{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,12]],"date-time":"2025-09-12T18:37:15Z","timestamp":1757702235064},"reference-count":24,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2011,1,7]],"date-time":"2011-01-07T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1294358400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":5485,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[1996,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:p><jats:italic>Background.<\/jats:italic> The purpose of our study was to compare laser cone excision with large loop excision of the transformation zone with particular respect to the retrieval of endocervical cells on follow\u2010up cervical cytology.<\/jats:p><jats:p><jats:italic>Methods.<\/jats:italic> Retrospective analysis of case records of 368 women who had large loop excision of the transformation zone and 188 women who had laser cone excision for suspected CIN changes at Middlemore Hospital, Auckland.<\/jats:p><jats:p><jats:italic>Results.<\/jats:italic> The retrieval of endocervical cells on cervical cytology following large loop excision was 94.7% and 85.2% following laser cone excision. Laser cone excision was associated with a higher chance of normal follow\u2010up cervical cytology.<\/jats:p><jats:p><jats:italic>Conclusions.<\/jats:italic> The retrieval of endocervical cells was satisfactory following both large loop excision and laser cone excision. Laser cone excision is recommended with large or more severe lesions.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3109\/00016349609033286","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2007,11,22]],"date-time":"2007-11-22T00:48:00Z","timestamp":1195692480000},"page":"63-67","update-policy":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["Endocervical cell retrieval following excisional treatment of CIN"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"75","author":[{"given":"Krzysztof J.","family":"Urbaniak","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Andreas","family":"Widjaja","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2011,1,7]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_1_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1989.tb02429.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1993.tb14234.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(72)90912-X"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(89)90324-3"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_6_1","first-page":"1009","article-title":"A randomised trial comparing two methods of cold knife conisation with laser conisation","volume":"76","author":"Kristensen G. B.","year":"1990","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.300.6741.1690"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/00016349309068042"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0090-8258(91)90007-R"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_10_1","first-page":"165","article-title":"Laser excision rather than vaporization: The treatment of choice for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia","volume":"74","author":"McIndoe G. A.","year":"1989","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0090-8258(92)90049-O"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1006\/gyno.1993.1116"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_13_1","first-page":"775","article-title":"Laser vaporisation versus laser excision conisation in the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia","volume":"73","author":"Partington C. K.","year":"1989","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0090-8258(90)90261-I"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(89)90233-0"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1991.tb10376.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(93)90078-W"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_18_1","first-page":"693","article-title":"Effect of CO2 laser conisation of the uterine cervix on pathologic interpretation of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia","volume":"79","author":"Fowler J. M.","year":"1992","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(93)90477-Z"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_20_1","first-page":"690","article-title":"Controlled evaluation of implementing the cytobrush technique to improve Papanicolaou smear quality","volume":"75","author":"Murata P. J.","year":"1990","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_21_1","first-page":"843","article-title":"Analysis of five sampling methods for the preparation of cervical smears","volume":"33","author":"Boon E. M.","year":"1989","journal-title":"Acta Cytol"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1989.tb03380.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_23_1","first-page":"633","article-title":"Cold\u2010knife and laser conisation for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia","volume":"76","author":"Tabor A.","year":"1990","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_24_1","first-page":"173","article-title":"Treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia using the loop electrosurgical excision procedure","volume":"79","author":"Wright T. C.","year":"1992","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0020-7292(93)90627-9"}],"container-title":["Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.3109%2F00016349609033286","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.3109\/00016349609033286","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,26]],"date-time":"2023-10-26T22:06:21Z","timestamp":1698357981000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.3109\/00016349609033286"}},"subtitle":["a comparison study between large loop excision of the transformation zone and laser cone excision"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[1996,1]]},"references-count":24,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[1996,1]]}},"alternative-id":["10.3109\/00016349609033286"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3109\/00016349609033286","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0001-6349","1600-0412"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0001-6349","type":"print"},{"value":"1600-0412","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[1996,1]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2011-01-07","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}