{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,29]],"date-time":"2025-10-29T19:10:22Z","timestamp":1761765022027,"version":"3.41.0"},"reference-count":29,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[1997,5,31]],"date-time":"1997-05-31T00:00:00Z","timestamp":865036800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":30,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[1997,5]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>Objective. The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical and urodynamic characteristics of women with recurrent urinary incontinence after Burch colposuspension.<\/jats:p><jats:p>Methods. The participants were assessed with medical history, uro\u2010gynecological examination and urodynamic investigation consisting of pad\u2010test, urethrocystoscopy, cough provocation test, cystometry, urethra profilometry and fiowmetry.<\/jats:p><jats:p>Results. Women with RUI demonstrated significantly increased incidences of recurrent lower urinary tract infection (24% vs. 8%), lumbago and sciatica (66% vs. 38%), rectocele (80% vs. 21%), and enterocele (24%&gt; vs. 0%) compared to women with primary stress urinary incontinence. Hypermobility of the bladder neck and urethra and palpable contraction of the levator ani muscles was observed significantly more often among the women with primary stress incontinence (90% vs. 42% and 83% vs. 56%&gt;, respectively). The leakage in women with RUI was significantly less pronounced than among women with primary stress incontinence. Detrusor instability was found significantly more often in women with RUI (47.5% vs. 23%). Low urethra pressure was found in five women with RUI.<\/jats:p><jats:p>Conclusion. Women with RUI after Burch colposuspension seem to have a more pronounced pelvic floor weakness than women with primary stress urinary incontinence, whereas the urinary leakage is less pronounced. Recurrent lower urinary tract infection, lumbago and sciatica as well as detrusor instability are commonly observed whereas low urethral closure pressure is rare in women with RUI after Burch colposuspension.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3109\/00016349709047829","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2008,3,5]],"date-time":"2008-03-05T19:06:37Z","timestamp":1204743997000},"page":"461-467","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":13,"title":["Clinical and urodynamic characteristics of women with recurrent urinary incontinence after Burch colposuspension"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"76","author":[{"given":"Preben","family":"Kj\u00f8Lhede","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Gunnar","family":"Ryd\u00e9N","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[1997,5,31]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_1_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(15)33576-6"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1979.tb11268.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1995.tb11434.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_5_1","unstructured":"ByrjalsenC. LaursenH. FarlieR. RasmussenK. L. AagardJ..Colposuspension a.m. Burch \u2014 an 18\u2010year follow\u2010up study.Proceedings of the 29th Congress of the Federation of Scandinavian Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology."},{"issue":"161","key":"e_1_2_1_6_1","first-page":"76","volume":"73","year":"1994","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/00016349409013459"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1996.tb09715.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(89)90471-7"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1983.tb06765.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_11_1","first-page":"693","article-title":"A urodynamic appraisal of success and failure after retropubic urethropexy","volume":"32","author":"Francis L. N.","year":"1987","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00400037"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01923384"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(94)90077-9"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_15_1","first-page":"354","article-title":"Risk factors and their effect on the results of the Burch colposuspension for urinary stress incontinence","volume":"28","author":"Gillon G.","year":"1992","journal-title":"Isr J Med Sci"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(94)90388-3"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-197805000-00001"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/nau.1930070504"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00373608"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/nau.1930040311"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1748-1716.1974.tb05767.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1475-097X.1981.tb00900.x"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_23_1","first-page":"33","article-title":"Voiding difficulties after colposuspension","volume":"69","author":"Lose G.","year":"1987","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_24_1","first-page":"495","article-title":"Pelvic floor neuropathy and surgical outcome in patients with stress incontinence","volume":"14","author":"Morley R.","year":"1995","journal-title":"Neurourol Urodyn"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(11)91419-7"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_26_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00003081-199006000-00014"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_27_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/00016349609054715"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_28_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01901527"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_29_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01900579"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_30_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/00016348009154090"}],"container-title":["Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.3109%2F00016349709047829","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.3109\/00016349709047829","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,9]],"date-time":"2025-06-09T07:01:57Z","timestamp":1749452517000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.3109\/00016349709047829"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[1997,5]]},"references-count":29,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[1997,5]]}},"alternative-id":["10.3109\/00016349709047829"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3109\/00016349709047829","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0001-6349","1600-0412"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0001-6349"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1600-0412"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[1997,5]]},"assertion":[{"value":"1997-05-31","order":3,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}