{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,11]],"date-time":"2025-11-11T12:49:18Z","timestamp":1762865358252},"reference-count":16,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"10","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2011,1,7]],"date-time":"2011-01-07T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1294358400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":5911,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[1994,11]]},"abstract":"<jats:p><jats:italic>Objective<\/jats:italic>. To assess maternal and fetal outcome at conservative ambulatory care of nulliparous women at term with prelabor rupture of the membranes.<\/jats:p><jats:p><jats:italic>Methods<\/jats:italic>. A prospective study of 176 women managed conservatively in an ambulatory setting (nonstress test and assessment of amniotic fluid index every second day). <jats:italic>Results<\/jats:italic>. The median rupture of the membrane to delivery interval was 30 hours. Ninety per cent were delivered within 85 hours. The patients were divided into three groups according to the time period between rupture of membranes and delivery (under the 25th, 25th\u201075th and above the 75th centile). The maternal infectious morbidity (0, 6, 7% respectively), fetal distress (5, 18, 17% respectively) and instrumental delivery rate (5, 16, 16% respectively) tended to be increased in the upper three quartiles, without reaching a statistically significant level as analysed by \u03c7<jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>\u2010test. Nonstress test or evaluation of amniotic fluid index was not able to predict intrapartum fetal distress. In no case was there a delay in the management of any complication due to the ambulatory care.<\/jats:p><jats:p><jats:italic>Conclusion<\/jats:italic>. Awaiting spontaneous labor in nulliparous women with prelabor rupture of the membranes at term does not seem to be associated with any obvious advantage. If, however, a conservative attitude is implemented, the patients can preferably be treated on an ambulatory basis.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3109\/00016349409072501","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2007,11,22]],"date-time":"2007-11-22T00:46:57Z","timestamp":1195692417000},"page":"765-769","update-policy":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":8,"title":["Conservative ambulatory management of prelabor rupture of the membranes at term in nulliparous women"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"73","author":[{"given":"Katrin","family":"Hagskog","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Henry","family":"Nisell","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ihsan","family":"Sarman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Magnus","family":"Westgren","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2011,1,7]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_1_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(62)90089-3"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(70)90378-9"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_4_1","first-page":"547","article-title":"Premature rupture of the membranes and prolonged latency","volume":"57","author":"Johnson J WC","year":"1981","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(16)32589-3"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_6_1","first-page":"33","article-title":"Relationship of antepartum pelvic examinations to premature rupture of the membranes","volume":"63","author":"Lenihan J. P.","year":"1984","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1982.tb05028.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00007611-198608000-00010"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_9_1","first-page":"697","article-title":"Management of premature rupture of membranes and unfavourable cervix in term pregnancy","volume":"63","author":"Duff P.","year":"1984","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/00016348609158393"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_11_1","first-page":"353","article-title":"The four quadrant assessment of amniotic fluid volume: an adjunct to antepartum fetal heart rate testing","volume":"70","author":"Rutherford S. E.","year":"1987","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"353","DOI":"10.1016\/S0889-8545(21)00355-7","article-title":"Management of premature rupture of membranes at term","volume":"19","author":"Zlatnik F. J.","year":"1992","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(67)90512-1"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_14_1","first-page":"93","article-title":"A comparison of early and delayed induction of labor with spontaneous rupture of membranes at term","volume":"74","author":"Wagner M. V.","year":"1989","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/00016349109007914"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1159\/000293318"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_17_1","first-page":"512","volume-title":"Obstetric infection in labour, obstetric and perinatal infections","author":"Friedman E. A.","year":"1973"}],"container-title":["Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.3109%2F00016349409072501","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.3109\/00016349409072501","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,24]],"date-time":"2023-10-24T01:16:20Z","timestamp":1698110180000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.3109\/00016349409072501"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[1994,11]]},"references-count":16,"journal-issue":{"issue":"10","published-print":{"date-parts":[[1994,11]]}},"alternative-id":["10.3109\/00016349409072501"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3109\/00016349409072501","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0001-6349","1600-0412"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0001-6349","type":"print"},{"value":"1600-0412","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[1994,11]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2011-01-07","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}