{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,11]],"date-time":"2025-04-11T04:03:59Z","timestamp":1744344239588,"version":"3.40.4"},"reference-count":73,"publisher":"Forum XXI","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,12,30]],"date-time":"2021-12-30T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1640822400000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["epsir"],"abstract":"<jats:p>The concept of ecosystem has been used to describe a dynamic set of relationships, services and interdependencies that potentiate the creation, renewal and growth of organizations. Social innovation is largely influenced by ecosystem conditions. The Portuguese social innovation ecosystem is a particularly interesting case study, as it assumes a hybrid structure that expresses a variety of policy schemes, networks and support structures. This article debates the concept of social innovation ecosystem and presents an exploratory approach to its mapping. Based on interviews with strategic stakeholders in the social and solidarity economy and social enterprises, the study elaborates on the specificities of the social innovation ecosystem. The Portuguese ecosystem is comprised of three sub-ecosystems that show different weights, limited connections and overlapping: social economy, social business, and the social solidarity ecosystem. The article concludes with an overview of the current state of social innovation, emphasizing the perspectives of stakeholders on recent experiences that the Portuguese state has developed in establishing dialogue within organizations integrating social innovation dynamics.\r\n\u00a0\r\nResumen\u00a0\r\nEl concepto de ecosistema se ha utilizado para describir un conjunto din\u00e1mico de relaciones, servicios e interdependencias que potencian la creaci\u00f3n, la renovaci\u00f3n y el crecimiento de las organizaciones. La innovaci\u00f3n social se ve influida en gran medida por las condiciones del ecosistema. El ecosistema portugu\u00e9s de innovaci\u00f3n social es un caso de estudio particularmente interesante, ya que asume una estructura h\u00edbrida que expresa una variedad de esquemas pol\u00edticos, redes y estructuras de apoyo. Este art\u00edculo debate el concepto de ecosistema de innovaci\u00f3n social y presenta un enfoque exploratorio para su mapeo. A partir de entrevistas con actores estrat\u00e9gicos de la econom\u00eda social y solidaria y con empresas sociales, el estudio profundiza en las especificidades del ecosistema de innovaci\u00f3n social. El ecosistema portugu\u00e9s se compone de tres sub-ecosistemas que muestran un peso diferente, conexiones limitadas y solapamientos: la econom\u00eda social, la empresa social y el ecosistema de la solidaridad social. El art\u00edculo concluye con una visi\u00f3n general del estado actual de la innovaci\u00f3n social, haciendo hincapi\u00e9 en las perspectivas de las partes interesadas sobre las recientes experiencias que el Estado portugu\u00e9s ha desarrollado para establecer el di\u00e1logo dentro de las organizaciones que integran la din\u00e1mica de la innovaci\u00f3n social.\r\nPalabras clave: innovaci\u00f3n social; ecosistemas; complejidad; econom\u00eda social; empresas sociales.\r\n\u00a0\r\nDOI: https:\/\/doi.org\/10.31637\/epsir.21-2.2<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.31637\/epsir-2021-154","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,10]],"date-time":"2025-04-10T08:01:10Z","timestamp":1744272070000},"page":"15-34","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["The emergence of a Social Innovation Ecosystem in Portugal: An exploratory approach based on the perspective of strategic stakeholders","La emergencia de un Ecosistema de Innovaci\u00f3n Social en Portugal: Un enfoque exploratorio basado en la perspectiva de los actores estrat\u00e9gicos"],"prefix":"10.31637","volume":"6","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8497-4798","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Hugo","family":"Pinto","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"S\u00edlvia","family":"Ferreira","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Jorge Andr\u00e9","family":"Guerreiro","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"2692","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,12,30]]},"reference":[{"key":"4471","unstructured":"Adner, R. (2006). Match Your Innovation Strategy to Your Innovation Ecosystem. Harvard Business Review, 84, 98-110."},{"key":"4472","unstructured":"Almeida, C.D., & Albuquerque, C.M. (2020). Welfare State in Portugal: delegated powers or disclaims responsibility? GIGAPP Estudios Working Papers, 147(7), 141-157."},{"key":"4473","unstructured":"Amaro, R.R. (2009). Economia Solid\u00e1ria da Macaron\u00e9sia \u2013 Um Novo Conceito. Revista de Economia Solid\u00e1ria: Economia Solid\u00e1ria \u2013 Apresenta\u00e7\u00e3o do Conceito. Ponta Delgada, 1, 11-28."},{"key":"4474","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Andr\u00e9, I., & Abreu, A. (2006). Dimens\u00f5es e Espa\u00e7os da Inova\u00e7\u00e3o Social. Finisterra, 41(81), 121-141. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18055\/Finis1465","DOI":"10.18055\/Finis1465"},{"key":"4475","unstructured":"Asenova, D., & Damianova, Z. (2019). The Interplay Between Social Innovation and Sustainability in the CASI and other FP7 Projects. In J. Howaldt, C. Kaletka, A. Schroder M. & M. Zirngiebl (Eds.), Atlas of Social Innovation: new practices for a better future (pp. 44-47). SI Drive."},{"key":"4476","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ayob, N., Teasdale, S., & Fagan, K. (2016). How Social Innovation \u2018Came to Be\u2019: Tracing the Evolution of a Contested Concept, Journal of Social Policy, 45(4), 635-653. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S004727941600009X","DOI":"10.1017\/S004727941600009X"},{"key":"4477","unstructured":"Bertalanffy, L.V. (1968). General Systems Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications. George Braziller."},{"key":"4478","unstructured":"Bloom, P., & Dees, J.G. (2008). Cultivate Your Ecosystem. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 6, 46\u201353."},{"key":"4479","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Borzillo, S., & Kaminska-Labbe, R. (2011). Unravelling the dynamics of knowledge creation in communities of practice through complexity theory lenses. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 9, 353-366. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1057\/kmrp.2011.13","DOI":"10.1057\/kmrp.2011.13"},{"key":"4480","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bristow, G., & Healy, A. (2018). Innovation and regional economic resilience: an exploratory analysis, The Annals of Regional Science, 60, 265-284. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00168-017-0841-6","DOI":"10.1007\/s00168-017-0841-6"},{"key":"4481","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cairney, P., & Geyer, R. (2017). A critical Discussion of Complexity Theory: How does 'Complexity Thinking' improve our Understanding of Politics and Policymaking? Complexity, Governance & Networks, 3(2), 1-11. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.20377\/cgn-56","DOI":"10.20377\/cgn-56"},{"key":"4482","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cajaiba-Santana, G. (2013). Social Innovation: Moving the Field Forward. A conceptual framework, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 82, 42-51. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.techfore.2013.05.008","DOI":"10.1016\/j.techfore.2013.05.008"},{"key":"4483","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Campbell-Hunt, C. (2007). Complexity in practice. Human Relations, 60(5), 793-823. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0018726707079202","DOI":"10.1177\/0018726707079202"},{"key":"4484","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Castellani, B., & Hafferty, F. (2009). Sociology and Complexity Science: A New Field of Inquiry. Springer.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-88462-0"},{"key":"4485","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cooke, P. (2012). Complex Adaptive Innovation Systems. Routledge.","DOI":"10.4324\/9780203126615"},{"key":"4486","unstructured":"Creswell, J.W., & Poth, C.N. (2018). Qualitative Inquire & Research Design. Sage Publications."},{"key":"4487","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (2017). Mapping social enterprise models: some evidences from the \"ICSEM\" project, Social Enterprise Journal, 13(4), 318-28. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1108\/SEJ-09-2017-0049","DOI":"10.1108\/SEJ-09-2017-0049"},{"key":"4488","unstructured":"Durst, S., & Poutanen, P. (2013). Success factors of innovation ecosystems \u2013 Initial insights from a literature review. In R. Smeds & O. Irrmann (Eds.), CO-CREATE 2013: The Boundary-Crossing Conference on Co-design in Innovation (pp. 27-38). Aalto."},{"key":"4489","unstructured":"Ferreira, S., Fidalgo, P., Giovannini, M., Almeida, J., Pinto, H., Lima, T. M., ... & Ferreira, V. (2021). Trajet\u00f3rias Institucionais e Modelos de Empresa Social em Portugal, Centro de Estudos Sociais: Coimbra, Available at: https:\/\/estudogeral.sib.uc.pt\/bitstream\/10316\/96549\/3\/e-book%20TIMES.pdf"},{"key":"4490","unstructured":"Ferreira, S., & Almeida, J. (2020). Social Enterprises in Portugal: Concepts, contexts and models. In J. Defourny & M. Nyssens (Eds.), Social Enterprise in western Europe (pp. 182-189). Routledge."},{"key":"4491","unstructured":"Ferreira, S. (2019). Social Enterprises and their Ecosystems in Europe: Country Report Portugal. Publications Office of the European Union."},{"key":"4492","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Floysand, A., & Jakobsen, S. (2010). The Complexity of Innovation: a relational turn, Progress in Human Geography, 35(3), 328-344. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0309132510376257","DOI":"10.1177\/0309132510376257"},{"key":"4493","unstructured":"Franzosi, R.P. (2009). Content Analysis. In M. Hardy & A. Bryman (Eds.), The Handbook of Data Analysis (pp. 547-565). Sage Publications."},{"key":"4494","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Frenken, K. (2017). A Complexity-Theoretic Perspective on Innovation Policy. Complexity, Governance & Networks, 35-47. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.20377\/cgn-41","DOI":"10.20377\/cgn-41"},{"key":"4495","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Garmestani, A.; Allen, C., & Gunderson, L. (2009). Panarchy: Discontinuities Reveal Similarities in the Dynamic System Structure of Ecological and Social Systems. Ecology and Society, 14(1), 15. http:\/\/www.ecologyandsociety.org\/vol14\/iss1\/art15\/","DOI":"10.5751\/ES-02744-140115"},{"key":"4496","unstructured":"Garrido, \u00c1., & Pereira, D. (2018). A Economia Social em Movimento: uma hist\u00f3ria das organiza\u00e7\u00f5es. Tinta da China."},{"key":"4497","unstructured":"Godin, B. (2012). Social Innovation: Utopias of Innovation from c.1830 to the Present. Project on the Intellectual History of Innovation Working Paper 11, 1-52."},{"key":"4498","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Godin, B. (2015). Innovation Contested: The Idea of Innovation over the Centuries. Routledge.","DOI":"10.4324\/9781315855608"},{"key":"4499","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gomes, L.A.V., Facin, A.L.F., Salerno, M.S., & Ikenami, R.K. (2018). Unpacking the innovation ecosystem construct: Evolution, gaps and trends, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 136, 30-48.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.techfore.2016.11.009"},{"key":"4500","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Granstrand, O., & Holgersson, M. (2019). Innovation ecosystems: A conceptual review and a new definition, Technovation, 90, 102098. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.technovation.2019.102098","DOI":"10.1016\/j.technovation.2019.102098"},{"key":"4501","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Guerreiro, J.A., & Pinto, H. (2021). Social Innovation, Fourth Sector and the Commodification of the Welfare State: The Portuguese Experience. In M.I. S\u00e1nchez-Hern\u00e1ndez, L. Carvalho, C. Rego, M. R. Lucas & A. Backx-Noronha (Eds.), Entrepreneurship Trends in the Fourth Sector. Looking for sustainable development. Springer.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-75714-4_4"},{"key":"4502","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Habermas, J. (1986). The New Obscurity: the crisis of the welfare state and the exhaustion of utopian energies. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 11(2), 1-18. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/019145378601100201","DOI":"10.1177\/019145378601100201"},{"key":"4503","unstructured":"INE. (2019). Conta Sat\u00e9lite da Economia Social \u2013 2016. Available at: https:\/\/www.ine.pt\/ngt_server\/attachfileu.jsp?look_parentBoui=382482927&att_display=n&att_download=y"},{"key":"4504","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kallemeyn, L., Hall, J., & Gates, E. (2020). Exploring the Relevance of Complexity Theory for Mixed Methods Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 14(3), 288-304. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1558689819872423","DOI":"10.1177\/1558689819872423"},{"key":"4505","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kerlin, J.A. (2006). Social Enterprises in the United States and Europe: Understanding and Learning from the Differences. Voluntas, 17, 247-63.","DOI":"10.1007\/s11266-006-9016-2"},{"key":"4506","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lee, I. (2015). A Social Enterprise Business Model for Social Entrepreneurs: theoretical foundations and model development, International Journal of Social Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 3(4), 269-301.","DOI":"10.1504\/IJSEI.2015.069351"},{"key":"4507","unstructured":"Luhmann, N. (1995). Social Systems. Stanford University Press."},{"key":"4508","unstructured":"Luhmann, N. (1974). Grundrechte als Institution. Ein Beitrag zur politischen Soziologie. Duncker & Humblot."},{"key":"4509","unstructured":"Margolis, E., & Zunjarwad, R. (2017). Visual Research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 1039-1089). Sage Publications."},{"key":"4510","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2010). Complexity thinking and evolutionary economic geography. In R. Boschma & R. Martin (Eds.), The Handbook of Evolutionary Economic Geography (pp. 93-119). Edward Elgar.","DOI":"10.4337\/9781849806497.00011"},{"key":"4511","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"McGowan, K., Westley, F., & Tjornbo, O. (2017). The History of Social Innovation. In F. Westley, K. McGowan & O. Tjornbo (Eds.), The Evolution of Social Innovation: Building Resilience Through Transitions (pp. 1-17). Edward Elgar Publishing.","DOI":"10.4337\/9781786431158.00006"},{"key":"4512","unstructured":"Moore, J.F. (1993). Predators & Prey: A New Ecology of Competition. Harvard Business Review, 71, 75-86."},{"key":"4513","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Moore, M., & Westley, F. (2011). Surmountable Chasms: Networks and Social Innovation for Resilient Systems, Ecology and Society, 16(1), 5. http:\/\/www.ecologyandsociety.org\/vol16\/iss1\/art5\/","DOI":"10.5751\/ES-03812-160105"},{"key":"4514","unstructured":"Moreno, L. (2003). Guia das organiza\u00e7\u00f5es e iniciativas de desenvolvimento local. ANIMAR."},{"key":"4515","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Moulaert, F., MacCallum, D., & Hillier, J. (2013). Social innovation: intuition, precept, concept, theory and practice. In F. Moulaert, D. MacCallum, A. Mehmood & A. Hamdouh (Eds.), The International Handbook on Social Innovation (pp. 13-24). Edward Elgar Publishing.","DOI":"10.4337\/9781849809986.00011"},{"key":"4516","unstructured":"Moulaert, F., & MacCallum, D. (2019). Advanced Introduction to Social Innovation. Edward Elgar Publishing."},{"key":"4517","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Moulaert, F., MacCallum, D., & Hillier, J. (2013). Social Innovation: Intuition, precept, concept, theory and practice. In F. Moulaert, D. MacCallum, A. Mehmood & A. Hamdouch (Eds.), The International Handbook on Social Innovation: Collective Action, Social Learning and Transdisciplinary Research (pp. 13-24). Edward Elgar Publishing.","DOI":"10.4337\/9781849809986.00011"},{"key":"4518","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nicholls, A., & Ziegler, R. (2019). Creating Economic Space for Social Innovation. Oxford University Press.","DOI":"10.1093\/oso\/9780198830511.001.0001"},{"key":"4519","unstructured":"Noya, A. (2011). The Essential Perspectives of Innovation: The OECD LEED Forum on Social Innovations. In OECD (Ed.), Fostering Innovation to Address Social Challenges Workshop Proceedings (pp. 18-24). OECD Publications."},{"key":"4520","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Oh, D., Phillips, F., Park, S., & Lee, E. (2016). Innovation ecosystems: A critical examination, Technovation, 54, 1-6. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.technovation.2016.02.004","DOI":"10.1016\/j.technovation.2016.02.004"},{"key":"4521","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Osborne, S.P. (2008). Key issues for the third sector in Europe. In S.P. Osborne (Ed.), The Third Sector in Europe: Prospects and challenges (pp. 3-6). Routledge.","DOI":"10.4324\/9780203932827.pt1"},{"key":"4522","unstructured":"Parsons, T. (1951). The Social System. Collier-MacMillan Limited."},{"key":"4523","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pel, B., Wittmayer, J., Dorland, J., & J\u00f8rgensen, M.S. (2019). Unpacking the social innovation ecosystem: an empirically grounded typology of empowering network constellations. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 33(3), 311-336. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/13511610.2019.1705147","DOI":"10.1080\/13511610.2019.1705147"},{"key":"4524","unstructured":"Perakyla, A., & Ruusuvuori, J. (2017). Analyzing Talk and Text. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 1163-1201). Sage Publications."},{"key":"4525","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Phillips, M., & Ritala, P. (2019). A complex adaptive systems agenda for ecosystem research methodology. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 148, 119739 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.techfore.2019.119739","DOI":"10.1016\/j.techfore.2019.119739"},{"key":"4526","unstructured":"Richardson, K. (2004). Systems theory and complexity: Part 1. Emergence: Complexity and Organizations, 6(3), 75-79."},{"key":"4527","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ritala, P., & Almpanopoulou, A. (2017). In defense of \u2018eco\u2019 in innovation ecosystem. Technovation, 60\/61, 39-42.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.technovation.2017.01.004"},{"key":"4528","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Russell, M., & Smorodinskaya, N. (2018). Leveraging complexity for ecosystemic innovation. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 136, 114-131. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.techfore.2017.11.024","DOI":"10.1016\/j.techfore.2017.11.024"},{"key":"4529","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Schneider, A. (2014). Embracing ambiguity \u2013 lessons from the study of corporate social responsibility throughout the rise and decline of the modern welfare state. Business Ethics: A European Review, 23(3), 293-308. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/beer.12052","DOI":"10.1111\/beer.12052"},{"key":"4530","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Shaw, D.R., & Allen, T. (2018). Studying innovation ecosystems using ecology theory. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 136, 88-102. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.techfore.2016.11.030","DOI":"10.1016\/j.techfore.2016.11.030"},{"key":"4531","unstructured":"Stichweh, R. (2011). Systems Theory. In B. Badie, D. Berg-Schlosser & L. Morlino (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Political Science (pp. 2579-2581). Sage."},{"key":"4532","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Strasser, T., Kraker, J., & Kemp, R. (2020). Three Dimensions of Transformative Impact and Capacity: A Conceptual Framework Applied in Social Innovation Practice. Sustainability, 12, 4742. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/su12114742","DOI":"10.3390\/su12114742"},{"key":"4533","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tansley, A.G. (1935). The Use and Abuse of Vegetal Concepts and Terms, Ecology, 6(3), 284-307. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0309133307083297","DOI":"10.2307\/1930070"},{"key":"4534","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Terstriep J., Rehfeld, D., & Kleverbeck, M. (2020). Favourable social innovation ecosystem(s)? \u2013 An explorative approach. European Planning Studies, 28, (5), 881-905.","DOI":"10.1080\/09654313.2019.1708868"},{"key":"4535","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/09654313.2019.1708868","DOI":"10.1080\/09654313.2019.1708868"},{"key":"4536","unstructured":"Thomas, L., & Autio, E. (2012). Modeling the ecosystem: a meta-synthesis of ecosystem and related literatures. Conference DRUID Working Paper, 1-40."},{"key":"4537","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Thomas, L., & Autio, E. (2020). Innovation ecosystems in management: An organizing typology. In Aldag (Ed.), Oxford Encyclopedia of Business and Management. Oxford University Press.","DOI":"10.1093\/acrefore\/9780190224851.013.203"},{"key":"4538","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Turner, J., & Baker, R (2019). Complexity Theory: An Overview with Potential Applications for the Social Sciences. Systems, 7(1), 4. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/systems7010004","DOI":"10.3390\/systems7010004"},{"key":"4539","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Valkokari, K. (2015). Business, innovation, and knowledge ecosystems: how they differ and how to survive and thrive within them. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(5), 17\u201324. http:\/\/doi.org\/10.22215\/timreview\/919","DOI":"10.22215\/timreview\/919"},{"key":"4540","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Van Der Have, R., & Rubalcaba, L. (2016). Social innovation research: An emerging area of innovation studies? Research Policy, 45(9), 923-1935. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.respol.2016.06.010","DOI":"10.1016\/j.respol.2016.06.010"},{"key":"4541","unstructured":"Vancouver, J.B. (2013). Systems Theory of Organizations. In E. Kessler (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Management Theory (pp. 815-820). Sage."},{"key":"4542","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Williams, A. (2020). Political Hegemony and Social Complexity: Mechanisms of Power After Gramsci. Palgrave Macmillan.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-19795-7"},{"key":"4543","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Yawson, R.M. (2009). The Ecological System of Innovation: A New Architectural Framework for a Functional Evidence-Based Platform for Science and Innovation Policy. XXIV ISPIM 2009 Conference, The Future of Innovation, Vienna, Austria.","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.1417676"}],"container-title":["European Public &amp; Social Innovation Review"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/epsir.net\/index.php\/epsir\/article\/download\/154\/93","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/epsir.net\/index.php\/epsir\/article\/download\/154\/93","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,10]],"date-time":"2025-04-10T08:02:50Z","timestamp":1744272170000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/epsir.net\/index.php\/epsir\/article\/view\/154"}},"subtitle":["La emergencia de un Ecosistema de Innovaci\u00f3n Social en Portugal: Un enfoque exploratorio basado en la perspectiva de los actores estrat\u00e9gicos"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,12,30]]},"references-count":73,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,12,30]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.31637\/epsir-2021-154","relation":{},"ISSN":["2529-9824"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2529-9824","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,12,30]]}}}