry Wooden Ayre Spatula and the Relevance of Positive Smear from the Endocervix and\/or from the Surface of the Portio"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"69","author":[{"given":"Lene","family":"Lundvall","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Lise Lotte","family":"Hajgaard","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Knud","family":"Hajgaard","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Finn","family":"Lundvall","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2011,1,7]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_1_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/00016346509155871"},{"issue":"4","key":"e_1_2_1_3_1","first-page":"138","article-title":"Comparison of pipette and smear methods in population screenings for carcinoma of the uterine cervix","volume":"19","author":"Klinken L.","year":"1972","journal-title":"Dan Med Bull"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(69)90268-3"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_5_1","volume-title":"Screening for cervical neoplasia. A survey of the assumptions from studies on the screening in Ma\u2010ribo Amt. (disp.)","author":"Berget A.","year":"1979"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1097\/00000441-194312000-00020","volume-title":"Diagnosis of uterine cancer by vaginal smears","author":"Papanicolaou G N.","year":"1943"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(47)90278-0"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/1097-0142(196511)18:11<1474::AID-CNCR2820181117>3.0.CO;2-V"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00006254-197901010-00027"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/00016347909154046"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_11_1","first-page":"127","article-title":"The irrigation smear. Accuracy in gynecologic cancer detection","volume":"5","author":"Koch F.","year":"1962","journal-title":"Dan Med Bull"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_12_1","unstructured":"BeilbyJ. BourneR. GuillebaudJ. SteeleT..Paired cervical smear: A method of reducing the false\u2010negative rate in population screening."}],"container-title":["Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.3109%2F00016349009006161","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.3109\/00016349009006161","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,22]],"date-time":"2023-10-22T18:11:43Z","timestamp":1697998303000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.3109\/00016349009006161"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[1990,1]]},"references-count":11,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[1990,1]]}},"alternative-id":["10.3109\/00016349009006161"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3109\/00016349009006161","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0001-6349","1600-0412"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0001-6349","type":"print"},{"value":"1600-0412","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[1990,1]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2011-01-07","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}