{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,9]],"date-time":"2026-07-09T09:15:59Z","timestamp":1783588559177,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":29,"publisher":"Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)","issue":"2","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["SPI"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,8]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n<jats:title>OBJECT<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>The authors evaluated the biomechanical effects of an interspinous process (ISP) device on kinematics and load sharing at the implanted and adjacent segments.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec>\n<jats:title>METHODS<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>A 3D finite-element (FE) model of the lumbar spine (L1\u20135) was developed and validated through comparison with published in vitro study data. Specifically, validation was achieved by a flexible (load-control) approach in 3 main planes under a pure moment of 10 Nm and a compressive follower load of 400 N. The ISP device was inserted between the L-3 and L-4 processes. Intact and implanted cases were simulated using the hybrid protocol in all motion directions. The resultant motion, facet load, and intradiscal pressure after implantation were investigated at the index and adjacent levels. In addition, stress at the bone-implant interface was predicted.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec>\n<jats:title>RESULTS<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>The hybrid approach, shown to be appropriate for adjacent-level investigations, predicted that the ISP device would decrease the range of motion, facet load, and intradiscal pressure at the index level relative to the corresponding values for the intact spine in extension. Specifically, the intradiscal pressure induced after implantation at adjacent segments increased by 39.7% and by 6.6% at L2\u20133 and L4\u20135, respectively. Similarly, facet loads at adjacent segments after implantation increased up to 60% relative to the loads in the intact case. Further, the stress at the bone-implant interface increased significantly. The influence of the ISP device on load sharing parameters in motion directions other than extension was negligible.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec>\n<jats:title>CONCLUSIONS<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>Although ISP devices apply a distraction force on the processes and prevent further extension of the index segment, their implantation may cause changes in biomechanical parameters such as facet load, intradiscal pressure, and range of motion at adjacent levels in extension.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.3171\/2014.12.spine14419","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,5,1]],"date-time":"2015-05-01T14:01:26Z","timestamp":1430488886000},"page":"200-208","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":60,"title":["Determination of the biomechanical effect of an interspinous process device on implanted and adjacent lumbar spinal segments using a hybrid testing protocol: a finite-element study"],"prefix":"10.3171","volume":"23","author":[{"given":"Deniz U.","family":"Erbulut","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Departments of Mechanical Engineering and"},{"name":"Neurosurgery, Koc University, Istanbul, Turkey"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Iman","family":"Zafarparandeh","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Departments of Mechanical Engineering and"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Chaudhry R.","family":"Hassan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Departments of Mechanical Engineering and"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ismail","family":"Lazoglu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Departments of Mechanical Engineering and"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ali F.","family":"Ozer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Neurosurgery, Koc University, Istanbul, Turkey"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1754","reference":[{"key":"b1-spine14419","series-title":"J Spinal Disord Tech","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"255","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0b013e3180331352","article-title":"Interspinous process devices in the lumbar spine","volume":"20","author":"Bono","year":"2007"},{"issue":"6","key":"b2-spine14419","series-title":"Neurosurg Focus","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E8","DOI":"10.3171\/2010.3.FOCUS1047","article-title":"Dynamic interspinous process stabilization: review of complications associated with the X-Stop device","volume":"28","author":"Bowers","year":"2010"},{"key":"b3-spine14419","series-title":"Med Eng Phys","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"915","DOI":"10.1016\/j.medengphy.2014.02.020","article-title":"Application of an asymmetric finite element model of the C2-T1 cervical spine for evaluating the role of soft tissues in stability","volume":"36","author":"Erbulut","year":"2014"},{"key":"b4-spine14419","series-title":"Adv Orthop","first-page":"451956","article-title":"Biomechanics of posterior dynamic stabilization systems","volume":"2013","author":"Erbulut","year":"2013"},{"key":"b5-spine14419","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2755","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000195897.17277.67","article-title":"Effects of charit\u00e9 artificial disc on the implanted and adjacent spinal segments mechanics using a hybrid testing protocol","volume":"30","author":"Goel","year":"2005"},{"key":"b6-spine14419","series-title":"Arch Orthop Trauma Surg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"917","DOI":"10.1007\/s00402-010-1235-8","article-title":"Biomechanical effect of different interspinous devices on lumbar spinal range of motion under preload conditions","volume":"131","author":"Hartmann","year":"2011"},{"key":"b7-spine14419","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E581","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3182463775","article-title":"Effect of graded facetectomy on biomechanics of Dynesys dynamic stabilization system","volume":"37","author":"Kiapour","year":"2012"},{"key":"b8-spine14419","series-title":"Spine J","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"466","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2012.03.034","article-title":"Association between degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinous process fracture after interspinous process spacer surgery","volume":"12","author":"Kim","year":"2012"},{"key":"b9-spine14419","series-title":"J Spinal Disord Tech","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"323","DOI":"10.1097\/01.bsd.0000211294.67508.3b","article-title":"Interspinous process decompression with the X-STOP device for lumbar spinal stenosis: a 4-year follow-up study","volume":"19","author":"Kondrashov","year":"2006"},{"key":"b10-spine14419","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1706","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3180b9f429","article-title":"New interspinous implant evaluation using an in vitro biomechanical study combined with a finite-element analysis","volume":"32","author":"Lafage","year":"2007"},{"key":"b11-spine14419","series-title":"J Spinal Disord Tech","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"72","DOI":"10.1097\/00024720-200402000-00013","article-title":"An interspinous process distractor (X STOP) for lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly patients: preliminary experiences in 10 consecutive cases","volume":"17","author":"Lee","year":"2004"},{"key":"b12-spine14419","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2192","DOI":"10.1097\/01.BRS.0000084877.88192.8E","article-title":"The effects of an interspinous implant on the kinematics of the instrumented and adjacent levels in the lumbar spine","volume":"28","author":"Lindsey","year":"2003"},{"key":"b13-spine14419","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"210","DOI":"10.3171\/2009.9.SPINE09144","article-title":"Erosion of the spinous process: a potential cause of interspinous process spacer failure","volume":"12","author":"Miller","year":"2010"},{"key":"b14-spine14419","series-title":"Eur Spine J","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"913","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-005-0948-9","article-title":"Biomechanical characterization of the three-dimensional kinematic behaviour of the Dynesys dynamic stabilization system: an in vitro study","volume":"15","author":"Niosi","year":"2006"},{"key":"b15-spine14419","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"959","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000260792.13893.88","article-title":"Hybrid testing of lumbar CHARITE discs versus fusions","volume":"32","author":"Panjabi","year":"2007"},{"key":"b16-spine14419","series-title":"Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"257","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clinbiomech.2006.08.006","article-title":"Hybrid multidirectional test method to evaluate spinal adjacent-level effects","volume":"22","author":"Panjabi","year":"2007"},{"key":"b17-spine14419","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2478","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-200111150-00016","article-title":"The cortical shell architecture of human cervical vertebral bodies","volume":"26","author":"Panjabi","year":"2001"},{"key":"b18-spine14419","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"744","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000157483.28505.e3","article-title":"The treatment mechanism of an interspinous process implant for lumbar neurogenic intermittent claudication","volume":"30","author":"Richards","year":"2005"},{"key":"b19-spine14419","series-title":"Spine J","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"972","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2010.08.004","article-title":"Scoliosis and interspinous decompression with the XSTOP: prospective minimum 1-year outcomes in lumbar spinal stenosis","volume":"10","author":"Rolfe","year":"2010"},{"key":"b20-spine14419","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E1251","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e318206cd84","article-title":"Comparison of three posterior dynamic stabilization devices","volume":"36","author":"Sangiorgio","year":"2011"},{"key":"b21-spine14419","series-title":"Eur Spine J","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"297","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-010-1620-6","article-title":"The effect of design parameters of dynamic pedicle screw systems on kinematics and load bearing: an in vitro study","volume":"20","author":"Schilling","year":"2011"},{"key":"b22-spine14419","series-title":"J Spinal Disord Tech","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"418","DOI":"10.1097\/00024720-200308000-00015","article-title":"Dynamic stabilization of the lumbar spine and its effects on adjacent segments: an in vitro experiment","volume":"16","author":"Schmoelz","year":"2003"},{"key":"b23-spine14419","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"319","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-200002010-00010","article-title":"Spinous process strength","volume":"25","author":"Shepherd","year":"2000"},{"key":"b24-spine14419","series-title":"J Spinal Disord Tech","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"328","DOI":"10.1097\/01.bsd.0000211297.52260.d5","article-title":"Effects of X-STOP device on sagittal lumbar spine kinematics in spinal stenosis","volume":"19","author":"Siddiqui","year":"2006"},{"key":"b25-spine14419","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"26","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-200301010-00008","article-title":"The effects of an interspinous implant on intervertebral disc pressures","volume":"28","author":"Swanson","year":"2003"},{"key":"b26-spine14419","series-title":"Eur Spine J","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1049","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-008-0657-2","article-title":"Biomechanical effect of different lumbar interspinous implants on flexibility and intradiscal pressure","volume":"17","author":"Wilke","year":"2008"},{"key":"b27-spine14419","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"903","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000158876.51771.f8","article-title":"The effect of an interspinous process implant on facet loading during extension","volume":"30","author":"Wiseman","year":"2005"},{"key":"b28-spine14419","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1256","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-198911000-00020","article-title":"Three-dimensional movements of the whole lumbar spine and lumbosacral joint","volume":"14","author":"Yamamoto","year":"1989"},{"key":"b29-spine14419","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1351","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000166618.42749.d1","article-title":"A multicenter, prospective, randomized trial evaluating the X STOP interspinous process decompression system for the treatment of neurogenic intermittent claudication: two-year follow-up results","volume":"30","author":"Zucherman","year":"2005"}],"container-title":["Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/view\/journals\/j-neurosurg-spine\/23\/2\/article-p200.xml","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/downloadpdf\/journals\/j-neurosurg-spine\/23\/2\/article-p200.xml","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/downloadpdf\/journals\/j-neurosurg-spine\/23\/2\/article-p200.xml","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,15]],"date-time":"2023-04-15T21:42:43Z","timestamp":1681594963000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/view\/journals\/j-neurosurg-spine\/23\/2\/article-p200.xml"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015,8]]},"references-count":29,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2"},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/2014.12.spine14419","relation":{},"ISSN":["1547-5654"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1547-5654","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015,8]]}}}