{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,18]],"date-time":"2026-08-18T04:02:25Z","timestamp":1787025745187,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":23,"publisher":"Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)","issue":"3","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["SPI"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,9]]},"abstract":"\n Object<\/jats:title>\n Classic biomechanical models have used thoracic spines disarticulated from the rib cage, but the biomechanical influence of the rib cage on fracture biomechanics has not been investigated. The well-accepted construct for stabilizing midthoracic fractures is posterior instrumentation 3 levels above and 2 levels below the injury. Short-segment fixation failure in thoracolumbar burst fractures has led to kyphosis and implant failure when anterior column support is lacking. Whether shorter constructs are viable in the midthoracic spine is a point of controversy. The objective of this study was the biomechanical evaluation of a burst fracture at T-9 with an intact rib cage using different fixation constructs for stabilizing the spine.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Methods<\/jats:title>\n A total of 8 human cadaveric spines (C7\u2013L1) with intact rib cages were used in this study. The range of motion (ROM) between T-8 and T-10 was the outcome measure. A robotic spine testing system was programmed to apply pure moment loads (\u00b1 5 Nm) in lateral bending, flexion-extension, and axial rotation to whole thoracic specimens. Intersegmental rotations were measured using an optoelectronic system. Flexibility tests were conducted on intact specimens, then sequentially after surgically induced fracture at T-9, and after each of 4 fixation construct patterns. The 4 construct patterns were sequentially tested in a nondestructive protocol, as follows: 1) 3 above\/2 below (3A\/2B); 2) 1 above\/1 below (1A\/1B); 3) 1 above\/1 below with vertebral body augmentation (1A\/1B w\/VA); and 4) vertebral body augmentation with no posterior instrumentation (VA). A repeated-measures ANOVA was used to compare the segmental motion between T-8 and T-10 vertebrae.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Results<\/jats:title>\n Mean ROM increased by 86%, 151%, and 31% after fracture in lateral bending, flexion-extension, and axial rotation, respectively. In lateral bending, there was significant reduction compared with intact controls for all 3 instrumented constructs: 3A\/2B (\u221292%, p = 0.0004), 1A\/1B (\u221263%, p = 0.0132), and 1A\/1B w\/VA (\u221266%, p = 0.0150). In flexion-extension, only the 3A\/2B pattern showed a significant reduction (\u221290%, p = 0.011). In axial rotation, motion was significantly reduced for the 3 instrumented constructs: 3A\/2B (\u221266%, p = 0.0001), 1A\/1B (\u221253%, p = 0.0001), and 1A\/1B w\/VA (\u221251%, p = 0.0002). Between the 4 construct patterns, the 3 instrumented constructs (3A\/2B, 1A\/1B, and 1A\/1B w\/VA) showed comparable stability in all 3 motion planes.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n This study showed no significant difference in the stability of the 3 instrumented constructs tested when the rib cage is intact. Fractures that might appear more grossly unstable when tested in the disarticulated spine may be bolstered by the ribs. This may affect the extent of segmental spinal instrumentation needed to restore stability in some spine injuries. While these initial findings suggest that shorter constructs may adequately stabilize the spine in this fracture model, further study is needed before these results can be extrapolated to clinical application.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.3171\/2014.5.spine13923","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,6,20]],"date-time":"2014-06-20T10:11:05Z","timestamp":1403259065000},"page":"481-488","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":17,"title":["Biomechanical evaluation of a simulated T-9 burst fracture of the thoracic spine with an intact rib cage"],"prefix":"10.3171","volume":"21","author":[{"given":"Tiffany G.","family":"Perry","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Spine Research Lab, Lutheran Hospital; and"},{"name":"Center for Spine Health, Neurological Institute, and"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Prasath","family":"Mageswaran","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Spine Research Lab, Lutheran Hospital; and"},{"name":"Center for Spine Health, Neurological Institute, and"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Robb W.","family":"Colbrunn","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Spine Research Lab, Lutheran Hospital; and"},{"name":"Center for Spine Health, Neurological Institute, and"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Tara F.","family":"Bonner","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Spine Research Lab, Lutheran Hospital; and"},{"name":"Center for Spine Health, Neurological Institute, and"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Todd","family":"Francis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Center for Spine Health, Neurological Institute, and"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Robert F.","family":"McLain","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Spine Research Lab, Lutheran Hospital; and"},{"name":"Center for Spine Health, Neurological Institute, and"},{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1754","reference":[{"key":"b1-spine13923","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"341","DOI":"10.3171\/SPI\/2008\/8\/4\/341","article-title":"Biomechanical comparison of three fixation techniques for unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures. Laboratory investigation","volume":"8","author":"Acosta","year":"2008"},{"key":"b2-spine13923","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"213","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-200101150-00017","article-title":"Shortsegment pedicle instrumentation of thoracolumbar burst fractures: does transpedicular intracorporeal grafting prevent early failure?","volume":"26","author":"Alanay","year":"2001"},{"key":"b3-spine13923","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"257","DOI":"10.1097\/01.BRS.0000106979.54651.D6","article-title":"Biomechanical evaluation of contemporary posterior spinal internal fixation configurations in an unstable burst-fracture calf spine model: special references of hook configurations and pedicle screws","volume":"29","author":"An","year":"2004"},{"key":"b4-spine13923","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"192","DOI":"10.3171\/2010.10.SPINE10222","article-title":"Biomechanical advantage of the index-level pedicle screw in unstable thoracolumbar junction fractures. Laboratory investigation","volume":"14","author":"Baaj","year":"2011"},{"key":"b5-spine13923","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1916","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-199310000-00033","article-title":"The sternal-rib complex. A possible fourth column in thoracic spine fractures","volume":"18","author":"Berg","year":"1993"},{"key":"b6-spine13923","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E1686","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e318219ce84","article-title":"Biomechanical contribution of the rib cage to thoracic stability","volume":"36","author":"Brasiliense","year":"2011"},{"key":"b7-spine13923","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E35","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181b21885","article-title":"In vitro biomechanical characteristics of the spine: a comparison between human and porcine spinal segments","volume":"35","author":"Busscher","year":"2010"},{"key":"b8-spine13923","series-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1182","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-198870080-00009","article-title":"Biomechanical analysis of anterior and posterior instrumentation systems after corpectomy. A calf-spine model","volume":"70","author":"Gurr","year":"1988"},{"key":"b9-spine13923","series-title":"J Spinal Disord Tech","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"216","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0b013e31807a2f61","article-title":"In vitro analysis of anterior and posterior fixation in an experimental unstable burst fracture model","volume":"21","author":"Kallemeier","year":"2008"},{"key":"b10-spine13923","series-title":"Orthopedics","first-page":"493","article-title":"Transpedicular bone grafting following short-segment posterior instrumentation for acute thoracolumbar burst fracture","volume":"32","author":"Liao","year":"2009"},{"key":"b11-spine13923","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"575","DOI":"10.3171\/2013.3.SPINE12949","article-title":"Plate fixation in the cervical spine: traditional paramedian screw configuration compared with unique unilateral configuration. Laboratory investigation","volume":"18","author":"Mageswaran","year":"2013"},{"key":"b12-spine13923","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"232","DOI":"10.3171\/2012.6.SPINE111054","article-title":"Hybrid dynamic stabilization: a biomechanical assessment of adjacent and supraadjacent levels of the lumbar spine. Laboratory investigation","volume":"17","author":"Mageswaran","year":"2012"},{"key":"b13-spine13923","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1503","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e318067dd24","article-title":"Short-segment fixation of lumbar burst fractures using pedicle fixation at the level of the fracture","volume":"32","author":"Mahar","year":"2007"},{"issue":"11 Suppl","key":"b14-spine13923","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S70","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000218221.47230.dd","article-title":"The biomechanics of long versus short fixation for thoracolumbar spine fractures","volume":"31","author":"McLain","year":"2006"},{"key":"b15-spine13923","series-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"162","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-199302000-00002","article-title":"Early failure of short-segment pedicle instrumentation for thoracolumbar fractures. A preliminary report","volume":"75","author":"McLain","year":"1993"},{"key":"b16-spine13923","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"664","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-199803150-00004","article-title":"Reinforcement of thoracolumbar burst fractures with calcium phosphate cement. A biomechanical study","volume":"23","author":"Mermelstein","year":"1998"},{"key":"b17-spine13923","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E64","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-200202010-00007","article-title":"An in vitro human cadaveric study investigating the biomechanical properties of the thoracic spine","volume":"27","author":"Oda","year":"2002"},{"key":"b18-spine13923","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1157","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-200005010-00018","article-title":"Successful short-segment instrumentation and fusion for thoracolumbar spine fractures: a consecutive 4 1\/2-year series","volume":"25","author":"Parker","year":"2000"},{"issue":"335","key":"b19-spine13923","series-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res","first-page":"73","article-title":"Posterior instrumentation for thoracolumbar trauma","author":"Stambough","year":"1997"},{"key":"b20-spine13923","series-title":"Spine J","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"572","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2013.01.042","article-title":"Properties of an interspinous fixation device (ISD) in lumbar fusion constructs: a biomechanical study","volume":"13","author":"Techy","year":"2013"},{"key":"b21-spine13923","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E73","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000152162.64015.fb","article-title":"Balloon vertebroplasty in combination with pedicle screw instrumentation: a novel technique to treat thoracic and lumbar burst fractures","volume":"30","author":"Verlaan","year":"2005"},{"key":"b22-spine13923","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"278","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181bda4e6","article-title":"Biomechanical evaluation of short-segment posterior instrumentation with and without crosslinks in a human cadaveric unstable thoracolumbar burst fracture model","volume":"35","author":"Wahba","year":"2010"},{"key":"b23-spine13923","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1283","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000164257.69354.bb","article-title":"Stability provided by the sternum and rib cage in the thoracic spine","volume":"30","author":"Watkins","year":"2005"}],"container-title":["Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/view\/journals\/j-neurosurg-spine\/21\/3\/article-p481.xml","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/downloadpdf\/journals\/j-neurosurg-spine\/21\/3\/article-p481.xml","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/downloadpdf\/journals\/j-neurosurg-spine\/21\/3\/article-p481.xml","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,15]],"date-time":"2023-04-15T19:01:25Z","timestamp":1681585285000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/view\/journals\/j-neurosurg-spine\/21\/3\/article-p481.xml"}},"subtitle":["Laboratory investigation"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2014,9]]},"references-count":23,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3"},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/2014.5.spine13923","relation":{},"ISSN":["1547-5654"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1547-5654","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2014,9]]}}}