{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,18]],"date-time":"2026-08-18T14:52:35Z","timestamp":1787064755167,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":18,"publisher":"Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)","issue":"4","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["SPI"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,4]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Object<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A reported risk factor for adjacent-segment disease is injury to the superior facet joint from pedicle screw placement. Given that the facet joint is not typically visualized during percutaneous pedicle screw insertion, there is a concern for increased facet violation (FV) in minimally invasive fusion procedures. The purpose of this study was to analyze and compare the incidence of FV among patients undergoing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MITLIF) and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). The impact of O-arm navigation compared with traditional fluoroscopy on FV in MITLIF is also assessed, as are risk factors for FV.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The authors identified a consecutive population of patients who underwent MITLIF with percutaneous pedicle screw placement, as well as a matched cohort of patients who underwent open TLIF. Postoperative CT imaging was assessed to determine intraarticular FV due to pedicle screw placement. Patients were stratified into minimally invasive and open TLIF groups. Within the MITLIF group, the authors performed a subanalysis of image guidance methods used in cases of FV. Two-tailed Student t-test, ANOVA, chi-square testing, and logistic regression were used for statistical analysis.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A total of 282 patients were identified, with a total of 564 superior pedicle screw placements. The MITLIF group consisted of 142 patients with 284 screw insertions. The open TLIF group consisted of 140 patients with 280 screw insertions. Overall, 21 (7.4%) of 282 patients experienced FV. A total of 21 screws violated a facet joint for a screw-based FV rate of 3.7% (21 of 564 screws). There were no significant differences between the MITLIF and open TLIF groups in the percentage of patients with FV (6.3% vs 8.6%) and or the percentage of screws with FV (3.2% vs 4.3%) (p = 0.475 and p = 0.484, respectively). Further stratifying the MI group into O-arm navigation and fluoroscopic guidance subgroups, the patient-based rates of FV were 10.8% (4 of 37 patients) and 4.8% (5 of 105 patients), respectively, and the screw-based rates of FV were 5.4% (4 of 74 screws) and 2.4% (5 of 210 screws), respectively. There was no significant difference between the subgroups with respect to patient-based or screw-based FV rates (p = 0.375 and p = 0.442, respectively). The O-arm group had a significantly higher body mass index (BMI) (p = 0.021). BMI greater than 29.9 was independently associated with higher FV (OR 2.36, 95% CI 1.65\u20138.53, p = 0.039).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The findings suggest that minimally invasive pedicle screw placement is not associated with higher rates of FV. Overall violation rates were similar in MITLIF and open TLIF. Higher BMI, however, was a risk factor for increased FV. The use of O-arm fluoroscopy with computer-assisted guidance did not significantly decrease the rate of FV.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.3171\/2013.1.spine12882","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2013,2,8]],"date-time":"2013-02-08T09:10:09Z","timestamp":1360314609000},"page":"356-361","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":89,"title":["Incidence of and risk factors for superior facet violation in minimally invasive versus open pedicle screw placement during transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a comparative analysis"],"prefix":"10.3171","volume":"18","author":[{"given":"Darryl","family":"Lau","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Departments of Neurosurgery and"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Samuel W.","family":"Terman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Departments of Neurosurgery and"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Rakesh","family":"Patel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Orthopedic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Frank","family":"La Marca","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Departments of Neurosurgery and"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Paul","family":"Park","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Departments of Neurosurgery and"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1754","reference":[{"key":"b1-spine12882","series-title":"J Spinal Disord","first-page":"464","article-title":"Postfusion instability at the adjacent segments after rigid pedicle screw fixation for degenerative lumbar spinal disorders","volume":"8","author":"Aota","year":"1995"},{"key":"b2-spine12882","series-title":"Clin Neurol Neurosurg","article-title":"O-Arm-based image guidance in minimally invasive spine surgery: technical note","author":"Baaj","year":"2012"},{"key":"b3-spine12882","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"560","DOI":"10.3171\/SPI.2008.9.08142","article-title":"Clinical and radiographic comparison of mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in 42 patients with long-term follow-up. Clinical article","volume":"9","author":"Dhall","year":"2008"},{"key":"b4-spine12882","series-title":"Eur Spine J","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"551","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-004-0830-1","article-title":"Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a safe technique with satisfactory three to five year results","volume":"14","author":"Hackenberg","year":"2005"},{"issue":"3","key":"b5-spine12882","series-title":"Neurosurg Focus","first-page":"E6","article-title":"Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: indications, technique, and complications","volume":"20","author":"Holly","year":"2006"},{"key":"b6-spine12882","series-title":"Neurosurgery","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"990","DOI":"10.1227\/NEU.0b013e318237a829","article-title":"Clinical assessment of percutaneous lumbar pedicle screw placement using the O-arm multidimensional surgical imaging system","volume":"70","author":"Houten","year":"2012"},{"key":"b7-spine12882","series-title":"Spine J","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"213","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2011.01.024","article-title":"Superior segment facet joint violation and cortical violation after minimally invasive pedicle screw placement","volume":"11","author":"Knox","year":"2011"},{"key":"b8-spine12882","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1693","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000224530.08481.4e","article-title":"Clinical and radiologic 2-4-year results of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis grades 1 and 2","volume":"31","author":"Lauber","year":"2006"},{"issue":"2","key":"b9-spine12882","series-title":"Neurosurg Focus","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E16","DOI":"10.3171\/FOC\/2008\/25\/8\/E16","article-title":"Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with reduction of spondylolisthesis: technique and outcomes after a minimum of 2 years' follow-up","volume":"25","author":"Park","year":"2008"},{"key":"b10-spine12882","series-title":"Surg Neurol Int","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"44","DOI":"10.4103\/2152-7806.68705","article-title":"Minimally invasive pedicle screw fixation utilizing O-arm fluoroscopy with computer-assisted navigation: feasibility, technique, and preliminary results","volume":"1","author":"Park","year":"2010"},{"key":"b11-spine12882","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1938","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000137069.88904.03","article-title":"Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: review of the literature","volume":"29","author":"Park","year":"2004"},{"key":"b12-spine12882","series-title":"Spine J","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"295","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2011.02.007","article-title":"Cranial facet joint violations by percutaneously placed pedicle screws adjacent to a minimally invasive lumbar spinal fusion","volume":"11","author":"Park","year":"2011"},{"key":"b13-spine12882","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E1749","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e318221a800","article-title":"Facet violation with the placement of percutaneous pedicle screws","volume":"36","author":"Patel","year":"2011"},{"key":"b14-spine12882","series-title":"Neurosurgery","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"569","DOI":"10.1097\/00006123-200103000-00022","article-title":"Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: technique, complications, and early results","volume":"48","author":"Rosenberg","year":"2001"},{"issue":"Suppl","key":"b15-spine12882","series-title":"J Spinal Disord Tech","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S1","DOI":"10.1097\/01.bsd.0000132291.50455.d0","article-title":"Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): technical feasibility and initial results","volume":"18","author":"Schwender","year":"2005"},{"key":"b16-spine12882","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1615","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181c70fe3","article-title":"Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases","volume":"35","author":"Shunwu","year":"2010"},{"key":"b17-spine12882","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"44","DOI":"10.3171\/2011.9.SPINE11373","article-title":"Perioperative surgical complications of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a single-center experience. Clinical article","volume":"16","author":"Tormenti","year":"2012"},{"key":"b18-spine12882","series-title":"Eur Spine J","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1780","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-010-1404-z","article-title":"Comparison of one-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis grades 1 and 2","volume":"19","author":"Wang","year":"2010"}],"container-title":["Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/view\/journals\/j-neurosurg-spine\/18\/4\/article-p356.xml","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/downloadpdf\/journals\/j-neurosurg-spine\/18\/4\/article-p356.xml","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/downloadpdf\/journals\/j-neurosurg-spine\/18\/4\/article-p356.xml","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,15]],"date-time":"2023-04-15T20:23:06Z","timestamp":1681590186000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/view\/journals\/j-neurosurg-spine\/18\/4\/article-p356.xml"}},"subtitle":["Clinical article"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2013,4]]},"references-count":18,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4"},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/2013.1.spine12882","relation":{},"ISSN":["1547-5654"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1547-5654","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2013,4]]}}}