{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,29]],"date-time":"2026-10-29T02:09:37Z","timestamp":1793239777925,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":35,"publisher":"Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)","issue":"5","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["SPI"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,11]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n<jats:title>OBJECT<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>This study compared the safety and efficacy of treatment with the PRESTIGE LP cervical disc versus a historical control anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec>\n<jats:title>METHODS<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>Prospectively collected PRESTIGE LP data from 20 investigational sites were compared with data from 265 historical control ACDF patients in the initial PRESTIGE Cervical Disc IDE study. The 280 investigational patients with single-level cervical disc disease with radiculopathy and\/or myelopathy underwent arthroplasty with a low-profile artificial disc. Key safety\/efficacy outcomes included Neck Disability Index (NDI), Neck and Arm Pain Numerical Rating Scale scores, 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) score, work status, disc height, range of motion, adverse events (AEs), additional surgeries, and neurological status. Clinical and radiographic evaluations were completed preoperatively, intraoperatively, and at 1.5, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Predefined Bayesian statistical methods with noninformative priors were used, along with the propensity score technique for controlling confounding factors. Analysis by independent statisticians confirmed initial statistical findings.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec>\n<jats:title>RESULTS<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>The investigational and control groups were mostly similar demographically. There was no significant difference in blood loss (51.0 ml [investigational] vs 57.1 ml [control]) or hospital stay (0.98 days [investigational] vs 0.95 days [control]). The investigational group had a significantly longer operative time (1.49 hours vs 1.38 hours); 95% Bayesian credible interval of the difference was 0.01\u20130.21 hours. Significant improvements versus preoperative in NDI, neck\/arm pain, SF-36, and neurological status were achieved by 1.5 months in both groups and were sustained at 24 months. Patient follow-up at 24 months was 97.1% for the investigational group and 84.0% for the control group. The mean NDI score improvements versus preoperative exceeded 30 points in both groups at 12 and 24 months. SF-36 Mental Component Summary superiority was established (Bayesian probability 0.993). The mean SF-36 PCS scores improved by 14.3 points in the investigational group and by 11.9 points in the control group from baseline to 24 months postoperatively. Neurological success at 24 months was 93.5% in the investigational group and 83.5% in the control group (probability of superiority ~ 1.00). At 24 months, 12.1% of investigational and 15.5% of control patients had an AE classified as device or device\/surgical procedure related; 14 (5.0%) investigational and 21 (7.9%) control patients had a second surgery at the index level. The median return-to-work time for the investigational group was 40 days compared with 60 days for the control group (p = 0.020 after adjusting for preoperative work status and propensity score). Following implantation of the PRESTIGE LP device, the mean angular motion was maintained at 12 months (7.9\u00b0) and 24 months (7.5\u00b0). At 24 months, 90.0% of investigational and 87.7% of control patients were satisfied with the results of surgery. PRESTIGE LP superiority on overall success (without disc height success), a composite safety\/efficacy end point, was strongly supported with 0.994 Bayesian probability.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>\n<jats:sec>\n<jats:title>CONCLUSIONS<\/jats:title>\n<jats:p>This device maintains mean postoperative segmental motion while providing the potential for biomechanical stability. Investigational patients reported significantly improved clinical outcomes compared with baseline, at least noninferior to ACDF, up to 24 months after surgery.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.3171\/2015.1.spine14589","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,7,31]],"date-time":"2015-07-31T14:02:55Z","timestamp":1438351375000},"page":"558-573","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":84,"title":["Cervical disc arthroplasty with PRESTIGE LP disc versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective, multicenter investigational device exemption study"],"prefix":"10.3171","volume":"23","author":[{"given":"Matthew F.","family":"Gornet","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"The Orthopedic Center of St. Louis, Missouri;"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"J. Kenneth","family":"Burkus","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Wilderness Spine Services, The Hughston Clinic, Columbus, Georgia;"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mark E.","family":"Shaffrey","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia;"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Perry J.","family":"Argires","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Brain Orthopedic Spine Specialists, Lancaster, Pennsylvania; and"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hui","family":"Nian","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Frank E.","family":"Harrell","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"1754","reference":[{"key":"b1-spine14589","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1337","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-200106150-00014","article-title":"Recurrent laryngeal nerve injury with anterior cervical spine surgery risk with laterality of surgical approach","volume":"26","author":"Beutler","year":"2001"},{"key":"b2-spine14589","series-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1298","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-199309000-00005","article-title":"Robinson anterior cervical discectomy and arthrodesis for cervical radiculopathy Long-term follow-up of one hundred and twenty-two patients","volume":"75","author":"Bohlman","year":"1993"},{"key":"b3-spine14589","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E1096","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3182994a32","article-title":"Arthroplasty versus fusion in single-level cervical degenerative disc disease: a Cochrane review","volume":"38","author":"Boselie","year":"2013"},{"key":"b4-spine14589","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"236","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-198803000-00003","article-title":"Cervical stabilization by plate and bone fusion","volume":"13","author":"Brown","year":"1988"},{"key":"b5-spine14589","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"308","DOI":"10.3171\/2010.3.SPINE09513","article-title":"Long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of cervical disc replacement with the Prestige disc: results from a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial","volume":"13","author":"Burkus","year":"2010"},{"key":"b6-spine14589","series-title":"J Spinal Disord","first-page":"202","article-title":"Anterior cervical fusion: outcome analysis of patients fused with and without anterior cervical plates","volume":"9","author":"Connolly","year":"1996"},{"key":"b7-spine14589","series-title":"J Neurosurg","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"943","DOI":"10.3171\/jns.1998.88.6.0943","article-title":"Surgical experience with an implanted artificial cervical joint","volume":"88","author":"Cummins","year":"1998"},{"key":"b8-spine14589","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","first-page":"532","article-title":"Cervical total disc replacement with the Mobi-C cervical artificial disc compared with anterior discectomy and fusion for treatment of 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial: clinical article","volume":"19","author":"Davis","year":"2013"},{"key":"b9-spine14589","series-title":"Biostatistics","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"383","DOI":"10.1093\/biostatistics\/kxq027","article-title":"The importance of independent academic statistical analysis","volume":"11","author":"DeAngelis","year":"2010"},{"key":"b10-spine14589","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"298","DOI":"10.3171\/spi.2007.6.4.2","article-title":"Anterior approaches to fusion of the cervical spine: a metaanalysis of fusion rates","volume":"6","author":"Fraser","year":"2007"},{"key":"b11-spine14589","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1842","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-199408150-00009","article-title":"A multicenter retrospective study of the clinical results of the LINK SB Charit\u00e9 intervertebral prosthesis The initial European experience","volume":"19","author":"Griffith","year":"1994"},{"issue":"22 Suppl","key":"b12-spine14589","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S96","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31826cb2d6","article-title":"Adjacent segment pathology following cervical motion-sparing procedures or devices compared with fusion surgery: a systematic review","volume":"37","author":"Harrod","year":"2012"},{"key":"b13-spine14589","series-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"519","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-199904000-00009","article-title":"Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis","volume":"81","author":"Hilibrand","year":"1999"},{"key":"b14-spine14589","series-title":"Neurosurgery","first-page":"229","article-title":"Anterior cervical plating enhances arthrodesis after discectomy and fusion with cortical allograft","volume":"50","author":"Kaiser","year":"2002"},{"issue":"22 Suppl","key":"b15-spine14589","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S65","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31826cb8f5","article-title":"The risk of adjacent-level ossification development after surgery in the cervical spine: are there factors that affect the risk? A systematic review","volume":"37","author":"Kim","year":"2012"},{"key":"b16-spine14589","series-title":"JAMA","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1593","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2011.1459","article-title":"A model for dissemination and independent analysis of industry data","volume":"306","author":"Krumholz","year":"2011"},{"key":"b17-spine14589","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"249","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000113","article-title":"Utilization trends of cervical artificial disc replacement after FDA approval compared with anterior cervical fusion: adoption of new technology","volume":"39","author":"Lu","year":"2014"},{"key":"b18-spine14589","series-title":"Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires","author":"McDowell","year":"1996"},{"key":"b19-spine14589","series-title":"Med Care","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"40","DOI":"10.1097\/00005650-199401000-00004","article-title":"The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups","volume":"32","author":"McHorney","year":"1994"},{"issue":"Suppl 3","key":"b20-spine14589","series-title":"Surg Neurol Int","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S216","DOI":"10.4103\/2152-7806.98582","article-title":"Cervical disc arthroplasty: Pros and cons","volume":"3","author":"Moatz","year":"2012"},{"key":"b21-spine14589","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","first-page":"198","article-title":"Clinical and radiographic analysis of cervical disc arthroplasty compared with allograft fusion: a randomized controlled clinical trial","volume":"6","author":"Mummaneni","year":"2007"},{"key":"b22-spine14589","series-title":"Spine J","first-page":"275","article-title":"Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease","volume":"9","author":"Murrey","year":"2009"},{"key":"b23-spine14589","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E907","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e318296232f","article-title":"A prospective, randomized, controlled clinical investigation comparing PCM cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion 2-year results from the US FDA IDE clinical trial","volume":"38","author":"Phillips","year":"2013"},{"issue":"S1","key":"b24-spine14589","series-title":"Evid Based Spine Care J","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0031-1298607","article-title":"Adjacent segment disease and C-ADR: promises fulfilled?","volume":"3","author":"Riew","year":"2012"},{"key":"b25-spine14589","series-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1684","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.J.00476","article-title":"Results of cervical arthroplasty compared with anterior discectomy and fusion: four-year clinical outcomes in a prospective, randomized controlled trial","volume":"93","author":"Sasso","year":"2011"},{"key":"b26-spine14589","series-title":"J Spinal Disord Tech","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"481","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0b013e3180310534","article-title":"Clinical outcomes of BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter trial with 24-month follow-up","volume":"20","author":"Sasso","year":"2007"},{"key":"b27-spine14589","series-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am 40-A","first-page":"607","article-title":"The treatment of certain cervical-spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion","author":"Smith","year":"1958"},{"key":"b28-spine14589","series-title":"eur Spine J","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"759","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-012-2594-3","article-title":"Footprint mismatch in total cervical disc arthroplasty","volume":"22","author":"Thaler","year":"2013"},{"key":"b29-spine14589","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"216","DOI":"10.3171\/2011.6.SPINE10623","article-title":"Analysis of the three United States Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption cervical arthroplasty trials","volume":"16","author":"Upadhyaya","year":"2012"},{"key":"b30-spine14589","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2227","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000031","article-title":"Clinical outcomes with selectively constrained SECURE-C cervical disc arthroplasty: two-year results from a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter investigational device exemption study","volume":"38","author":"Vaccaro","year":"2013"},{"key":"b31-spine14589","series-title":"WHO Handbook for Reporting Results of Cancer Treatment","first-page":"14","author":"World Health Organization: Toxic effects","year":"1979"},{"key":"b32-spine14589","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2138","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000180479.63092.17","article-title":"Long-term results after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with allograft and plating: a 5- to 11-year radiologic and clinical follow-up study","volume":"30","author":"Yue","year":"2005"},{"key":"b33-spine14589","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S163","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-200310151-00009","article-title":"Clinical results with ProDisc: European experience and U.S. investigation device exemption study","volume":"28","author":"Zigler","year":"2003"},{"key":"b34-spine14589","series-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"203","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e318278eb38","article-title":"ProDisc-C and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion as surgical treatment for single-level cervical symptomatic degenerative disc disease: five-year results of a Food and Drug Administration study","volume":"38","author":"Zigler","year":"2013"},{"key":"b35-spine14589","series-title":"J Neurosurg Spine","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"504","DOI":"10.3171\/2012.9.SPINE11717","article-title":"Five-year adjacent-level degenerative changes in patients with single-level disease treated using lumbar total disc replacement with ProDisc-L versus circumferential fusion","volume":"17","author":"Zigler","year":"2012"}],"container-title":["Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/view\/journals\/j-neurosurg-spine\/23\/5\/article-p558.xml","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/downloadpdf\/journals\/j-neurosurg-spine\/23\/5\/article-p558.xml","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/downloadpdf\/journals\/j-neurosurg-spine\/23\/5\/article-p558.xml","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,15]],"date-time":"2023-04-15T21:47:36Z","timestamp":1681595256000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/thejns.org\/view\/journals\/j-neurosurg-spine\/23\/5\/article-p558.xml"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015,11]]},"references-count":35,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5"},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/2015.1.spine14589","relation":{},"ISSN":["1547-5654"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1547-5654","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015,11]]}}}