{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,18]],"date-time":"2026-04-18T07:52:43Z","timestamp":1776498763451,"version":"3.51.2"},"reference-count":18,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2011,1,7]],"date-time":"2011-01-07T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1294358400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":6156,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[1994,3]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>Fifty\u2010eight Danish maternity units, managing 99% of Danish deliveries, participated in a cross sectional study to assess the relationship between use of birth\u2010related technologies, cesarean section rates and perinatal mortality for births after 35 completed weeks of gestation. A regional technology index (0\u201010) was calculated for each maternity unit according to its use of ante and intra partum fetal heart rate monitoring (FHM), hormone analysis (human placental lactogen (HPL) and\/or estriol (\u00d83)), fetal blood samples (scalp\u2010pH), intrauterine catheter and umbilical cord\u2010pH. Maternity units using FHM had a 15% higher cesarean section rate (not planned) than units not using FHM (p&lt;0.05). The referral of potentially complicated deliveries to central units, which at the same time relatively often use FHM, is probably responsible for this association. Trying to encounter this selection bias a technology index was calculated for eight regions in Denmark, weighting the index of each unit in a region according to its number of deliveries. There was no association between the technology index in these eight regions in Denmark and their cesarean section rates. Use of FHM, technology index, and unplanned cesarean section rates in the eight regions were all without significant association to the perinatal mortality in the same regions. For births after the 35th completed week of gestation, this study could not confirm a relationship between <jats:italic>different degrees of<\/jats:italic> use of birth\u2010related technologies and perinatal mortality.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3109\/00016349409023447","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2007,11,22]],"date-time":"2007-11-22T00:46:45Z","timestamp":1195692405000},"page":"240-245","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":9,"title":["Technology use, cesarean section rates, and perinatal mortality at Danish maternity wards"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"73","author":[{"given":"\u00d8jvind","family":"Lidegaard","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Lars Meinert","family":"Jensen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Tom","family":"Weber","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2011,1,7]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_1_2_1","volume-title":"10\u2010year\u2010overview for Danish health care 1973\u201382. Statistical surveys IV: 1","year":"1985"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-70358-4_3"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_4_1","first-page":"173","article-title":"Electronic fetal monitoring in relation to caesarean section delivery, for live births and stillbirths in the U.S., 1980","volume":"99","author":"Placek P. J.","year":"1984","journal-title":"Publ Health Rep"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"295","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(81)90276-3","article-title":"The effect of electronic fetal monitoring on the incidence of Cesarean section","volume":"140","author":"Boehm F. H.","year":"1981","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_6_1","first-page":"3702","article-title":"Birth\u2010related technologies at maternity wards in Denmark","volume":"152","author":"Lidegaard \u00d8","year":"1990","journal-title":"Ugeskr Lager"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_7_1","volume-title":"Technology assessment: an evaluation of electronic fetal monitoring","author":"Pillar B.","year":"1988"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00003081-198803000-00022"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM198609043151004"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_10_1","first-page":"3164","article-title":"Fetal heart rate monitoring. Changes in frequency of Cesarean sections and newborns condition judged by Apgar score","volume":"144","author":"Qvist N.","year":"1982","journal-title":"Ugeskr Laeger"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/00016348509154692"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/00016348909013275"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/00016349109007159"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(78)90114-X"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(16)33082-4"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(85)90619-2"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(81)90042-9"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/00016348609157033"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(87)90197-9"}],"container-title":["Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.3109%2F00016349409023447","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.3109\/00016349409023447","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,24]],"date-time":"2023-10-24T01:44:44Z","timestamp":1698111884000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.3109\/00016349409023447"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[1994,3]]},"references-count":18,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[1994,3]]}},"alternative-id":["10.3109\/00016349409023447"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3109\/00016349409023447","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0001-6349","1600-0412"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0001-6349","type":"print"},{"value":"1600-0412","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[1994,3]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2011-01-07","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}