{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,8]],"date-time":"2026-03-08T21:20:58Z","timestamp":1773004858578,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":13,"publisher":"Wiley","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2011,3,24]],"date-time":"2011-03-24T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1300924800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":7053,"URL":"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/termsAndConditions#vor"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["onlinelibrary.wiley.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Intl J Lang &amp; Comm Disor"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[1991,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstracts<\/jats:title><jats:p>Acceptability and intelligibility of three groups of alaryngeal speakers were examined: four oesophageal speakers, four tracheo\u2010oesophageal puncture speakers using a tracheostoma valve and four tracheo\u2010oesophageal puncture speakers using digital occlusion. Speakers were video\u2010taped producing samples from the Assessment of Intelligibility of Dysarthric Speech, in addition to a section of spontaneous speech. Three groups of listeners were used: nine speech and language therapists, five ENT surgeons and ten na\u00efve listeners. Specific variables including fluency, rate, quality, intensity, extraneous noise, effort required, pitch and general acceptability were rated on a 7\u2010point scale. Overall no significant difference was found between the speaker groups but listener groups did obtain significantly different intelligibility scores with speech and language therapists scoring highest and ENT surgeons lowest. Analysis suggests that speech and language therapist listeners cope equally well with all speaker groups but ENT surgeons and na\u00efve listeners cope best with tracheo\u2010oesophageal puncture speakers using the tracheostoma valve; only the data from ENT surgeons showed a significant difference between scores for the different speaker groups.<\/jats:p><jats:p>La qualit\u00e9 et l'intelligibilit\u00e9 de trois groupes de sujets sans larynx ont \u00e9t\u00e9 \u00e9tudi\u00e9s: locuteur avec voix oesophagienne, les locuteurs ayant subi une trach\u00e9otomie et utilisant une canule parlante, et ceux utilisant le principe de l'occlusion manuelle. Les locuteurs ont \u00e9t\u00e9 film\u00e9s alors qu'il pronon\u00e7aient des morceaux tir\u00e9s de \u2018l'Evaluation de l'Intelligibilit\u00e9 de la Parole Dysarthrique\u2019 ainsi qu'une s\u00e9quence de parole spontan\u00e9e. Trois groupes de testeurs ont particip\u00e9 \u00e0 l'\u00e9valuation: des orthophonistes, des chirurgiens ORL et des sujets inexp\u00e9riment\u00e9s. Des variables sp\u00e9cifiques incluant la fluidit\u00e9, le d\u00e9bit, la qualit\u00e9, l'intensit\u00e9, les bruits incontr\u00f4l\u00e9s, les efforts n\u00e9cessaires, l'intonation et la qualit\u00e9 globale ont \u00e9t\u00e9 not\u00e9es sur une \u00e9chelle de 1 \u00e0 7. Globalement, aucune diff\u00e9rence significative n'a \u00e9t\u00e9 trouv\u00e9e entre les groupes de locuteurs, alors que les groupes de testeurs ont obtenu des diff\u00e9rences significatives sur les scores d'intelligibilit\u00e9, les orthophonistes obtenant les meilleurs r\u00e9sultats et les chirurgiens ORL les moins bons. Une analyse sugg\u00e8re que les orthophonistes r\u00e9ussissent aussi bien avec tous les groupes de locuteurs alors que les chirurgiens ORL et les sujets inexp\u00e9riment\u00e9s r\u00e9ussissaient mieux avec les locuteurs ayant subi une trach\u00e9otomie et utilisant une canule de parole. Seules les donn\u00e9es obtenues avec les chirurgiens ORL ont montr\u00e9 des diff\u00e9rences significatives entre les scores obtenus pour les diff\u00e9rents groupes de locuteurs.<\/jats:p><jats:p>Wir untersuchten die Akzeptierbarkeit und Verst\u00e4ndlichkeit des Sprechens von drei Gruppen ohne Kehlkopf: 4 Oesophagussprache, 4 Sprecher mit Tracheotomie, die mit Hilfe eines Ventils im Tracheostoma sprachen und 4 Personen mit Tracheotomie, die zum Sprechen die Kan\u00fcle mit dem Finger zuhielten. Videoaufnahmen wurden gemacht, beim Vorsprechen von Beispielen aus der Assessment of Intelligibility of Dysarthric Speech und beim Spontansprechen. Drei H\u00f6rergruppen haben die Aufnahmen bewertet \u2010 9 Logop\u00e4den, 5 HNO Chirurgen und 10 untrainierte H\u00f6rer. Sie bewerteten auf einer Skala 1\u20137 spezifische Variablen, wie zum Beispiel, ob das Sprechen fliessend war, Geschwindigkeit, Qualit\u00e4t, Tonst\u00e4rke, Nebenger\u00e4usche, Anstrengung. Im Allgemeinen konnte man keine signifikanten Unterschiede zwischen den Sprechergruppen feststellen. Trotzdem entstanden bei den H\u00f6rergruppen signifikante Unterschiede bei den Verst\u00e4ndlichkeitswerten. Die Logop\u00e4den hatten die h\u00f6chsten, die Chirurgen die niedrigsten Werte. Eine Analyse der Ergebnisse zeigt, dass Logopaeden alle Gruppen gleichm\u00e4ssig gut verstehen, aber die Chirurgen und untrainierte H\u00f6rer verstehen am Besten die Sprecher mit Tracheotomie mit Ventil. Nur bei den Chirurgen zeigte sich ein signifikanter Unterschied zwischen den Werten bei den verschiedenen Sprechergruppen.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.3109\/13682829109012018","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2007,11,18]],"date-time":"2007-11-18T01:20:11Z","timestamp":1195348811000},"page":"325-335","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":16,"title":["Acceptability ratings and intelligibility scores of alaryngeal speakers by three listener groups"],"prefix":"10.1111","volume":"26","author":[{"given":"Alison","family":"Bridges","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"311","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2011,3,24]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_1_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1044\/jshd.5001.60"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1044\/jshr.2503.333"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1044\/jshd.4601.77"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3109\/13682828509012264"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_6_1","unstructured":"PERRY A.(1989).Voice restoration after laryngectomy.Unpublished PhD thesis CNAA Leicester Polytechnic."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1288\/00005537-198804000-00007"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1044\/jshd.4902.202"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1044\/jshd.5402.209"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_10_1","first-page":"529","article-title":"An endoscopic technique for restoration of voice after laryngectomy","volume":"89","author":"SINGER M.","year":"1980","journal-title":"Annals of Otology"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/archotol.1985.00800060037002"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/archotol.1985.00800060040003"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1288\/00005537-198706000-00018"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_14_1","unstructured":"YORKSTON K. M.&BEUKELMAN D. R.(1981).Assessment of Intelligibility of Dysarthric Speech.C. C. Publications Inc. Address correspondence to Alison Bridges Speech Therapy Department Frimley Park Hospital Frimley Surrey."}],"container-title":["International Journal of Language &amp; Communication Disorders"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.wiley.com\/onlinelibrary\/tdm\/v1\/articles\/10.3109%2F13682829109012018","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.3109\/13682829109012018","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,23]],"date-time":"2023-10-23T05:08:07Z","timestamp":1698037687000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.3109\/13682829109012018"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[1991,12]]},"references-count":13,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[1991,12]]}},"alternative-id":["10.3109\/13682829109012018"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3109\/13682829109012018","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1368-2822","1460-6984"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1368-2822","type":"print"},{"value":"1460-6984","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[1991,12]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2011-03-24","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}