{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,20]],"date-time":"2026-08-20T11:53:01Z","timestamp":1787226781020,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":19,"publisher":"Informa UK Limited","issue":"6","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,8]]},"DOI":"10.3109\/01443615.2012.684911","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2012,7,10]],"date-time":"2012-07-10T16:12:34Z","timestamp":1341936754000},"page":"548-551","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":16,"title":["Reverse breech extraction in cases of second stage caesarean section"],"prefix":"10.3109","volume":"32","author":[{"given":"D.","family":"Schwake","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Holy Family Hospital, Nazareth"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"L.","family":"Petchenkin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Holy Family Hospital, Nazareth"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"J. S.","family":"Younis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Holy Family Hospital, Nazareth"},{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Poriya Medical Center, Tiberias"},{"name":"Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University,\rGalilee, Israel"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"301","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2012,7,10]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_2_2_1","volume-title":"Practice Bulletin No","author":"ACOG","year":"1998","unstructured":"ACOG. 1998. Vaginal birth after pervious cesarean delivery. Practice Bulletin No. 2, October. Washington DC: American College of Obstetrician and Gynecologists."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_3_1","volume-title":"Evaluation of cesarean delivery","author":"ACOG","year":"2000","unstructured":"ACOG. 2000. Evaluation of cesarean delivery. Washington DC: American College of Obstetrician and Gynecologists."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000257121.56126.fe"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2005.00615.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2006.06.026"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340903214932"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_8_1","first-page":"587","volume-title":"Williams\u2019 obstetrics","author":"Cunningham FG","year":"2005","unstructured":"Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Hauth JC, Gilstrip III LC, Wenstrom KD. 2005. Cesarean delivery and peripartum hysterectomy. In: Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Hauth JC, Gilstrip III LC, Wenstrom KD, eds. Williams\u2019 obstetrics. New York: McGraw-Hill; Ch. 25, p. 587\u2013606."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_9_1","first-page":"844","volume-title":"Practical obstetric problems","author":"Donald I","year":"1988","unstructured":"Donald I. 1988. Caesarean section. In: Donald I, editor. Practical obstetric problems, 5th ed. London: Lloyd-Luke; p. 844\u2013845.","edition":"5"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/01443610220141290"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-7292(96)02817-2"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_12_1","first-page":"589","article-title":"Lack of progress in labor as a reason for cesarean","volume":"95","author":"Gifford DS","year":"2000","unstructured":"Gifford DS, Morton SC, Fiske M, Keesey J, Keeler E, Kahn KL. 2000. Lack of progress in labor as a reason for cesarean. Obstetrics and Gynecology 95:589\u2013595.","journal-title":"Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(84)90551-9"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2004.09.014"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(85)90172-3"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_16_1","volume-title":"Green-top guideline No. 26","author":"RCOG","year":"2000","unstructured":"RCOG. 2000. Instrumental vaginal delivery. Green-top guideline No. 26. London: Royal College of Obstetrician and Gynaecologists."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-007-0548-5"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/01443615.2010.491566"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clp.2007.11.008"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_20_1","volume-title":"National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit Report","author":"Thomas J","year":"2001","unstructured":"Thomas J, Paranjothy S. 2001. Royal College of Obstetrician and Gynecologists Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit. National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit Report. London: RCOG Press."}],"container-title":["Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.tandfonline.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.3109\/01443615.2012.684911","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,7]],"date-time":"2024-02-07T09:07:38Z","timestamp":1707296858000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.tandfonline.com\/doi\/full\/10.3109\/01443615.2012.684911"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2012,7,10]]},"references-count":19,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,8]]}},"alternative-id":["10.3109\/01443615.2012.684911"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3109\/01443615.2012.684911","relation":{},"ISSN":["0144-3615","1364-6893"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0144-3615","type":"print"},{"value":"1364-6893","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2012,7,10]]}}}